LOKI And DOCTOR STRANGE 2 Writer Michael Waldron Officially Writing AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY And SECRET WARS

LOKI And DOCTOR STRANGE 2 Writer Michael Waldron Officially Writing AVENGERS: THE KANG DYNASTY And SECRET WARS

Following recent rumblings this might happen, it’s now been confirmed that Loki scribe Michael Waldron is attached to pen the screenplays for both Avengers: The Kang Dynasty and Avengers: Secret Wars.

By JoshWilding - Nov 27, 2023 05:11 PM EST
Source: Deadline

We’d heard rumblings this might be the case, but Deadline has just confirmed that Loki season 1 (Eric Martin replaced him on season 2) and Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness scribe Michael Waldron will write Avengers: The Kang Dynasty.

He remains attached to Avengers: Secret Wars, meaning both movies now have a single writer attached to them. Previously, Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania’s Jeff Loveness was set to pen The Kang Dynasty, but there were rumblings earlier this year that he'd been dropped from the movie after the Ant-Man threequel underperformed both critically and commercially.

The same writer taking charge of both titles makes sense as it ensures a more cohesive vision. Originally, The Kang Dynasty and Secret Wars were meant to come out in the same year, and while there’s now a bigger gap between them, it was always strange to think they’d have completely different creative teams.

While it’s not mentioned in this report, we recently heard that, following Dustin Daniel Cretton's departure, Marvel Studios wants one director (or directing team) to tackle the two-part conclusion to the Multiverse Saga.

It was last October when we heard Waldron had been chosen to write Secret Wars, so even with the WGA strike, he’s had a fair bit of time to work on it. Of course, if recent reports are to be believed, both Avengers projects are being creatively overhauled to reflect the changes this Saga is undergoing. Will that involve Doctor Doom replacing Kang? Time will tell.

It’s hard to say what we should expect from either Avengers movie. If Jonathan Majors is out as Kang, there’s a chance the villain will be recast, though we can’t discount the possibility the character is dropped altogether. Previously, it was rumoured that The Kang Dynasty would see Earth’s Mightiest Heroes assemble to battle the time-traveller’s army of Variants.

From there, the ultimate Kang, The Beyonder, would emerge as the true threat, leading to a Secret Wars where only a handful of remaining heroes - Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man and Hugh Jackman's Wolverine, for example - are left to fight back. That’s what we’ve pieced together from rumours, anyway, and it’s safe to say none of it is set in stone as things stand.

Waldron was Head Writer on the first season of Loki, introducing He Who Remains in the finale. With the Doctor Strange sequel, he threw us into the Multiverse, explored Earth-838 and, controversially, transformed the Scarlet Witch into a villain.

Avengers: The Kang Dynasty is currently scheduled to arrive in theaters on May 1, 2026, with Avengers: Secret Wars to follow on May 7, 2027.

Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige Refuses To Answer Question About Kang's MCU Future Ahead Of SDCC Panel
Related:

Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige Refuses To Answer Question About Kang's MCU Future Ahead Of SDCC Panel

The Russo Brothers Directing AVENGERS 5 & SECRET WARS - The Right Move Or A Step Backwards For The MCU?
Recommended For You:

The Russo Brothers Directing AVENGERS 5 & SECRET WARS - The Right Move Or A Step Backwards For The MCU?

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
tmp3
tmp3 - 11/27/2023, 5:14 PM
Kang Dynasty has the potential to be an all-timer bomb. Like a Heaven's Gate-level disaster that kills the whole genre
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 11/27/2023, 5:23 PM
@tmp3 -

ShellHead
ShellHead - 11/27/2023, 5:35 PM
@tmp3 - and an equal amount of potential to revitalize interest in superhero films after a period of delays and fewer releases.
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 11/27/2023, 5:36 PM
@DrReedRichards -
Not sure what his problem is.
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 11/27/2023, 5:38 PM
@ShellHead - What's wrong with a little optimism around here after all? Regardless, 2025 will be the make or brake it year for the genre as a whole.
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 11/27/2023, 5:42 PM
@MCUKnight11 -

I consider @tmp3 a friend, or at least a very amicable and politely mannered acquaintance, and with regularmovieguy and ghostdog (and sometimes porgy) among the few who can actually discuss film outside of the site's genre.

However, after carefully choosing my words, I will say this about some recent behaviour:

Succession is for reddit-obsessed corporate finance graduates what Breaking Bad was for teenagers who just had their first joint. And I'm saying this having actively avoided to watch a single episode of Succession, so make of that what you will.
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 11/27/2023, 5:50 PM
@DrReedRichards - Won't shut up about Oppenheimer either. Also was probably the only user on the sight excited about the possibility of Driver as Reed even though that was completely wrong. He's an acquaintance of mine but recently I can't shake off the feeling of pretentious YouTube video essayist. Makes me wonder if he even wants the genre to stay. I will say one group of people I absolutely can't stand are the ones who think Cruise saved movie theaters seemingly forgetting that Shang-Chi and NWH were released before Maverick. Make of THAT what you will.
supermanrex
supermanrex - 11/27/2023, 5:54 PM
@DrReedRichards - there are no hopes or joys any where in the culture for this site man. none. its all a depressing toxic cesspool.
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 11/27/2023, 6:01 PM
@MCUKnight11, @supermanrex -

I can understand having favourites. He's a fan of Nolan, so i get the excitement. What I also relate to, is schadenfraude. It just feels good when we see things we dislike fail.

What I don't understand, though, is the inabiility the reasoning behind this pettiness.

For instance, I know why I want a certain side of DC on screen to fail. Actuallly, scratch that. Not to just fail, but to be ridiculed eternally. And not even the entirety, mind you, 'cause Lord knows I respect the everliving shit out of the publisher on page and its history on screen. But I've been pretty vocal as to why not only I want this certain side of DC to spectacularly explode, but why I believe it to be just that it should.

But for the life of me, for the love of God and all that is holy, I cannot understand why somoene so knowledgeable in this craft would ever in their right mind openly wish for the MCU to fail. Because Marty said so? When did this site of COMIC BOOK MOVIES become an extension of kino reddit?

Tell me, pleae. I implore you.
ShellHead
ShellHead - 11/27/2023, 6:02 PM
@DrReedRichards - like you said,schadenfreude. I suspect a load of the negativity on this site now is DC Bros getting their licks in for the shit talking they got over the Snyder verse. They want Marvel to fail, the whole genre to fail, so they can pull the rest of us down into their own misery over a failed project.
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 11/27/2023, 6:05 PM
@ShellHead -

TMP is not a DC-bro, he's a cinephile. But with how adamant both sides are against the MCU at the moment, one seeing it as an oponent in the genre and the other as an insult to the art, they might as well be seen as indistinguishable, at least for the time being; especially since both sides' spite seems to stem from an arrogant sense of elitism.
ShellHead
ShellHead - 11/27/2023, 6:14 PM
@DrReedRichards - In which case, it's perpetually disappointing that supposed lovers of movies fail to see anything of value in popular cinema and CBMs. Lazy, soulless dreck is easy to spot, and rarely the foundation for over a decade of popularity
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 11/27/2023, 6:47 PM
@DrReedRichards - You read my mind. It's not like Nolan or Cruise can make multiple movies a year. If they really cared about movie theaters, shouldn't they want the MCU to succeed? What other franchise could consistently make multiple movies a year that bring in hundreds of millions and billions? Don't think anyone could give me a good answer.
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 11/27/2023, 6:49 PM
@DrReedRichards - Can't stand filmbros. Think they're better than everyone else. Let people watch what they want to even if it's not considered "cinema".
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 11/27/2023, 6:54 PM
@MCUKnight11 -

I can't stand that circlejerk either, and I f#ckin' work at a movie theatre so imagine that. But I'd like to think that TMP is not a total filmbro. Or at least I hope he isn't.
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 11/27/2023, 7:38 PM
@DrReedRichards - I hope so too but some cracks are starting to show.
hue66
hue66 - 11/27/2023, 8:29 PM
@MCUKnight11 - not sure it will break the genre. If these 2 projects fail. MARVEL will still come with Xmen and see if that revitalizes interest and takes them back to the to.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/27/2023, 9:31 PM
@DrReedRichards - I agree, Succession is the most overrated hbo show ever. It's literally just rich people arguing about how they can get richer. Also I like you for what it's worth, perhaps I'm too harsh haha
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/27/2023, 9:32 PM
@MCUKnight11 - you might hate us, but we don't hate you. Since you wanna put it that way, it seems you have shitty taste haha
DrReedRichards
DrReedRichards - 11/27/2023, 10:07 PM
@bobevanz -

Thanks, but I think you and I need to talk. I just sent you a request, so that I can DM you at some point tomorrow.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 11/28/2023, 6:50 AM
@ShellHead - Things I never get...

...most cinephiles should know that the popcorn blockbusters have historicaly been what funded the more artistic/cultured films which tend to fail to turn a profit more oft than not...

...most should also be aware for funding for a specific genre of blockbuster film to exist a belief amongst execs that there is profit to be made in said genre is needed thus there will be no CBM's if all CBM's are considered unprofitable (ie failure of the one CBM franchise which had a good track record could kill all CBM's being greenlit for a decade or two).
mountainman
mountainman - 11/27/2023, 5:14 PM
We are still going forward with this huh? 4 more years of the multiverse?
Fogs
Fogs - 11/27/2023, 6:00 PM
@mountainman - if they could release just stuff with loki-level writing I'd be fine with that.

Odds are, though...
DanFlashesShirt
DanFlashesShirt - 11/27/2023, 6:11 PM
@mountainman - yes, they’re going forward with the franchise that has earned them 6 billion dollars at the box office.

It was already clear after the response to Love and Thunder, Quantumania, and now the Marvels that they were going to reassess some things.. but if you thought they were just going to completely abandon their plans fof the next 3 years then you are crazy.
mountainman
mountainman - 11/27/2023, 6:16 PM
@DanFlashesShirt - Reassessing sure could meaning adjusting the direction and ditching a villain that has been a complete flop.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/27/2023, 5:17 PM
Cool. No fatigue at all will affect this film...I guess
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 11/27/2023, 5:17 PM
DOCTOR STRANGE 2 had a Writer?
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder