THE MARVELS Rumored To Have "Musical Elements"- Will Brie Larson's Carol Danvers Belt Out A Tune?

@Origame - no, but many whined that she wasn't showing enough personality.

This would certainly rectify that.

@Origame - lol I think you mean "you can't have personality without singing".

@thewanderer - ...what? Are you seriously under the impression that singing just gives you a personality? And that you can't have one without singing?🤣

@Origame - umm no, I was merely pointing out that I think you the sarcastic comment you said, you said wrong.

@Origame - not really, but ok? It doesn't work with my original comment.

@Origame - It could be a response to people saying the most personality she had in her movie was in the karaoke flashback scene.

Which...I don't disagree with.

@Origame - And what makes you think the SEQUEL won't focus first on the problems of the original? That's a bit assumptive don't you think? This article talks about ONE sequence seemingly somewhere in the middle of the movie. You seem to be drawing irrational conclusions in order to assert more negativity yet again.

Also, I'm curious, what problems of the first film would you like to see addressed? I'm sure Skrulls undercover on Earth will be one. But then again, events from any film / show can be addressed in any other film / show as the MCU is one big storytelling machine rather than a conglomerate of individual character titles.

@Origame - Still doesn't add up. Seems like you're just complaining to complain again. If I'm being honest. I thought at some point I'd see you post something worth having a real discussion about. But you never seem to like anything. Has anyone else told you this? I mean, even for you it's gotta get old after a while. Surely at some point you make self improvement adjustments based on community response.

@Origame - I'm not even necessarily a huge MCU fan boy. I'm more of a casual fan of all CBMs. But Marvel Studios' overall delivery is net positive. Calling Phase 4 a train wreck is super exaggerated. I didn't like the amount of humor in Thor 4, for example. But I still enjoyed the film for the things I DID like about it. And that's my point. You seem to be so hyper focused on the things that didn't work for you that you look past the parts of a film that are fun and enjoyable.

And what I meant about a conversation is a decent one. Not just arguing with people. Maybe that's what you like to get out of this. But for me I think it's nice to have friendly debates instead of being prodded with dramatic hot takes.

I mean, wanting good story is great. But to say these aren't good stories is just your opinion and not based in fact. So ultimately you're saying you want things YOUR way. Because for the majority of fans, these are great stories with the occasional misstep. They all review relatively well and perform excellent in the box office. Eternals is the only exception and although I admit it was a let down and didn't meet my expectations no way did it deserve a 47%. Between 60%-70% is appropriate. The villain situation was horrendous but the character exposé was intriguing and the visuals were some of the best in the MCU. (More so with the celestials and fighting effects...Kro not so much.)

So back to the point. If you're actually a fan of the MCU you'd be able to ALSO have some positives to contribute. Not just complaints. Like films I don't like...I don't feel entitled for them to be made to my standard. I just don't follow things I don't like. I'd love for DC to have a great cinematic universe. But it's so bad. I would've loved to have good X-Men films but Fox royally jacked those up. And don't get me started on Sony... So instead of going into those articles and bad mouthing them while others are trying to enjoy them, I stay out and let them have at it.

Does that make sense at all?