PaulRom Reviews: Transformers: Dark Of The Moon

PaulRom Reviews: Transformers: Dark Of The Moon

Is the latest film in the Michael Bay-directed franchise as bad as critics make it out to be? Or is it as good as the audience claims it is? Hit the jump for my take...

Review Opinion
By PaulRom - Jul 03, 2011 04:07 PM EST
Filed Under: Transformers



Note: the following review contains some major spoilers. If you haven't seen the movie yet and want to know as little about it as possible, you may wanna turn away. Thank you.

I think we all know what to expect from every Transformers film - thin scripts, loads of robot action/explosions, and....Megan Fox. The first film, released back in 2007, was released to mixed reviews but became a huge box office hit upon its release. The second film, Revenge Of The Fallen, was released two years later - this time to even worse reviews, yet an even bigger box office hit - and led many people to use that film to categorize the franchise (mostly for negative reasons). While ROTF certainly wasn't very good, it wasn't exactly horrible (I'll post my revisits of both films later this week) like everyone has said. So what can we expect from the third and reportedly final film, Dark Of The Moon? Director Michael Bay has promised time and again that this will be the best film in the trilogy (Shia LaBeouf agrees), but does he keep those promises? I think so.

Transformers: Dark Of the Moon takes place shortly after the events of the second film. Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) has broken up with Mikaela Barnes (Megan Fox) and has a new girlfriend, Carly (Rosie Huntington-Whitely). The war between the Autobots and Decepticons has seemed to die down a bit, with Megatron's in hiding in Africa (the first scene he's in, where he was scaring a bunch of zebras and elephants away, was rather hilarious). And yes, the Twins ARE in this film - just a greatly reduced role this time around (like what's been stated before...Mr. Bay, can I have my $25,000 now that I found the Twins?), which actually makes quite an improvement from the last film, in which they were heavily featured.

First up, the casting is a noticeable improvement from previous films. As stated before, Megan Fox is dropped out completely (which is actually a great improvement, despite her keeping the guys interested in the previous films), and is replaced by model-turned-actress Rosie Huntington-Whitely in her acting debut. She actually does a good job with what she's given, and unlike Megan Fox, she manages to be hot AND be a good actress at the same time. Shia LaBeouf turns in what's possibly his best performance as Sam to date, also improving on mistakes from the predecessors. Patrick Dempsey is good as Carly's boss, and after watching this film, I'd be totally OK with this guy playing Doctor Strange.

The voice acting is even more solid. Peter Cullen does a magnificent job yet again as Autobot leader Optimus Prime, and IMO he just might be the best voice actor around (or at least one of them). Hugo Weaving does another good job as Megatron, while Leonard 'Spock' Nimoy is excellent as Sentinel Prime, the film's Autobot-turned-villain. Everyone else - from Ironhide and Bumblebee (although he rarely talks) to Shockwave (he doesn't talk much either) and Soundwave - all do great jobs in their respective roles (with the Twins as obvious exceptions, of course!).

Explosions are common throughout the franchise, but in ROTF, the action seemed rather sloppy compared to what it could've been. Dark Of The Moon corrects these errors and makes the action/destruction top-notch - from the devastation of Chicago to the final fight between the Primes. Half the film was shot in 3D, and while most people (me included) aren't big on the growing fad of having every other film shot in 3D, but the 3D actually helps the film look awesome, and has the best 3D since Avatar (yes, I enjoyed that movie, despite its being overrated). That said, the film overall looks astonishing, and the overall darker tone helps too (as well as Bay better shooting the action sequences so we know what the heck is going on).

I only have a handful of complaints here. First, the script is relatively thin still (while not as thin as the first two), and doesn't allow as much character development as I would've liked (although, is character development absolutely needed for a film about giant robots? To some extent yes). Also, the presence of Shockwave is severely undermined. The marketing seemed to make Shockwave look like the main villain of the film, but instead has a rather small role before being killed off by Prime. The character himself was done excellently, but I would've loved to see more scenes with the 'bot.

So, in the end, Transformers: Dark Of The Moon is a massive improvement over its predecessors (even better than the excellent first film), and is possibly Bay's best film to date. Whether or not most of the Bay-haters will like this is a little too early to tell (the audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes is currently 90%, while the first film was 89% 76% for ROTF), but for those who enjoyed the other films, this movie's the Transformers you have been waiting for.

I rate Transformers: Dark Of The Moon 4.5 out of 5 stars.
TRANSFORMERS & G.I. JOE TV-MA Animated ENERGON UNIVERSE Series From Robert Kirkman In Development
Related:

TRANSFORMERS & G.I. JOE TV-MA Animated ENERGON UNIVERSE Series From Robert Kirkman In Development

Michael Bay Planning TRANSFORMERS Franchise Return - But What Does It Mean For G.I. JOE Crossover Plans?
Recommended For You:

Michael Bay Planning TRANSFORMERS Franchise Return - But What Does It Mean For G.I. JOE Crossover Plans?

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
thepurplepiledriver
thepurplepiledriver - 7/4/2011, 12:24 AM
It was better that the second one, but not as good as the first. I give it 3/5
peeandvagee
peeandvagee - 7/4/2011, 1:19 AM
@ thepurplepiledriver

couldnt agree anymore the first is stil the best but three dumps on two
marvelmark
marvelmark - 7/4/2011, 1:53 AM
4.5 REALLY? i've actually seen this movie and it's so bad i don't know where to begin...but here goes,
*Incomprehensible fight/action scenes
*Worse dialogue than fast and furious
*A story that seemingly never ended yet also never went anywhere
*Poor acting from 90% of the cast
*So many racial stereotypes i lost count
.....Seriously the list could be endless.
The film can be summed up best by the guy playing shia labeouf's dad,
"its like a bad sci-fi movie"... he actually says that in the movie.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 7/4/2011, 2:49 AM
SWEET!!!

I'll give u a thumbs up buddy! ; P

Not seen it yet, wanted to today but I'm gonna watch it 2morro!

Cool review, we need a better TRANS movie after the second one!

Great stuff! :)
Ichaos
Ichaos - 7/4/2011, 4:53 AM
The plot of all the bay transformer movies is giant robots hitting each other. This one is no different. Seek more than that from the movie and you will be disapointed. Not a great film just a popcorn muncher though it ran WAY too long and could have lived without the lame needs of the many quote from Nimoy. Nimoy has a very distinctive voice and think people got its Nimoy without slipping that growner in. Honestly I was bracing for someone to say "you have and always shall be my friend"

@marvelmark I do have to say I dont recall any stereotypes and dont think Japanese being mistaken for having gay sex in a bathroom stall is one of them. That scene was way over the top though and could done without it
Cook
Cook - 7/4/2011, 4:58 AM
4.5 out of 5? Really?! I'd give it a 2.5 or 3 at best. I agree with everything you said in your revue. The one other thing I would have added as usual there are WAAAAAAAYYYY to many characters in this film. Just like the first 2 there are to many "cooks in the kitchen" to actually prepare a satisfying movie. We've got the the boy, the girl, the girls evil boss, 16 robots, 2 off beat robot sidekicks, the parents, the wacky conspiracy guy, his butler, 14 soldiers, the new head of the Autobot/Human team and f"n Buzz Aldrin. Oh and lets not forget the comedy stylings of John Malkovich and Ken Jeong. There are just to many characters to even care what happens to anyone of them. But if you are comparing them to the previous I would have to say this was the best of the bunch. When the next one comes out, let's hope they they have slimmed down charters list so there is room for improvement.
marvel72
marvel72 - 7/4/2011, 5:04 AM
4.5/5 this must be f*cking excellent,i've never seen a cbm movie that deserves such a high mark.

4/5 yes,but films that deserve such a high rating are the likes of 5/5 are classics.

transformers 3 is half a mark from these.

-the godfather
-the godfather part 2
-scarface
-heat
-taxi driver
-the shining
-the exocist
-goodfellas
-the deer hunter
-2001

Cyanide
Cyanide - 7/4/2011, 5:08 AM
I just saw it yesterday and it was just horrible. The CGI-stuff was great. Also the quality of the 3D. But the rest...? Come on! Some of the scenes absolutely made no sense. Like the one with the boss of LaBeouf. The speeches, that were held, were so pathetic. Plus Bay obviously stole scenes from a previous movie.

The dialogues were also sometimes just senseless. Just one example with no real spoiler in it: In the german version, which I watched, there was one scene that really make me facepalm big time.
The fight between the puny humans and the decepticons was at the peak. Everybody was shooting their comparatively small arms at the big 'bots. Explosions, screaming and stuff like we all have experienced in Michael Bay's movies. And one of the dudes really yelled "Aim at the decepticons!!". Oh yeah...that's really good point. I almost expected some other dude to reply: "Sh*t! Really? I was just shooting at my buddies plus the main character's hot gf, cause there are so many other bad guys around! Sorry, dude! The many explosions around must've damaged my brain."

It's not that I don't like Bay, but that movie sucked balls. Good thing that the trilogy came to an end with this one. Story was as thin as a sheet of paper. The acting was only okay on LaBeouf's account. The rest was as exciting as stomach flu. I couldn't explain the given 4,5 stars. 1 or 2 maybe appropriate.

Sorry for writing or grammar mistakes..my english got kinda rusty...
Orphix
Orphix - 7/4/2011, 5:09 AM
@Marvelmark

You pretty much summed it up.

@Ichaos

Angry scottish robot - drunken irish robot - gay european robot, etc, etc...
Sonny
Sonny - 7/4/2011, 5:24 AM
You , my friend are crazy.... UBER FAIL
fayzon10
fayzon10 - 7/4/2011, 5:51 AM
I agree, I thought the film was great the only issue I had with the film was a few cheesy speeches and I kinda missed Megan Fox but overall I loved the movie..
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 7/4/2011, 5:55 AM
Seriosuly? 4.5 out of 5? That is shocking.
Hawknator
Hawknator - 7/4/2011, 5:55 AM
I dont remember seeing the Twins in the 2 times Ive seen this movie. They mean TWINS= Skidz and Mudflap. Not Wheelie and Brains. Sorry no 25,000.
tripttwe
tripttwe - 7/4/2011, 5:57 AM
@ Cyanide LMMFAO at your comment! My Independence Day is complete...
eatmyhit
eatmyhit - 7/4/2011, 6:05 AM
It was ok but just like all the others it seemed to be fixated on the human cast the films called Transformers not the human struggle against Robots.The last hour had about 10-15 minutes if that of the Autobots and Decepticons facing off against each other than that it was just filled with lots of running, needless explosions and lots of screaming. 4.5 stars is a little OTT myself would give it a 2.5 to 3 stars.
MagnaSolaris
MagnaSolaris - 7/4/2011, 6:08 AM
The problem of this movies is that their are NOT ABOUT GIANT ROBOTS FIGHTING EACHOTHER, it's about marines fighting bad alien robots with good robots in the background! That's what makes me angry! Oh, and in this particular movie, with the great leadership of a bipolar Optimus Prime... WTF happened to Optimus?? he became some kind of facist MoFo!

¡¡¡¡¡¡¡SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Really Optimus? Behead your enemy when he saved you and appealed for a truce, and sacrifice Chicago so "human leaders can learn" does not seem very noble behavior, ... You really are a great apprentice of Sentinel Prime!!

END OF SPOILER
Starlight
Starlight - 7/4/2011, 6:11 AM
I agree with the review and really enjoyed the movie... I guess at the end of any movie the onyle question left is: "was it worthy of my ticket money?"... in my case the answer is YES. :)
PaulRom
PaulRom - 7/4/2011, 6:16 AM
Wow, I'm shocked that this thing hit main. Thanks to whoever moved it!
And the Transformers movies aren't made to make you think, they're made to entertain. The only Oscar they can be worthy of receiving is special effects (especially this film).
@Sonny You, my friend, are sadly mistaken. ;)
@Hawknator OK, must've been mistaken. They seemed very similar to the Twins in ROTF, IMO. :P
@MangaSolaris Yeah, that scene was definitely out of character for Optimus. And (SPOILER!!!) the way he killed Megatron was definitely odd too (END OF SPOILER).

Oh, and just because someone disagrees with me doesn't mean I'M the idiot. ;P
Cyanide
Cyanide - 7/4/2011, 6:25 AM
@ tripttwe:
thx...enjoy your Independance Day ;)

@ MagnaSolaris:
I so totally agree with you!! Absolutely!!
JohnWilbanks
JohnWilbanks - 7/4/2011, 6:28 AM
I also agree with the review. Some people will like it, some won't, those that don't like it or obviously going in expecting one thing and not getting what they want or just hate the Bay-verse altogether.

It is well worth the ticket price and does what it is supposed to do - give you an exciting summer popcorn experience.
PaulRom
PaulRom - 7/4/2011, 6:40 AM
@Rulk I'm pretty sure the 2 hour 40 minute running time was just for the IMAX version. The version I watched was about 134 minutes or so (which I think is the regular theater version). Which reminds me, I should've noted that another flaw was the fact that it dragged a bit too much in scenes (especially the first half).
Braynsmasher
Braynsmasher - 7/4/2011, 6:42 AM
Good review PaulRom.

What the hell people, It was a really damn good movie. Do the posters here ever like something? Not often from what i read. It seems like 8 out of 10 articles I read, 90% of the posters are hating on the movie. Its Comic Book Movies people from fictional comic books. Its not real. Can you just enjoy what was made. Another good thing about comic books and CBMs is no one has to be permanently dead. Robots can be rebuilt, and then sparked back to life.

Oh and another thing, if it was just the Robots fighting on Earth, you people would complain where the heck are all the people. It would be silly if it was just Sam his girlfriend and all the Robots beating the crap out of each other.
bbttc81
bbttc81 - 7/4/2011, 8:05 AM
tinyurl.com/3umps6f
CBMfan001
CBMfan001 - 7/4/2011, 8:13 AM
story wise or acting even nothing average even,but the visual effects are amazing :) the first film was the best,all other films are only good for action.like i always say people brand movies as bad or horrible when critics despise them and brand movies like transformers as awesome because it earns huge,fact is what people like or watch no one can predict but it's not always based on story or acting.that is why i feel sad for GL coz overall as a film it was better than transformers 2,3, but people just didn't want to see

all lies,even a worst reviewed film can earn big bucks
blazingkidtes
blazingkidtes - 7/4/2011, 8:32 AM
It was okay but I agree optimus the real optimus would not kill megatron unless he had to some scenes was stolen from the second movie with Carly makela was mention once or twice I think but if this was the last one then I understand him doing it well bay what now maybe we can finally focus on a bad boys 3 now
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 7/4/2011, 8:54 AM
Nice review Paul. Check your e-mail.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 7/4/2011, 9:05 AM
First was the best. Pouring in lengthier action sequences may be nice, and pushing out more Cybertronians is great for selling toys... but they can't top the first film.

Here's why.
In TF, we have an intro to all of our beloved Autobots and Decepticons (even though they epic-failed with Brawl)... making them all identifiable, especially to those unfamiliar with Transformers. In DotM, there's hundreds of no-named Decepticons that all mostly look alike, not to mention the additional Autobots who may fill the roles of other regulars but may as well by original creations. I shouldn't need wikipedia to tell who is who. If Soundwave were blue, then the scene where he executes an Autobot wouldn't have your attention divided trying to tell the difference between him and Barricade.

But really, what makes the first the best is the fact that it was new, fresh, and character-driven.

Don't get me wrong - I spent $28 so that my sister and I could go see it in 3D. I enjoyed it, didn't come out feeling like I made a big mistake. But it's far from perfect. Particularly Optimus being turned into an angry vengeful leader. Looking over Chicago's state, he says: "We'll kill EVERY one of them." He ain't lyin.

Some highlights though...
*Megatron/Starscream/Soundwave banter in the desert
*Laserbeak's CREEPY assassinations
*Dutch and Simmons (if you can't get into these guys, then you don't have a prayer)
*Ironhide
*Starscream vs Sam
*Optimus Prime falcon-punching Shockwave
*Sentinel Prime quoting Star Trek AND Highlander in the same half-hour
SpiderFan35
SpiderFan35 - 7/4/2011, 11:16 AM
It was not TOO bad IMO, the comic relief "twins" were far less annoying than the ones in ROTF and actually ended up being kind of heroic this time.

I'm done with Megan Fox so I'm glad they booted her.

Optimus and Bumblebee kicked some ass in some great fights and Optimus is a stone cold killah, that was pretty cool.

I went in with low expectations and therefore was not that disappointed, same as most of Micheal Bay's stuff. They are called popcorn movies for a reason!
PaulRom
PaulRom - 7/4/2011, 12:29 PM
@Hawks Thanks man, got it earlier. ;)
@ToughGrappler well that's just too bad. ;D
@MadKing Apparently you don't know fun movies when you see one. Like I said, the movies are just for mindless enjoyment and nothing else. If you want a crap movie, go see Batman & Robin!
ohsoserious
ohsoserious - 7/4/2011, 12:33 PM
@paulrom Great movie ok review but sadly my friend you are mistaken the twins are not in this movie
Ceejay
Ceejay - 7/4/2011, 1:08 PM
TF3 was damn good entertainment and that's why people watch it. The people who want to moan about its qualities can moan all they want, doesn't mean the rest of the world wants to moan with you.

Roll on Harry Potter!
1 2
View Recorder