THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS: First Look At Practical Thing Suit Revealed Along With A Deleted Dating Scene

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS: First Look At Practical Thing Suit Revealed Along With A Deleted Dating Scene

A first look at the practical suit worn by actor and professional wrestler Richard Summers-Calvert on the set of The Fantastic Four: First Steps has been revealed, along with a deleted scene from the film.

By JoshWilding - Jul 28, 2025 06:07 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantastic Four

Much of The Fantastic Four: First Steps' Earth-828 was brought to life with practical effects, and we're sure you'll remember set photos showing a "real" version of The Thing. 

The character was brought to life with visual effects (unlike the 2005 and 2007 Fantastic Four movies), but this stand-in was used on set to give the cast and VFX artists some much-needed reference material. Now, we know who was in the suit, and it wasn't Ebon Moss-Bachrach.

Actor and professional wrestler Richard Summers-Calvert has confirmed that he was the practical Ben Grimm in The Fantastic Four: First Steps, while sharing new behind-the-scenes photos from the reboot's set. 

You can take a closer look at Summers-Calvert as The Thing in the Instagram post below. 

Marvel Studios, meanwhile, has released a new deleted scene from The Fantastic Four: First Steps showing Ben Grimm on a dating show. Leaked trailers from D23 and Comic-Con included an early version of this sequence from test footage, and it was clearly shot for real afterwards.

Over the weekend, many fans have discussed the reboot's omission of several scenes from trailers and set photos. However, that's pretty normal for an MCU movie, and it seems much of this material (including the Sunday night dinner scene below) was filmed purely for promo material. 

Set against the vibrant backdrop of a 1960s-inspired, retro-futuristic world, Marvel Studios' The Fantastic Four: First Steps introduces Marvel’s First Family—Reed Richards/Mister Fantastic (Pedro Pascal), Sue Storm/Invisible Woman (Vanessa Kirby), Johnny Storm/Human Torch (Joseph Quinn) and Ben Grimm/The Thing (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) as they face their most daunting challenge yet.

Forced to balance their roles as heroes with the strength of their family bond, they must defend Earth from a ravenous space god called Galactus (Ralph Ineson) and his enigmatic Herald, Silver Surfer (Julia Garner). And if Galactus’ plan to devour the entire planet and everyone on it weren’t bad enough, it suddenly gets very personal.

Also appearing are Natasha Lyonne as Rachel Rozman, Paul Walter Hauser as Harvey Elder/Mole Man, Sarah Niles as Lynne Nichols, and Mark Gatiss as Ted Gilbert. John Malkovich was set to play Red Ghost, but was cut due to time constraints.

The Fantastic Four: First Steps is directed by Matt Shakman from a screenplay by Josh Friedman and Eric Pearson and Jeff Kaplan & Ian Springer.

The movie is set to be released in theaters on July 25, 2025.

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Opens To $218 Million Worldwide As SUPERMAN Soars Beyond $500 Million
Related:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Opens To $218 Million Worldwide As SUPERMAN Soars Beyond $500 Million

MCU Multiverse Saga Movies Ranked According To Rotten Tomatoes (Including THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS)
Recommended For You:

MCU Multiverse Saga Movies Ranked According To Rotten Tomatoes (Including THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 7/28/2025, 6:57 AM
Idk if the dinner footage or Ben being a dating show were ever going to be in the actual film since they seem to be material made just for promotion (though the latter could have set the stage for him trying to find love with Natasha Lyonne’s character).

I do wish they had kept atleast a couple of the scenes from the trailers such as Reed’s “I stretched the bounds of space” talk with Sue or her talking to Ben aswell as shots like this…

User Comment Image

Anyway , I still found it to be a satisfying & solid film overall so I guess it didn’t hurt that much.
MisterBones
MisterBones - 7/28/2025, 8:56 AM
I remember this was a part of the teaser last year. They should've kept this in. Would've added to Ben's arc of loneliness which you could tell they were trying to get at, but ultimately did not. He had a family but you could see he was looking for a different kind of love and connection with the teacher. A lot was cut, you can tell.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 7/28/2025, 9:57 AM
@MisterBones - which is a shame. The theme of The Thing having the appearance of a monster, and Ben grappling with his curse, should have been explored in the film, including an introduction to Alicia Masters and how her blindness is her 'curse' yet she is attracted to Ben Grimm, the man on the inside. This omission, and omitting Norrin Radd's story (his Faustian bargain with Galactus) were huge misses, keeping a good film from being a great one.

The filmmakers appointed a committee of 4 screen writers to come up with the script. It's as if they wanted to present the simplest story possible.
Steel86
Steel86 - 7/28/2025, 10:23 AM
I really enjoyed the film. It is like 90% story. Just rewatched the original two F4 films. This film is alot better overall but I will say Johnny and Thing's relationship was portrayed better in the og films imo. And eventhough I liked that they gave Johnny more and showed he was smart in this movie I think Johnny as a character was better in the og films. Honestly if they added instead of subtracting and adding to Johnny he would have been perfect.
Pictilli
Pictilli - 7/28/2025, 10:45 AM
The Thing looked good but man did his voice suck here. Ebon Moss Bachrach clearly only played himself with the voice he did because he knows he is barely in the film otherwise, and not even in the practical suit.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder