IT: CHAPTER 2 Spoiler-Free Review; "[It's Not] The Essential, Epic Conclusion Fans Hoped For"

IT: CHAPTER 2 Spoiler-Free Review; "[It's Not] The Essential, Epic Conclusion Fans Hoped For"

It: Chapter 2 is now in theaters but does the sequel live up to that amazing first instalment? Unfortunately not, and you can find our spoiler-free verdict on the Stephen King adaptation right here...

Review Opinion
By JoshWilding - Sep 09, 2019 11:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Horror
It is arguably one of the greatest horror movies of all-time and a fantastic adaptation of Stephen King's lengthy novel (a rarity in Hollywood). Unfortunately, the same can't be said for the bloated sequel which tries too hard to capture the magic of that first instalment while too often neglecting the adult version of the Losers' Club. That 80s charm is gone this time around, and what we're left with is a movie that feels far too bland to make the same sort of impact as the first. 

Nearly three hours in length, It: Chapter 2 doesn't fly by the same way Avengers: Endgame did earlier this year, and there's so much here that could and should have been cut, it's hard to figure out why the movie is that long anyway. Far too much time is devoted to the young Losers' Club thanks to a rehash of similar but slightly different sequences of them being terrorised by Pennywise during their childhood which we conveniently didn't see in the first movie and that they're only now just remembering. It's almost as if Warner Bros. didn't have any faith in the adult cast being able to capture the magic from the first chapter so the kids (most of whom look pretty bizarre thanks to the special effects used to de-age them) are given way too much screentime at the expense of the present day storyline. 

Major plot points (such as the return of Henry Bowers) are glossed over relatively quickly and have little impact, while way too much time is spent on a confusing mythology and silly MacGuffin rather than the genuine scares and inventive ideas which peppered It. Too much of the horror here feels like a rehash of what we've seen before, and it's simply not that scary as a result. There are some genuinely great sequences and jump scares here and there, but Pennywise pulls out too many of the same tricks and just doesn't seem to be anywhere near as threatening; he never comes across as demented or twisted as the last time we saw him, and Muschietti really needed to pull out the stops here in order to top his 2017 appearance.

It's the performances which save the day here, though, and Bill Hader absolutely steals the show as the adult Richie. Despite the humour often feeling very out of place (and making Pennywise feel even less threatening that he already does), it's hard to imagine anyone else in the role and this performance promises to put the actor back on the map in a big way. James McAvoy (Bill) is also excellent, while Jessica Chastain (Beverly) is fine, but probably not as great as the fans who spent the past few years fan casting her in the role hoped. Between this and Dark Phoenix, 2019 really hasn't been her year. As for Bill Skarsgård, his Pennywise performance is as iconic as ever and it's just a shame he's mostly forced to repeat what's come before rather than being able to flesh out this villain in a significant way. Sadly, he winds up coming across as just another two-dimensional horror movie baddie for the most part. 

Light on tension and a strong script, It: Chapter 2 fails to live up to its predecessor, and while it's often faithful to King's novel, it sadly falls into the same trappings the second half of that lengthy tome did so many years ago. There's fun to be had here, but it's far too long and wastes too much time, leaving moviegoers more concerned with checking their watches than becoming completely engrossed by what's happening on screen. As King adaptations go, it's not exactly a disaster and it certainly has its moments (including a final battle which definitely improves on the source material). but this isn't the follow-up that Chapter 1 deserved. 

Andy Muschietti has assembled a terrific cast to battle Pennywise in the present day, but a muddled and meandering plot bogs the follow-up down and stops It: Chapter 2 from being the essential, epic conclusion fans hoped for. 

Pennywise1
M3GAN Returns In A New Body In First Official Look At Next Year's Sequel
Related:

M3GAN Returns In A New Body In First Official Look At Next Year's Sequel

FROM: Acclaimed Sci-Fi Horror Series Renewed For A 10-Episode Fourth Season
Recommended For You:

FROM: Acclaimed Sci-Fi Horror Series Renewed For A 10-Episode Fourth Season

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

narrow290
narrow290 - 9/9/2019, 11:59 AM
1st!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 9/9/2019, 12:01 PM
I actually don't disagree with any of your points, but the movie still worked for me. Definitely could have lost at least 20 mins, but overall I thought it was funny, emotional, and jumpy... if never genuinely scary.
dragon316
dragon316 - 9/9/2019, 12:38 PM
Not it fan it don’t bother will I see it yes same as first one that I did to rent off of iTunes not in theater besides I saw reviews spoilers and non spoilers YouTube people like it what have we learn people your opinion matters not strangers reviews see movie for your self and judge to decide
FASELI
FASELI - 9/9/2019, 12:42 PM
"and while it's often faithful to King's novel"

I would openly challenge the author of this article as to whether he has actually read it or not.
bcom
bcom - 9/9/2019, 5:00 PM
@FASELI - Having read a few of the author's articles, I would say at best he probably quickly read Wikipedia's page on IT the novel and thought it was as good as reading the novel :-)

While there are certain elements that are faithful to the book, the structure and events of the story play out quite differently.
FASELI
FASELI - 9/10/2019, 1:43 AM
@bcom - Well he has shown massive inaccuracies when reporting on this film in the past.
MyCoolYoung
MyCoolYoung - 9/9/2019, 12:46 PM
The run time didn't bother me it did kind of fly by but I didn't enjoy it, especially after surprisingly enjoying the second one. I kept reading reviews where they said the first and 3rd act were strong while the 2nd drug but I didn't feel neither act was all that strong.

The 2nd act definitely becomes repetitive but the 3rd act was kinda silly. The movie was less about pennywise and more about conquering one's fears so I got the message or part of the message but I don't like how we got to the message.

The 3rd act while faithful(at least to what I've read the book to be about other than the giant turtle) seemed like something that just didn't translate that well.
BrainySleep
BrainySleep - 9/9/2019, 2:22 PM
3.5 stars for me.

Great cast, some good moments but drags on a bit.
Jimster
Jimster - 9/9/2019, 3:16 PM
Saw it today. Enjoyed it for the most part. The run time didn't bother me as much as I was engaged enough to only check my watch around I would the half way mark and again near the end. Great cast. Never found it scary but still had a good time.
Over all 3.5 out of 5 for me as well.
The book is still the best. Give IT a read if you haven't yet.
Kozmik
Kozmik - 9/9/2019, 4:48 PM
“IT is arguably one of the greatest horror movies of all-time and a fantastic adaptation of Stephen King's lengthy novel (a rarity in Hollywood).”

It this point such hyperbole is expected from Josh Wilding because IT it's isn't arguably one of the greatest horror movies of all time at all, but at best a middling Steven King adaptation done better by John Carpenter, Mary Lambert and Mike Flanagan among others.
DannyN176
DannyN176 - 9/10/2019, 8:31 AM
People's reactions to this are bumming me out; but opinions are opinions, I suppose.

My friends and family all loved it. As a big fan of the book and miniseries, this did not disappoint for me at all. Thought the pacing was spot on and I was fully engaged with the story at all times. Actually enjoyed the way they separated and that the scares were somewhat episodic. A bit 'forced' perhaps but I can live with that.

Also delivered on the scares for me at times. I wouldn't say I scare easy but I'm good at forcing some investment so I let myself get worked up if I care about the film.

Gets a fat juicy 9 outta 10 from me. Shame others didn't enjoy so much.
View Recorder