DOCTOR STRANGE 2 Writer Breaks Silence On Reports He Hadn't Seen WANDAVISION While Writing The Sequel

DOCTOR STRANGE 2 Writer Breaks Silence On Reports He Hadn't Seen WANDAVISION While Writing The Sequel

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness writer Michael Waldron has broken his silence on repeated claims that he wrote the sequel—and the Scarlet Witch's villainous turn—without seeing WandaVision.

By JoshWilding - Oct 29, 2025 08:10 AM EST
Filed Under: WandaVision

In 2021, WandaVision saw Wanda Maximoff finally become the MCU's Scarlet Witch. The show ended on a rather ominous note, with the Avenger last shown taking a deep dive into the Darkhold. 

When we caught up with Wanda in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, she'd been fully corrupted by the ancient tome and embarked on a rampage across the Multiverse in a bid to find real versions of her sons, Billy and Tommy. She ultimately saw the error of her ways and buried herself beneath Mount Wundagore in a moment of redemption.

Fans have been critical of the Scarlet Witch's villainous turn, blaming Doctor Strange sequel writer Michael Waldron for taking the character down the wrong path.

Those complaints were partially based on comments from Elizabeth Olsen, who said in a Vanity Fair interview that the movie's writers "had not seen it because it wasn't finished yet" when she criticised Wanda's arc for being "repetitive." Now, Waldron has weighed in during a recent Reddit AMA

"I liked continuing to explore Strange's need for control, especially in the wake of his experience in Infinity War/Endgame," the writer told a fan. "And this mirrored Wanda's own struggle with control following WandaVision (which, contrary to what the internet tells you, I was reading/watching all the way through)."

"And his last lines to Wong, about how saving the world doesn't necessarily make you happy," Waldron added, "just felt resonant for such a powerful yet lonely character."

So, he was aware of what was happening in WandaVision. It's no secret that rewrites were taking place on set while Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness was being shot, so Olsen's conversation with Waldron may well have happened much earlier in production. 

Further reflecting on his overall experience working on the movie, Waldron said, "I loved Strange and especially Benedict's performance as the character. It was a lot of fun to make that movie with him and Sam. The musical battle was mostly Sam, his team of great board artists (many of whom worked on his Spider-Man films), and Danny Elfman."

"And, of course, Benedict playing two parts. Rachel McAdams also sells the hell out of the ending when Strange is impaled on the fence and his third eye snaps open. I think it's one of the coolest parts of the movie."

Waldron later said that he and producer Richie Palmer came up with the idea of a zombified Strange together, and called it "the best lightbulb [moment] of my career." As you'll likely recall, Strange was forced to inhabit the body of his dead Variant during the movie's final act. 

After working on Loki Season 1 and the Doctor Strange sequel, Waldron is now helping Stephen McFeely on the Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars scripts. 

More Never-Before-Seen Photos Of Elizabeth Olsen's Scarlet Witch In AVENGERS, DOCTOR STRANGE Movies Revealed
Related:

More Never-Before-Seen Photos Of Elizabeth Olsen's Scarlet Witch In AVENGERS, DOCTOR STRANGE Movies Revealed

THE SUICIDE SQUAD Star Margot Robbie As Patrick Bateman? Here's The Latest On AMERICAN PSYCHO Remake Rumor
Recommended For You:

THE SUICIDE SQUAD Star Margot Robbie As Patrick Bateman? Here's The Latest On AMERICAN PSYCHO Remake Rumor

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/29/2025, 8:09 AM
MoM Wanda did feel like a logical continuation of Wandavision Wanda, it just felt like a chapter was missing. Strange was perfect though, he got that right
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 10/29/2025, 8:24 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Disagree.

She ended the show fixing what she ruined. Ok she was getting involved with the Darkhold, but MoM made it clear it was her instead of being possessed. Olsen was right. She just repeated the same arc, just more murderous the second time.

Wakanda Forever still the best of the MCU post Endgame without depending on nostalgia (No way home a close second, but still Nostalgia bait)
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 10/29/2025, 8:36 AM
@bkmeijer1 - I mean ultimately the only real issue can be put down to the last episode of WandaVision that didn't realy sell the whole corruption of the Darkhold stuff well enough.

Also made it too ambiguous with if Wanda was still good but made an unintended error without initial awareness of doing so, when she became aware of that mistake and sell why she didn't end the Hex sooner. That was added to by how/why/when she DID end the Hex it was a bit fuzzy if that meant she was still good at heart or not or if still on a dark path.

A LOT of that will be down to them having to fast track major rewrites for the last episode or two cos of COVID restrictions kicking in then preventing some cast appearing at all and how many cast/crew could be there in person at time of shooting.

