Paramount's David Ellison Just Won't Give Up; Directly Addresses WBD Shareholders: "IT'S NOT TOO LATE!"

Paramount's David Ellison Just Won't Give Up; Directly Addresses WBD Shareholders: "IT'S NOT TOO LATE!"

Despite Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav making it pretty clear that he has no interest in weighing-up any offer from Paramount Skydance, David Ellison is not going down without a fight...

By MarkCassidy - Dec 10, 2025 05:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Netflix
Source: Via THR

Though the deal isn't quite officially official (there are still a few things to iron out), it looks like Netflix will ultimately claim ownership of Warner Bros. Discovery after the company accepted the streaming giant's $82.7 billion offer this week.

Paramount Skydance was not happy (to say the least) about this development, and CEO David Ellison is determined not to go down without a fight... even if it's one he has little to no chance of winning.

Paramount has already submitted a hostile bid worth $108.4 billion.

"Look, we're sitting on Wall Street, where cash is still king," Ellison told CNBC. "We are offering shareholders $17.6 billion dollars more cash than the deal they currently have signed up with Netflix. And we believe, when they see what is currently in our offer, that that's what they'll vote for."

Zaslav has ten business days from the date the bid was submitted to turn down Netflix's offer and weigh-up other options, and Ellison has now gone straight to WBD's board of directors with a seventh offer, this time worth $30 per share.

“Our public offer — identical to the terms we presented to WBD privately — delivers superior value and a faster, more certain path to completion than the transaction announced with Netflix. IT IS NOT TOO LATE TO REALIZE THE BENEFITS OF PARAMOUNT’S PROPOSAL IF YOU CHOOSE TO ACT NOW AND TENDER YOUR SHARES.”

“Our offer is financially superior to Netflix’s transaction, which provides WBD shareholders with lower value, less cash and significantly less certainty. On its face, Netflix is offering WBD shareholders $23.25 per share in cash, $4.50 in stock and a share in WBD’s Global Networks spin-off,” the letter continues. “In reality, however, the total value is materially lower than advertised.”

Ellison then pretty much put Zaslav on blast.

“To suggest that we are not “good for the money” (or might commit fraud to try to escape our obligations), as certain reports have speculated, is absurd. That absurdity is underscored by the fact that WBD and its advisors never picked up the phone or typed out a responsive text or email to raise any question or concern or to seek any clarification about either the trust or our equity commitment papers.”

A lot of people within the industry (and in general, really) feel that Ellison is just embarrassing himself at this stage, but he is right about one thing: more money is more money, and cash is king at the end of the day.

Is there a chance WBD's shareholders will decide to take him up on this offer? We'll just have to wait and see how things play out.

In related news, an HBO Max subscriber has filed a class-action lawsuit over Netflix’s proposed acquisition.

According to the LA Times, Michelle Fendelander alleged that if Netflix’s deal were to go through, it would decrease competition in the subscription streaming market. The lawsuit asks the court to issue an injunction to prevent the merger from happening.

“American consumers — including SVOD purchasers like Plaintiff, an HBO Max subscriber — will bear the brunt of this decreased competition, paying increased prices and receiving degraded and diminished services for their money,” Fendelander’s lawsuit claims. “The elimination of this rivalry is likely to reduce overall content output, diminish the diversity and quality of available content, and narrow the spectrum of creative voices appearing on major streaming platforms.”

Netflix responded with:: “We believe this suit is meritless and is merely an attempt by the plaintiffs’ bar to leverage all the attention on the deal.”

About The Author:
MarkCassidy
Member Since 11/9/2008
Mark Cassidy is a writer, photographer, amateur filmmaker, and Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic from Dublin, Ireland.
James Gunn Reveals Why The Authority Has Been Scrapped; May Be Revisited Someday. Not Soon.
Related:

James Gunn Reveals Why The Authority Has Been Scrapped; May Be Revisited "Someday. Not Soon."

Daredevil: Born Again Star Explains How Their Character Almost Got A Much Happier Ending - Spoilers
Recommended For You:

Daredevil: Born Again Star Explains How Their Character Almost Got A Much Happier Ending - Spoilers

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Madman
Madman - 12/10/2025, 5:43 PM
I really don’t want Netflix to take over, but I also really don’t want the Ellisons and Saudi Arabia to run half of all media. Why isn’t Comcast getting in on this?
Madman
Madman - 12/10/2025, 5:44 PM
@Madman - Also in every text I’ve seen Ellison brings up his father. This begging and the daddy’s boy schtick are… something else
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 12/10/2025, 5:49 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Heard the company of Paramount feel like he is a disgrace for losing out that deal to Netflix. Lol. Dude's Pride is shattered.

User Comment Image
BlackStar25
BlackStar25 - 12/10/2025, 5:46 PM
This Ellison guy is looking more and more like a little baby...

User Comment Image
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/10/2025, 5:54 PM
@BlackStar25 - You keep playing.

This [frick]ing cry baby is gonna get his [frick]ing candy.

Watch this space
TheVisionary26
TheVisionary26 - 12/10/2025, 5:58 PM
@THEKENDOMAN - For [frick]s sake !! 🤣🤣
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/10/2025, 6:22 PM
@TheVisionary26 - For Real 😂
Wahhvacado
Wahhvacado - 12/10/2025, 5:48 PM
Giving creepy ex vibes
User Comment Image
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/10/2025, 6:47 PM
@Wahhvacado - It seems like that to us but the way Zaslav is behaving is actually very shady.

This is more like a boyfriend who is cheating on his girlfriend who is texting them about their anniversary dinner that the girlfriend has paid for that he hasn't showed up for.
TheVisionary26
TheVisionary26 - 12/10/2025, 5:50 PM
Lets go Ellison!! Lets hope the good guys win
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/10/2025, 5:55 PM
@TheVisionary26 - I like the [frick]er
Spidey91
Spidey91 - 12/10/2025, 5:52 PM
watching massive corporations fighting over who gets to buy another massive corporation is just as riveting as it sounds.
Spidey91
Spidey91 - 12/10/2025, 5:53 PM
eventually everything is going to be owned by Disney, Netflix or Google anyways.
PewPewPew
PewPewPew - 12/10/2025, 8:35 PM
@Spidey91 - User Comment Image
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/10/2025, 5:53 PM
[frick]ing hell.

Ellison really out here texting like a man who knows she read it and still won’t [frick]ing reply.

But hey, he’s not wrong. $17.6 billion more in cash is real leverage, not just noise. If shareholders care about long-term value and creative control (and not just Netflix’s shiny PR), they’ll at least read the damn message.

Also, shout out to the HBO Max lawsuit, finally someone calling out the real threat: less choice, higher prices, and one giant algorithm deciding what stories get made.

This isn’t over. Not [frick]ing yet.

For [frick]s Sake
MrKayDeeBee
MrKayDeeBee - 12/10/2025, 6:37 PM
@THEKENDOMAN - So...do you think by Paramount owning WBD it will be any different? Prices are going up regardless of who owns the content. I personally would have liked either Amazon or Apple to have purchased WBD. I think creatively Amazon and Apple would committed to the overall quality of the existing IPs.
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/10/2025, 6:51 PM
@MrKayDeeBee - Fair points matey, and I actually [frick]ing agree to some extent, Apple and Amazon do bring serious creative discipline (Apple especially, they don’t greenlight rubbish).

But here’s why Paramount is on my list right now:

1. They’re offering $17.6B more in cash, which means actual leverage for shareholders and creatives.

2. Unlike Netflix, they’ve committed to a theatrical-first strategy, which means more space for diverse storytelling and less algorithmic content slop.

3. Analysts are calling their bid cleaner and faster to close, with less regulatory risk.

Is any corporate takeover [frick]ing perfect? [frick] No. But compared to Netflix’s “strip it, stream it, sell it” approach, Paramount’s bid looks like the lesser evil, and, for now, the better [frick]ing creative bet.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/10/2025, 7:06 PM
@THEKENDOMAN - I wouldn't be surprised if the FCC doesn't even allow Netflix to merge with HBO Max. The lady is right, and I'm sure anti-trust laws agree.

I wouldn't mind Paramount+ and HBO Max merging though. That would put it around the same size as Disney+ and Amazon Prime.
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/10/2025, 7:20 PM
@bkmeijer1 - Honestly? You’re probably [frick]ing right.

Netflix swallowing HBO Max would absolutely raise [frick]ing red flags, you’re talking about a single company controlling the largest subscriber base and the [frick]ing deepest prestige catalogue. The class-action lawsuit already shows the antitrust buzz is [frick]ing real.

Now Paramount+ x HBO Max? That’s actually a [frick]ing smart alignment. It creates a true counterweight to Disney+ without tipping the monopoly [frick]ing scale.
And unlike Netflix, Paramount’s still investing in cinema-first content and legacy IP, they’re not [frick]ing just chasing volume for the [frick]ing algorithm.

Would still need a careful merger plan, but creatively and structurally, that one could [frick]ing make sense.
AlexGSpeaks
AlexGSpeaks - 12/11/2025, 2:08 AM
@THEKENDOMAN - Paramount only has money to do this because it's from Saudi Arabia. In his short time running Paramount, Ellison drove away Tom Cruise (who went to Warner) and Taylor Sheridan (who went to Peacock) who were arguably their top money makers. They've also been bleeding financially since Ellison took over and been unable to gain any ground on their competitors. If Ellison didn't have backing from the Middle East and assurances that Trump will fight the merger, this would be over all ready. Ellison will run Paramount/WB into the ground.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/11/2025, 3:48 AM
@THEKENDOMAN - wonder what it would mean for SkyShowtime though if Paramount pulls out. I guess it kinda forces Universal to roll out Peacock internationally too
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/11/2025, 3:51 AM
@AlexGSpeaks - Matey, fair points, but let’s not pretend Paramount’s still standing by [frick]ing accident.

If Ellison was that incompetent, they’d be in a fire sale, not launching hostile bids against Netflix with analyst backing and regulatory leverage. You don’t throw down $108 billion without knowing you’ve got cards to play. 🤷‍♂️

And sure, Cruise went to Warner and Sheridan dipped to Peacock, but Paramount still delivered the biggest box office hit with Top Gun: Maverick under Ellison’s watch and greenlit major new content from Halo to Mission Impossible and A Quiet Place. So it’s not like the place turned into a creative graveyard.

Also… let’s be real: foreign capital in Hollywood isn’t new. If people are only suddenly bothered because it’s Saudi money, they’re either being naive or selectively outraged. Cash has no passport.

At the end of the day, if Ellison wins, it’ll be because Paramount offered a better deal, not because he “ran it into the ground.” The game’s still on.
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/11/2025, 3:54 AM
@bkmeijer1 - If Paramount pulls out, SkyShowtime becomes Universal’s awkward situationship. 😅

Wouldn’t be shocked if it forces Comcast’s hand to finally commit and push Peacock globally, or at least stop treating it like a half-finished group project.

One thing’s certain though: Europe’s about to get [frick]ing messier.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/11/2025, 4:11 AM
@THEKENDOMAN - as someone who already has SkyShowtime, I don't think it can get messier. I rather have Peacock to be honest.
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/11/2025, 4:27 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Mate, if SkyShowtime gets any messier, Ofcom might have to file a wellness check. Peacock might not be perfect, but at least it knows what it wants to be, unlike SkyShowtime, which still feels like it’s buffering its own identity.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/11/2025, 4:36 AM
@THEKENDOMAN - SkyShowtime is clearly just a collection of stuff without an identity indeed imo
THEKENDOMAN
THEKENDOMAN - 12/11/2025, 5:54 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Exactly. SkyShowtime feels like when your mum tells you she’s made a “buffet” and it’s just leftover crisps, cocktail sausages, and a [frick]ing sad quiche. No identity, no flavour, just [frick]ing vibes. At least Peacock knows it’s trash TV with [frick]ing confidence.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/11/2025, 7:14 AM
@THEKENDOMAN - that's a solid fuсking comparison
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 12/10/2025, 5:55 PM
Damn , why is Ellison so desperate lol?.

It’s really reeking of “ Baby , give me one more chance” after a bad breakup.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/10/2025, 7:04 PM
@TheVisionary25 - with all the Visionary accounts, I had to double check if this remark was really yours. Unexpected, but you're absolutely correct
RolandD
RolandD - 12/10/2025, 8:14 PM
@bkmeijer1 - All you have to do is read the content and it’s obvious. 😂I’ve scrolled backwards before and from what I’ve read, I could tell it was him even before I saw his name.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/11/2025, 3:50 AM
@RolandD - I'm kinda used to more thought out responses from Visionary25. Now 26 and 27 on the other hand, those are radical
RolandD
RolandD - 12/11/2025, 3:56 AM
@bkmeijer1 - Right.
Mongrol
Mongrol - 12/10/2025, 5:57 PM


The NepoBaby can't let go even though it's gone.

HeavyMetal4Life
HeavyMetal4Life - 12/10/2025, 6:22 PM
A pathetic look
PapaBear562
PapaBear562 - 12/10/2025, 6:24 PM
A lot of people within the industry feel that Ellison is just embarrassing himself.

Who said this? Sources please Mr Cassidy.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 12/10/2025, 6:55 PM
@PapaBear562 - Amanda Hugginkiss, for one.
Lisa89
Lisa89 - 12/10/2025, 7:31 PM
@MarkCassidy - User Comment Image
RolandD
RolandD - 12/10/2025, 8:15 PM
@PapaBear562 - I think he’s embarrassing himself. You can quote me.
Timerider
Timerider - 12/10/2025, 11:16 PM
@Lisa89 - I need Amanda Huggenkiss!
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder