DAREDEVIL Showrunner Still Thinks Of Disney+'s BORN AGAIN As "Season 4" Of The Netflix Series

DAREDEVIL Showrunner Still Thinks Of Disney+'s BORN AGAIN As "Season 4" Of The Netflix Series

Daredevil showrunner Erik Oleson has admitted that he still looks at Disney+'s upcoming "reboot" Daredevil: Born Again as a continuation of the long-defunct Netflix series...

By MarkCassidy - Mar 21, 2023 12:03 PM EST
Filed Under: Daredevil

Since the project was first announced, Marvel Studios has made it clear that Daredevil: Born Again will not serve as a continuation of the long-defunct Netflix series, but with three major cast members (that we know of) reprising their roles, it can be difficult to view the show as a full reboot.

Erik Oleson, who boarded Daredevil as showrunner on the third and final season, was asked about the Disney+ series during an interview with Screen Rant, and admitted that he still views Born Again as "season 4."

"I knew it was going to happen just from rumblings through friends in the grapevine of the Marvel family. But I really don't know what they're planning yet. We used pieces of Born Again in our season. I still call [Daredevil: Born Again] season 4, but they're trying to insist it isn't, so I'll go along with whatever they want to call it. I'm very happy that Charlie [Cox] and Vincent, and hopefully more of our Marvel friends, will get a chance to go make more of the show. I'm a huge fan of them; I'm a huge fan of the show. I look forward to seeing what it is. I hope it's great, let me put it that way."

Rumors point to Born Again being developed as a "soft reboot," meaning it won't be beholden to what came before, but nor will it directly contradict anything from the Netflix show.

Based on what we've already seen, we're not sure if that's entirely accurate (the version of Wilson Fisk that debuted in Hawkeye was significantly different to Vincent D'Onofrio's earlier portrayal, for example), but we may not find out for certain until the series premiere.

Oleson was also asked if he thinks Born Again will be able to go as dark as the Netflix show (not a chance), which could get pretty violent and dealt with some themes that would likely be a bit full-on for an MCU-set story.

"We had the ability to go to some dark places, and I'm not sure what a Disney+ version of the show is gonna look like. But we'll see. There are lots of different iterations of that character in the comic books too, so it's like, 'Is it more yellow? Or is it more...?' Who knows? But I wish them the best of luck, and I'm totally stoked to watch."

Daredevil: Born Again will be loosely based on the '80s Marvel Comics series of the same name by Frank Miller and David Mazzuchelli, but is not expected to be an overly faithful adaptation. Despite some significant changes to the story, "Daredevil versus Wilson Fisk, aka the Kingpin, remains the focal point."

Matt Corman and Chris Ord are on board as writers and executive producers. No premiere date has been announced, but the 18-episode epic is expected to bow in the spring of 2024.

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Season 2 Gets An Exciting Update Before Season 1's Planned March 2025 Release
Related:

DAREDEVIL: BORN AGAIN Season 2 Gets An Exciting Update Before Season 1's Planned March 2025 Release

GLADIATOR II: Paul Mescal Squares Off With Pedro Pascal & Denzel Washington In Epic First Trailer
Recommended For You:

GLADIATOR II: Paul Mescal Squares Off With Pedro Pascal & Denzel Washington In Epic First Trailer

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
Toonstrack
Toonstrack - 3/21/2023, 12:35 PM
Thats good, because it is.
TheyDont
TheyDont - 3/21/2023, 12:38 PM
We don't know much, but at least one character has been unnecessarily recast. I'm afraid they'll fuсk it up like most of their latest work.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 3/21/2023, 12:41 PM
@TheyDont - you said [frick].
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 3/21/2023, 12:41 PM
How did you do that?
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 3/21/2023, 12:46 PM
@TheyDont @ObserverIO - yeah, I wanna know too how to say [frick] without getting censored
EZBeast
EZBeast - 3/21/2023, 1:02 PM
@bkmeijer1 @observerIO reminds this South Park episode
Fogs
Fogs - 3/21/2023, 1:07 PM
@ObserverIO - How the fuсk did he do that???
mountainman
mountainman - 3/21/2023, 1:13 PM
@Fogs - Wait you did it too? Am I allowed to say [frick]?
Fogs
Fogs - 3/21/2023, 1:20 PM
@mountainman - I cheated and did a copy paste :)

He probably used a different glyph for one or more letters.
DiegoMD
DiegoMD - 3/21/2023, 1:22 PM
@Fogs - fuсk
mountainman
mountainman - 3/21/2023, 1:24 PM
@Fogs - fuсk
mountainman
mountainman - 3/21/2023, 1:25 PM
@Fogs - Copy/paste works!
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 3/21/2023, 1:39 PM
@mountainman - fuсk me sideways with a [electrical power tool]!
EZBeast
EZBeast - 3/21/2023, 1:42 PM
@TheyDont - you created something amazing and getting to watch it is a pleasure
Variant
Variant - 3/21/2023, 1:51 PM
@Fogs - @mountainman - @ObserverIO - @bkmeijer1 - It's the "c". If you copy/paste then type it normally, you can see the very subtle difference. I just don't know what language or substitute character is being used.

@TheyDont - Thank you for your service. 🫡
TheyDont
TheyDont - 3/21/2023, 3:15 PM
@Variant - That's the correct answer. Use my magic "с", and you shall fuсk to your heart's content :)
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 3/21/2023, 3:32 PM
@Variant @TheyDont - fuсk yeah. Feels like I possess the forbidden knowledge
generictheeric
generictheeric - 3/21/2023, 7:46 PM
@TheyDont -



Matchesz
Matchesz - 3/21/2023, 8:24 PM
fuсk it
ShimmyShimmyYA
ShimmyShimmyYA - 3/21/2023, 12:38 PM
Lololol

The studio , the actors, the creatives involved all say it’s not S4
*crickets*

Unaffiliated show runner from previous project
*gospel* do I have that right?

And to be clear I don’t care if they were to canonize the Netflix stuff , i just don’t want to see the incessant whining that’ll take place when Disney / MS hold their word that this isn’t S4 of the Netflix stuff cause they never told you it was . Charlie/Vincent thought it might be until they got the story and everything we’ve learned points to it not being a continuation

It’s Wandavision all over again, don’t set expectations for something that were never promised
TheHumanSpider2
TheHumanSpider2 - 3/21/2023, 1:47 PM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - Charlie said several wasnt it wasnt!
Variant
Variant - 3/21/2023, 1:57 PM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - Exactly!

And it's really not hard to chalk this up to multiverse workings. Multiverse versions can be infinite in variations. The MCU can be 95% parallel with what occurred in the Netflix universe. The Multiverse Saga will serve its purpose in getting all the Marvel characters under one roof and HOW these characters are universalized within the MCU.
StSteven
StSteven - 3/21/2023, 8:29 PM
@ShimmyShimmyYA - Well, I watched all of the Netflix DD shows and I say that it's actually going to be that long-awaited live action Power Puff girls show that we've all been waiting for. And I'm about as involved in this new DD show as that previous show runner so... (and DON'T even get on me about MY Hollywood connections because you don't know, man, YOU DON'T KNOW!).
StSteven
StSteven - 3/21/2023, 8:42 PM
@Variant - Yeah, I've been trying to make this point for a while now, and I'm sure that a lot of people get it, but there are probably a good amount who don't: the MS was designed to do A LOT of things (arguably TOO many) but I think that Marvel had to deal with timing among other things. Consider that the MS had to:

1. Bring closure to the IS and all the characters from it that are gone
2. Introduce a whole host of new characters (through the movies and D+) to set the stage for "A:KD" and the even larger "A:SW"
3. Establish the concept of the Multiverse in the MCU and flesh it out enough that audiences will be familiar with it and it's inner workings by the time we get to "A:KD" and "A:SW"
4. Expand the MCU in exciting new directions, such as the supernatural
5. Still do more grounded shows/movies for those fans (i.e. the "CA:WS" fanbase)
6. Give the already established/well liked characters their time in the spotlight

I mean, now that I type all that out it just seems like a TREMENDOUS amount for any studio to attempt within ANY time frame, much less the 5 or so years that Marvel had originally projected. Not surprising that they're likely going to stretch it out now that "those-who-shall-not-be-named" are out and the right folks (i.e. Iger and Feige) are back in control.

It's still a staggering amount to accomplish in one saga, especially when you compare it to what was done it the IS. So I think that even if they manage to pull off at least 75% of what they're trying to SUCCESSFULLY it will be a MAJOR cinematic accomplishment.
1 2 3
View Recorder