An End to the Internet As You Know It

An End to the Internet As You Know It

Why you could see an untimely end to your favorite website(s)...

Editorial Opinion
By TheNameIsBetty - Nov 24, 2011 06:11 PM EST
Filed Under: Other

Okay, my article in the 'News' section about this was taken down for having, and I quote:
"nothing to do with comic book movies"

So I'm going to post an editorial about it. The editorials section is broad enough to have this topic permitted, or at least it should be. After all, it directly affects this website.





The short story:
The American Government wants to pass a particularly unsettling bill. This bill, called the "Stop Online Piracy Act" (SOPA) is in talks for being passed as you read this article. What will SOPA do? Basically, it will outlaw any and all 'unauthorized content' from being streamed on the internet. The bill is mainly geared towards games and movies being downloaded on the net, but what does this mean for CBM?

None of the following--

* Bootlegs of trailers
* Pictures snapped of trailers/posters/ect
* Any videos, music, images that are posted on sites everywhere that are copyright protected.

So apart from official press releases, CBM.com will become an underground information train if the bill passes. Does that make any sense?

And just to scare you, the Motion Picture Association of America has already shown what they think of this bill. They like it.







The Long Story:
(From Wikipedia)
The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), also known as H.R.3261, is a bill that was introduced in the United States House of Representatives on October 26, 2011, by Representative Lamar Smith [R-TX] and a bipartisan group of 12 initial co-sponsors. The bill expands the ability of U.S. law enforcement and copyright holders to fight online trafficking in copyrighted intellectual property and counterfeit goods.[3] Now before the House Judiciary Committee, it builds on the similar PRO-IP Act of 2008 and the corresponding Senate bill, the Protect IP Act.

The bill would allow the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and others to seek court orders against websites accused of enabling or facilitating copyright infringement. Depending on who requests the court orders, the actions could include barring online advertising networks and payment facilitators such as PayPal from doing business with the infringing website; barring search engines from linking to such sites and requiring Internet service providers to block access to such sites. The bill would make unauthorized streaming of copyrighted content a felony. The bill also gives immunity to Internet services that voluntarily take action against websites dedicated to infringement, while making liable for damages any copyright holder who knowingly misrepresents that a website is dedicated to infringement.

Proponents of the bill say it protects the intellectual property market, including the resultant revenue and jobs, and is necessary to bolster enforcement of copyright laws especially against foreign websites. Opponents say it is censorship, that it will "break the internet", cost jobs, and will threaten whistleblowing and other free speech.




So, as you can see, I doubt this needs more explanation. What can you do to help stop this? The following website has everything you need.
http://americancensorship.org/




Thank you for reading this, and please do take this seriously.
Link to the bill in its entirety:
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/pdf/112%20HR%203261.pdf

With Love for ComicBookMovie.com,
Fartman
New Academy Rules State Generative AI Use Will Not Impact Oscar Eligibility
Related:

New Academy Rules State Generative AI Use Will Not Impact Oscar Eligibility

David Zaslav Received Raise Of Millions Despite WB's Hard Times
Recommended For You:

David Zaslav Received Raise Of Millions Despite WB's Hard Times

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Xandera
Xandera - 11/24/2011, 6:33 PM
I appreciate your bringing this to everybody's attention, however, I am unsure of what will come of it.
They have tried things of this nature before and it didn't work, so we'll just have to wait and see...
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 11/24/2011, 6:36 PM
Well, it wouldn't hurt to sign the petition anyway, would it? ;)
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 11/24/2011, 6:39 PM
@ncreb - EXACTLY!!! I POSTED THIS AS A NEWS ARTICLE, AND THE EDITOR FREAKING TOLD ME IT WASN'T CBM RELATED!!
Wadey09
Wadey09 - 11/24/2011, 7:22 PM
while i love all the scoops and photos, i can actually understand where they are coming from with this bill.

this mainly has to deal with pirated material such as bootleg movies.

anyone remember what happened in 2009?
we were all anxious to see X-men Origins: Wolverine. even though some material in the trailers kinda put us off, we could only speculate.

then, the unimaginable happened:
someone at Fox released the workprint of the film online. this is just one of the many examples that show how much money a movie can lose due to downloaded or streamed content.

i am in no way supporting this bill in its current form nor am i excusing Fox for that atrocity of a film. but with a few tweaks to the bill, maybe we could see less downloaded content and more revenue generated from a theatrical release that could garner sequels that WE want.

lets face it, money is tight. i get it. and people are not gonna pay hard earned money on a piece of crap movie. and more are churned out every year. i get that that and the ever rising price of tickets is discouraging audiences to go to the movies.

but that's my point. if you don't want to see it in theatres, you can probably wait the three to five months to rent it for a buck. and lets face it, if you cant afford one dollar, then why are you driving? you get my point.

i want to see good movies make money and the bad ones flop. but downloading pirated content, streaming it, etc is causing the line between flop and success to blur. because the people making the movies can no longer tell what is a good movie.

again, this bill in its current form is a little extreme. i want to be able to visit sites like CBM to get the latest scoop and photo. maybe even a clip or description. you get my point.

say what you will, but this is what i think.
thanks for bringing the problem home for us @Fartman.
golden123
golden123 - 11/24/2011, 7:50 PM
I know to little about that bill to put my two cents in, but I'm doing it anyways. Based on this article, I want the bill to pass. Pirating should really stop. Besides, how much interesting material on this website is pirated, anyways. The best articles on this site are the official releases.
LAWLZY96
LAWLZY96 - 11/24/2011, 9:10 PM
Hell Yeah! I sign the shit of some petitions!
LAWLZY96
LAWLZY96 - 11/24/2011, 9:22 PM
Also anyone with a Youtube channel knows how easy it is to have a copyright infringement case put against you. If you show a little clip of a trailer or something in your video or something they can do that. Generally you can fight the case and win because your not doing anything wrong, but this bill changes that. You get a case put against you and your video and channel is down immediately, your name is blacklisted, and you're tried as a criminal. Great.
Also they can take down whole websites if any copyrighted material is posted on it. You understand that that means that THIS website would be down. All those blurry spy pics of the new Dark Knight, all those low quality pics of Empire magazine, etc. This bill will kill this site, not to mention youtube...
I understand that piracy is wrong but this bill was created by a bunch of greedy bureaucrats who want to shut down any possible challenges to their control. I understand I might be coming off as paranoid, but this bill is a load of crap. I use pictures in MY reviews. How can I be sure this bill won't shut ME down?
SeaSerpentine
SeaSerpentine - 11/24/2011, 9:22 PM
Okay, I'm scared.
LAWLZY96
LAWLZY96 - 11/24/2011, 9:26 PM
http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-the-internet-control-bill-now
LAWLZY96
LAWLZY96 - 11/24/2011, 9:29 PM
@golden123 The "pirated" material won't be the only thing taken down. The whole website will be taken down.
Wadey09
Wadey09 - 11/24/2011, 9:34 PM
like i said, in its current form, i do NOT support this bill.
i just want the the sites with entire movies that are free while they are still in theatres. that is stealing.

all the pics and clips only garner more interest for the films in question. so banning those sites including this one is actually counter productive.

if they want to shut down every web site that has clips and pics of movies, they need to 86 every tabloid newspaper in the country. this bill probably will not pass because it will be deemed too extreme whch i whole heartedly agree with.

its like prohibition. crack down on everyone and eventually, they will find a way around it.
crack down on a few, it keeps everyone in line.

i'll promote any petition against this bill until they know who their real enemies are: the thieves at the theatres who record the films.
heisei24
heisei24 - 11/25/2011, 2:43 AM
THIS SHOULD GET ON MAIN
comiccow6
comiccow6 - 11/25/2011, 3:31 AM
THAT'S IT I'M MOVIN' TO CANADA!!!
Coldblood6
Coldblood6 - 11/25/2011, 5:14 AM
I agree with Wadey09. I hate how downloading movies reduces the BO gross of good movies.
StrangerX
StrangerX - 11/25/2011, 5:15 AM
Well it would make the internet a lot less interesting. As for the Bill itself it should be done. X-Men Origins: Wolverine is a prime example why.
superotherside
superotherside - 11/25/2011, 7:38 AM


NUFF SAID! :p
dezdigi
dezdigi - 11/25/2011, 8:50 AM
I agree with Wadey for the most part. I have friends that download everything and never pay for anything. They download as much as they can (songs, movies, tv shows) and don't really value any of it. For them, it's disposable free media and couldn't see themselves ever paying for it.
Why would you care about something you place no value on? I don't agree with the bill and I love CBM.com but this piracy thing has got to change.
I'm a huge fan of movies and music and would hate for these things to go away. Piracy makes it hard for the little guy to get their hard work out to the public and be able to make a living from it.
Ok, rant over.
SigmaCenturion
SigmaCenturion - 11/25/2011, 8:55 AM
Signed a lot of these already.
golden123
golden123 - 11/25/2011, 9:05 AM
@sirprize: Thanks for sharing that video! I can now see both good and bad in that bill. Though, the guy talking in that video did make a few stupid remarks. Such as infering that getting rid of the internet would get rid of our free expression. That sounds like something an OWS protester would say.
LAWLZY96
LAWLZY96 - 11/25/2011, 9:12 AM
http://www.youtube.com/user/JeremyJahns?feature=chclk#p/u/3/t74BzyM7iis
kong
kong - 11/25/2011, 10:46 AM
NOT THE PORN!
marvelguy
marvelguy - 11/25/2011, 1:04 PM
Teabag,

I am certain there will always be a plethora of boob pics on the internet. Ha ha
headlopper
headlopper - 11/25/2011, 1:55 PM
This is a diversionary tactic by Congress to redirect attention off the fact that they're NOT dong their jobs(passing legislation to improve the economy) and fallaciously onto petty issues.
golden123
golden123 - 11/25/2011, 4:17 PM
@headlopper: Yeah, but in the mean time they can focus on things like this. Those kind of bills go through a process...well all bills go through a process, but still. Pirating is exactly a petty issue anyways. Anyway you look at it stealing does not help the economy. Filmakers have families, too.
golden123
golden123 - 11/25/2011, 5:59 PM
@ncreb: Not if the industry can't make money because it the companies go backrupt. There are masses of students in college studying to work in the film industry. If the film industry can't hire more people because of the lack of people then what happens to those students. There are more filmmakers out there than the big names like Nolan, Speilburg, and Cameron that we here about so often. Alot of people don't understand that. Not everybody in that industry in famous and rich is my point.
golden123
golden123 - 11/25/2011, 7:01 PM
@ncreb: I guess I can't really relate to you since I'm only paying seven dollars for a two hour movie, and you're supposed to pay anyways when you use copyrighted materials to make a profit. What you described is stealing. Unless they're not making a profit off it, but then why couldn't they just pay the 99 cents on itunes to download the song? If they can't pay the 99 cents then make the movie without music. You can't expect a movie that can't spend an extra 99 cents to be good anyways although there are many talented people out there that could work magic like that. I'm getting off topic, though. Anyways, we can't just go around pretending like all these big business' entertainment is our property to throw around. Oh and actors make so much money because all the producers want the most popular actor and the most popular actor goes to the highest payer (most of the time). Finally, if at the end of the day you're lucky to have a dollar left then why blow that extra twelve bucks (seven if you moved to Florida) on entertainment? You should save your money? I'm not judging, though.
Wadey09
Wadey09 - 11/25/2011, 8:05 PM
hey guys, i'm not worried about the actors, directors, or studios making money.
although that factors in the long run i'm worried more about the writers, set builders, make up artists, graphics designers, etc.

these are the people who literally BUILT Hollywood.
and these are the people most likely to strike.
anyone remember the Writer's Strike three years back?

if these guys dont get paid, then there is no movie.
think about that.
more than 1000 work on a movie and everyone only thinks of the 50 or so big names.
this is about the little guys too.
golden123
golden123 - 11/25/2011, 8:37 PM
@Wadey09: You're right on most accounts; however, writers, set builders, make up artists, graphic designers, etc. are all types of film makers and you can make a good movie without set builders (shoot on location) and make up artists (cast good looking people and use camera angles to your advantage). You don't even need a writer if you think about it. Just look at half the superhero fan films on the internet. They are mainly choreographed messes that take full use of improvisation. Then again, half the superhero fan films on the internet aren't good.
Wadey09
Wadey09 - 11/25/2011, 9:24 PM
@Golden

then you get lazy film making.
i'm all for cutting costs. and shooting on location is usually beyond epic. but look at LOTR. all three films shot in New Zealand. but they still had to build the sets to make it look like Middle Earth.

and you can be as good looking as you want under all the makeup and prosthetics it takes to make you look like an orc. or Hellboy. or Mystique. etc etc.

scripts are rewritten on a daily basis while the film is still shooting. it took Peter Jackson and his wife almost a decade if not more to get the script right.

believe me, all of these hard working people are essential to the movie making process. and they always will be.

unless of course you want it to look like it was sweded from the movie Be Kind Rewind.
1 2
View Recorder