THE FANTASTIC FOUR Writer On Why The Human Torch Didn't Say "Flame On" And The Ultimate Nullifier's Absence

THE FANTASTIC FOUR Writer On Why The Human Torch Didn't Say "Flame On" And The Ultimate Nullifier's Absence

The Fantastic Four: First Steps writer Eric Pearson has weighed in on The Human Torch's catchphrase being absent from the movie and reveals whether the Ultimate Nullifier was ever included in the script.

By JoshWilding - Aug 10, 2025 08:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantastic Four
Source: ComicBook.com

In The Fantastic Four: First Steps, Marvel's First Family defeats Galactus when Sue Storm gives her life to force the villain into a teleporter that will leave him stranded on the other side of the universe. 

However, when the team first encountered the Devourer of Worlds in the comic books, The Watcher tasked the Human Torch with travelling to Galactus' home and stealing the Ultimate Nullifier. The device is not only capable of killing Galactus, but is powerful enough to wipe out entire realities.

Mister Fantastic threatens the villain with the Ultimate Nullifier, forcing him to leave Earth and promise not to return. The weapon is then given to The Watcher for safekeeping (this happened in the pages of Fantastic Four #51).

Neither the Ultimate Nullifier nor Uatu appear in The Fantastic Four: First Steps, and according to writer Eric Pearson, the all-powerful device wasn't one Marvel Studios seriously considered using in the movie. 

"Not that I am aware of," he told ComicBook.com. "I think it came up in conversation, at one point, but I don’t think it was ever written down."

Its absence led to a far more emotionally powerful final act, which also saw The Thing finally relent and say, "It's Clobberin' Time." However, many fans have expressed disappointment that there wasn't a single moment in the movie where the Human Torch says, "Flame On!" 

"You did [get it]. From the little toy, you did. You got it. We checked the box," Pearson argued. "I always enjoyed the joke and it might have passed on to me. There was the idea when they were particularly screwed and had no plan, Ben brought out a bottle of whiskey and started pouring shots and said, 'It’s clobberin' time!'"

He added, "I always thought that was really funny. The payoff was just too good in this case. We had to find the exact time to say it."

While there are rumblings about filmmaker Matt Shakman being lined up to helm a sequel to The Fantastic Four: First Steps, Pearson confirmed he remains in the dark when it comes to the franchise's future. 

"I honestly don’t know. I’m such a literal person that I would need to understand the fallout of how everything looks and who knows who out of Avengers: Doomsday and Secret Wars," he explained. "I don’t know where we are all sitting. Sometimes, when everything is on the table, you don’t know what to eat."

"Would it be cool to see them in a murder mystery together? Sure. Would it be cool to see them in a time-travelling romp? Sure, that would be cool. There are all these different things, but you don’t want to completely upset the apple cart. I feel like anything I’d have to say really doesn’t matter until we see how all our favorite characters survive the upcoming adventures with Victor von Doom," Pearson concluded. 

The Fantastic Four: First Steps is now playing in theaters.

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Concept Art Reveals A Touching Moment That Didn't Make The Final Cut
Related:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Concept Art Reveals A Touching Moment That Didn't Make The Final Cut

HARRY POTTER Director Chris Columbus Reveals Why He Was FIRED From 2005's FANTASTIC FOUR Movie
Recommended For You:

HARRY POTTER Director Chris Columbus Reveals Why He Was FIRED From 2005's FANTASTIC FOUR Movie

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
gulducati
gulducati - 8/10/2025, 9:09 AM
Reed does say it to Johnny when he introduces the new space suit. He said if you flame on, you have x minutes of oxygen.
IAmAHoot
IAmAHoot - 8/10/2025, 9:13 AM
I didn't even notice.

And the "It's clobberin' time" line I didn't feel was exhilarating or quite satisfying enough; not bad but okay.
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 8/10/2025, 9:27 AM
@IAmAHoot - I felt the same way when Steve Rogers FINALLY said the "Avengers Assemble" line in ENDGAME but he kinda'/sorta' whispered the "Assemble" part of the iconic battle-cry. It was a let-down IMO. 🫤
SummersEssex
SummersEssex - 8/11/2025, 12:05 AM
@SuperiorHeckler - this.
AgentofSH1ELD
AgentofSH1ELD - 8/11/2025, 6:15 AM
@SuperiorHeckler - hmmm. I was the opposite. The emotion and anger behind it was perfect. It is one of my favorite scenes of all time (not just CBM). You can tell how ready he is for battle. Him saying it the way he did made much more sense than screaming "Assemble". It was more of a rally for himself and the OG's around him than it was everyone else. It was what they were creating. Ultimate team to take out ultimate threats.
Spike101
Spike101 - 8/10/2025, 9:17 AM
He really comes across as a real jerk to me. Why would oh you not use lines that every fan out there wants to hear? Utter knob….
dragon316
dragon316 - 8/10/2025, 9:31 AM
Hardly used in comics now typical Disney showing alcohol try get kids drinking but no smoking
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 8/10/2025, 9:32 AM
Reed using the Nullifier MacGuffin would mean a man saves the day.
Sue pushing Galactus into the portal means a strong woman saves the day.

