How the Rumored SPIDER-MAN/AVENGERS Crossover Might Play Out...

How the Rumored SPIDER-MAN/AVENGERS Crossover Might Play Out...

While both Marvel/Disney and Sony have failed to comment, a new report has surfaced from an additional source suggesting if, when, and how Spider-Man could end up in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

By DCMarvelFreshman - Oct 07, 2014 04:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man
Source: Entertainment Weekly
In response to the latest widely-spread rumor that Sony Pictures is negotiating with Marvel/Disney for Spider-Man to somehow join the Marvel Cinematic Universe, Entertainment Weekly reached out to sources from within both camps to confirm if the crossover could actually happen in the near future, but got a solid "No."  However, "official reps for both studios both declined to comment." However, EW's "well-placed" sources reckon that Spider-Man could indeed link up with the likes of Iron Man or Captain America "in a few years from now," and that's not all. The site drops some other "facts," or case scenarios, about how the crossover could occur, again according to its "several" sources. First up, the site notes that "Sony isn’t interested in sharing its Spider-Man," especially since the studio has already lost both Ghost Rider's and Daredevil's character rights to the Disney-owned Marvel. And while the Andrew Garfield-starring Amazing Spider-Man franchise may seem to be in shambles, EW then reassures that "Sinister Six is definitely happening," which we all know given its 2016 release date. However, if the supervillain team-up movie happens to flop at the box office, "only then would any deep negotiations be had about" Spider-Man potentially joining Earth's Mightiest Heroes on the big-screen. Furthermore, Entertainment Weekly suggests that Marvel Studios does want the Webhead, but certainly does not need him. After all, the studio will be introducing many new character with the Phase Three expansion of the the shared universe. Last but not least, EW's sources suggest that if Sinister Six does indeed flob in 2016, and Sony decides to allow Spidey's rights to revert back to Marvel Studios, we still should not expect a full-blown solo reboot. Instead, the character will most likely  become a "supporting player in one of the movies already in the works." What do you think?
RUMOR: Sony Pictures Has Paused All Its SPIDER-MAN Spin-offs - Including One Revolving Around Knull
Related:

RUMOR: Sony Pictures Has Paused All Its SPIDER-MAN Spin-offs - Including One Revolving Around Knull

Original SPIDER-MAN Trilogy Returning To Theaters - With SPIDER-MAN 2.1 Set To Make Its Theatrical Debut
Recommended For You:

Original SPIDER-MAN Trilogy Returning To Theaters - With SPIDER-MAN 2.1 Set To Make Its Theatrical Debut

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
Abary
Abary - 10/7/2014, 4:26 PM
Well of course, I sure didn't expect them to flat-out confirm it.
Abary
Abary - 10/7/2014, 4:28 PM
I really do hope Sony keeps the Spider-Man rights. As much as I hate the direction their taking the Amazing Spider-Man films, Marvel is perfectly capable of making a massive film universe with the characters they have, and getting Spider-Man back will just interfere too much. Let them each do their own thing, then reboot everything if a couple of decades and start from the beginning.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 10/7/2014, 4:39 PM
EW's sources saying it's not happening right now (but might later) and Sony/Marvel declining to comment on the rumour don't add up to a solid debunk.
JusticePourTous
JusticePourTous - 10/7/2014, 4:40 PM
The only reason I want spidey back is his villains. Actually that's a lie. The potential spidey/stark and spidey/hulk dynamics could be insane...
MisterBatfleck
MisterBatfleck - 10/7/2014, 4:40 PM
Sony is one damn stubborn company. So be it, they shall learn the hard way come November 2016.
ScottMontgomery
ScottMontgomery - 10/7/2014, 4:42 PM
I thought Fox owned Daredevil not Sony...?
Kurne
Kurne - 10/7/2014, 4:42 PM
Even they said Spidey won't have his own film at MS for awhile, and I don't care. Supporting player or not, that's where he belongs.
MisterBatfleck
MisterBatfleck - 10/7/2014, 4:42 PM
Marvel be like:



While Sony be like:

Kurne
Kurne - 10/7/2014, 4:45 PM
Every time I hear Sony says no, I see Arad's face anyway.
Bekss
Bekss - 10/7/2014, 4:45 PM
What a surprise.

CaptainObvious
CaptainObvious - 10/7/2014, 4:46 PM
"However, if the supervillain team-up movie happens to flop at the box office..."

It will flop.
JoJo1982
JoJo1982 - 10/7/2014, 4:47 PM
LMAO!!!! I told y'all

Smh @Josh Wilding
Kurne
Kurne - 10/7/2014, 4:49 PM
If Sinister Six flops, what negotiation would need to be made with MS and Sony other than handing the rights back? If Sinister Six flops, where can Sony even go from there? Other than moving ahead with a sequel nobody would want at that point, of course.

Marvel Studios will say no. They'll let the rights come back knowing Sony won't have a lot of options.
Bekss
Bekss - 10/7/2014, 4:51 PM
Now we just have to wait for Sony to completely destroy Spiderman, then wait a few years for Marvel to do something with him (as a secundary character) and then we'll have another Spiderman movie
Deschain99
Deschain99 - 10/7/2014, 4:52 PM
Wait, so we aren't gonna take Avi out to the ole farm? . . .

MrBlackJack
MrBlackJack - 10/7/2014, 4:52 PM
wallhead
wallhead - 10/7/2014, 4:53 PM
@JoJo1982


they aint gonna say yes
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 10/7/2014, 4:53 PM
"EW's sources saying it's not happening right now (but might later) and Sony/Marvel declining to comment on the rumour don't add up to a solid debunk."

Pretty much this. Heck, I bet Sony themselves can't even solidly debunk this with any certainty because they don't even know their own plans for this character yet.

Where there's smoke, there's usually fire. And no one would even be discussing this, with any type of credibility, if it weren't painfully clear that Sony has no idea what to do after the TASM 2 debacle. I mean, all the rumors about Sony's indecisiveness about Sinister Six and TASM 3's release date being redacted indefinitely, all of that kind of points to one glaring thing: this rebooted franchise is awful.

How anyone can continue on and say that these are high-quality, excellently-made, perfect Spider-Man movies...well, that's completely beyond me.
TucksFrom2015
TucksFrom2015 - 10/7/2014, 4:54 PM
Wishful thinking? Iron Man 4 is possible when The Judge is in theaters, Sony's shared universe has accepted defeat, and FOX fires Josh Trank due to horrible casting decions. Wishful thinking indeed.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 10/7/2014, 4:54 PM
Considering the original reporting was about nebulous talks and conversations, then this isn't really debunking it, but actually confirming it.

Group A says: "People are talking about it."
Group B says: "People aren't talking about it all that seriously... yet."

This is not a contradiction.
TucksFrom2015
TucksFrom2015 - 10/7/2014, 4:56 PM
I heard Edgar Wright has secretly been filming Ant-Man all this time, with his original script. A trusted source telled me.
SuperCat
SuperCat - 10/7/2014, 4:56 PM
What a surprise. Oh yeah, f*ck you Sony.
staypuffed
staypuffed - 10/7/2014, 4:56 PM
Yes means no and no means yes. I have no clue anymore.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 10/7/2014, 4:59 PM
"Sony isn’t interested in sharing its Spider-Man..."

Odd phrasing. Even odder when you add emphasis like this. Could it be? Halflife 3 confirme-.... I mean, Miles Morales confirmed?!
TheDarkPassenger
TheDarkPassenger - 10/7/2014, 5:00 PM
THANK THE [frick] CHRIST THAT SINISTER SIX MOVIE WASN'T CANCELLED. WE TOTALLY NEED THAT SHIT.
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 10/7/2014, 5:01 PM
My sources tell me that tomorrow will indeed be another day.
UrichLeeds
UrichLeeds - 10/7/2014, 5:06 PM
I'm gonna agree with @JoshWilding , and say that his doesn't add up to a true debunking.

Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 10/7/2014, 5:08 PM
The headline is much better now, DCMarvelFreshman. People should thumb it up to get it on the main.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 10/7/2014, 5:10 PM
There;s not really any new info here that I can see..I mean, we knew it wasn't going to happen in the "near future" anyway, and then all the site actually do is reconfirm the earlier report that it's still a possibility in a few years.

There's some extra stuff about the Sinister Six etc alright.
TucksFrom2015
TucksFrom2015 - 10/7/2014, 5:12 PM
I believe in #TheInsidiousSix movie.
and Scott Derickson is a great choice in director. bravo Fox.

MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 10/7/2014, 5:14 PM
Which Tucks conspiracy is that? 479?
1 2 3 4 5
View Recorder