Ultimately tho, Wanda from day one was at best shades of grey starting out as a literal terrorist and did bad things during her show. Understanding the reasons why she did what she did prior to AoU and for the first two acts of that and likewise in Westview doesn't negate she has always had a dark side and the show explicitly talked about the corrupting influence on the book which the movie doubled down on A LOT so it all tracks that her using the book to try and bring back/find her kids would result in what she became in MoM.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 10/29/2025, 8:36 AM
@bkmeijer1 - I think if perhaps we got to see her being corrupted by the Darkhold rather then already being so would have made the transition smoother then but oh well.

To me Wanda was in a more morally grey area in WV and given the ending of that , it made sense she would still be in a vulnerable place to an extent that the Darkhold would take advantage off.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 10/29/2025, 8:37 AM
@UnderBelly - The point of the Darkhold is that it lets you believe you're in control and corrupts your soul in the process. That's why she had black fingertips. She thought she was in control, but once she got a taste of the power of the book she was hooked. Not the same arc at all.
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 10/29/2025, 8:44 AM
@JackDeth - Yeah, I felt the movie made more of a point to hammer home that she was in control rather than corrupted...

If it is that she was infact corrupted then it was poor story telling.
UnderBelly
UnderBelly - 10/29/2025, 8:44 AM
@JackDeth - especially as she had already gone through a similar arc a short while before in WandaVision.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 10/29/2025, 9:40 AM
@Apophis71 @Apophis71 @UnderBelly - all good points. Kinda forgot it wasn't just the Darkhold, but also just Wanda being morally questionable from the start
Spike101
Spike101 - 10/29/2025, 8:21 AM
Despite what some people think I really enjoyed Multiverse of Madness. The scene where Wanda kills the Illuminati seemed a bit rushed and a waste of good characters but otherwise it was pretty good in my opinion and certainly one of the better movies in that phase.
Fogs
Fogs - 10/29/2025, 10:00 AM
@Spike101 - I also enjoyed it more than most but yeah, the Illuminati were there for the sake of some nostalgia minutes only. Zero consequence for the story.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 10/29/2025, 8:34 AM
Waldron imo has had the best use of the Multiverse in the MCU so far in that he has used it to explore character rather then do just cameos or fan service such as Loki & Strange in their respective projects which I enjoyed and though was well done.

I especially liked how Stranges need for control or having to be the one “ to hold the knife” as Christine said extended to him not bowing to Wong who had replaced him as Sorcerer Supreme till the end , it wasn’t a big aspect of his arc but felt was nicely executed.

If Waldron can bring that character exploration to Doomsday alongside Stephen McFeely then I think we should be good!!.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 10/29/2025, 8:38 AM
Am I the only one who LOVED 'MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS' ?? Sam Raimi KILLED it.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 10/29/2025, 8:42 AM
@JackDeth - I liked it , didn’t love it

It has some really cool & fun moments though such as the music fight.

?si=jIVqCwumiPKqdIL4

Also Wanda being presented as a villain from a slasher/horror film was so cool!!.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 10/29/2025, 9:21 AM
@TheVisionary25 - As an old school Strange fan, I LOVED it. I got to see the 'Vipers of Valtorr' in live action.
CrimsonComet40
CrimsonComet40 - 10/29/2025, 9:25 AM
@JackDeth -

Raimi was fantastic, it's literally the first Marvel movie since Phase 1 to have some actual style! The guitar riff kicking in while Wanda's conjuring spells? The music fight? Zombie Strange? Just a sick movie overall!
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 10/29/2025, 9:26 AM
@JackDeth - yeah , that was cool

User Comment Image
CrimsonComet40
CrimsonComet40 - 10/29/2025, 9:23 AM
Multiverse of Madness is one of the only post-Endgame movies worth watching, will never understand the hate for it!
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 10/29/2025, 9:57 AM
Multiverse of Madness was better than Superman.
User Comment Image
DianaGohan
DianaGohan - 10/29/2025, 10:04 AM
They really did need to sell that idea of corruption better. Like the elements were there since that's something even Agatha was warning Wanda about after her defeat (I mean you can argue "Agatha's the bad guy you can't trust her" but even based on her show it's clear despite her wickedness she wasn't some S level ranked force who could reek havoc through dimensions like Wanda) and yeah Wanda admitted she must have been manipulated at the end thus her decision to sacrifice herself to try and destroy all copies of the Darkhold but since this obviously WAS a sequel to Wandavision as well and she was the central character in that and had this whole arc and journey you did need it to be sold more to make it feel connected.
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 10/29/2025, 10:11 AM
I wanna know if he's the one that wrote this part of the movie.



User Comment Image
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 10/29/2025, 10:16 AM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - supercat will be proud of you

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder