POLL: What Did You Think Of JOHN CARTER?

POLL: What Did You Think Of JOHN CARTER?

This one should be interesting. What did you make of Andrew Stanton's critic and fan dividing adaptation of the classic novel? Should it have made more cash? Does it deserve a sequel? Click to have your say..

Feature Opinion
By MarkCassidy - Mar 13, 2012 11:03 AM EST
Filed Under: John Carter of Mars



We cover a lot of movies here on CBM that divide our readers, but perhaps none more-so than John Carter. The movie is seen as a "failure" by many because of it's mediocre opening weekend and because it seems unlikely to so much as break even on its huge budget. But the movie's quality was also a dividing issue. Many critics and fans loved it, but just as many thought it was rubbish and a complete waste of talent and cash. Disney and Stanton had high hopes that this would kick start a new franchise, and apparently always envisioned John Carter as a trilogy. This really does seem unlikely unless the movie finds legs - but they had better be strong ones - over the next week or so. There have been lots of theories as to why the movie failed to make much of an impact stateside, but seemed much stronger overseas. Bad marketing and promotion, lack of any big stars etc. These all may have played a part but the important questions for us fans are: was the movie any good, and does it deserve a sequel based on its quality alone? You can read my thoughts Here, now lets have yours..












X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Star Taylor Kitsch Reflects On JOHN CARTER And The Love It Still Gets From Fans
Related:

X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Star Taylor Kitsch Reflects On JOHN CARTER And The Love It Still Gets From Fans

Recommended For You:

Andrew Stanton's JOHN CARTER Had Planned Sequels, Here Are The Logos And Titles

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

ksommer
ksommer - 3/13/2012, 11:45 AM
I saw it on Saturday. I brought my 7 yr old cousin and 8 year old future step son. I felt so bad for having them sit through this movie. They were tossing and turning the whole time till the last 20 minutes when it got interesting.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 3/13/2012, 11:57 AM
"All these polls" Yeah the main page is swamped with em huh?
genesis609
genesis609 - 3/13/2012, 11:58 AM
the cliffhanger at the end wanted me WANTING SOOOOOO MUCH MORE!!! i loved it... haters will be haters.... i never have read any of the books, but it made me want too!
criple15
criple15 - 3/13/2012, 12:00 PM
How about "Meh. Not terrible but I can totally see why it didn't do better BO, but I see potential and would like to see a sequel?"
FightmasterNoel
FightmasterNoel - 3/13/2012, 12:02 PM
i havent seen it, when i do itll probly be on dvd ,i wasnt too hyped fer it anyways. It was one of those id prefer to wait til dvd just based on the trailers.
FightmasterNoel
FightmasterNoel - 3/13/2012, 12:05 PM
not knocin it jus saying i wasnt as hyped bout it coming out as i was fer say GR,Avengers,Bats3,and Man O steel.
MarkJulian
MarkJulian - 3/13/2012, 12:06 PM
@Gusto You're returning to form! Bravo!
Kingdork
Kingdork - 3/13/2012, 12:07 PM
Everybody kept telling me how crappy that movie was, and my expectations were so low that I actually manage to enjoy the movie on a pulpy B-movie level. But yeah the movie has some serious serious shortcomings. The pacing's all over the place, the acting is so so (that Spy Kid guy and his unacting ass had me in tears he was so bad). I was a little... let's say confused by the stakes at hand. I really don't know what the big deal, the big threat was all about... some blue energy stuff, a wedding to crash, a [frick]ed up Goddess or something... I also didn't care about any of the characters, though the green four-arm creatures were fun and well made, but some plot devices are downright preposterous, like how they all speak english all of the sudden. But one thing I really did love is that dog thingy, that obligatory cute pet sidekick who was actually awesome ^^
ValarMorghulis
ValarMorghulis - 3/13/2012, 12:08 PM
My wife and I took my little brother to see it Saturday. For a sci-fi movie that's based on a series written 100 years ago, I'd say it was a damn good movie. All 3 of us enjoyed it and I would definitely see a sequel.
JackBauer
JackBauer - 3/13/2012, 12:11 PM
@Gusto - Don't you mean you like his "pole"? :D
JackBauer
JackBauer - 3/13/2012, 12:13 PM
Unfortunately I didn't get to see it this past weekend. I took my boy to see The Lorax. I'm definitely going to check it out this weekend though.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 3/13/2012, 12:13 PM
The kid from Spy Kids was the worst part of this otherwise great movie.

Critics are stupid. It's as boring as Mass Effect.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 3/13/2012, 12:14 PM
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention the little shit that played Burroughs in my review. Horrible bastard of an actor.
pintoman
pintoman - 3/13/2012, 12:22 PM
It suffered from uneven pacing as mentioned above and uneven tone (both of which may have been able to fix with editing—not sure). I was surprised the film had these problems in a Stanton film. I don't see any Pixar lineage here.

However, none of those problems make this a terrible experience. The film is still "solid" and true to itself. It has heart and romance. There are a lot of really good things here. Actually, this is sort of how I felt after seeing 'Empire Strikes Back' for the first time—so I imagine repeat viewings clear up the uneven issues. This is not Transformers action (thankfully). This is a blast from the past type of film.

Would love to return to Barsoom in the future.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 3/13/2012, 12:23 PM
It was average. Lots of terrible acting (hot or not, Lynne Collins was stiff as a board) but watchable at the very least.
JackBauer
JackBauer - 3/13/2012, 12:34 PM
I'll give her my stiff board.
Oxbow
Oxbow - 3/13/2012, 12:38 PM
i saw it with my friends opening day! Well-made, if a bit hokey. What do you expect from a 100 year old property though? Woola is a real treat to watch, and the mars scenes are pretty cool. Love the historical embedding, Stanton does a good job of making the post-civil war sets look authentic.

I will be watching it again in theaters with my girlfriend later this week, praise Aries ;-)
Spidey91
Spidey91 - 3/13/2012, 12:39 PM
it was...OK

great effects and creative action
great sets and locations
the actors were okay,not great but not terrible.

but the story was really hard to follow,at least for me,many times I was like "wait,what? where? who? when? why? what's happening?"

but it was enjoyable,way more watchable than other movies that are considered better (no way this is worst than Star Wars Episodes I and II,judging by the T-meter on Rotten Tomatoes).
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 3/13/2012, 12:39 PM
Ha, nicely done JackBauer! :)
Spidey91
Spidey91 - 3/13/2012, 12:41 PM
extra points for Woola, the cutest thing in a movie since Toothless from How to train your dragon ^___^

and Lynn Collins,DAYUUUUUUUUUMMM! *___*
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 3/13/2012, 12:50 PM
Dusto" Dreaming about days long ago when he too, used tooth paste.
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 3/13/2012, 12:54 PM
tea: Don't think for a second I was going to forget about your "Brit" toothed smile..

MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 3/13/2012, 12:58 PM
No Gusto, NO! Bad Gusto

Josh that's mad, I really thought she was the best thing about it..not just cos she was hot. I thought she did a great job with the character.
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 3/13/2012, 1:04 PM
tea: That dog gif you posted reminds me of the good old days when I was rarely sober. ;P
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 3/13/2012, 1:10 PM
I do look goooood wearin me some red ribbons! =D
MovieMaster
MovieMaster - 3/13/2012, 1:25 PM
It was meh but I want to see a sequel so it can redeem the first movie
Hawksblueyes
Hawksblueyes - 3/13/2012, 1:35 PM
Dusto you know as well as I do that you always light up a stogie before you go out babe hunting.

Quasimodo
Quasimodo - 3/13/2012, 2:07 PM
I guess the movie hasnt divided fans as much as I've heard. Seems that most people liked it.
rocky
rocky - 3/13/2012, 2:33 PM
Most of the haters are the silly girls that were predicting failure or haven't seen it.
Oh and the people that act as if the 250mil budget came out of their pocket.
The budget shouldn't be a critic's or a fan's concern
95
95 - 3/13/2012, 2:34 PM
I liked it. Charming story.
ralfinader
ralfinader - 3/13/2012, 3:15 PM
I have only heard good things about the movie from my friends that caught it last weekend. No plans on seeing it in the theaters myself, but from what I heard, planned on buying the DVD without a pre-viewing.
comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 3/13/2012, 3:39 PM
I wish you had waited a couple of days to post this poll. I'm going to see the movie tomorrow night.
gambgel
gambgel - 3/13/2012, 3:49 PM
I liked the movie. Love the sets, the action, the costumes, the cgi characters... decent cast....

I want to see more sequels from this adaptation, if not a trilogy, at least another one.
HulkMan
HulkMan - 3/13/2012, 5:43 PM
Saw it last Saturday, thought it was great. Might go again to see it in 2d later this week. The soundtrack is amazing.
Phlegmbot
Phlegmbot - 3/13/2012, 11:24 PM
The reason the movie bombed at the B.O. is LESS about how good or bad was, it's about how POORLY Disney marketed it.

This has been covered on a ton of websites...

You have to remember that, sure, us genre fans know the name John Carter but most people do not. Several people I know didn't even know the movie took place on Mars -- there is ZERO information about that in the commercials. The title says NOTHING (once they cut out "of Mars").

They had a strong supporting cast, which they didn't show to people at all (for actors doing VO's, they could've done a split screen thing like they do in ads for animated movies showing who's doing voices).

Plus, to make matters worse, they've been showing the same spot since the Superbowl. How about giving us some more scenes, more story, more of an understanding of WHO John Carter is, WHY we should care about him, WHERE he is, and WHAT the consequences are of him being there. You know, something some might call an ad campaign.

But they didn't. Disney spent $350M estimated on this movie (including marketing), but they forgot to tell people what the movie was about and who's in it. Astounding.
View Recorder