Not much more difficult than that to figure out why they chose that particular narrative. 🤨
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 8/10/2025, 9:43 AM
@SuperiorHeckler - BREAKING NEWS: people writing fictional stories pick fictional character to be the hero . More at 6
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/10/2025, 9:45 AM
@SuperiorHeckler - you sound like one of those Christian nationalists
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/10/2025, 9:52 AM
@SuperiorHeckler - For an action film, winning by negotiation would kinda suck over a fight based victory, I mean all the build up to a fight with Galactus for the final act and it ends on go away or else and Galactus says OK.

I know in print it worked and is source accurate but it would be lame and would it REALY be just the man saving the day if they ALL took part in stealing a device Reed didn't even invent if source accurate cos no way it would ONLY be Human Torch going to acquire the device? Remember Reed didn't actualy invent or use the device in the original story, it was basicaly I have this button and I will press it if you don't sod off as an analogy to the cold war and threat of nuclear missiles.

Heck even if Reed HAD invented the device AND used it winning by simply pushing a button can be very lame in live action.

Also, Sue did not save the day on her own anyway, was a team effort with a final assist from the Surfer too, Reed was still the man who made the plan and invented the device Galactus was pushed through with it almost being Johnny doing the self sacrifice as well as Sue (who has been stated as being the strongest powerset wise for decades anyway) to save the day.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/10/2025, 9:56 AM
@SuperiorHeckler - Final point, if the solution was using the Nullifier that would mean Galactus never set foot on Earth as would make zero sense to threated or use such a powefull device if it would also destroy the Earth at the same time. Second they decided to not have the final act a space battle and going for a terran one instead an ultimate weapon of that type would be ditched from the narrative.
SethBullock
SethBullock - 8/10/2025, 11:21 AM
@Apophis71 - Why did Galactus have to set foot on Earth when he could have just sent the Silver Surfer to pick up Franklin?
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 8/10/2025, 11:22 AM
@bobevanz - Wrong (again) Bobbie. 🫤 Disney has moved on from their most overt 'Social Justice/Political Correctness' phase that so hampered and damaged the brand following ENDGAME. However, they are still very much checking certain boxes. And having a strong woman save the day fits that narrative. And that's all I pretty much stated in my original post.
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 8/10/2025, 11:26 AM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - Your grasp of the obvious is most impressive Shim-Shim. (Did you hear the one about water being wet???) Please flag down an adult and have them re-read my original post to you. I simply implied that Disney is still obligated to promote certain gender narratives over others. I neither condemned it nor condoned it. (Unlike you...) 🙄
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/10/2025, 11:30 AM
@SethBullock - Cos the writers were going to have a space battle but realised without the perspective of scale it wouldn't have worked as well thus wanted him walking through NYC so you can tell exactly how big he is thus a greater sense of threat both to the team AND to the planet.

However he HAD sent the Silver Surfer to get Franklin prior to that, but they temp took her off the playing field so....

I mean at one point the kid was born on Earth too far earlier in the movie, not in space, changes were made as it was considered it wouldn't work as well on the big screen for the GA, they wanted the big fight with Galactus not just the SS and ultimately decided that would visualy work better on Earth not in space.
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 8/10/2025, 11:32 AM
@Apophis71 - Thank you Apophis for a well thought-out and deliberate response. (Folks like Bobbie and Shim-Shim could learn a thing or two from you) 😉 TBH, I would have had Sue use her force-field to burst Galactus' helmet from the inside-out and the image of G screaming as he falls through the portal would have been an even more dramatic display of Sue's powers than simply pushing him backwards waiting for Shalla-Bal to finish the maneuver.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/10/2025, 11:44 AM
@SuperiorHeckler - For sure there are other ways it could pan out but typicaly with a standard team movie you want all team members to be part of how they win, a focus on whoever did the final kick in the nuts is choosing to undermine how much the acts of others could be as much or a bigger factor in how the day was won. When it is a crossover movie fairer to have one given the credit such as Tony in Endgame but even then he couldn't have gotten the stones back and made the ultimate sacrifice without the actions of many others.
SethBullock
SethBullock - 8/10/2025, 2:55 PM
@Apophis71 - I understand why for the movie it's better to have Galactus on Earth, problem is that unless there is something I'm forgetting now, it doesn't make much sense that Galactus decides to go down to Times Square for Franklin when he could have just sent his herald at any time to pick him up from Times Square, from the Baxter Building or from anywhere else.

I think the writers should have given us any kind of decent excuse to explain why that wasn't possible and why Galactus really needed to go down to Times Square to pick up Franklin by himself instead of just sending the Silver Surfer to do it for him.

He could have sent her at any time, and if she was temp taken off the playing field, he could have just waited until she was back.

He just shouldn't have any kind of hurry or any kind of need to go down to Earth by himself, unless she was killed or something like that, but even if that happened iirc in the comics he has certain powers like teleportation, telekinesis, etc, that he could have used to catch Franklin without needing to set foot on Earth. Or he could have even created another herald and send him/her to pick up Franklin.

And if he was so nerfed that he couldn't use those powers to get Franklin without going down to NYC or to give a more decent fight against the FF, since she was not dead he could have just waited for the Surfer to do the job for him, or he could have sent her much earlier instead of giving Reed and company so much time to get ready and to plan anything for his arrival with the teleportation bridges.

Another thing I don't understand is why a genius like Reed planned to move the whole planet to the other side of the universe with his teleportation bridges and when that doesn't work because the Silver Surfer just destroys them (duh), then he realizes that maybe they could just try to send Galactus to the other side of the universe, why didn'y he think about that in the first place, lol.

If he had thought about that first, he would have only needed one teleportation bridge instead of all the others he needed to be built to move the whole planet, and with their own spaceship the team could have taken it to Galactus' ship and turn it on there instead of having to wait for Galactus to arrive to Earth and then decide he just wanted to stretch his legs and take a walk through Mahattan instead of sending his Surfer to pick up the baby.

I mean, I'm no genius like Reed, maybe I missed some important stuff while watching the movie, but I think it's the writers job to properly explain these things instead of just expecting us to simply understand that fighting Galactus on NYC just looked cooler and worked better for the movie and that's why neither Reed nor Galactus could use their brains.

I mostly liked the movie, but these are things that I think the writers should have explained better if they thought they really needed Galactus on Earth because it would be better for the final act.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/10/2025, 3:12 PM
@SethBullock - You don't realy NEED a good reason, Surfer tried once and failed is enough for Galactus to go fine, I'll do it myself if it fits into how the writers want it to play out.
SethBullock
SethBullock - 8/10/2025, 5:06 PM
@Apophis71 - Well, I do need a good reason to know why he would do it when he just doesn't need to do it and it'd much easier and much safer to just send her again later.

She should be able to do it in a much faster and easier way if it wasn't because the writers just wanted Galactus to walk through NYC and to be defeated in a really dumb way, because like you said that's how they wanted it to play out, they wanted their fight on Earth and not in space because it would visually work better, it's just a plot convenience, but the problem is that it doesn't make any sense.

A good writer would make 100% sure that everybody in the audience understood why Galactus had no other option than to go down to Earth to pick Franklin up by himself with his own hands or why he wouldn't destroy the teleportation bridge in Times Square as soon as he saw/detected it like his herald did with all the others bridges on Earth before.

Or why Reed wouldn't think about taking a teleportation bridge to Galactus' spaceship before building all those other bridges all around the world to send their whole planet to the other corner of the universe.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/10/2025, 5:53 PM
@SethBullock - How much is ever needed to be spoon fed?

Galactus was coming to Earth anyway, that was made clear before the F4 even headed into space and before the birth of the child by Shalla Bal and she was defeated by the F4 once trying to get the kid, there realy doesn't need to be more than that.

Remember that the initial threat wasn't anything to do with a kid, it was that Galactus IS going to destroy and eat the planet. The child wasn't part of the initial plan of the big bad, he was always likely to destroy Earth ultimately thus was always coming to Earth.

As to Reeds initial plan, it was to avoid Galactus ever reaching Earth as they knew they were no match to him. Plan B of pushing him through a device was even more of a longshot than managing to teleport the entire planet with major consequence in Richard's calculations cos if Galactus got to Earth he may simply destroy the planet whilst SS salvaged Franklin's body from the debris (or just let them all die).

They would never be able to guarantee they could get Galactus anywhere near a device off planet, in space it is even more difficult to do so cos size and physics and massive frickin spacecraft and no guaranteed way to get him to beam down to the planet or whatever either.

There are other ways it could play out but ultimately the writers wanted Galactus walking through NYC cos it made for a better film to watch even if shortcuts used to get there. Galactus after retrieving the child himself is the only way him coming down onto the planet would make much sense.

The 'a good writer' bit is thrown about a lot but a good writer can OVER explain for the purposes of a film thus a lot will get cut in order to maintain a good narrative flow within a couple hours rather than a four hour one where everything is spoon fed to the audience. It is exactly why you hear of all the subplots and scenes that don't make it into final cuts as more pieces to give a greater understanding of all the characters thus why they do what they do that ultimately ends up with a decision they aren't needed as the negatives of pacing and duration are greater than the plus of more explanation.
SethBullock
SethBullock - 8/11/2025, 6:00 AM
@Apophis71 - Yeah, he is coming to Earth to destroy it and to eat it if the F4 don't give him the kid, but that doesn't mean he needs to pick him up with his own hands when he could simply send his herald to do it for him in a much quicker and safer way.

She failed to get the kid in space, but once she escaped the black hole, why couldn't she be sent again by Galactus to just pick Franklin up from Times Square, from the Baxter Building or from anywhere else in the world?

That's why he has a herald, so he doesn't need to do that kind of sh*t by himself, lol.

-Galactus: "Surfer Girl, go pick up the baby, if they don't allow you to bring him to me, tell them I'll destroy the planet".

-Silver Surfer: "Yes, sir."

She comes to Earth, destroys the teleportation bridges, picks up the baby, job done.

Or the F4 fight her and don't allow her to take Franklin, so Galactus just destroys and eats the planet.

I don't see where is the logic in not doing exactly that, what is shown in the movie is just plot convenience because the writers wanted Galactus on NYC, but it's completely unnecessary imo. 🤷‍♂️

And they could have just agreed to deliver Franklin to Galactus on his spaceship, then take a teleportation bridge with them hidden on their own spaceship, leave the bridge on Galactus' ship and escape before turning it on and sending Galactus' ship to the other side of the universe.

Just some version of that, it would much easier to do than building idk how many teleportation bridges all around the world just to be destroyed by the Silver Surfer once she comes to Earth and sees them, which anyone with a brain knew that would be what was going to happen.

Plus moving a whole planet full of people, animals, buildings, cars, planes, etc, to the other side of the universe is not as easy as moving an egg somewhere else in the same room (and iirc Reed used two devices for the eggs, but afaik didn't have a receiving one where he planned to move Earth or where he finally sent Galactus).

The chances of f*cking up and getting the planet destroyed and everybody killed with that plan were huge.

User Comment Image

Much bigger than just putting a teleportation bridge into Galactus' ship.

Reed could have even planned a way to send the bridge to Galactus' ship without the F4 having to take it there on their own spaceship.

Maybe sending it with a rocket or a drone controlled from Earth, or controlled by a robot like Herbie, or... maybe just use a teleportation bridge to send another teleportation bridge to Galactus' spaceship, why couldn't he do that?

Wouldn't that be much easier than moving the whole planet? And he would only need two bridges instead of building so many others all around the world just to be easily destroyed by the Silver Surfer as soon as she saw them.

He could have even used some of these last tactics on Earth to surprise Galactus somehow with the teleportation bridges.

If I can think about these things, why couldn't a genius like Reed do it, specially having so much time until Galactus' arrival.

It's just easier to believe that Reed could find a way to hide a teleportation bridge in the F4 spaceship and once in Galactus' ship find a way to leave it there and escape before activating it, or that he could directly send the bridge to Galactus spaceship somehow, than believing that his genius masterplan is puting the baby's empty basket right below/besides a teleportation bridge and that Galactus would just come down to Earth, walk through NYC and wouldn't notice the teleportation bridge right between him and the baby's empty basket.

I understand why the writers wanted Galactus in NYC, I just think they could have done a better job explaining why it was absolutely necessary, why he didn't have any other option.

What I saw was not convincing enough, at least not for me. 🤷‍♂️
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/11/2025, 7:25 AM
@SethBullock - Which part of they did intend the battle to be in space but switched as wasn't working don't you get with all of that.

Yes there are easier ways for Galactus theoreticaly to get the Kid but at that point he knew the F4 were capable of defeating Surfer but knew he was indestructable but more importantly they realised they needed Galactus on Earth and getting the kid himself is the only logical reason to go with for that to occur. Any attempt to explain more than he came down onto the planet to get the kid would cause more issues not less. As you correctly point out, Galactus had options, thus it being his choice to do it himself is literaly the ONLY reason and how much time would be wasted trying to explain WHY he made a choice which as you point out he didn't need to make.

Was it necessary for Galactus to do it himself, no, but it wasn't necessary to go the theatre and watch a film either. Choice is a thing, a detailed reason why needed isn't always required and an attempt to try and explain frankly not required in most cases beyond wanted to do/get something so went to do/get it yourself.

I totaly agree that the plan to move an entire planet is riddled with issues, think that was a daft option to go with to be frank. The most I can say to that is Reed should know that and still went ahead with that demonstrates how certain he was trying to fight Galactus directly was futile, that there would be zero chance of slipping into his ship with a device let alone escape after doing so in his calculations.

Reed MAY have been wrong but he likely considered the chance of getting Galactus through a gate was near impossible too, and killing/destroying him impossible as this is a huge villain who survived the destruction of an entire universe and every event in the creation of the current one and since. Switching to what they did that after most the bridges were destroyed only became the plan when there was nothing else they could do.

Well, nothing else other than give them a kid which can be said to be a very easy solution that would end the film in act two, lol.
SethBullock
SethBullock - 8/11/2025, 8:55 PM
@Apophis71 -
"Which part of they did intend the battle to be in space but switched as wasn't working don't you get with all of that."

I told you several times that I did get that, I get that they thought that the final battle in NYC would be better for the movie, I said it in at least a couple of my messages. 😅

I just think they should have given us a more compelling reason to explain why Galactus had to go down to Times Square to pick Franklin up by himself when he didn't need to do it and when there were other much better, faster and safer options like just sending his herald to do it for him. 🤷‍♂️

Same way I think Reed, who is supposed to be a genius, maybe had other much better and safer options to send Galactus to the other side of the universe without needing to risk the whole planet in the first place, and when he didn't even know if the world would be able to build in time so many teleportation bridges that could be so easily detected and destroyed by the Silver Surfer later.

Call it nitpicking, idk, I just think the writers could have tried to find some more solid reasons to explain why neither of those things were possible, but they decided not to do it because I guess they may have thought that people in the audience wouldn't ask any of these questions, but for me personally that's a mistake, because I just think that these are too obvious questions, and that the only reason why Galactus ultimately goes down to NYC is because of plot convenience, because the writers just wanted the final battle to be fought there.

You don't seem to fully agree, that's ok, let's agree to disagree. 🤷😅
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/11/2025, 9:04 PM
@SethBullock - I actualy think we both agree and are debating around the same nitpick in what on a surface level appears a different take.

As in we both accept it was a plot convenience/shortcut and there were better plans theoreticaly Reed and/or Galactus could come up with.

I am just more on there need not be a reason beyond he chose to do it himself is all, that isn't something I feel NEEDS time to explain in a film where he was coming to Earth anyway prior to him knowing about the child. You think more explanation was required or stick with a space battle, what works best on screen be damned which is fine to feel :D

We deffo ALL think teleporting an entire planet is daft, I can more readily look past that with thinking the fact they went with such a dumb plan shows how futile and doomed to fail any other option was in Reeds assessment (even if he was wrong).
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 8/10/2025, 10:56 AM
I wish we got atleast one “Flame On” from Johnny in the film even with the bit of the toy saying it repeatedly to annoy Ben was funny imo.

I’m glad the Ultimate Nullifier didn’t show up though since I have no idea how you could do that without having it be a Deus Ex Machina or lessening the “stakes” which people have complained about the lack of them in these films previously…

Having the team use Franklin as bait in a last ditch effort to stop Galactus gives an emotional hook to the final action setpiece since it also puts pressure on Reed & Sue’s marriage and creates tension which gets you more invested in the film and how they’ll defeat the baddie.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/10/2025, 11:22 AM
@TheVisionary25 - Yup, I don't think most even know that device when originaly used destroyed nine tenths of the entire Uniiverse and wasn't invented by Reed. Coming up with an alternate device to win the day that maybe would result in them stuck in 616 is one thing but a source accurate Ultimate Nullifier was never likely.

Any such destructive device capable of destroying Galactus (which I was already averse to them doing) would require it to be used LONG before Galactus even was in our solar system let alone stood on the planet. Even Sue would be unable to contain a blast capable of killing Galactus and do we REALY want a first solo franchise film where one of the ultimate indestructable villains is killed in a teams first full onscreen adventure, how do you top that?

I mean he may not be in most folks lists of top five threats, but in terms of being able to survive almost anything he should be considering in the top three as he was the ONLY thing to survive the destruction of an entire previous UNIVERSE and the big bang after that creating the current one.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 8/10/2025, 11:52 AM
@Apophis71 - to be fair

The Ultimate Nullifier was created by Reed in the Ultimate universe and used the energy of the Big Bang so there’s precedent for it but I still liked the direction they went here since it just made it more emotional imo
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/10/2025, 12:12 PM
@TheVisionary25 - For sure, but your still talking a device that once destroyed nine tenths of the universe when activated so that is more the problem with it as a solution, your walking into nuclear deterrent on steroids territory. There are issues with the cataclysmic effect of transporting an entire inhabbited planet in the story they went with, the ultimate nullified would be even more destuctive if actualy used and seemed to want an F4 who mostly look for non lethal means to win rather than one whose go to would be the ultimate weapon.
Huskers
Huskers - 8/10/2025, 10:59 AM
So no all powerful nullifier, but an all powerful Franklin that can even bring people back to life?!?! 👌

Seriously though, with a character that powerful how are any villains an actual threat anymore! 🤷🏻‍♂️
SuperiorHeckler
SuperiorHeckler - 8/10/2025, 11:41 AM
@Huskers - Excellent point. Even their version of the Infinity Gauntlet could not bring truly dead individuals back to life. However, someone thought-up the ultimate dramatic moment of self-sacrifice on Sue's part but still needed a way to cheat death for one of the main characters. Their answer was to make Franklin himself became a convenient MacGuffin just for that purpose. 🧐
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/10/2025, 12:06 PM
@Huskers - How powerfull Franklin is was always an issue in the comics too, but source accurate thus is what it is. Good writing is key to how you make a character like that work and in the source with the ultimate one for him becoming the new Galactus but one who would only consume uninhabbited worlds or just gain the energy he needs from stars in solar systems sans any lifeforms thus negating both the threat of that force of nature AND taking a potential OP hero off the board.

Other than that you have narratives like what they did with him early on where Annihilus put him in a device that would have resulted in the destruction of Earth and the only option to save the day was to use that device to put him into a coma or some other narrative where you nerf most his powers. In one story Franklin himself realises his powers are too great and is the one to put dampners on himself vastly reducing his abilities.
PartyKiller
PartyKiller - 8/10/2025, 11:02 AM
Marvel movies are now less entertaining than little TV series episodes. It's incredible that Fantastic Four & Thunderbolts made as much money as they did.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 8/10/2025, 11:44 AM
No "Flame on!" The menace of Galactus easily dispatched with. The Thing's screen time muted. No Ultimare Nullifier. No Norin Radd. No Alicia Masters. Feeble Reed. Mole Man (30 seconds of screen time) becomes good guy. Looking back, FFFS is more an FF movie in name only. This is what happens when you have 4 (5?) writers receiving screenplay credit.
Pictilli
Pictilli - 8/10/2025, 12:03 PM
@GeneralZod - agreed
1stDalek
1stDalek - 8/10/2025, 11:53 AM
Maybe it was a problem with my local theater, but the "It's clobbering time" line got drowned out by the swelling music and it barely registered. I feel like the movie should have cut the music for the short sequence of Johnny dropping him, the war cry and then let the booming impact of the punch fill the space.

Not sure the toy thing counts, that was just a fun callback to the '05 movie when Johnny shows Ben the little toy that says "it's clobbering time" and Ben crushes it. Then there's also Ben saying the thing (ha) in the cartoon so that would have counted too by that logic. Anyway, it doesn't matter they will all say their catchphrases in Avengers plus do some meme references and everyone will be happy, this is just part 1 in a likely >5 movie saga
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 8/10/2025, 12:01 PM
@1stDalek - the line worked in my theater so maybe it was a sound issue at yours.

I have had that happen at times in mine too
1stDalek
1stDalek - 8/10/2025, 12:12 PM
@TheVisionary25 - Thanks for confirming. It sucks how sound issues can deflate a scene.
THEDARKKNIGHT1939
THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - 8/10/2025, 1:42 PM
I honestly didn't even notice. Probably because it didn't even feel like I was watching Johnny Storm.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder