Does MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - THE FINAL RECKONING Have A Post-Credits Scene? Here's Your Spoiler-Free Answer

Does MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - THE FINAL RECKONING Have A Post-Credits Scene? Here's Your Spoiler-Free Answer

Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning is nearly here, but does the movie feature any post-credits scenes, or is this the end of the line for Tom Cruise's Ethan Hunt? Here's what you need to know...

By JoshWilding - May 19, 2025 11:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Mission: Impossible
Source: ActioNewz.com

This article was originally published on ActioNewz.com. 

Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning arrives in theaters later this week, but is it worth sticking around through the credits? Post-credits scenes are the norm in the MCU, and many franchises now take their cues from Marvel Studios. 

Even at 62, Tom Cruise is showing no signs of slowing down, and it's no secret that he wishes to keep the door open to playing Ethan Hunt again (he reportedly clashed with Paramount Pictures over the studio's decision to promote this movie as his last). 

Despite that, Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning doesn't have any post-credits scenes. Of course, you can always watch them to see the names of everyone who worked hard to make the movie a reality.

This isn't overly surprising, as no Mission: Impossible movie has included a stinger. However, Dead Reckoning Part One did include The Entity’s distorted groan at the very end of the credits, setting up this sequel (which was then titled Dead Reckoning Part Two).

Back in February, Cruise was asked about the possibility of this movie being the end of the line for Ethan Hunt. You gotta see the movie [Laughs]. It’s a hard thing for me to discuss at the moment, because it really is something that you have to experience." He'd add that The Final Reckoning is "an epic, emotional journey of the entire franchise... It’s Homeric."

Filmmaker Christopher McQuarrie was also reluctant to confirm or deny anything. "It is, I hope, the satisfying conclusion to a 30-year story arc," he teased. "I’m pretty confident that people are going to feel that the title was appropriate."

It's been widely reported that Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning's budget ballooned to upwards of $400 million due to delays caused by 2023's Hollywood strikes, meaning it will likely need to gross close to $1 billion to turn a substantial profit. 

Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning earned $571.1 million, so only time will tell whether marketing this as the end of the line for the IMF agent has paid off for Paramount Pictures. Either way, The Final Reckoning's box office haul will be what dictates whether another movie happens, so it makes sense that a post-credits scene wasn't included to tease a follow-up that may not be made.

"Our lives are the sum of our choices. Tom Cruise is Ethan Hunt in Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning," reads the brief synopsis for the movie. 

Directed by Christopher McQuarrie, Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning stars Tom Cruise, Hayley Atwell, Ving Rhames, Simon Pegg, Vanessa Kirby, Esai Morales, Pom Klementieff, Mariela Garriga, Henry Czerny, Holt McCallany, Janet McTeer, Nick Offerman, Hannah Waddingham, Angela Bassett, Shea Whigham, Greg Tarzan Davis, Charles Parnell, and Frederick Schmidt.

Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning arrives in theaters on May 23, 2025. 

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - THE FINAL RECKONING Ending Explained By Director - And Why Post-Credits Scene Was Cut
Related:

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - THE FINAL RECKONING Ending Explained By Director - And Why Post-Credits Scene Was Cut

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - THE FINAL RECKONING And LILO & STITCH's CinemaScores Have Been Revealed
Recommended For You:

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - THE FINAL RECKONING And LILO & STITCH's CinemaScores Have Been Revealed

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DocSpock
DocSpock - 5/19/2025, 11:52 AM

If the MCU really wants to make a giant move, here is your new Magneto.

vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 5/19/2025, 11:52 AM
@DocSpock - too small?
Steel86
Steel86 - 5/19/2025, 11:55 AM
@vectorsigma - Not really. With a character like Magneto his boots wouldn't be as obvious and he flys so he would naturally be higher than others. Now would he be a good fit for the character. Probably not.
kg8817
kg8817 - 5/19/2025, 12:09 PM
@DocSpock - Wow man, I have never ever considered anything remotely related to cruise as Erik but…I can see it.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 5/19/2025, 12:11 PM
@vectorsigma -

I initially thought that about him headlining the Mission Impossible movies. If the movies are great, no one would care. Everyone initially claimed that Jackman was too big for Wolverine.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 5/19/2025, 12:12 PM
@kg8817 -

And Liam Neeson as Magneto.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 5/19/2025, 12:25 PM
@DocSpock @Steel86 - makes sense if it is written well i guess.
DocSpock
DocSpock - 5/19/2025, 12:42 PM
@vectorsigma -

I agree. I am very fearful about who they will hand FF to for writers and director. I don't think Cretton or Coogler are the right choices there. I would like to see them give to the Russos.

