BETTY BOOP: New Horror Take On The Classic Animated Character On The Way; First Look Revealed

BETTY BOOP: New Horror Take On The Classic Animated Character On The Way; First Look Revealed

You didn't think the low-budget horror movies based on classic cartoon characters had gone away, did you? Check out a first look at a bloodthirsty Betty Boop...

By MarkCassidy - Nov 12, 2025 10:11 AM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: Via FearHQ.com

Boop-Oop-a-Doop... disembowel!

The Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey movies have led to twisted takes on the likes of Peter Pan, Bambi, Popeye, Mouses Mickey and Minnie... and now Betty Boop! As the public domain adaptations continue to roll on, the iconic '30s 'toon is the latest beloved character to get the low-budget horror treatment.

Deadline reports that Boop is headed to the American Film Market via VMI Worldwide. Directed by Jared Cohn and written by Josh Ridgway, the project will star Katisha Shaw, Spencer Breslin, Eva Hamilton, Colton Tran, and Devanny Pinn as Betty.

The movie is described as a “re-imagining of 1930s cartoon icon Betty Boop but told through a genre lens.”

The synopsis reads: "A team of horror podcast investigators [who] break into an abandoned theater to discover the hauntings of the starlet once known as Boop. A simple investigation turns into a horrific blood bath as they fight to escape the murderous Boop, as she is out for revenge."

A caricature of a Jazz Age flapper, Miss Boop first appeared in the Talkartoon and Betty Boop film series produced by Fleischer Studios and released by Paramount Pictures. She was later featured in numerous theatrical cartoons between 1930 and 1939, and has also been the focus of various comic strips and prolific mass merchandising, as well as two television specials in the 1980s. Boop! The Musical debuted on Broadway earlier this year.

“Getting your classic cartoon told as a horror film is still mind-blowing, but what sets Boop apart from all the other horror IPs is her motivation,” Jessica Russo, COO of VMI, said in a statement. “Boop’s dark history is extremely grim, but this telling allows her to get her power back. A true testament to feminism led by a predominantly female team.”

Jarrett Furst added: “When I learned this cartoon was entering the public domain, I knew there was something special waiting to happen. This team—brimming with extraordinary talent both in front of and behind the camera—absolutely blew me away. I couldn’t be happier with how it turned out. Get ready for a wildly violent, ridiculously fun ride… and trust me, this is only the beginning.”

Despite being an animated character, Betty Boop is viewed as one of the very first sex symbols. She was mostly popular with adult audiences, and many of the cartoons contained some sexual and psychological elements, particularly in the 1932 "Talkartoon" Minnie the Moocher (1932), featuring Cab Calloway and his orchestra.

What do you make of this news? Check out a first-look image, and drop us a comment down below.

About The Author:
MarkCassidy
Member Since 11/9/2008
Mark Cassidy is a writer, photographer, amateur filmmaker, and Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic from Dublin, Ireland.
ANACONDA: New Teaser And Character Posters For Sony's Meta Horror Comedy Reboot Slither Online
Related:

ANACONDA: New Teaser And Character Posters For Sony's Meta Horror Comedy Reboot Slither Online

THE BEAUTY: First Look At Ryan Murphy's Image Comics Adaptation Revealed As FX Series Sets January Premiere
Recommended For You:

THE BEAUTY: First Look At Ryan Murphy's Image Comics Adaptation Revealed As FX Series Sets January Premiere

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 11/12/2025, 10:04 AM
User Comment Image
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 11/12/2025, 10:15 AM
User Comment Image
hainesy
hainesy - 11/12/2025, 10:17 AM
I mean the adult movie has been doing this for years, so why not horror. I haven't seen any of these and don't intend to, but if the IP rights are up, why not make them.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/12/2025, 11:25 AM
@hainesy - I love them! And, wait...
There's porno version of Betty?! My day's schedule just got filled up!
MisterBones
MisterBones - 11/12/2025, 10:18 AM
User Comment Image
MMFRESHSW2
MMFRESHSW2 - 11/12/2025, 10:19 AM
even tho BOOP character is based on a black woman
JayLemleAgain3X
JayLemleAgain3X - 11/12/2025, 10:28 AM
@MMFRESHSW2 - Word? As a Black American, this is really cool learn. Thanks for sharing.
Ikusa
Ikusa - 11/12/2025, 10:45 AM
@MMFRESHSW2 - Back when they had class.
DarthOmega
DarthOmega - 11/12/2025, 10:53 AM
@MMFRESHSW2 - Esther Jones was the black performer, and also a white woman named Helen Kane. But both have kinda been in dispute as the inspiration. Earlier models of Betty were actually portrayed as a poodle.
kseven
kseven - 11/12/2025, 11:55 AM
@MMFRESHSW2 - she wasn't a rip off of a black woman but go off
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 11/12/2025, 12:31 PM
@Ikusa - Found the Racist neckbeard!
MMFRESHSW2
MMFRESHSW2 - 11/18/2025, 3:28 AM
@DarthOmega - it was about esther jones who mae west copied. mae was black too just like carol channing.
MMFRESHSW2
MMFRESHSW2 - 11/18/2025, 3:28 AM
@kseven - go back 2 sleep...
kseven
kseven - 11/18/2025, 4:29 AM
@MMFRESHSW2 - prove it
kseven
kseven - 11/12/2025, 10:20 AM
"Hey what if this old kid's cartoon was a violent horror movie??" = creatively bankrupt
MouthyMerc
MouthyMerc - 11/12/2025, 10:25 AM
Why are people making these shitty low budget horror films. Nobody asked for any of them.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/12/2025, 11:37 AM
@MouthyMerc - we didn't ask for them but we damn sure like 'em!
JayLemleAgain3X
JayLemleAgain3X - 11/12/2025, 10:26 AM
I have yet to find one person who isn't connected to the entertainment industry that likes these movies. Are they any good?
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/12/2025, 11:38 AM
@JayLemleAgain3X - they're terrible! And I love 'em!!
JayLemleAgain3X
JayLemleAgain3X - 11/12/2025, 1:42 PM
@lazlodaytona - Which one would be your best recommendation to start with?
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/12/2025, 4:36 PM
@JayLemleAgain3X - Winnie the Pooh. Although, the Micky Mouse one is actually pretty good.
SATW42
SATW42 - 11/12/2025, 10:33 AM
Why is it always horror? This stuff becomes public domain and you can do ANYTHING, and it's always horror...

Also, this may or may not be a popular opinion, but I really think I side with Disney and the nicknamed "Mickey Mouse protection act" because these copyrights expiring isnt fostering creativity, it's fostering absolute shit.
JayLemleAgain3X
JayLemleAgain3X - 11/12/2025, 10:53 AM
@SATW42 - It's people's weird-ass imaginations, and the fact they CAN do anything they want. Seeing the exact opposite of how we know these properties in print and film, I think the creators have a weird "what if..." fascination.

Streaming is lucrative for movies, so I assume these movies must be making some bank. Isn't there supposed to be an Avengers-style team-up movie once the solo films are completed?
SATW42
SATW42 - 11/12/2025, 11:27 AM
@JayLemleAgain3X - You could just as easily make a steamboat willie a "the lighthouse" like movie, instead of gore and horror. There's plenty of "what ifs" to be done, but we're so creatively bankrupt, that this is what we get
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/12/2025, 11:39 AM
@SATW42 - maybe the Nazis are making these films. Thus, you have a job to do!
SATW42
SATW42 - 11/12/2025, 10:45 AM
The original point of copyrights expiring is that eventually the art transcends the creator and it should be readily available for schools to use and teach it. Like Romeo and Julliet for example. West Side Story is inspired by Romeo and Julliet, but it doesn't outright ape the characters to do so and is a beloved piece of art in and of itself.

These garbage horror remakes was not the intention of copyrights expiring.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 11/12/2025, 11:14 AM
@SATW42 - The point of copyrights expiring is, in fact, artists to interpret those works into new works of art. The original copyright term was 14 years, allowing an artist to profit from their efforts for a time before they entered the public domain. It's been expanded again and again in the last 200 years to the point where, by the time a work enters the public domain, it has no direct cultural relevance.

Now we find ourselves in a circumstance where there are, essentially, no living artists who have experienced a well known work entering the public domain. But horror and porn are always pioneers. I'm sure the rest of us will figure out.
SATW42
SATW42 - 11/12/2025, 11:29 AM
@Clintthahamster - I'm well aware, I still don't think the original intention was this nonsense.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 11/12/2025, 12:47 PM
@SATW42 - I'm sure that the founders weren't like "In 14 years, I hope someone makes a version of Robinson Crusoe where he kills and eats Friday." But artists doing new things with existing characters and concepts is the point. Take it from me, I got a B in Copyright Law 101 in 1996!
SATW42
SATW42 - 11/12/2025, 1:13 PM
@Clintthahamster - it was supposed to foster creativity while also allowing “the people” to own culture instead of corporations.

Yes my thinking this schlock isn’t creative is an opinion and not fact, but it makes me side with Disney wanting to extend copyright lengths.
SATW42
SATW42 - 11/12/2025, 1:17 PM
@Clintthahamster - if there was other projects coming out that showed any originality, any modicum of not just riding on the coattails of established IP, I’d argue a different point.

This is the laziest shit ever. You know, someone could be like “I have a passion project of a Betty Boop story that was never told” or, and I don’t think this is good, but what if Betty Boop was freed from copyright and gains sentience and lives life “free”

Again why is it always [frick]ing horror. And it’s not even elevated horror or an anything, it’s 70s exploitation horror level D-list shit. EVERY. TIME.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 11/12/2025, 1:24 PM
@SATW42 - As an artist myself, I value copyright protections very highly (or I would if I ever wrote a song anyone wanted to rip off, lol) but I think the duration is the problem. If the original term, 14 years, were still in place, "Rolling In The Deep" and "Bridesmaids" would be entering the public domain this year. Even with the 14 year extension, we'd be able to make new works with "I Believe I Can Fly" or "Face/Off." But what artists are inspired by music and movies of the late 20s?

Again, not trying to defend this schlock, but there will always be schlock. The problem is not the shitty horror adaptations existing, but rather the lack of anything else.
SATW42
SATW42 - 11/12/2025, 1:52 PM
@Clintthahamster - I happen to really enjoy Baz Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet. That's an example of an artist being able to take an existing work in the public domain and make it their own and make a good piece of media, again in my opinion.

Tao of Pooh could be written now without asking for permission (it did get permission in the 80s) but it's another example of creatively using established characters in a creative new way.

My frustration is with the artists I guess. And these artists are so creatively deprived that they have me siding with corporations, as an artist myself. If this is the shit we're going to get, let Fleischer and Paramount keep the damn rights to protect us from this shit lol
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 11/12/2025, 3:03 PM
@SATW42 - I get your frustration. I've never watched one of these movies, and I don't plan to. But, you know, it is what it is. Schlock filmmakers are going to crank out schlock films about SOMETHING, this just has a marketing hook. It's a tradition as old as cinema.

The director of this Betty Boop thing has directed 21 movies in the last 16 years, including a lot for The Asylum, a film distributor whose entire business strategy is see what movies are hits and shoot quick and dirty knockoffs to beat the original to video stores (or, now, VOD/streamers.) Movies like Atlantic Rim, Transmorphers, Jurassic Reborn, and I swear to god, Road Wars: Max Fury.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, there's nothing wrong with schlock, but I don't want to live in a world with ONLY schlock. I just don't know what a heightened reimagining of Betty Boop looks like.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 11/12/2025, 11:20 AM
Just because you CAN, doesn't mean you should.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 11/12/2025, 11:41 AM
These open-domain movies are horrible. Yet, I love watching each one!
DocSpock
DocSpock - 11/12/2025, 12:56 PM

The Winnie-the-Pooh: Blood and Honey movies have led to twisted takes on the likes of Peter Pan, Bambi, Popeye, Mouses Mickey and Minnie...

Horrible ideas. What trash
SATW42
SATW42 - 11/12/2025, 2:02 PM
In less than 10 years, we'll be seeing Superman... BUT HORROR!

But instead of it being Brightburn, it will be something that's literally Superman called "Man of steel blades!" or some stupid shit like that.

"The really Dark Night" starring a Bat Man, where he, here me out, kills people.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder