Executive Producer Michael Uslan Reflects On His Long Career Producing Batman Movies

Executive Producer Michael Uslan Reflects On His Long Career Producing Batman Movies

From Tim Burton's Batman (1989) to the upcoming The Dark Knight Rises (2012), Michael Uslan has served as producer on every single Batman movie in that interim. See what he has to say about each film, including the atrocious Batman & Robin.

By MarkJulian - Oct 12, 2011 08:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman
Source: via High Deff Digest


Source: High-Def Digest

Here's an excerpt from Michael's chat with High-Def Digest.

HDD: You clearly have a love for Batman. What is it about the caped crusader that captures your interest?

Michael Uslan: He’s a super-hero who has no super-powers. His greatest super-power is his humanity. I could strongly identify with him and believe in him. Also, he has the most primal origin story that anyone can relate to on a deeply emotional level. And… he has the world’s best super-villains!


HDD: Did you face a lot of rejection when trying to get the 1989 'Batman' film made? Tell us about some of what you went through.

Michael Uslan: I was told I was crazy, that it was the worst idea they ever heard, and every studio turned me down. Favorite rejections:

"Michael, 'Batman' will never succeed as a movie because 'Annie' didn’t do well."

"Michael, 'Batman and Robin' won’t work as a movie because the movie 'Robin And Marian' didn’t do well."

"Michael, nobody’s ever made a movie out of some old television show!"

"Michael, audiences will only remember and love that Pow! Zap! Wham! funny guy with the pot belly."

"Michael, Superman is the only super-hero from the funny papers who is big enough to be made into a motion picture feature."


HDD: After 'Batman Returns' the franchise went in what many consider to be a very unpleasant direction, culminating in 'Batman & Robin,' which upset fans and scored poorly with critics. How did you feel about the film?

Michael Uslan: It was the TV series Redux.


HDD: Which of the Batman films is your favorite and why?

Michael Uslan: 'Batman' because it was my dream-come-true after well over ten years, 'Mask of the Phantasm' because some of the best stories about Batman ever made came from the brilliant folks on the animation side, and the Christopher Nolan trilogy.


HDD: What can we expect from the new film? Is there a worry about living up to Heath Ledger's much praised portrayal of The Joker in 'The Dark Knight?'

Michael Uslan: July 20, 2012. Fasten your seat belt!


HDD: You pushed to get Batman into theaters and a comic book movie boom followed. Do you feel that your efforts influenced the movie landscape as it is today?

Michael Uslan: The first Batman film in 1989 was revolutionary. To this day, Burton’s vision, Furst’s designs, and Elfman’s music seem to reverberate through all genre pictures. Their influence has been enormous and pervasive. Nolan taught Hollywood the art of the successful reboot and Bond, Star Trek, Superman, Spider-Man, et al owe what they are doing to his influence. I’m happy to let history answer this question over the years.


HDD: Tell us a little bit about your book, 'The Boy Who Loved Batman.'

Michael Uslan: It’s intended to motivate young people so that if they burn with a passion for something in life, my story will prove to them that if they get up off the couch, forfeiting their sense of entitlement that the world owes them something, and instead make a commitment to knock on doors till their knuckles bleed, maintaining a high threshold for frustration, they, too, can make their own dreams come true.


HDD: What's next for you? Are you sticking with Batman or do you intend to keep branching out like you did with 'Constantine' and 'The Spirit?'

Michael Uslan: I have many fun and favorite projects in the works from the pages of some famous and historic comic books and comic strips and now there’s strong interest in my turning my book into a feature film a la “A Christmas Story.”


Be sure to head over to HDD, there' a lot more Q&A from Michael. Also, be sure to check out Michael's book by clicking the link below.







Michael E. Uslan (born June 2, 1952) is the originator of the Batman movies and was the first instructor to teach "Comic Book Folklore" at an accredited university. Uslan is a native of Cedar Grove, New Jersey.

Uslan is best known as a key producer (another being Benjamin Melniker) of all of the modern Batman films to date, starting with Tim Burton's 1989 film, and continuing to 2008's The Dark Knight and also includes various feature-length films based on the Batman: The Animated Series and The Batman. Uslan envisioned a dark Batman, not the sort of Batman that came from the "funny books," as reflected in the 1960s TV series starring Adam West.

When Uslan initially pitched the idea to producers, he was turned down. The justification from producers was that Batman was based on a comic book, and it did not have much success in the box office. He was turned down for various reasons, one most curious and nonsensical was a executive that argued that Batman and Robin wouldn't work as a film because the studio's previous flop Robin and Marian starring Sean Connery as an elderly Robin Hood failed to find success.

Uslan views the 1989 Batman film directed by Tim Burton and starring Michael Keaton as the Caped Crusader as being most representative of the earliest take of the character by Bob Kane and Bill Finger from 1939. Meanwhile, Uslan considers the second Tim Burton/Michael Keaton Batman film, Batman Returns (1992) as serving more as an embodiment of the "almost soulless, very dark, almost vampiric" comics of the 1990s. Uslan considers the Joel Schumacher directed Batman Forever (1995) starring Val Kilmer taking over for Michael Keaton as being the closest in spirit of the Dick Sprang drawn, Bill Finger-written stories (featuring not only Batman, but also Robin as played by Chris O'Donnell in Batman Forever) of the 1940s and 1950s. Finally, Uslan sees the second Joel Schumacher directed Batman film (this time, starring George Clooney as the Dark Knight instead of Val Kilmer or Michael Keaton), Batman & Robin (1997) as being most representative of the Batman of the mid-1960s (à la the campy TV series starring Adam West).



@All_Thats_Bueno
Graphic City


BANE And DEATHSTROKE Live-Action Movie In Development At DC Studios
Related:

BANE And DEATHSTROKE Live-Action Movie In Development At DC Studios

Hayden Christensen Responds To BATMAN Rumors And Explains Why Darth Vader Would Beat Thanos
Recommended For You:

Hayden Christensen Responds To BATMAN Rumors And Explains Why Darth Vader Would Beat Thanos

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Dedpool
Dedpool - 10/12/2011, 9:18 AM
"It was the TV series Redux."
My sentiments exactly!!!

Michael Uslan rules!!!


JackBauer
JackBauer - 10/12/2011, 9:41 AM
@ELgUaSoN - Agreed. That's my favorite Batman movie.
Gnyah123
Gnyah123 - 10/12/2011, 9:52 AM
exactly
@agree with elguason
batman returns is 1 of my favorites n prob. the best after nolans
Ceejay
Ceejay - 10/12/2011, 9:57 AM
Returns was a shite Batman film, Batman paying DJ in the Batmobile and SCRATCHING A CD? The entire film had zero exterior shots, everything looked filmed on a soundstage! The midget in the ill fitting Batman suit with the beeeeeeg head and multiude of James Bond gadgets was bad enough the first time around but this time they brought us a mutant Penguin in a zero convincing prosthetic suit and stupid people in penguin suits with missiles strapped to their backs. Michelle Pfieffer's performance as Catwoman was the only good thing about the film and even her origin made zero sense. In fact too much in that stupid film made no sense, worst of all how the hell the Penguin gets plans to the Batmobile and the know how and expertise to take it over and turn it into a Bat-Toboggan!

Thank GOD for Chris Nolan and Christian Bale, take this shit seriously or don't bother!
TheAmarilloBlack
TheAmarilloBlack - 10/12/2011, 10:09 AM






Michael Uslan is the bomb.
AsianVersionOfET
AsianVersionOfET - 10/12/2011, 10:36 AM
Cool stuff. I love Christopher Nolan's movies the most.
ironknight
ironknight - 10/12/2011, 1:25 PM
@KNIGHT3000
You know Schumacher actually IS gay right?

Anyway, to the point. I can find something I like about all the movies, but TDK and Burton's Batman are the best. Never really cared for the Penguin.
ejkousc
ejkousc - 10/12/2011, 2:05 PM
Uslan is the lamest interview ever. He doesn't even answer the questions. When asked how he feels about B&R he deflects the question with a safe boring obvious observation that it was the TV series redux. Kay. Duh. And?

When asked what his favorite Batman film is he lists off 5 of the 8 theatrical releases in no particular order. Hey Michael why dont you just list all of them while you're at it.

HDD: What can we expect from the new film? Is there a worry about living up to Heath Ledger's much praised portrayal of The Joker in 'The Dark Knight?'

Michael Uslan: July 20, 2012. Fasten your seat belt!

Michael did you even hear the question? He didnt ask WHEN it comes out. He asked What can we expect? Dude's deaf.
Hellmont
Hellmont - 10/12/2011, 4:26 PM
hmmmmph......somebody should have asked Michael Uslan...Where the fu#ck were you when all the execs got together and said.......Joel Schumacher is the right queen for the job when it comes to directing the next two Batman films?

ejkousc
ejkousc - 10/12/2011, 7:08 PM
@Hellmont - Good point but honestly I think the guy only had some say on the first Batman but even then when bigwigs like Peters and Guber (and later Burton) came in they took over the operation and dictated the course. He was a little guy with a dream and Uslan and Benjamin Melniker were granted automatic lifetime producing credit rights on any Batman movie (theatrical or video) to be made. Uslan and Melniker were not really entitled to any creative say in anything since they were relative nobodies. I guarantee he is not involved in any way with Nolan's movies other than he gets a credit and a paycheck and probably has clearance to review scripts but with no actual say-so in it's shaping. He scored quite a coup in securing lifetime producing credit through his Batman Films (Inc or LLC - don't know) and good for him for scoring it back when nobody had faith in putting Batman on the big screen. But the highs and lows of the franchise can't really be accredited to him in any way. His sole worth was getting Batman's foot in the door in the first place and he has been forever rewarded for so-doing. But I think WB would have eventually gotten wise to Batman with or without Uslan/Melniker. They just initiated the process.

And yes if fans wonder why Schumacher's movies were so "gay" there might be something in the fact that Schumacher himself (as someone posted above) is in fact flamboyantly gay. It's not a diss it's just a simple observable fact. The dude is capable of making awesome dark movies like Falling Down and 8MM and he probably coulda made a dark Batman but I think he let his gay preferences dictate things (bat nipples) in tandem with WB's credo to make lighter campier toy friendly fare.

Bryan Singer is also an out homosexual and maybe that has something to do with Superman Returns being a sort of emo/angsty/effeminated soft character. He did an alright job on X-Men but the "coming out" overtones of the X-Men movies are heavily correlated to the gay cultures fight for acceptance and tolerance. Though I do find it believable and neccesarily that in reality mutants would "hide in the closet" and wary family members would ask "have you ever tried NOT being a mutant?" as if its a choice - I think the point was even more pronounced by Singer given his own biography and sensibilities.
Hellmont
Hellmont - 10/12/2011, 9:28 PM
@ejkousc

Yeah its a shame that WB Studios and FOX were never able to read between the lines of the overtones that were injected into these movies by these Gay directors who came on board with their own agenda to mock comic books and try and make their life styles relate able through the films.
I really hope this doesnt happen again to another CBM. Gay directors should either take the source material and the fan base seriously or get lost and find other projects more befitting of their talents?

ejkousc
ejkousc - 10/13/2011, 3:30 AM
@Hellmont - Well I'm not sure that being gay predisposes one to make a ill-prioritized comic book film per se. Plenty of shallow straight hacks can butcher a film in their own stupid way. Michael Bay is a macho meathead who sets his movies in a world where all the film extras are evidently supermodels and nothing less. I just think that Schumacher in particular didn't care for the source material and used the opportunity to exercise his own fetishes on screen what with rubber nipples and gigantic cod pieces and suits that look like they were laquered with lube. And the love story in Superman Returns was obviously governed by a man whose never actually been in love with a woman and doesn't know "how it works". It's a bad approximation of how hetero relationships play out. But to be fair plenty of hetero directors dumb down their stuff to exercise their own immature fantasy of a world filled with needlessly hot babes.
VictorHugo
VictorHugo - 10/13/2011, 4:23 AM
Very nice! All Batman movies have their qualities. They were all trying and experimenting to get it right.
Ichaos
Ichaos - 10/13/2011, 5:05 AM
Great so we have Nolan to blame for the insane reboot craze. Someone smack him
Hellmont
Hellmont - 10/13/2011, 6:29 AM
@ ejkousc as I mentioned earlier..... Gay directors should either take the source material and the fan base seriously or get lost and find other projects more befitting of their talents?

But your absolutley right there are a ton of hetero sexual directors who are immature and also have no clue on how to direct the most basic of action films.

But out of 3 Gay Directors who have done Violent Actions Films
Roland Emmerich
Joel Schumacher
Bryan Singer

Only Emmerich gets it right the other two have always managed to piss outside the bowl? And Push their Gay Agendas.
ejkousc
ejkousc - 10/13/2011, 10:41 AM
@Knight3000 - Yeah I've noticed a collective sense of amnesia among fanboys (that or they didnt notice in the first place) when they rip into Schumacher. It's like they aren't even aware of his filmography. The guy is a great filmmaker can go dark. We've all seen his movies we just don't know it's him. So that he turned in such shitty Batman movies goes to show that something was very very wrong at WB and there were too many cooks in the kitchen. I believe him in his interviews on the Batman DVD's which are surprisingly candid. He accepts responsibility for taking the job/assignment which was to make a lighter/campier "toyetic" movie. I don't think that would have been his impulse but that was his assignment and they paid him a lot of money to deliver. And once he was told to wear that hat then yes I believe he put on his queen hat and turned the entire movie into a west hollywood gay super fantasy.
View Recorder