Chris Pratt Fights To Save The Future In The Official Trailer For THE TOMORROW WAR

Chris Pratt Fights To Save The Future In The Official Trailer For THE TOMORROW WAR

The fate of humanity is at stake, and with Tom Cruise unavailable, all eyes are on Chris Pratt to save the day as he jumps thirty years into the future to fight a war against a deadly alien enemy.

By RohanPatel - May 26, 2021 06:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Amazon

Amazon Prime Video has finally released the official trailer for Chris McKay's sci-fi actioner The Tomorrow War, which stars Chris Pratt (Jurassic World: Dominion; Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3) in the lead role as a family man named Dan Forester, who is drafted by soldiers from the future to fight a war against a deadly alien species. 

He'll be aided on his mission by a brilliant scientist named Vicki Winslow (Yvonne Strahovski), who may hold the answer to ensuring humanity's survival, and his estranged father Slade (J.K. Simmons), who, based on what we see in the trailer, will seemingly join him on an important arctic journey to stop the war from ever happening. 

The cast features Pratt alongside Yvonne Strahovski (Chuck; 24: Live Another Day), J.K. Simmons (Spider-Man trilogy; Spider-Man: No Way Home), Betty Gilpin (GLOWThe Hunt), Sam Richardson (VeepDetroiters), Edwin Hodge (The PurgeMayans M.C.), Jasmine Mathews (The Rookie; Sweetbitter), Ryan Kiera Armstrong (Black Widow; It Chapter Two), Keith Powers (Before I Fall; Straight Outta Compton), Seychelle Gabriel (The Last AirbenderThe Legend of Korra), Mike Mitchell (Brooklyn Nine-NineLove), and Mary Lynn Rajskub (24; It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia).

In case you missed them, check out official character motion posters by heading HERE!

The Tomorrow War arrives, exclusively on Amazon Prime Video, on July 2.

In The Tomorrow War, the world is stunned when a group of time travelers arrive from the year 2051 to deliver an urgent message: Thirty years in the future mankind is losing a global war against a deadly alien species. The only hope for survival is for soldiers and civilians from the present to be transported to the future and join the fight. Among those recruited is high school teacher and family man Dan Forester (Chris Pratt). Determined to save the world for his young daughter, Dan teams up with a brilliant scientist (Yvonne Strahovski) and his estranged father (J.K. Simmons) in a desperate quest to rewrite the fate of the planet.
HIT MAN Star Glen Powell Spotted On Set Of Edgar Wright's THE RUNNING MAN; Movie's Logo Revealed
Related:

HIT MAN Star Glen Powell Spotted On Set Of Edgar Wright's THE RUNNING MAN; Movie's Logo Revealed

CANARY BLACK: Things Get Personal For Kate Beckinsale In Action-Packed New Trailer
Recommended For You:

CANARY BLACK: Things Get Personal For Kate Beckinsale In Action-Packed New Trailer

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Starlord7597
Starlord7597 - 5/26/2021, 6:30 AM
Why do i feel like i saw this movie 30 times already??
DoubleD
DoubleD - 5/26/2021, 6:31 AM
Looks good can't wait.
Havenless
Havenless - 5/26/2021, 6:32 AM
That was the most uninteresting action trailer I’ve ever seen.

It feels like they paid someone a lot of money to make it as inoffensive, color-by-numbers as possible
LSHF
LSHF - 5/26/2021, 7:43 AM
@Havenless - Offensive films sometimes make less money than non-offensive films.
Havenless
Havenless - 5/26/2021, 2:14 PM
@LSHF - I don’t mean literally offensive, but otic like the Inception bwam or visually like SFIV trailer. Maybe aggressive is the better word
LSHF
LSHF - 5/26/2021, 2:40 PM
@Havenless - Sorry. I admit that I have had a problem with taking things too literally for decades.
LameLuka
LameLuka - 5/26/2021, 6:33 AM
Looks meh
BatNips
BatNips - 5/26/2021, 6:38 AM
That trailer made my nipples pretty hard, not gonna lie!
Reeds2Much
Reeds2Much - 5/26/2021, 6:50 AM
I'm just curious to see what the point of pulling civilians is about. Like did the person that came up with this plan see The Last Starfighter and think a CoD leaderboard was a good place to find freedom fighters?
GhostDog
GhostDog - 5/26/2021, 6:59 AM
Wow that was uninteresting
MarvelousMarty
MarvelousMarty - 5/26/2021, 7:00 AM
Movie looks almost as bad as that poster. Shows once more how reliant these people are on Marvel to produce a decent flick. Imagine watching this, then Dr Doolittle and then Endgame. Dear oh dear.
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 5/26/2021, 7:00 AM
Still not sold on this. Was hoping the trailer would atleast answer some basic answers, but it kinda just raises more in my opinion.

For one, if the human are going to dissappear, why don't jump farther back in the past and build a defense system there? Or why take humans at all, when you seemingly have drone tech to do it too?

Anyway, maybe I'm just salty because they took stay-at-home veteran dad instead of a samurai, Sun Tzu and Spartacus
LSHF
LSHF - 5/26/2021, 2:56 PM
@bkmeijer - Hello, "salty".

Sometimes I play the Devil's Advocate and try to put myself in the other's position and try to imagine the "why's".

"...why don't jump farther back in the past and build a defense system there?"

Okay, maybe since these aliens obviously have very advanced technology (they were able to travel here and destroy us all), we do not have the technology to build a proper defense system here.

"Or why take humans at all, when you seemingly have drone tech to do it too?"

I can't think of anything. Hopefully the answer to that becomes obvious during the film.

"...they took stay-at-home veteran dad instead of a samurai, Sun Tzu and Spartacus."

Good question. Wouldn't that look really cool? Depending upon how much time, tech, effort, power, energy, etc., it takes to make this trip back to our current time, they may not be able to pick and chooses various periods in history and try to talk others into this. And I imagine (for example) them trying to convince others who from the Roman Empire period (or whatever it is called) might be more problematic than we think. Things might be a little too freaky for them for their minds to accept. It might be better to just go to one period in the past when everyone there can comprehend what is happening, understand the technology enough to use it, and accept that time-travel is a thing. And etc.

But, of course, always keep in mind that if films (especially sci-fi) were realistic, the stories wouldn't happen (or would happen very differently).

So, the same "suspension of disbelief" that we use to accept the story's premise, it would also be helpful to use to accept everything else in the films. Studios count of that, and writers of these films are sometimes confused as to why viewers don't do that.
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 5/26/2021, 3:24 PM
@LSHF - ah man, you make this way too understandable.

I would say a premise like this has to offer something really unique to set itself apart from other movies, but right now it just feels way too similar to Edge of Tomorrow for example. In order to do that I'd think they could do that through willingly asking us to suspend all belief and accept Julius Caesar fighting aliens in the future. Now that would be something no other movie can offer.

I'm hoping the movie will offer enough rewarding and satisfying (and even surprising) answers, its just right now it all just looks... generic.
LSHF
LSHF - 5/26/2021, 3:42 PM
@bkmeijer - Sorry; it's a fault of mine.

But I understand. It's just that these things that bother many people here don't bother me. It's like (for example), if I enjoyed "Edge of Tomorrow", I might want to see another one like it, and, so, here it comes.

But, yes, famous warriors from the past would be a unique storyline, and I would be on board for that. Hopefully we will get that one day.
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 5/26/2021, 3:46 PM
@LSHF - oh no need to apologize. I'll probably enjoy this too (although maybe not as much as others).
xHollywoodx
xHollywoodx - 5/26/2021, 7:03 AM
I mean I'm probably going to sit down with a giant bowl of pop corn and watch this.
KWilly
KWilly - 5/26/2021, 7:10 AM
This seems like a movie I would decently enjoy, and forget about as soon as the credits roll.
1 2
View Recorder