The Hunger Games: Reboot!

The Hunger Games: Reboot!

I know this isn't a comicbook movie or have any relations to a comicbook but this site has covered this movie, I was gonna post a review but I felt more obliged to post my opinions here.

Editorial Opinion
By EdgyOutsider - Sep 27, 2012 09:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Fan Fic

I am a fan of the Hunger Games trilogy and currently working on Mockingjay, the third and final book. I finally saw The Hunger Games in August, and while as a movie it was pretty good. But, as a adaptation of the book it was HORRIBLE! There was lack of development and nothing was explained, there was one exception. Other than that, it was horrible. It needs rebooted and here is what I would do to reboot The Hunger Games.

More character development



The only development they gave the movie was to Seneca Crane, a character you see maybe once or twice in the book and yea it was cool to see the Capitol during the games but that's it. They don't touch on anything about Katniss' dad, why she's so skilled at hunting, her relationship with Gale, the boy with the bread (we saw it, but it wasn't explained), her relationship with Peeta during the end of the games and Katniss' life as a whole in District 12. None of it was explained in the movie and it was quite frustrating. How do they expect to make Catching Fire, Mockingjay parts 1 and 2 any good if they don't develop anything in the movie and don't explain anything about Katniss, her character and the relationships she has with anybody around her. Hell, if they had just done all of that then the movie would've been a maximum of 20 minutes longer.

Lack of Explanation



As stated above, there wasn't an explanation for alot of things. They completely ignore Katniss' damaged ear, they don't amputate Peeta's leg like in the book and they don't explain why/how her dad is dead. Katniss' new ear and Peeta's new leg plays a part, a small part but a part in the Quater Quell in Catching Fire. Again, we don't get to know Katniss or why she is such an angry person.

Tone

The tone of the movie was wrong, anyone who has read the books and thinks the movie nailed the tone apparently hasn't read the books in a long time. Kevin Tancharoen's pitch for Hunger Games as far as the tone goes is much more in line with the books. It needs to be a dark, despressing atmopshere. The Hunger Games themselves need to be a scary, frightening, violent place. I thought they handeld the violence and blood fine in the movie, but they didn't have the right tone for the movie.



Look

The look of the movie needed to be brooding, district 12 needed to have a more post apocolyptic type of look. Just by looking at it, you needed to be able to tell that these people are suffering. That they are struggling. The movie that Gary Ross gave us had a more polished, new, fresh sort of look like everything is ok except for when in the games. That's at least how I looked at it.

Rating

I'm fine with a PG-13 rating, but they need to push it more. The book had the perfect balance of suspense, drama and violence. They violence and the blood that goes with it needs to be enough to barely get a PG-13 rating. Darker and more serious than The Dark Knight. The rating should reflect that this is NOT a kids movie, not a teen girl type of movie. It needs to reflect that this is a very serious, emotional, violent movie.

What I would do if I were to reboot, The Hunger Games

I would develop Katniss as she is in the book and explain everything about her, even the boy with the bread incident. Her relationships with the other characters would have more depth to it as her relationships with her sister, Gale, Rue and Peeta would be more emotional. She would have the damaged ear, Peeta would have the amputated leg, District 12 would look like a place that is suffering, the tone would be very dark, brutal and depression.

Overall: The Hunger Games was a good movie but crap adaptation. It needs to be rebooted with more character development, more serious tone and look. No, I'm not saying put everything in the movie but put the most important part of each character and put those things in the movie. It needs to be an emotional, depressing, violent movie. I cried when I read Rue's death, I could've cared less about it in the movie. There was no feeling of emotion what so ever coming from me to the movie, I could've cared less about the characters. I have lost faith in the rest of the movies until an appropriate adaptation comes out.

These are my thoughts, what are yours? Comment below and be respectful in those comments.
About The Author:
EdgyOutsider
Member Since 8/23/2011
Fan of comic books with dreams to become a writer and director for film one day. Spider-Man, Ghost Rider and Captain America are my favorite superheroes. While Dr. Doom, Thanos, The Lizard and Ultron rank among my all time favorite super villains.
DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created Infinite Crisis Video
Related:

DC & Marvel Team Up In Awesome Fan-Created "Infinite Crisis" Video

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film
Recommended For You:

Bill Cosby Says He Wants To Be In A Superhero Film

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 9/27/2012, 10:50 AM
@jpfola26: Reboot it because it we literally don't know anything about the characters. All the important parts of the book were left out with the exception of one or two parts. It was crap unless you haven't read the book. If you had read the book, you'd understand why I feel the way I do about it. They didn't have the correct tone, look or anything. They even cut out an important character. It's rediculous.
iuhgluiblbjjkhkjhkljh
iuhgluiblbjjkhkjhkljh - 9/27/2012, 11:09 AM
Don't reboot it. Just stop making the movies. The books suck.
TheRaven20
TheRaven20 - 9/27/2012, 12:45 PM
I agree completely. You really nailed all the problems I had with the film. HOWEVER, I don't believe it needs to be rebooted and I think Francis Lawrence can make a much darker faithful adaptation. The main reason to not reboot, besides that it'd be completely absurd to reboot only a year after, is that the cast was really spot on, it was the script and directing that caused problems. Good article, but i don't agree with the idea of rebooting.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 9/27/2012, 2:18 PM
Thanks you guys :)

@BattlinMurdock: They left alot of important stuff out, some of it goes into the other book as well. They left out important stuff. I feel they should reboot it because so it's more in line with the book. I think as a stand alone movie that it is pretty good.

I know that no adaptation is perfect but I would rather have a movie like this be a bit closer and develop the characters better than the attempt that they did. IF anything
kong
kong - 9/27/2012, 2:50 PM
the movie was JUST like the book. The hunger games will probably NEVER get remade or rebooted and the movie was great. It's as closer to the book than the Harry Potter movies were. It's an amazing movie. I've read all the books and i think you don't need any more development of characters. You talk about how they needed more life in District 12, that would make it father away from the book. Every scene except the ones with President Snow and the guys who control the games (which developed Prez Snow more) was in the book. They left nothing out and only added stuff that helped the movie be better
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 9/27/2012, 3:06 PM
RedHood13: They left alot out of the movie, no where close to amazing. I respect your opinion but to say that this movie was amazing and close to the book is false.
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 9/27/2012, 3:11 PM
The movie was alright and I never read the books but my sisters said they were really good. They were disappointed with the movie. In the books there is a lot of violence when in the movie there was not much which was kind of crappy. It was in by no means a bad movie but it has wasted potential.

Battle Royale is a much better movie because it was very disturbing to watch. Hunger Games is in many ways a huge ripoff of Battle Royale if you think of it.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 9/27/2012, 4:44 PM
Ok, we seem to disagree on a lot of things, and this is, oh boy, no exception.

THE BOOK IS WRITTEN FROM ONLY KATNISS' POINT OF VIEW

Of course there's going to be a crap-load of omissions!

Do you want Battle Royale rebooted because the director left a lot out and changed a few things that he kept in?
(Not agreeing that this was a rip-off of Battle Royale, but my point remains)

You haven't even finished Mockingjay. Snow's rose garden (which wasn't in Hunger Games, because dammit, you only have Katniss' perspective) is shown in the movie. Can you tell me why that is?

And yes, they did show, more or less, how her dad died. He goes into the elevator and BOOM! the mine explodes/collapses.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 9/27/2012, 5:04 PM
@AvengerFan2012
Nah, they're too different movies. One's a social commentary, the other is a gore-fest.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 9/27/2012, 6:22 PM
@BattlinMurdcok: She's gonna think it because she helped write the movie
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 9/27/2012, 7:34 PM
Apparently not. She wasn't any help to the lack of character development of her own characters. She is the author and yet doesn't realize she cut out important character details and yet she liked the movie. I personally think she is literally on drugs
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 9/27/2012, 8:25 PM
I completely understand and respect where you come from, I am just letting you know that she didn't develop the characters at all with the exception of characters you never really saw in the book.
EdgyOutsider
EdgyOutsider - 9/27/2012, 9:17 PM
Actually, I won't. I really didn't mean to start an arguement, I have a great deal of respect for you. If anything, I'm sorry for snapping.
lokibane2012
lokibane2012 - 9/27/2012, 10:24 PM
Yeah, I hear you. But you failed to address the biggest problem with the movie.

The book is was adapting was complete shit.
lokibane2012
lokibane2012 - 9/27/2012, 10:33 PM
^and yeah, I actually read the book because I am surrounded by its fans constantly preaching its greatness and now, I can say with surety and proof that it sucked.

A lot of problems that you noted root back to one problem. A movie is not a book. The majority of the book was Katniss thinking to herself. The way it was handled in the book just can't be effectively pulled off on-screen without taking liberties with the source material. And taking liberties is obviously something that "die hard" (read whiny) fans cannot stand.

And the movie's faults effectively also point out the major flaw of the book. It fails to follow the simple "show, don't tell" guideline. Remember back to the book, Primrose was constantly described as basically "somebody that everyone loves" and all their actions center around the point that they love her. But the book never made the effort to show scenes or explain why that was so. Just, "they love her. Because... yeah, because."

Lame book. Lame movie.
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 9/28/2012, 3:26 AM
Let me just say this right out of the box. The movie sucked, and so did the book.

My wife made me read the book, then when i finished, we literally watched the movie the next day. The only thing i can agree with here is the lack of character development.

But the movie did a great job of bringing the images i envisioned from the book to the screen. It caught the tone perfectly. They did a very good job of adapting the book. All the important moments from the book were there.

One more thing i'll agree witb is that the movie did rush through the events in the book, however, they were still there. If they would have made it, scene for scene, like the book, then there would have been about 6 chapters of Kat and Peeta sitting in a [frick]ing cave. Aside from that, there were a lot of boring spots in the book.

So really, overall, it was a very good adaptatiom, because again, all of the important things were there.

And i didnt feel a very dark tone in the book either. Its a tween book, and written like one. Battle Royale had a dark tone, but you can tell tham movie was made for adults...
justified1
justified1 - 9/28/2012, 9:34 AM
A reboot. Of hunger Games? Shit! just get the movies over with and we can forget about all this.
marvel72
marvel72 - 9/28/2012, 1:54 PM
the hunger games was average at best,a chick flick with a touch of violence.

i'm not even sure i want to see the sequel let alone a reboot.
superbatspiderman
superbatspiderman - 9/28/2012, 2:39 PM

@AvengerFan2012 - The Hunger Games was boring for half of the whole movie and had very little action. Battle Royale was much better and I cared for the characters more. The only character I liked in Hunger games was that little girl that climbs trees and helps out Katnis.


This video says it all.

marvel72
marvel72 - 9/29/2012, 5:29 AM
all this talk about the hunger games reminds me i need something to eat.
View Recorder