Anthony Stark Reviews: THE HOBBIT: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES

Anthony Stark Reviews: THE HOBBIT: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES

Yesterday, Peter Jackson's Middle-Earth finale hit the big screen worldwide, and is considered by some the best, and by some the worst movie in the Hobbit franchise. Hit the Jump, and check out my spoiler-free thoughts on the film!

Review Opinion
By r3negade - Dec 18, 2014 08:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Fantasy
The sixth and supposed "last" film in the Lord of the Rings universe has just made it's way to the big screen, so I took a bunch of friends and fellow nerds to check it out and see if it was worth the watch. Scroll down below to check out my spoiler-free thoughts on the plot, the characters, action and more!





By now, most of you know that the film is shorter than any of the other films in Peter Jackson's Middle-Earth universe. So with a final battle around 45 minutes long, you already know that the plot is pretty weak compared to the previous films. Unlike most films in a franchise, this one picks up right after the ending of The Desolation of Smaug, making it a lot easier to marathon the trilogy. But the first two had so much story and not that much action, that this one makes up for them. Which brings us to our next topic, the action.

As I previously stated, the action wasn't much in An Unexpected Journey and The Desolation of Smaug, so they make up for it, bringing us one of the coolest scenes in the Hobbit franchise by kicking it off with Smaug. The REAL Desolation this time. And they didn't stop there. The entire film built up to a huge scaled finale, featuring no long, boring scenes, and keeping you excited with plenty of battles between good and evil. So the action was one of the best elements of the film, but what's action without the characters?

In the book and the previous films, it seemed as if it was "Bilbo's movie", focusing only on him with everyone else as side characters. The Battle of the Five Armies nearly reversed the roles, giving everyone else that needed to a chance to shine, which was needed and appreciated, yet still giving Bilbo some focus.

If you know anything of the Hobbit movies, you know that Legolas and other characters that weren't in the book were brought into the films. In the second film heroes such as him and Evangeline Lilly's 'Tauriel' seemed as if they didn't belong in the film, but their roles were more fitting in this one, and the film wouldn't be the same without them.

Normally I discuss the graphics, but if you've seen the other two films, you'll know that the graphics pretty well stay equal through the series, so they're great, but not really anything new or spectacular.




So to sum up the film, it was great. It was a well-made finale to a well-made film series, And quite likely the best of the trilogy. It certainly needed more plot and like the other films, featured some silly and unnecessary moments, as well as some hints to the original franchise, but definitely showed emotion when it wanted to. I give The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies 4 stars.




Thanks for reading, and as always, be sure to drop a comment below!
HIGHLANDER Will See MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Play A Warrior With 500 Years Of Martial Arts Training
Related:

HIGHLANDER Will See MAN OF STEEL Star Henry Cavill Play A Warrior With 500 Years Of Martial Arts Training

WICKED Is The Clear Box Office Winner As Musical Goes Head-To-Head With GLADIATOR II - Glicked Begins!
Recommended For You:

WICKED Is The Clear Box Office Winner As Musical Goes Head-To-Head With GLADIATOR II - "Glicked" Begins!

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 12/18/2014, 6:50 AM
Saw it last night and it was very good not great but very good!

The Dwarves were awesome and IronFoot was fun to watch!
NeoBaggins
NeoBaggins - 12/18/2014, 9:26 AM
The film is [frick]ing awesome and its a great climax to the series. The final fights, the intimate fights, are incredible. I was jarred by the CGI Bolg VS Legolas in Desolation, but this time, not only are the fights epically choreographed and in sync, but the CGI VS human fights are seamless.

This one felt more in tune with Lord of the Rings tho it wasn't obligated too. I saw it first in IMAX3DHFR which is the worst thing to happen to film, then, in wannabe IMAX3D and loved it. Next, standard 3D or just standard- depending on what starts first.
batz11
batz11 - 12/18/2014, 9:40 AM
Doops sucks. Nice review, can't wait to see it...
Battabing
Battabing - 12/18/2014, 10:04 AM
This was a very good movie, but I felt like something was just missing.
It just kinda lacked the punch that Return of the King had. Still, I greatly enjoyed it.
Azazel1
Azazel1 - 12/18/2014, 10:51 AM
The entire film looked like one giant video game..

The whole series was shit...

This one was a tad better but still shit...

Peter Jackson is the new George Lucas of this generation...
ThedamnBatman
ThedamnBatman - 12/18/2014, 10:59 AM
Good review, but I'm still on the fence of seeing it in the theaters
Mike89
Mike89 - 12/18/2014, 11:05 AM
The movie was good. But doesnt hold a candle to the LOTR trilogy.

That alfred guy was annoying.
ekrolo2
ekrolo2 - 12/18/2014, 11:13 AM
I too think this is the best of them all though I don't think any of them hold a candle to LOTR. It'll be interesting to see how they work in unison when played together at home as I think it'll work better in that format then in the theaters.
SpideyQuad
SpideyQuad - 12/18/2014, 11:20 AM
I think Peter Jackson was a victim of his own self in that it seemed as if he were constantly trying to outdo himself. The problem with this is the Hobbit is not the Lord of the Rings. In no way should it be it's equal let alone more. It's a pity they came out in the order that they did. That said, I love everything middle Earth and I love these movies. I hope we get more in the future. Only whoever does them needs to trust the material.
pintoman
pintoman - 12/18/2014, 1:30 PM
No, actually, Desolation of Smaug did not feel like Bilbo's journey,
HelaGood
HelaGood - 12/18/2014, 1:41 PM
can someone explain why Billy Connelly's Dain was all CG????
HelaGood
HelaGood - 12/18/2014, 1:55 PM
Nevermind... I found this:

"The reason why was because when filming Billy Connolly couldn't get through a whole take without forgetting his lines due to his Parkinson's / Alzheimers. In the end they sent him back home (from NZ) and managed to voice record him later."
MCott
MCott - 12/18/2014, 2:22 PM
Saw the movie. I enjoyed it more than DOS. My nitpicks were that I felt there was WAY too much Alfrid (he was funny the first couple of times, but then it got old). And, as awesome as it was, I felt the Expulsion of the Necromancer from Dol Guldur felt kind of rushed.

Oh, and there's no "supposed" about it. This will indeed be the LAST Middle-Earth film. Tolkien's family absolutely refuses to sell anymore film rights. (Actually, Tolkien himself only sold the film right to the Hobbit and LOTR to pay off some taxes, otherwise he wouldn't have at all).

And everyone complains that they reduced Bilbo to a side character. They didn't. This is something I noticed in Lord of the Rings as well. Within these stories, there is multiple plots and arcs going on. What Jackson does is he tells those multiple arcs, but in each movie, he pays more attention to one character than the others:
*Fellowship focused on Frodo
*Two Towers focused on Aragorn
*Return of the King focused on Gandalf
(you could also debate Fellowship focused on Gandalf and Return focused on Frodo)
It's the same thing with the Hobbit movies:
*Unexpected Journey focused on Bilbo
*Desolation of Smaug focused on Gandalf
*BOTFA focused on Thorin

Now that I've seen all three of them (almost-- waiting on the Extended Edition of this one of course), I can rank them.

1. Battle of the Five Armies
2. Unexpected Journey
3. Desolation of Smaug (I understand having to omit and change some details from the book for screen time... but they just changed so much in this one)
Kur5e
Kur5e - 12/19/2014, 2:59 AM
Are u all blind? This movie sucked so bad. It was a total letdown compared to LotR. I know it should stand on its own but those fightscenes were so over the top and physics never ever deployed. In addition I was never worrying about any of the characters. Story was flat and Alfrid was JarJarBinks. I'll rate this with a 2/10 max and I am a huge fan of PJ previous works. Its just that he failed in this triology except for a few cool moments like the riddle scene or Smaugs awakening. Overall it looked like the screenplay was written by a 7 year old child when playing with toys.
I have to mention here that I am a big Tolkienfan and I've read all of his Middle-Earth related books several times, already before the LotR came out in 2001. I was so fired up for this triology... In the end I only got disappointed.
Kur5e
Kur5e - 12/19/2014, 3:01 AM
I'll rate his middle earth movies in chronological order

Fellowship of the Ring 10/10
The two Towers 9/10
Return of the King 9.5/10
An unexpected Journey 6/10
Desolation of Smaug 6/10
Battle of the lols 2/10
Feedthemachine
Feedthemachine - 12/19/2014, 1:32 PM
I'm the biggest LOTR nerd out there, but god, this franchise was awful.
Raiden92
Raiden92 - 12/26/2014, 11:35 AM
People will complain and nitpick because thats who we are, but The Hobbit films have been fantastic fun. It doesn't match Lord of the Rings caliber, but neither did the book. Yes, it takes some liberties but the differences made for a better film experience I think. Everything from the performances, battles, special effects, production, script, Howard Shore's epic score, & just the overall fun have been unlike any film experience I've had since Return of the King. Peter Jackson has done a brilliant job once again

People complain that they made a trilogy out of just one book. But I'm glad they did. The book kinda had bad pacing, everything seemed to be really rushed and way to quick pased, plus we don't get to know anything on the characters besides ther names with exception of Bilbo... The movies on the other hand take ther time to develop the characters and the story.

those fightscenes were so over the top and physics never ever deployed. < and this coming from someone who have the avatar of the fake Kurse in Thor: The Dark World? Don't dare say that Thor: The Dark World have good battle scenes... actually there isn't a marvel movie with battle and action scenes as good as The Hobbit's movies.

I have to mention here that I am a big Tolkienfan and I've read all of his Middle-Earth related books several times, already before the LotR came out in 2001. I was so fired up for this triology... In the end I only got disappointed. < and it's coming from someone who liked Thor The Dark World? because that movie was ten thousand times more different from the original source and ten thousand times more disappointed for a true Thor's fan. If you really know who Kurse is, you wouldn't dare take his name and there use the avatar of the movie. Because the movie version sucked. Unlike The Hobbit movies who may have added something but at least they respect the spirit and the source. The exact oppost of Thor The Dark World, a trash who completely ridicolize the world of Thor.

The movie was good. But doesnt hold a candle to the LOTR trilogy. < neither did the book. Considering how The Hobbit book is inferior to the LOTR books, the reason I like The Hobbit movies is because they added more elements in order to make it feel much more true to the Middle-Earth's world.

"The entire film looked like one giant video game..

The whole series was shit...

This one was a tad better but still shit...

Peter Jackson is the new George Lucas of this generation... " < coming from someone who acclaim the x-men series this is hypocrisy. And even more, this sound more like the typical internet-mania of nitpick and simply mania of repeating the insult you hear from another about a movie. I bet you don't even saw it.

George Lucas is one of the greatest directors ever existed and Star Wars is one of the greatest cinema's franchise. Oh, but I bet now they will come the nerds who are gonna see that the prequels sucks. You wanna know what really ruined Star Wars? Not the CGI, not the green screen. Star Wars was ruined by [frick]ing stupid nerds who complain about everything not being like their perfect 80s years movies.

The Hobbit trilogy was ruined by the same kind of nerds. People who nitpick about CGI and changing from the original sources. The same people who later cheering about Guardians of the Galaxy as the greatest movie of 2014.

Guardians of the Galaxy was ten times more different from the comic books than The Hobbit was from Tolkien's books. And they shout every damn scene on green screen. But seems that people only care when the mass care.
View Recorder