Disney+ Reportedly Has Plans For Always-On Channels Dedicated To Marvel, STAR WARS, And More

Disney+ Reportedly Has Plans For Always-On Channels Dedicated To Marvel, STAR WARS, And More

It seems streaming is now returning to the traditional TV method of delivering content as Disney+ is said to be planning always-on channels dedicated to brands like Marvel and Star Wars. Check it out...

By JoshWilding - Apr 16, 2024 05:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Disney
Source: The Information

Remember TV? Well, thanks to streaming, it's become a thing of the past in many ways, with streaming giving people the content they want on demand, 24/7. 

Now, though, it seems we're circling back to traditional TV programming as Disney+ is planning always-on channels dedicated to various brands, including Marvel and Star Wars. This news comes from The Information, with the site explaining that subscribers will be able to tune into 24/7 channels featuring programming from Disney brands already on the platform. 

However, unlike many other FAST platforms - free, ad-supported streaming TV channels such as Tubi, for example - you will need a subscription to tune into Disney+'s offerings. 

Similar to most FAST channels (which typically offer people access to streaming content free of charge), there will probably be advertisements. While not confirmed, we'd guess those who pay for the higher-tier Disney+ subscriptions won't see them. 

Is a continuous stream of content you can watch on demand whenever you please really that big of a draw? Disney+ believes so and is no doubt basing this on the success Peacock, Shudder, and Amazon's Freevee have found doing the same thing. 

Believe it or not, many people still want to watch TV. FAST services like Tubi draw larger viewership numbers than Peacock, Max, and Apple TV+, as there's something to be said for tuning into a random episode of a series rather than being presented with a seemingly endless list of on-demand picks. 

In a speech to the Morgan Stanley Technology Media and Telecom Conference, Disney CEO Bob Iger recently admitted the technology behind Disney+ isn't currently good enough to "lower customer acquisition and retention cost, to increase engagement, to essentially grow our margins by reducing marketing expenses."

"Obviously, the gold standard there is Netflix," he added. "We need to be at their level in terms of technology. One of the reasons why their margins are so much more significant than ours is because they have that technology."

"We’re finding wherever we bundle, churn rates are down significantly. So that’s a path to profitability."

Presumably, these channels are part of that. We've seen a great many changes to streaming in recent years, including streamers moving away from the notion of releasing every episode of a series on the same day. X-Men '97 is a big talking point each week; Fallout, however, seems to have already been forgotten after 8 instalments dropped in one go last Thursday.

Stay tuned for updates.

New LILO & STITCH Poster Highlights Experiment 626 - When Will The First Trailer Be Released?
Related:

New LILO & STITCH Poster Highlights Experiment 626 - When Will The First Trailer Be Released?

MOANA 2 Social Media Reactions Promise A (Mostly) Worthy Sequel...Even If The Songs Aren't As Good
Recommended For You:

MOANA 2 Social Media Reactions Promise A (Mostly) Worthy Sequel...Even If The Songs Aren't As Good

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Mercwitham0uth
Mercwitham0uth - 4/16/2024, 5:10 AM
Here we are full circle. Streaming services with ads and now becoming just like cable tv. [frick] this shit. I'll stick with pirating.
JDL
JDL - 4/16/2024, 6:22 AM
Some time back we started serious cord cutting. At the time the coventional wisdom was that commercials were the problem. True or not advertisers shied away from streaming to a serious degree. Mainly they just would not pay the same money per eyeball as for linear TV.

FF to today. Ad rates have rebounded and viewership for ad-supported streaming content has gotten better. It is becoming clear that the problem was not ads and that leads me to be cautiously optimistic for a brighter future for streaming. The cable bundle otoh is doomed. I expect shrinkage to continue with channels either going dark or even jumping to streaming.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 4/16/2024, 6:34 AM
"Is a continuous stream ** ******* you can watch on demand whenever you please really that big of a draw?"