Steel86
Steel86 - 5/19/2025, 12:45 PM
@DocSpock - Liam would've been perfect for the original run. He's too old now. And yes I know they're looking at a few 70+ year old actors. But if they want to really milk X-Men for that rumored 10 years a 50-60ish actor would be better.
dragon316
dragon316 - 5/19/2025, 1:04 PM
@vectorsigma - don cheadle is 1 foot shorter 100 pounds lighter less muscle to Jim Rohdes comic height no one complained about his height ,

Keaton is 1 foot shorter to Bruce Wayne in comics ,

Wesley snipes is 1 foot short to blade in comics ,

Pedro pascal is 5 foot reed in comics is 6 foot tall only complaints i read about Pedro pascal is his stupid mustached refuse shave off,

Robert Downey jr is 1 foot shorter to Tony stark dr doom in comics ,

josh brolin is 5 foot cable in comics 6 foot tall

Height does not make important decision in Hollywood characters does with of fans of course what else is new not in Hollywood decisions
dragon316
dragon316 - 5/19/2025, 1:06 PM
@DocSpock - one foot really bothers fans how is it no one complains about don cheadle as Jim Rohdes , josh brolin as cable they both short to comic counter parts one have less muscle don cheadle same Robert Downey jr as Tony stark and dr doom , Pedro pascal as reed
Steel86
Steel86 - 5/19/2025, 11:53 AM
I love Mission Impossible but Tom is 62. They probably should've been done with Fallout. Tom is probably more upset because MI and Top Gun have been his only money makers. Since the Oprah couch his movies have bombed.
Blergh
Blergh - 5/19/2025, 12:21 PM
@Steel86 - Oblivion was a great flick tho
Steel86
Steel86 - 5/19/2025, 12:39 PM
@Blergh - Oblivion and Day After Tomorrow are both really good and did good numbers. I think those two and War of Worlds are the only money makers in his post couch category other than what was previously mentioned.
dragon316
dragon316 - 5/19/2025, 1:08 PM
@Blergh - it was good depends who you ask movie fans or not pickers over analyze every second in movie what movie critics do for pay check
Blergh
Blergh - 5/19/2025, 2:13 PM
@Steel86 - just because I love browsing BoxOficeMojo, post-couch Cruise stats (with x2 + 100 rule applied, note that this isn't always true but just assuming the marketing budget being normal-sized for a big studio release):

Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One (2023)
Budget: $300M
Box Office: $571M
Verdict: BOMB ($700M breakeven)


Top Gun: Maverick (2022)
Budget: $170M
Box Office: $1,4B
Verdict: BOMB ($440M breakeven)


Mission: Impossible - Fallout (2018)
Budget: $180M
Box Office: $824M
Verdict: HIT ($460M breakeven)


American Made (2017)
Budget: $50M
Box Office: $134M
Verdict: BOMB ($200M breakeven)


The Mummy (2017)
Budget: $125M
Box Office: $409M
Verdict: HIT ($350M breakeven)


Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2016)
Budget: $60M
Box Office: $162M
Verdict: BOMB ($220M breakeven)


Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation (2015)
Budget: $150M
Box Office: $710M
Verdict: BOMB ($400M breakeven)


Edge of Tomorrow (2014)
Budget: $178M
Box Office: $377
Verdict: BOMB ($456M breakeven)


Oblivion (2013)
Budget: $120M
Box Office: $286M
Verdict: BOMB ($340M breakeven)


Jack Reacher (2012)
Budget: $60M
Box Office: $218M
Verdict: BOMB ($220M breakeven)


Rock of Ages (2012)
Budget: $75M
Box Office: $59M
Verdict: BOMB ($250M breakeven)


Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol (2011)
Budget: $145M
Box Office: $694M
Verdict: HIT ($390M breakeven)


Knight and Day (2010)
Budget: $117M
Box Office: $261M
Verdict: BOMB ($334M breakeven)


Valkyrie (2008)
Budget: $90M
Box Office: $201M
Verdict: BOMB ($280M breakeven)


Tropic Thunder (2008)
Budget: $92M
Box Office: $195M
Verdict: BOMB ($284M breakeven - although a smaller release so probably a tinier marketing budget than assumed)


Lions for Lambs (2007)
Budget: $35M
Box Office: $64M
Verdict: BOMB ($170M breakeven - although most likely not given the niche release)


Mission: Impossible III (2006)
Budget: $150M
Box Office: $398M
Verdict: BOMB ($400M breakeven)


Always remember these movies have a way more profitable shelf life post their theatrical run with home media and streaming/TV Rights. And the rule I applied is incredibly flawed but can be used as "a cynic's guide to box Office Analysis"


Nonameforme
Nonameforme - 5/19/2025, 11:54 AM
Of course it didn't. None of them do
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 5/19/2025, 12:00 PM
Ive seen it. Some spoilers

I think it has too much overindulgence in setting up the action set pieces to the point that the spy angle of the MI franchise has been forgotten. Dont get me wrong, the stunts were great, but too much of it is tiring.

The set up of Ethan's past with Esai and that girl from the last movie was also a dead end and nothing was done to explain that arc.

Too much exposition at the start. You need to keep up with the whole franchise to enjoy it fully. There's one sequence from MI3 the I guessed correctly for this last 2 films.

They dont want to commit where the franchise will go and is a question mark, inspite of the "final" in the title. Guess theyd check the BO results first.

This is mid at best. Enjoyable to see in a theater, ofc, but with almost 3 hours of redundancy, i dont think id watch it again.
Steel86
Steel86 - 5/19/2025, 12:04 PM
I'm not sure what Kyle Chandler's Hall story will be but if I was Tom when they were casting I would've negotiated for a three picture deal with TV appearances. A super hero or villain would really help his brand.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 5/19/2025, 12:55 PM
"No other MI film had a post-credits scene, so does THIS ONE have one?" LOL
sully
sully - 5/19/2025, 1:55 PM
Can't wait for MI: Final Reckoning Part II: Dawn of the Final Final Reckoning

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder