An In Depth Review of The Losers

An In Depth Review of The Losers

A comprehensive and detailed look at the recent Vertigo adaption, The Losers. This review includes trailers, character posters and some scenes WB released from the film.

This is for those of you still on the fence about the film.

Review Opinion
By THEHAWK - Apr 25, 2010 02:04 AM EST
Filed Under: The Losers



Well, this is a difficult review for me. I love The Losers, the series. It is one series that never disappointed me, so going into this movie I had a lot of expectations.
So, did the film live up to these expectations, did it stay true to the source material? Let’s see, shall we?
This review is not as long as it seems, I included the trailers, posters and the character posters for the film as well.



I’ll start by giving a brief summary of what the Losers is about.
Here is the plot of the series:
“ The Losers' reimagining was set against events surrounding and including the War on Terror. Originally a Special Forces team integrated with the Central Intelligence Agency. In the 90s, the Losers were betrayed by their handler, Max, and left for dead following the conclusion of their operation. Eager for revenge and the opportunity to remove their names from a secret CIA death list, the Losers regroup and conduct covert operations against the CIA and its interests, uncovering startling operations spearheaded by the enigmatic Max, whose influence within the CIA and U.S. government is unparalleled.

Now, here is the film:


“Five members of an elite United States Special Forces team are sent into the Bolivian jungle. The team find themselves the target of a betrayal instigated from inside by a powerful enemy known only as Max. Believed to be dead, the group makes plans to even the score when they're joined by the mysterious Aisha, a beautiful operative with her own agenda.

Fairly similar, right? It seems like they were true to the source right?



I may be a little harsh. The overall tone of the film was true to the series, which focuses on the team’s attempts to clear their name and get back at Max for screwing them over. The film is true to this, except on the methods.

In the first two arcs of the comic, which the film is adapted from, The Losers attempt to expose the unspeakable lengths that the CIA have gone to in order to ensure America’s “security”. In the comic, the CIA does this by smuggling drugs and weapons into and out of the country in order to fund covert ops. And most of this is coordinated by a enigmatic handler known to the world as “Max”. Max is simply a codename that has been in use since WWII by the OSS and eventually the CIA. In the series, Max is rarely seen. He is basically a voice over a phone, a corrupt Charlie if you will.

SPOILERS
In the film, none of this is relevant. Max’s endgame is that he creates sonic bombs to sell to enemies of the US. These “Snukes” as they are called are a clean form of weapons that have the capacity to destroy an entire island. Max in this is not simply an omnipresent voice on a phone, he is a man seen for the majority of the film. But, I will cover him in the cast section.
END SPOILERS

I for one could not understand why, or how, they went from a simple and politically stirring plot device like drugs and guns to a snuke. The Snuke and Max are the only main differences between the grahic novel and the film.

Several instances in the film are lifted directly from the comic. The scene from the comic where they “chopper-jack” the US army was pulled nearly exactly panel for panel from the series. They altered it in one place to give Pooch the infamous “Blagyver” line. That was one of my favorite parts of the comic, and it came out great in the film.

One thing that annoyed me was that this film did nothing to expand upon the back stories of the characters, save for Pooch. It would have helped us have an emotional attachment to the characters if we knew something about where they came from.

My favorite moment has to be when Chris Evans’s Jensen has to infiltrate an office building to gain some crucial information. This is an amazing translation of the comic, executed perfectly. I won’t give anything away, but it was hilarious.
Here is the scene for those wanting to see it (you would not believe how hard this was to find)

The Losers - Clip #9 HD [VO]
Uploaded by Lyricis. - Classic TV and last night's shows, online.

I don’t want to spoil anything, so I will move on to the cast now.

Jeffrey Dean Morgan as Franklin Clay.

Morgan is great as Clay, he plays Clay as a good blend of the Comedian and John Winchester. He has the relaxed cynical tone of the Comedian combined with John Winchester’s practicality and level headedness. Morgan is great in this role, but his version of Clay is much lighter than the comics. Clay in the series would be visibly angered at the mere mention of Max’s name, and carried a great deal of guilt over what had happened to his men.

Idris Elba as William Roque.

Elba was disappointing to me. He portrayed Roque as a very one sided character, with little death and emotion. His only emotions were angry and less angry. I’m not sure if this is the actor or the directors fault.

Zoe Saldana as Aisha al-Fadhil.

She is probably the most radically altered character in the film. Gone is the cold murdering b**** who would slit a man’s throat and lick the blood from the blade. Instead we get a much lighter version of the character that still maintains some of the cold and calculating nature of the source character. The film really played up Zoe’s sex appeal, and still managed to adequately use her acting talent, making her more than just eye candy. Her interaction with the rest of the cast was excellent, Zoe had excellent chemistry with all of the actors. My biggest complaint with her is that they changed her origin from being Middle Eastern to Columbian with a perfect American accent.

Chris Evans as Jake Jensen.

Probably my favorite part of the film. He stole every scene he was in. He said lines that any other actor would fail at. He is probably the only person who could pull off Jensen’s one lines effectively. He is the real highlight of the film. As perfect as he is for Jensen, it doesn’t really help the idea of him being Captain America. He is too… energetic, manic. And his build is too slight, but I think some time in a weight room will handle that. I only hope he downplays his natural comedic talent in Captain America.

Columbus Short as Linwood "Pooch" Porteous.

Arguably the biggest surprise of the film, save for Max. I had only seen Short in “Stomp the Yard”, so I was unsure what to expect from him. I was pleasantly surprised, he turned my least favorite Loser from the comic, to one of my favorites from the film. He was a perfect Pooch, I mean a near exact translation! I have no complaints at all.

Óscar Jaenada as Carlos "Cougar" Alvarez.

This is his first big budget starring role and he did great with the little lines he was given. He was a good translation of Cougar and I have no complaints, save for one. My one complaint is that they did not go into his back story at all. He is an interesting character, but they didn’t give him enough detail.

Jason Patric as Max.
The biggest character change from the comics. As I have said, Max was an enigmatic character in the comics, here he is the opposite. All of his motivations and plots are right on the cuff, little is played close to the vest, and yet this strangely works. If they were to make Max a real person, they did a great job of it. They made him a confident man, comfortable in his motivations and goal. He is a strong believer in the ends justifying the means. Patric was unbelievable as Max, you never questioned his character. It took me most of the movie to recognize Michael from Lost Boys as the villain of this film. Max is an unassuming man, who still has a commanding presence and Patric played this perfectly. He was comical, yet malicious. Honestly I was reminded of Jack Nicholson’s take on the Joker. You never knew if Max was going to crack a joke or shoot someone in the face for dropping his umbrella. This unpredictability, and possible insanity, made this one of the best surprises of the film. The ending with him has o be one of the best, and most humiliating, end scene of any villain, it was perfectly written.

Visually the film is pleasing, I am not too fond of shaky cameras, but they are popular in action films. The action scenes were well choreographed and believable. Nothing in this film, save for the snukes, was unbelievable. You could actually see people doing these things in real life.

You can tell that director Sylvain White loves and respects the amazing artwork done on the series by Mark Simpson aka Jock. Several scenes in the film were shot as if the panel had come to life before you. I especially liked how when they introduced the characters they cut in a shot of Jock’s artwork. It was also nice seeing the credits, which were basically a motion comic of the artwork from the series.




The film has a good original score that really goes well with the scenes. It also includes great tracks from famous artists, my two favorites being “Black Betty” by Ram Jam and “Don’t Stop Believing” by Journey. “Don’t Stop Believing” is played during one of the best scenes of the film and becomes the anthem of this film. Not the song one would expect in an action film, but it fits the scene perfectly.

One thing that I think hindered this film had to be its PG 13 rating. They were forced to tone down the action and change scenes, and even characters, to match a PG 13 style. Zoe Saldana’s character, as she is in the books, could not even exist in a PG 13 film. This is a girl that cuts off peoples ears, and licks blood from the knife while doing it! The language was another thing that suffered. Several lines in the film were almost word for word from the comics, yet others were altered due to the proliferate swearing in the Vertigo series. The lack of **** and *** or **** made some of the lines awkward and less effective.

Overall the film is enjoyable despite its departures from the source material, and reality.
I give this film 4 out of 5 stars. It is a honest, enjoyable action flick, but unlike many action flicks it actually takes the time to develop the characters and even ties up what subplot it introduces. The scene during the credits with Jensen is evidence enough of that.

HAWK out
Related:

Jock Artwork Revealed For The Losers DVD/Blu-Ray Release!

Recommended For You:

Joel Silver Shares His Thoughts On Comic Book Movies

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

darthstern
darthstern - 4/25/2010, 3:10 AM
nice review hawk gonna check it out later today
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/25/2010, 3:38 AM
It is definatly worth a viewing. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 4/25/2010, 6:55 AM
Great stuff dude, notch another positive one up. I have heard such mixed things. I'll deffo watch it anyway, not sure when I can though. Its not out in our neck of the woods for a while is it Tea?
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 4/25/2010, 10:18 AM
Very nice review Hawk! I couldn't agree with you more on all your points. The cast is Phenomenal! This movie could have easily fallen apart if not for such an engaging line of actors to pull it all together. Jason Patric is just so damn enjoyable as Max. He's a hilarious character, but never lets the audience forget that at the same time, he is the villain. You compared Patric's Max to Jack Nicholson's Joker, and I gotta say, you hit the nail on the head!

Apart from too many pointless sex scenes in the film, I really liked the pacing. The movie moves fast enough to get to each plot point without a dull moment, but slows down just enough to get to know some of the characters, and understand why they work so well together.

Clearly, I've never read the comics, so as a stand alone film, I really enjoyed The Losers
SHHH
SHHH - 4/25/2010, 1:34 PM
Good review!! An unbiased review....I'd rather watch the Loser's than KickAss..Red Mist kills it for me....You know what I love People who leave a Thumbs Down but no comment :)


Image and video hosting by TinyPic


Ranger14
Ranger14 - 4/25/2010, 2:06 PM
I haven't seen the movie, but I gave you a thumbs up for a very comprehensive review. Obviously there are some "Losers" who think thumbs down indicates that they disagree with your review, as opposed to being an indication of how good of a job you did in stating your case for the review you delivered.
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/25/2010, 2:26 PM
@TEabag. thanks man. The previews honestly don't do it justice.

@Ror. Thanks man. I don't know why it isn't out yet on you side of the pond. It is a British comic. I mean, yeah its about America, but hte entire team behin it was British. So i would have thought Europe would have gotten it by now.

@Supermario. Yeah, the cast really did it for me too. Patric was amazing as Max. I mean, the few tiems you see Max in the comics, he is such a dick. Honestly, Patric downplayed him, he could have been more over the top and stayed true to character.
I agree that the sex scene were superfluous, but not too bad.

@Ozy. You'll enjoy it man, its a good action film.

@SHHH. *wipes tear from eye* thank you man, thats all that matters, if Chuck aroves, I can die happy!

@Ranger. Thanks man, I hope its only cause they disagree. I spent hours writign this damn thing, and another hour trying to find that video.

HAWK out
SHHH
SHHH - 4/25/2010, 4:03 PM
You know you have ta agree.....

THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/25/2010, 4:14 PM
Bout what SHHH?
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/25/2010, 4:15 PM
Very nice review, Hawk.
I'm on the fence here. Though your review caught the essence of the film. I wasn't blown away by thinking that it may walk away as the best summer blockbuster. If forced I'd give it a reluctant thumbs up. Not a personal purchase, but if the office scene with Evans was on TBS/TNT, I'd stop to watch. It was fun. But the movie would be quick to wear down with its low brow treatment.
cfho83
cfho83 - 4/25/2010, 4:29 PM
the movie wasn't all that bad, to be honest, it was good for what it was, no comicbook movie is ever gonna live up to the source material, except ironman, all the execs do is use the comics for base material.
but the movie was enjoyable
SHHH
SHHH - 4/25/2010, 5:12 PM
That It suck's....
Gideon
Gideon - 4/25/2010, 6:23 PM
I saw it today, and I thought it was awesome. Great blend of action, comedy, FX, and character development. Max was a little over the top for my liking, though. Chris Evans stole the show, as far as I am concerned.
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/25/2010, 6:48 PM
@Phin. You've seen it? Or are on the fence about seeing it?

@cfho. It was good, very different from the source, but it was extremely enjoyable. As you said, the source was mainly a road map for the film.

@SHHH. You suck... jk jk
What didn't you like about it?

@Gideon. Agreed, Evans was the breakout star of this one.
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/25/2010, 8:00 PM
I saw it Friday night. I'm on the fence on whether to go thumbs up or down. I suppose I lean into thumbs up.
SHHH
SHHH - 4/25/2010, 8:13 PM
My mistake...I liked it...I don't like folks leaving a thumbs down and no comment as to why..
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/25/2010, 8:35 PM
@Phin. I hear ya. Did you read the comic it was based off of?

@SHHH. That bugs me too.
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/25/2010, 9:03 PM
Not sure why this got 7 thumbs down, I tried to be fair in my assesment of the film.

Ranger14
Ranger14 - 4/25/2010, 9:24 PM
TheHawk@ Like I said, I don't think that some people understand what the thumbs up and down really mean. Not all the lightbulbs on the string are lit....
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/25/2010, 11:35 PM
I didn't read through it. Since its release, I thumbed through the trade, but its not my cup of tea. I was just judging the movie on its own merits, and it was ok. A bit hollow in the plot department, yet a good popcorn flick.
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/25/2010, 11:40 PM
@Ranger. Quite true.

@Phinehas. Trust me, if you were a fan of the original, you would be angered by some of the things in the film. Mainly the snukes and lack of the political corruption that served as a driving force for the series. I think if they had stuck to teh drugs and money like the original books did, the film would have been better.

I mean, they mention the snuke like three times in the film then it shows up at the climax.
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/25/2010, 11:49 PM
The snukes seemed like a ridiculous ploy from 70's tv programming. It was dumb even without having read the original comics. If that were the basis of the comics, it begs the question on why they changed it. It should have held its own on those merits alone.
Unfortunately for you fans, this will be blown out of the water by the A-Team. I movie with similar plot devices.
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/25/2010, 11:58 PM
The film was fairly realistic, save for the snukes.

And the A=Team had a 160 million + budget, while the Losers only had a bout 25 million.

I think the cast saved this one, the great performances lifted the weak plot, like in Avatar.
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/26/2010, 12:06 AM
"The film was fairly realistic, save for the snukes."

Yeah. Fairly. I'm not so sure about the betrayal as blatant as it was for such a tight team being realistic. I mean, he was amongst those that Max tried to kill too. As for me, I wouldn't forget that as easily. But maybe I haven't been betrayed by a brother the way I have by women, so...
LOL

BTW, you seem to be a fan of Chuck Norris. Here is part one of an article he's writing on the Second Amendment:
Lambs to the slaughter, Part 1

THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/26/2010, 1:54 AM
Yeah, I gotta blame the writers for the whole betrayal thing. They actually give a bit more reason for it in the comic. Elba kinda portrayed him as one dimensional, which made teh betrayal way too obvious.

In the book it made more sense because it was about 5 years after Max tried to kill them, and they made it seem like he was on Max's payroll the entire time.

IS that a legit article by Chuck Norris?

I am somewhat of a fan. I'm not obsesed with him or anything but i do like some of his martial arts acomplishments. Especially the fact that he is the first American to be an 8th degree black belt in Tai Qwon Do (can't spell it to save my life.)
mwmcintyre
mwmcintyre - 4/26/2010, 3:04 AM
Just saw it, loved it, lots of fun, was mystified by why they never used the song-

"I'm a loser, baby, so why don't you kill me."

How do you have an action movie called "The Losers" and NOT use that song, even if just in the credits.

/Having fun, not actually bothered
//Still wondering why not though :P
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 4/26/2010, 4:42 AM
Great stuff @ HAWK!!!

An quality article!

Havn't seen THE LOSERS yet but gonna, gonna be [frick]ing AWESOME!

Cheers for a honest review and stuff dude!
Shaman
Shaman - 4/26/2010, 8:36 AM
Great review Hawk!!! It's funny to read the extreme differences between yours and Multi's LOL :P IMO, this still looks way better than A Team. But Expendables will kick both their asses.

Phine- I find it funny that one of the top Karaté (empty hand) & Tae Kwon-Do (way of the hand and foot) martial artists in the world is against gun control. I mean, to each's own opinion but that's just irony at its most hillarious right there LMFAO :P
THEHAWK
THEHAWK - 4/26/2010, 8:57 AM
@mwmcintyre. that would fit, but I suppose Beck isn't mainstream enough for WB.

@LEEE. Thanks man. It is awesome, and should get more notice than it is.

@Shaman. Thanks man. Yeah, me and Multi seemed to end up on opposite ends of the spectrum on this one lol.

I didn't plan on a positive review, I only meant to weigh the pros adn cons, and to me the pros won it.
Zero
Zero - 4/26/2010, 9:13 AM
Ah, good review. I'm thinking of checking out the movie myself, despite what some of the more negative reviews are saying about it, and it's nice to see a big fan of the comic series enjoying this movie.

I'll admit that I usually try not to let reviews really influence me too much, especially the negative ones. I check reviews out just to get an idea of what most people think about the movie, but I try not to let it affect me as my taste in things are different from everyone. Sometimes I may agree with the reviews, sometimes I may not. I noticed that quite a few times, I don't agree with the majority of reviews for some movies (whether they say a movie is a extremely horrible or extremely great), so now I just go see a movie I'm interested in despite what others say and judge it myself. Same with video games. Can't really trust reviews for video games now.

The Losers is getting mixed reviews everywhere, but I still plan to check it out just because it looks interesting to me. I knew Clash of the Titans was gonna be pretty bad (I saw the original, and I haven't heard anything good about the remake), but I still wanted to check out the Kraken in 3D lol Huge disappointment, but oh well. At least Gemma Arterton was cute.

Anyway, about Zoe Saldana. Yeah, I think I read an article or something here (or somewhere else. I forget) that they filmed the scene of her licking a knife, but they had to cut it out for the PG-13 rating, which sucks. How does licking a knife make a movie rate higher than PG-13? I lick the stuff off my knife all the time after making a sandwich lol I think I've seen a be-heading in a PG-13 movie once. How is that not worse? lol They could have at least let her lick a clean knife before she does anything. Maybe as a taunt? Ah well. Maybe they'll put the scene in the DVD/BD release.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 4/26/2010, 9:21 AM
HAWKSTER @ I'd drink to that man!!!
GreenLantern416
GreenLantern416 - 4/26/2010, 10:34 AM
excellent review!

you've laid it all out very professionally. This is the kinda thing we need to see more on this site.
Phinehas
Phinehas - 4/26/2010, 1:46 PM
Shaman
I fail to see the irony of the two principles. Can you explain to me what irony you see? I don't see a contradiction with owning and bearing weapons along with knowing martial arts. Cops are typically taught Judo, and yet carry a weapon.

Hawk Yes. He's been writing Monday columns for WND for a few years now.
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 4/26/2010, 2:51 PM
Nice review this movie seems cool so I'll check it out.
THEPHOENIX
THEPHOENIX - 4/27/2010, 10:42 AM
You put way too muhc time into this. lol

I still need to see it. Looks like fun. Gotta love a superfluous action film/
Shaman
Shaman - 4/27/2010, 12:39 PM
Phinehas- Don't get me wrong, certain martial arts do have weapon techniques but the two specific arts Chuck has chosen to master flat out preach not to use weapons. That's what i find funny. If Will Ferrel was to play a sketch of Chuck Norris on SNL, his "We don't dial 911 here" sign on his door would also have a specification in brackets: (and it has nothing to do about Karate or Tae Kwon-Do, it's cause i have a gun). Hell, he could change his sign to "We don't need our Karate or Tae Kwon-Do here". But i guess you have to be a Canadian martial artist that's been living his entire life with gun control to find it funny.
View Recorder