Well, when u and your buddies are 10 beers in each, and other people demand it to watch, dudes line up next to each other to create a continuous stream that feels like it'll last 24/7 🚽🧻
Fares
Fares - 4/16/2024, 7:02 AM
Finally. I always wanted this to happen. There's something about giving up control to the randomness of channels that just hits different compared to browsing and choosing what to watch from a library. I find myself rewatching stuff less and less with the latter, but when I open a channel and I find something I haven't seen in a while, it just feels great to watch or just even keep as background noise. I think a good component to experiment with would be having a chat on the side as well, and maybe premiering new content on the channel first before having it available in the library.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 4/16/2024, 7:10 AM
@Fares - i just poatwd something similar to this. Good to hear some people like me still do this
Fares
Fares - 4/16/2024, 7:42 AM
@vectorsigma - My man. I hope this new feature proves we're not a dying breed.
Origame
Origame - 4/16/2024, 7:49 AM
@Fares - just saying, cable still exists.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 4/16/2024, 8:17 AM
@Fares - its the ‘in the moment’ zeitgeist euphoria. It’s why ‘The Last of Us’ was such a runaway viral sensation. Water cooler discourse builds anticipation as opposed to just having it at your leisure. The failed ‘all-access’ model doesn’t allow for shared viewership linkup moments and therefore it runs tepid
Fares
Fares - 4/16/2024, 8:32 AM
@Origame - Of course, but if we assume it's going to go extinct, at some point, it's nice to know that some of its perks can carry on with streaming.
Fares
Fares - 4/16/2024, 8:34 AM
@SauronthePower - That's absolutely a major part of it, which is why it's a shame seeing a show like Fallout not get the same treatment. I'm two episodes in and liking it a lot, but it feels like everybody else has either already seen it all or hasn't started it altogether.
Origame
Origame - 4/16/2024, 8:45 AM
@Fares - I mean, at this point I genuinely believe streaming will go extinct before cable does. Disney+ is arguably one of the most successful streaming services, and it has never made disney a profit.
Fares
Fares - 4/16/2024, 8:55 AM
@Origame - I could see it transforming into something unrecognizable compared to what it is now. Could we interpret that as "going extinct"? Perhaps, from a certain point of view. But ultimately I think a service via internet that works on all electonic devices eventually beats any other kind of service, so I'm not holding out hope for the future of cable, no matter how long it persists. Granted, I'm not gonna pretend to understand all the ins and outs of cable technology or how it operates in different countries, so don't quote me.
Origame
Origame - 4/16/2024, 8:58 AM
@Fares - you can say that in terms of what you're interested in, but money is what matters. Cable routinely still makes money. Streaming for almost all services doesn't.
Fares
Fares - 4/16/2024, 9:16 AM
@Origame - I mean what we as a collective audience are interested in is what ultimately makes money, I'm just trying to imagine what would be convenient for the majority. Sure, subscribing to all streaming platforms is ridiculously costly, but if you can find a compromise between an appealing pricing model and the convenience of the streaming tech, sprinkle on top of it cable-like features such as the one mentioned in this article, I don't see why anyone would rather stick with cable in the long term. Am I describing an impossible scenario? I think there's still some experimenting to do to tell for sure.
As for profitability, I can't speak to it with certainty either. Hasn't Netflix announced that they've become profitable only recently? Perhaps investing in streaming is more costly, perhaps it's a whole different beast from investing in cable and it requires a longer-term commitment, perhaps Netflix got a once-in-a-lifetime advantage by being the first to do it, or perhaps they will all become profitable in a decade, I say only time will tell.
Origame
Origame - 4/16/2024, 9:20 AM
@Fares - you say this, yet plenty are doing so and several cable shows are outperforming streaming shows. You just can't ignore the reality that these streaming services are operating at a loss while cable is still going strong.

And I really don't see how it's any less convenient considering cable has also implemented an on demand feature well before even the mighty netflix.
Fares
Fares - 4/16/2024, 10:52 AM
@Origame - Sounds nice, but not the kind of thing we have where I come from. Does it come with extra fees or is it part of the basic cable service?
Origame
Origame - 4/16/2024, 11:24 AM
@Fares - with something like Comcast it's basic, though some on demand features require you have the premium channels like showtime.
mountainman
mountainman - 4/16/2024, 7:04 AM
Like or not, a lot of humans like other people to make their decisions for them. How many times have you heard a person who scrolls through the options on their streaming platform and can’t find anything to watch? When a similar phenomenon happens with a traditional TV service, they just tend to pick the option that looks the most appealing.

I have no interest in this type of option at all as I don’t watch TV when I’m bored only for specific programming, but a lot of people who like to sit in front of the TV for long periods of time will welcome this option.
MotherGooseUPus
MotherGooseUPus - 4/16/2024, 8:12 AM
@mountainman - man, i never thought of it that way lol. I'm on both ends. I watch alot of tv, but only for specific shows when i work out, and only for hockey/football/baseball/golf. when i'm not watching something specific, i just put on whats most appealing like you said.

On Netflix/Amazon Prime; unless im by myself and watch something on my watchlist, it takes FOREVER for my better half to find something to watch lol.

Im not sure how this will affect me moving forward as i pay for Disney+ ONLY for specific shows they have; XMen 97, Loki, Mando etc.... wondering if i can cancel and still watch those shows
mountainman
mountainman - 4/16/2024, 8:17 AM
@MotherGooseUPus - Oh I’ll amend my previous statement, I’m ok with sports on in the background. I like to watch the handful of teams I’m a fan of or good UFC cards (like the last one!!!). My wife watches more than me and I just can’t sit and watch random shows, like what this new feature seems to be offering.
MotherGooseUPus
MotherGooseUPus - 4/16/2024, 9:36 AM
@mountainman - i really only watch TV during the week for the following:
1. when i work out
2. eating dinner
3. just relaxing after a long day of work before bed

on the weekends i only watch TV/Movies with the lady after we have been out to dinner or at a friends.

when i was single, i used to binge TV shows or movies, but not anymore. i'd much rather be outside or doing something unless it's rainy and miserable outside lol
mountainman
mountainman - 4/16/2024, 9:59 AM
@MotherGooseUPus - Oh I used to watch a lot more too. But I’ve just prioritized other things in my current lifestyle.

For me it’s:
- 1 episode of a show that wife and I can watch together after the baby is asleep. Currently bouncing between The Wire, Shogun, and Reacher. Next up coming soon is Fallout.
- Sports at times. NFL when my team is playing (Chargers) or just random games. With few overall games it’s easier to keep up. Soccer and Baseball too but I don’t keep up with it all, even if my team is playing. And I’ll watch other sports when big tournaments or playoffs occur.
- Movies on the weekends. Random stuff or we always will pick a series and watch the whole thing through 1 movie per week. Currently going through Transformers and the Fox mutant movies are next leading up to Deadpool & Wolverine.

I just can’t have it on for hours a day. It gets in the way of things I deem as more important to spend my time on.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 4/16/2024, 7:09 AM
Id go with this. i still have cable, rarely use netflix and disney+, and would prefer background movies playing like in HBO.

I remember not missing any marvel movies when it was still in our cable movie channels. Now i cant even play one on Disney+
WarMonkey
WarMonkey - 4/16/2024, 7:31 AM
I love the pro argument for this..."Thank you for giving me the option to pay for your service so I can receive many more ads and not decide what to watch cause I can just watch your channel selections all day in the background!!!"

Just get cable y'all. lol

BTW they wouldn't be doing this is their streaming service and it's shows were a success. Here's a Forbes article talking about how much Lucasfilm has lost since they bought it...

Disney ‘Star Wars’ Box-Office Profits Fail To Cover Cost Of Buying Lucasfilm
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinereid/2024/04/14/disneys-star-wars-box-office-profits-fail-to-cover-cost-of-lucasfilm/?sh=4adb62d76bb7
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 4/16/2024, 8:21 AM
@WarMonkey - not buying into this tripe for even a second

Force Awakens, bad as it was, is the #1 domestic grossing movie of all time, and it’s not even close

Not number two.

Number 1!

The perpetual hype on Baby Yoda/Grogu, coupled with the runaway box office (whatever you think of the actial films themselves) has MORE than paid off that acquisition

Forbes be runnin out the C-team on this nonsense
WarMonkey
WarMonkey - 4/16/2024, 9:31 AM
@SauronthePower - The article mentions the success of TFA FYI. I'll simplify it for you, if someone says they made $100 but doesn't tell you that they spent $101 to get there then that is deceptive and they actually loss $1.00. In a nutshell, that's what Disney did and the records from England that are disclosed by public record laws proves it.
SauronthePower
SauronthePower - 4/18/2024, 6:38 PM
@WarMonkey - Chapek trotted out his pantsuit wunderkind CFO (cannot recall her name and too uninterested to look it up) who proudly, and pointedly, stated that ‘Endgame’ would NEVER be profitable (this is AFTER the 358mil opening weekend that literally annihilated the previous opening record by a cool hundred mil) in order to bully a narrative that Marvel required too much financial outlay commitment

I’ll simplify it for you: Hollywood is one giant money-laundering scheme designed to skew studio ‘sacrificing for the artistic vision’ narrative as studio leverage against said ‘artists’
TheShape9859
TheShape9859 - 4/16/2024, 8:19 AM
Disney+ just needs to add Hulu+ Live TV and be done. Keep the separate aps however for those that don't bundle...
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder