Why this new Bourne movie (if the studio doesn't throw it away) shouldn't be made

Why this new Bourne movie (if the studio doesn't throw it away) shouldn't be made

My thoughts on the new upcoming Jason Bourne flick.

Editorial Opinion
By sonofsamadams - Jul 13, 2011 12:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman

The Bourne movies are indeed classics. They are fantastic action thrillers and suspenseful conspiracy dramas. Matt Damon was perfectly cast for his role as the rogue agent from the New York Times bestselling books. Doug Liman's Bourne Identity was far better than the lousy 1988 film. It followed the book really well, and with Chris Cooper and Clive Owen as the villains out to silence Bourne who has no idea who he is.


Bourne Identity was the origin story for this memorable action hero. It was a great set up for the second best trilogy of the decade. The suspense as whether or not he'll find out who he is, the girl who tags along with him will be killed or not, or if the people out to assasinate him will succeed or not is fantastically put together. Robert Ludlum would be pleased with the movie, but not entirely pleased. He would have been though if he was there to see the Greengrass films.

R.I.P Robert Ludlum (1957-2001)


Bourne Supremacy is the best out of the trilogy for me. While it has the shortest running time, its still very well paced. The final car chase sequence is arguably the best in movie history, and when Bourne pins Kiril it leaves you thrilled, excited, and changed. Supremacy continues the story of Bourne, showing that he migt not ever escape the predicament that hes caught in. It became very clear that Paul Greengrass was the perfect director for Bourne.


Ultimatum was the biggest book out of the three, and the biggest film out of the three. The Bourne Ultimatum is a wonderful film, and in my opinion its the best movie of 2007's summer. The action is a bit toned down so we know whats going on at least, but the sense, the look, and the feel aren't as good as Supremacy was for me. But Ultimatum capped off a wonderful trilogy with a bang and it closes extremley well. The Bourne Trilogy would be looked back as one of the most successful action pictures of all time.



This is another trilogy that is in danger of having a fourth movie ruin the magic that the first three films brought to the screen. (Yes Indiana Jones, I'm speaking to you) When I first heard about them coming out with a new Bourne my first thought was, 'Damon's gettin' too old, right?' Well, Matt's not in this movie. Jeremy Renner (The Hurt Locker, Thor, Town, SWAT) is going to play the popular action hero for the Bourne Legacy. Supposedly that is. Really? Is the Bourne franchise going to develop into the next Bond? Grant it there are three more books, 'Legacy', 'Sanctum', and 'Betrayal', but they simply cannot do it without Damon. This could be a very well speculation since on IMDB there is no Cast listed. But I've heard from several sources that Renner is going to be Bourne. Shame.



I've read both Supremacy and Ultimatum. Greengrass's adaptations of those amazing books held very true to their source material. (Something a few movies out there need to do) Matt Damon WAS Jason Bourne. He portrayed his character very well and he cannot be replaced. Jeremy Renner is a fine actor. He really is. I enjoy watching him onscreen, but he will never be a Bourne. Never. The plus about this Bourne movie is that it will rack in a crap ton of cash, and Tony Gilroy (the writer of the first 3 films) is coming back. But if it doesn't make a lot of cash at the BO, the big reasons might be that audiences would be angry and confused that Damon isn't back (or maybe it'll be because it'll suck)

I will say I am not a supporter of this film at all. The only franchise that was successful in the means of changing its title character and had a positive response was Bond. Bourne will never do that. Sorry it won't. Renner should stick with the Avengers and not Bourne. He'll be better off fighting along side Evans, Dowey, Hemsworth, and (Unfortunately) Mark Ruffalo. I'm not really excited to see The Amazing Spider-man either, but I'm giving it a chance. I would be excited if it was ten years from now. I'm not giving Bourne Legacy a chance. I would if Greengrass was the director, though. But my support would still be on low. If they're doing this sequel and an Evil Dead sequel, they might as well reboot the Matrix.

but that's my opinion I guess.



Thoughts?

comments?

let me know!
About The Author:
sonofsamadams
Member Since 5/17/2011
I'm not a huge Comic Book Geek, but the super hero movie genre has always excited me, and always will. I do not enjoy when people argue over CBMs like they're a religion, but i guess thats how most movie geeks are.

oh and if i had to really pic a side,
i mean really really really had to, then
DC, baby :)

but i really don't care about which is best. they both make me happy
TRANSFORMERS Star Megan Fox Seemingly Confirms Poison Ivy Interest After Viral Photo Dump
Related:

TRANSFORMERS Star Megan Fox Seemingly Confirms Poison Ivy Interest After Viral Photo Dump

Over Your Dead Body Interview: Director Jorma Taccone On Assembling The Perfect Cast (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

Over Your Dead Body Interview: Director Jorma Taccone On Assembling The Perfect Cast (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

CraptainAmerica
CraptainAmerica - 7/13/2011, 1:15 AM
I think the trilogy should remain just that
sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 7/13/2011, 5:54 AM
@Craptain

Me too man. Me too.
SCOURGE
SCOURGE - 7/13/2011, 7:06 AM
I thought it had been said that Jason wasn't going to be in this up coming film? I thought the focus was going to be on Operation: Treadstone?
LP4
LP4 - 7/13/2011, 7:49 AM
I never watched enough of the bourne films to know which one to vote for in your poll. I could care less for Damon which may be why.
sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 7/13/2011, 9:50 AM
@Scourge
I've heard many stories. Many different speculations. But the main word of the mouth states that Renner is Bourne. And why call it Bourne Legacy when its about operation treadstone without Bourne??

Makes no sense.

@LP4
All of them are better than Superman Returns so I think you should give them a chance :)
Leonato
Leonato - 7/13/2011, 3:40 PM
Jeremy Renner IS NOT playing Jason Bourne. Which is why I am slightly on board with this movie. Jeremy Renner in my mind is the next big up and coming. He's had great flicks before and I think this could be a chance to really shine for him.

Renner is said to be playing another assassin that was trained in the same program Bourne was trained in but he IS NOT Jason Bourne.

On a side note, its on good authority that Edward Norton is playing the villain.
marvelguy
marvelguy - 7/13/2011, 11:23 PM
www.imdb.com does list Jeremy Renner and Rachel Weisz as cast members without character names.
The first Bourne movie in 1988 followed the original Ludlum book.

That said, this is a franchise identified by its star. To go on with someone else without some sort of reboot is insipid. I liked Damon's work and thought he took over the king's reins of the action genre. Obviously there is more to film, why drop him or not wait until he is ready?

Ahh, Hollywood, you will throw as much stuff at the wall as long as we pay to watch it.
sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 7/15/2011, 3:53 PM
Why is this on Batman's main page?

I'm so confused.
View Recorder