The Fury of Jon Favreau's Tweets!

this film is gonna be awesome...

he let out more than i thought he would lol watch the fight w/ Fury be a verbal throwdown lol

I BET they got quiet. Her twat is so hot it kills men like a... a BLACK WIDOW!! Dee Doo Deee!

i dont want to change characters or swap spit with each other.,... i just want maybe a modern adaption to the same caharacters ya know? just spruce em up, thank god i dont care about Crymson Dynamo though. Imagine if that happedned in TDK! oh well as long i dont have to see Donald Blake turn into Thor ... Thats Bruce Banners thing ya know? I mean i couldnt handle that in the Avengers movie. Damn i really hate Donald Blake.... really though , i just reread my post and if you made it this far it pretty pointless so just disregard what i said .... thanks;)

I was thinking he would of posted a pic of Scarlett instead of the doughnut place he tweeted :(

Nick Fury :thumbsdown heh heh! Im over it lol! Cant wait for IRON MAN 2 though they should've done the devil in the bottle movie!

I AGREE WHOLEHEARTEDLY!

Its funny how nobody is on here having a shit fit about all the changes in this movie the way they were about Wolverine? 2 characters combined to make a new one? Id say thats a pretty big liberty made by precious Marvel studios wouldnt you? So lets hear it fanboys..[frick] MARVEL..cmon everybody join in..[frick] MARVEL..

Yes, you gotta love hypocracy.

DC!!!! ; )

Of course its [frick]ing hypocracy! Just because YOU think those were good changes, what about all the fans of Crimson Dynamo and Whiplash that are outraged..for them it could be like combining Joker and Riddler! So as far as your concerned when Fav does it hes IMPROVING on the source material, but Hood making changes (good or bad) pisses on it? And of course your qualified to make this judgement because your a fan! Jesus your arrogance astounds me. Im not condemning anyone for seeing things differently to me, im saying that no movie has been made from a comic yet that has not changed something and its hypocracy to condemn one and praise another, regardless of weather you think they are good or bad alterations, because its the fact that they change anything in the first place thats the liberty! If i happened to like the changes Hood made in Wolverine, who the hell are you to tell me they were any worse or better than whats happening in Iron Man 2?

Honestly Roar, i think it's because there are no "hard core" ironman fans that have been collecting the comic since their birth (and nothing but Ironman) on here. Or if there are, they don't type much. As for Wolverine deadpool and gambit, statistically speaking, those characters have always been more worshiped than Ironman worldwide. Most of us fans that just happen to simply like Ironman, have read about him more oftenly in Avengers than anything else. But now, more and more hard core ironman fans are being inducted because we finally got to see him on the big screen in all his CGI glory, making even Batman look like a semi-panzy! These fans however, mostly aren't accustomed to the specifics of the character's source material and couldn't give a shit if Favreau changed everything BUT Ironman. In other words, Favreau probably picked the best franchise ever to work with from the comic book realm.

So i hope it explains a bit better the "ironman versus wolverine" issue which i'm sure you already knew but you know... just saying LOL Oh and Juggernaut's always arogant, you know that LOL :P

... yyyyyyeeaahhh you are arrogant. But that's fine, so am i, given the time of the month.

IRON MAN was changed for a reason! WOLVERINE was changed coz FOX don't give a sh!t!!! : D

SJ's body must look so tight.

I've pretty much stated it from the beginning. An Iron Man film is the perfect starting vehicle for Marvel for two basic reasons. One, the character is known, but not WELL known, so there's a lot of room to work with there (much like Deadpool, he has no real "universe" of his own, yet), and two, it's a guy in a suit of armor. The special effects capabilities alone are astounding, let alone the fact that there have been, like what... 2000 different versions of his armor?! That means the stylization of the character is left WIDELY open for artistic interpretation. And they can update changes to his look through the course of time without ANY upheaval from his fanbase!
This means, obviously, with characters like X-Men, or other more main stream franchise characters, they have a more detailed, visually stringent history, so making changes or alterations becomes a slippery slope, and has a lot more succeptability to main stream dissaproval.

Ok so I just checked it out... Favreau plans on combining the characters of Whiplash and Crimson Dynamo.

Now I definitely do not think that's a good idea. I don't like it one bit, but I can understand why Favs did it.

Except for his weapon, Whiplash is kind of on the weak side and it would be way too easy for Iron man to beat him with a ranged attack. I know Whiplash has some kind of body armor, but it probably wouldn't be enough to stand up to a full power repulsor blast. So what they will probably do is to give CD a nifty whip like weapon to use.

Again... I do not agree. whiplash is classic, and they should have let him stand alone, but that's a a detail flaw I can live with as long as the rest is good.

@Shaman..exactly! Thats my whole point. people aint up in arms about the liberties Fav is taking because the characters are not that well known but that shouldnt matter, what should matter is that hes changing things from the comics, which is what all movies do but if Iron Man was being produced by Fox people would be saing "Fox are at it again"..personally i couldnt care less! I take the movies as seperate realities from the comics, like Ultimates or Allstar with DC..But i just have to laugh at clowns like Juggy...speaking of...

Jugg glad you finally grasp the [frick]ing argument your having now! You are not only arrogant but a childish idiot that resorts to silly insults when you cant get your point across. I never accused anybody of anything you paranoid freak! All i said was its hypocritical to bash one movie for doing something and praise another for doing the same. Thats all i said! Your the one that brought up sucking foxs cock and all the rest of the inane, juvenile garbage..grow up..KID. i loved Iron man, im sure i will love Iron man 2 and yes i enjoyed Wolverine but i never once said it was a great movie did i? And what are you on about me being outraged! Im perfectly happy thank you, your the one about to burst a blood vessel sunshine. In fairness i should of realized i was dealing with a reactionary moron after i saw your little hissy fit about your Juggernaut avatar on another post, lol..i see youv changed it anyway? way to stick to your guns! Now [frick] off, the adults are talking

Awesome comeback Big Dog! lmao

Juggs: You contradicted yourself, and attacked someone personally for a generalized comment.
I can't see how anyone could take your side now, even though you started with a valid argument about what "kind" of liberties are acceptable, and which one's aren't. Should have stuck with that instead.

I LOVE THIS SITE!

Rorschach: There's NO help for you cause you just can't fix stupid. All the meds in world wouldn't raise the iq of a nitwit like you to the hights of blissful ingorance.

I think I need to call up Fox Studios. I bet they don't realize that Rorschach01 has been out of his gimp cage too long and has taken to banging on the keys of somebody's PC. somebody logged into this web site unfortunately.
I guess you didn't read so good the first time little girl so YOU [frick] off.
I know it's a waste trading words with a walking monkey on the web like this, but a sorry bitch like you just begs for it.