Watchmen: Too long. Too much filler

Watchmen: Too long. Too much filler

They made watchmen with too much filler and background of the characters. 3.75 stars

Review Opinion
By CBMcontributor - Mar 03, 2009 01:03 PM EST
Filed Under: Watchmen

CBM Comment: Hmmmm. Is this user giving it a bad review then? Nearly 4 stars is usually a pretty good rating. I'm confused.

WATCHMEN PART II Trailer And Cover Art Tease The Epic Conclusion To Animated Adaptation Of Classic Story
Related:

WATCHMEN PART II Trailer And Cover Art Tease The Epic Conclusion To Animated Adaptation Of Classic Story

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel
Recommended For You:

WATCHMEN CHAPTER I Clip Recreates Two Big Scenes From Alan Moore And Dave Gibbons' Iconic Graphic Novel

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 3/3/2009, 3:04 PM
Wow, what a review! i love how you back up your ONE point so eloquently! lol
Pierce_Highmen
Pierce_Highmen - 3/3/2009, 5:07 PM
Hey CBM, maybe he meant 3.75 out of 10.
drewthecool150
drewthecool150 - 3/3/2009, 5:10 PM
well im not very good at doing reviews one other point i have to add is that it does not flow. you go from one character in the present and then you revisit them over and over again. by the way an epic comic book movie should get a 5 stars, on a scale of 5, such as what i would have to give both new batman movies and iron man.
CaptainDeadpool
CaptainDeadpool - 3/3/2009, 6:03 PM
if there is no background on the characters how the [frick] will anybody know who they are...duh...good review dumbass
SGA
SGA - 3/3/2009, 9:14 PM
I agree w/ CaptainDeadpool and Drewthecool....the author of this needs to do some SERIOUS research.
TheLarTheorem
TheLarTheorem - 3/3/2009, 9:22 PM
I.. wait... waht? Thats it?!?!
drewthecool150
drewthecool150 - 3/3/2009, 10:12 PM
or all of you are just a-holes, there was just way too much info, they should have made it into two movies. iron man and batman were still better, and no i haven't read the novel but i probably will eventually. get over yourself
rauchsolid
rauchsolid - 3/3/2009, 11:06 PM
Too long? Too full of filler? Have you read the novel? I really don't think you have, otherwise you would agree that they had glossed over many details and the movie could actually afford a bit more length.
drewthecool150
drewthecool150 - 3/3/2009, 11:21 PM
so they should have made it into tow movies, so it doesn't get boring. and i answered if i read the novel idiot.
CRUSH
CRUSH - 3/3/2009, 11:46 PM
You made this Review with too much filler.
drewthecool150
drewthecool150 - 3/4/2009, 12:10 AM
say what you want i still don't think its even near par with batman or iron man
xaosjerk
xaosjerk - 3/4/2009, 2:58 AM
I thought Iron man sucked balls btw, this is one of the reviews that just sounds like he probably doesn't like intelligent movies, which just means he's not in a position to tell me whether I'll like it whatsoever.
rauchsolid
rauchsolid - 3/4/2009, 10:44 AM
Sounds like he went into the movie expecting TDK2 or Iron Man 2. An action oriented movie, which Watchmen clearly was never meant to be.
SGA
SGA - 3/4/2009, 11:33 AM
drewthecool....you are a moron.

You have to read the novel before you can make that kind of judgement.

Sure watchmen has a some cool action in it, but it's mostly a PSYCHOLOGICAL comic
Pierce_Highmen
Pierce_Highmen - 3/4/2009, 11:53 AM
Get off the guys back. This is a point of view from someone that never read the book.

@ SGA

I never read The Godfather before I saw that movie and I understood what was going on, by the way that is my favorite movie, and book now that I found a copy and read it. They left a ton out of the book for the movie, but it still made since. Or the Borne books, and those movies were understandable. If you really need to read the book first, then the filmmakers did not do their job. EVERY MOVIE should be idiot proof. The 4 movies I mentioned that were based on books, were good to great films, and you didnt need to read the book first to understand what was going on. Another good example is Sahara, the book was awesome, but the movie went so far from the book. Now, I saw the movie before I read the book. I liked the movie at first, but it could have been SO MUCH BETTER, now that I've seen then sourse material.

@ rauchsolid

Why shouldn't he have expected alot of action. Every single trailor and commerical for Watchmen, is FULL OF ACTION. The way they are selling it, we should expect an experience like TDK or IronMan. Not that the film should be like them, but at least the experience should be the same. That would mean a fun, fast paced & action packed adventure. That is what they are tring to sell in the trailors. So if they are giving us the bait and switch, shame on you Snyder and WB.
xaosjerk
xaosjerk - 3/4/2009, 12:49 PM
RE: pierce

"Every MOVIE should be idiot proof?" What? exqueeze me? Might as well decommission and destroy half the movies that are my favorites.
SGA
SGA - 3/4/2009, 1:06 PM
"Every MOVIE should be idiot proof?"

Wow, you just eliminated all the GOOD movies.

They are the ones with the deep complex stories that are more mentally stimulating than just some action flicks or drama movies with sex scenes.

If every movie was idiot proof, it would get rid of some of our most intellectual film makers such as Chris Nolan, Francis Ford Copala, Jon Favreau, Tim Burton, and Chris Columbus.

Sure, all these people catch a lot of flack from movie goers, but that's because they use their imagination for fun, yet intelligent movies. They push the limits.

If every movie was "idiot proof" i swear that the U.S. would be hated even more by other countries because we're finally giving in to our stereotyped stupidity.

It's because of comments like that from people like you why we're losing our intelligence and creativity. You want something hum-drum and ordinary where every person can understand it.

But if you do that, the story's just going to be strait forward and boring. There'd be no life lessons learned, no moral questioning, we'd become a nation of degenerates who conform even in our art.

We need stimulating and complex movies like Watchmen to help us better our understanding of human kind and not look for just some action flick.

I could go on forever about this...but i'm gonna stop here. I've said enough....for now.
deaditeminion
deaditeminion - 3/4/2009, 2:02 PM
3 things you need to do

1 - Read the graphic novel

2 - Reevaluate what you've said here

3 - Slap yourself


repeat until you've learned the errors of your ways
SGA
SGA - 3/4/2009, 2:42 PM
lol (i actually laughed out loud)

well put deaditeminion
Pierce_Highmen
Pierce_Highmen - 3/4/2009, 2:52 PM

"Every MOVIE should be idiot proof?"

I think you guys misunderstood what I tried to say there, or I wasn't clear enough. These comic book movies and adaptions of books, should be IDIOT PROOF, to a point. But, sometimes to can oversimplify or IDIOT PROOF too much.

I hate to keep using this example, but its a good one. Look no further then Sahara. Read that book, then watch the movie, you will see what I mean. They look all the good stuff from the book, and left it out. It could have been so much better, had they followed the book. They left out all the good stuff from the book. Kitty Mannock, the kiddnapping of Lincon and his Sec of War being the man behind the action, Linclon being put on the Texas and taken to Africa 4 days before his "assination", the slave mines in Tebezza, the UN Special Ops team that acctually helped to rescue the captors at the slave mines, then helped to defeat Kazim's army, and the worldwide extermination of every living thing if they could not find the contamination point. So in the book it was a tale of tring to save the world from extintion. Sure they focused on it in the movie, but it was so much better in the book. And the fact that Clive tried to take his name off it, should prove my point. He hated that the filmmakers IDIOT PROOFED it.

I agree we need stimulating and complex movies. Doesn't The Godfather fall into that category? Easily the best book or comic adaptation there will ever be. And that was IDIOT PROOFED alittle bit, they took out a few of the side plots, that could have confused people, and used them in the 2nd and 3rd film. But, these movies that they try to sell to the masses, need to be IDIOT PROOF. Even TDK was that way. It was complex and stimulating, but easy to follow. It also was excatly what they were selling us in the trailors and previews. A fun, fast paced, and action packed adventure.

Then you look at the movies that are not IDIOT PROOF. Memento, Usual Suspects, The Departed, The Good Sheppard, Big Fish... I can keep going. You know the difference between those, and these comic book movies? BUDGET! They are made for far less money, so they dont need to make the HUGE bucks. The comic book movies have HUGE budgets, and therefor, need to be HUGE at the B.O. So they need to appeal to the masses more then the smaller budget movies do. The studios are not in this business to have fun, they are here to make money.

To be honest, I like the comic book movies because he remind me of my childhood. But not one them would rank in my top 10 of favorite movies, for the simple fact that they are to simple. Im not saying they are not fun to watch, because they are, but they are what they are. Fun action films! When you start to expect more from action films you will be greatly disappointed.

Well if Watchmen is supposed to be this complex look at the human condition. Shouldn't they be selling it like that? Why are they selling it as an action packed adventure? If its a detective story, fine, sell it that way.

Do we really need movies to "understand human kind"? If you are learning about human kind from movies, then you are going to be greatly misinformed. The human condition in a movie, especially Watchmen, wont help us to better understand reality.
Pierce_Highmen
Pierce_Highmen - 3/4/2009, 4:56 PM
@ SGA

Never, ever put Jon Favreau or Chris Columbus in the same sentence with Chris Nolan or Francis Ford. That is just crazy. They have not directed a movie that comes close to The Godfather or Memento. Made, Elf, Zathura, Harry Potter, Mrs Doubtfire, Rent, or Bicentennial Man can never, ever compete with even the worst POS Nolan or Coppola have made. Ok, maybe they can compete with The Rainmaker.
Trioch
Trioch - 3/4/2009, 8:47 PM
OMG you are a NUB!too much filler?if anything it didnt have enough!read the book before you make a review long-filler boy.
View Recorder