FANTASTIC FOUR: Cillian Murphy Rumored To Be Marvel's Top Choice To Play Doctor Doom

FANTASTIC FOUR: Cillian Murphy Rumored To Be Marvel's Top Choice To Play Doctor Doom

A new rumor is claiming that Cillian Murphy (The Dark Knight, Oppenheimer) is Marvel Studios' top pick to play the villainous Doctor Doom in the upcoming Fantastic Four reboot...

By MarkCassidy - Nov 26, 2023 12:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Fantastic Four

With the SAG-AFTRA and WGA strikes at an end, Marvel Studios is back to casting the main roles for the upcoming MCU Fantastic Four reboot, and while this is just a(nother) rumor for now, we can see it generating a lot of excitement.

According to MTTSH, Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer, Batman Begins, Inception) is now the studio's top choice to play Doctor Doom in the movie.

Murphy has been a fan-favorite pick to play the iconic villain for quite a while, so if this is accurate, it's bound to go over well with the Fantastic Four faithful. Of course, even if an offer is made, there's nothing to say the Irish actor would be interested, and it sounds like there are several other contenders.

Previous rumors have claimed that both Ryan Gosling and Josh Hartnett were in the mix to play Doom, and both actors are still said to be in with a chance of landing the part. More recently, we heard that Ralph Fiennes (Harry Potter, In Bruges) and Jason Clarke (Oppenheimer, Lawless) might be on the studio's radar, Mads Mikklesen (Rogue One, Doctor Strange) was reportedly offered the gig, but presumably declined if they've now moved on to Murphy.

The team's most prolific foe is not expected to have a significant role in the reboot (in fact, he may only show up in the post-credits scene), but the villain could well emerge as the new big bad of the Marvel Cinematic Universe - especially if the studio does decide to pivot away from Kang (Jonathan Majors).

Several well-placed sources have claimed that Doom will be the main villain of Avengers: Secret Wars.

Production is reportedly set to commence slightly earlier than expected, and Marvel is believed to want to announce the entire cast at once. So far, the only "confirmed" actor is Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards, but he will likely be joined by Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm, aka the Invisible Woman, Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm, aka the Human Torch, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach as Ben Grimm, aka the Thing.

Javier Bardem is said to be the top choice for Galactus, but his schedule may prevent him from signing on. The Eater of Worlds' herald is believed to be Silver Surfer, but a female take on the character. A recent rumor claimed that Anya Taylor-Joy is being eyed for that role.

Matt Shakman will direct FF from a script by Jeff Kaplan and Ian Springer. Plot details are still a mystery, but Kevin Feige has confirmed that this will not be another origin story for the super-team.

“A lot of people know this origin story. A lot of people know the basics. How do we take that and bring something that they’ve never seen before?” he said in a 2022 interview, comparing this new take on the heroes to Marvel Studios' pact with Sony to bring Spider-Man into the MCU. “We’ve set a very high bar for ourselves with bringing that to the screen.”

Fantastic Four is set to be released in theaters on May 2, 2025.

New Video Reveals Best Look Yet At Pedro Pascal's Reed Richards Look In THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS
Related:

New Video Reveals Best Look Yet At Pedro Pascal's Reed Richards Look In THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS

FANTASTIC FOUR - Comic Accuracy or Historical Accuracy: Why It Is Important (UPDATED)
Recommended For You:

FANTASTIC FOUR - Comic Accuracy or Historical Accuracy: Why It Is Important (UPDATED)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
JFerguson
JFerguson - 11/26/2023, 12:24 PM
Rumor by MyTimeToShineHello 😂
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/26/2023, 12:29 PM
@JFerguson - somehow they already ran out of credible sources lol
Itwasme
Itwasme - 11/26/2023, 12:24 PM
I hate this.

I mean he's a great actor and would kill it, but aren't we supposed to hate all castings before we see it play out? Isn't that the rule around here?
jst5
jst5 - 11/26/2023, 2:07 PM
@Itwasme - Superman cast getting tons of love around here so doesn't seem to be a rule.
dragon316
dragon316 - 11/26/2023, 6:19 PM
@Itwasme - that’s rule of fan casting not to everyone I’m fine with it kang in comics is white actor play kang is black no one complained
URCOMMENTSUCKS
URCOMMENTSUCKS - 11/26/2023, 12:25 PM
Meh. Doesn't have the threatening presence Doom should have. His voice is not deep enough. Plus too old.

Then again, when did the MCU was good with its supervillain casting choices? It has always been half and half. On one half they waste great actors for roles that are beneath them, on another they cast wrong actors for the roles. Then occasionally they can strike gold.

Also, I'm pretty sure Murphy has said that he can't stand capeshit.
whoknows
whoknows - 11/26/2023, 2:22 PM
@URCOMMENTSUCKS - what do you think about Henry Cavil for Dr Doom?
MCUKnight11
MCUKnight11 - 11/26/2023, 12:25 PM
If you have Pascal, Kirby and Bardem in the same cast, you need someone of that caliber to be believable that they are contemporaries.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/26/2023, 12:28 PM
Typical..I thought you guys learned your lesson. No toast, no RPK, no timetoshine. This is the dumbest [frick]ing rumor so far
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/26/2023, 12:30 PM
Fake rumors for all of F4. Watch me make a Twitter account, pay 8 bucks and make up crap. You'll eat it up
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/26/2023, 12:37 PM
@bobevanz - Yeah, they never get anything right... oh wait, didn't I just recently school you on the Jimmy Olsen article? I guess that was just a lucky guess? And RPK getting the jump on the trades with the Pedro Pascal news... just pulled it out of his ass? Sit down.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/26/2023, 1:13 PM
@MarkCassidy - a broken clock is right twice a day, don't kid yourself. And we're still waiting on CONFIRMATION for Pedro. Be better.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 11/26/2023, 1:14 PM
@MarkCassidy - I'll start keeping track just for you buttercup
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 11/26/2023, 1:18 PM
@bobevanz - lol... Sure. And whether Pascal lands the role or not, the point is Rpk broke the story before the trades. These guys clearly have legit sources. Does everything they post prove accurate? Of course not, hence the rumor tag. But they're still more than worth covering for the stuff they do get right. But by all means, keep whining on every rumor article... At this stage it's good for a laugh.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 11/26/2023, 1:30 PM
@MarkCassidy - Problem is even if they are hearing whispers from somewhere legit, directly or indirectly, when the same couple of 'scoopers' have already thrown out a dozen names for each role are they even worth listening to any more by this point. They 'are considering' or 'on the list' is as meaningless as fancasts when they are throwing out a new name every other day.

Reporting on it, fair enough I guess but been too many that will be wrong to trust anything anymore, specicialy on F4 castings.

Now, if the discussions here were more civilised more oft and we could rationaly debate in an adult fassion on such things all would be fine, reliable or not, but as is of late...
1 2 3
View Recorder