WANDAVISION: This Week's Retro Poster Puts The Spotlight On Teyonah Parris' Monica Rambeau Geraldine

Y not this show or this actress? This signal 🤔

@BlackBeltJones - I've been combing through the end credits sequence for days and I swear there is some Mephisto imagery before Kathyrn Hahn's name comes up at the 0:26 mark. Or i'm going crazt

@Godzillakartt - I don't like it because the first episode is actually pointless, and the story so far doesn't make sense, I'll watch and give it time to build and hopefully enjoy the ride, but so far I'm not happy with it as about 10% is great and 90% is pointless or to be connected to later. People bemoaned iron fist for this slow narrative, yet praise this show for some reason.

@Gizmoduck - If the scenes/episodes were written with a purpose (point), then it isn't pointless. It isn't up to "you" to decide if it is pointless, because you didn't write, direct, and/or produce these scenes/episodes.

They have reasons (points) for what they write and produce. Apparently, you missed the points.

@LSHF - Ah the Snyder movie fan "you missed the point"/"too dumb"/"too smart for you" comment.

You could have removed the first episode and it would not harm the show in anyway.

@Gizmoduck - No "too smart" / "too dumb". It has nothing to do with intelligence. No insult was intended on my part.

It can be very difficult to pick up on "everything" the writers and actors and directors do in every scene, especially if the viewer doesn't do all of those things. Hell, even directors miss what other directors are trying to do (the "points" they are trying to make).

I'm not one to talk (or type), either. I miss LOTS of humor that goes right over my head, and many other things. Sometimes people (even here) have to explain things to me (because I missed them).

I'm just making a blanket statement about intentions. They didn't spend millions of dollars deliberately producing an entire episode with no "point" to it. It all had a purpose. Maybe that will be clearer as the season progresses.

If we started on episode two, we would be even more confused that we already are. I think it is too early to determine if the show would be harmed without it. But we would definately be more confused.

Again, it was just a blanket statement. The dialogue, the story, etc. all had a reason/purpose/intent/"point", so it was not "pointless".

Maybe out definition of what is "pointless" differs greatly. That is what I suspect.

And, regarding "Man of Steel" and "Batman v Superman", every time my brother and I watch these films, we get more out of it and everything makes more sense, because there isn't a normal amount of dialogue that "explains" what they do. But, by watching what the characters do, we get to know them better, and upon watching the story again, their actions make more sense. It has nothing to do with "smart" and "dumb".

I watched "300" and the fights chorography was great. Other than that, I got nothing out of it. I thought "Watchmen" was pretty decent, but I suspect he (nor anyone else) actually wrote the story since it is my understanding it was almost frame-for-frame taken from the graphic novel (which I never read).

I'm not a Snyder movie fan, but the writing on the two films I mentioned earlier was much better than it appeared during the first viewings.

Stay safe and healthy.