Why DAVID FINCHER and other "Big Name" directors will NEVER ever do a superhero-flick!!!

Why DAVID FINCHER and other "Big Name" directors will NEVER ever do a superhero-flick!!!

In this Editorial I will explain to you why your wet dream of acclaimed directors like David Fincher and Jim Cameron doing a Superhero film will never come true.

Editorial Opinion
By PuyGuy - Aug 16, 2012 09:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Other

First off, YEAH, I know that this Editorial will most likely stirr alot of hate against me. But you know what, I really dont care. I am considered a troll/hater/Nolanite on this site already. So how can it get worse?

And I really feel like some of you amazing fanboys are desperately in the NEED for this Editorial - and be it just as an eye-opener.

Whats the Topic? Ah, wait...first things first: WHY do I write this? Well, it is because of the comments section of the Editorial "Six possible directors for Daredevil". What I read there really raised my rage and my hate to an unspeakable level. But I read bullcrap like this before everywhere on this site, it comes up in the comments almost every day. So the comments on the Editorial I just named really was just the final spark it took to make me explode and write this.

So, let me put it as nicely as possible: How the hell can it be that so many of you amazing nerdy nerds and Marvelites are STILL believing that a director like DAVID "The Man" [frick]ING FINCHER would get anywhere close to a ComicBookMovie-project anymore? I mean, how naive can a fanboy be? The pure assumination of that is donkey donkey. David Fincher would be a good pick for "Daredevil". Yeah. Same goes to all of you who constantly bring up bullass like James Cameron would make a great "Guardians of the Galaxy" or Quentin Tarantino would be an excellent choice for "Deadpool".

Its true...they would make great movies outta it. They are all extremely talented, crafty and visionary directors. Tarantino is even a marvelous writer. Fincher has an flabbergasting eye for detail, a brooding and dark atmosphere and an unique visual style. Cameron is always top notch when it comes to awe, spectacle and CGI. They would do great Marvel films. Right.

But why, OH GOD WHY...should they?????

That is the point of this write-up.

Think about it. Ask that question to yourself. Seriously, do it!!!!

This does not only go for the three directors I just named, but for very many other BIG NAMES as well (Spielberg, Jackson, Scott, Scorsese...just to name a few).

Why should directors who have made such big and well acclaimed films, Award-worthy films, BoxOffice smashes, why should they go back to HIDING behind an iconic and well known character, telling bland and uninspired and safe and marketable storys that have been told in the comics countless times before?

Why should they put their talent under the umbrella-supervising of MARVEL? Why should they bow down in front of the brand MARVEL, if their very own NAMES are BRANDS THEMSELVES? Fincher is a brand. Cameron is a brand. Hell, Spielberg and Scorsese are brands for more then 30 years now.

Directors like that doesnet need to bow down, they have influence in Hollywood, they decide WHAT they do and HOW they do it.

And that wouldnt be the case if they were making a Marvel movie.

(Well, whilst Sony and FOX give their Marvel-project directors at least a bit of a free hand, the oh-so-glorious Marvel Studios is clearly only using studio whores to control and push arround who dont really direct the film - FACT)

Why should directors like Spielberg, Jackson, Fincher, Tarantino, Cameron, Scott and Scorsese LOWER themselves down to the likes of Marc Webb, Joe Johnston, Louis Lettierer and Matthew Vaughn. It just doesent make sense.

Yes, I know what you are thinking right now, I know with what arguements you wanna come up. Please DONT.

Please DONT come up with the arguemnet that Fincher and Cameron were attached to Spider-Man once.

ALSO please DONT come up with the arguement that Nolan did Batman.

I will explain to you why those two arguements are not worth a poop.

Maybe David Fincher would ve give Spidey a shot back in 2000 when he was first considered for it. But those times are long gone by now. He has not only made cult-classics that are universally acclaimed amongst fans (Seven, Fight Club), NOW he has also made films that were truly award-worthy, which were big contenders at the Oscars (Benjamin Button, The Social Network, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo). He doesent need Superheros anymore. He is over it. Now he can pick whatever he wants to do. As I said, he is a brand now.

And YES, I also know that Fincher was shortly considered for the Spidey-REBOOT as well, however he did turn this down very quickly. According to an 2011 Interview he had some pretty dark and neat ideas for getting his very own Spidey off the ground, but soon he figured that Sony would not allow him to do his vision in the slightest way. Sony wanted a safe and kids friendly generic movie. They wanted the movie to contain exactly what they (Sony exes) had in mind. So they went with that hacky hack known as Marc Webb, who was an easy push-arround. And we all know how that turned out. Unfinished story elements all over the movie, LIES is the advertising, Untold story my ass.

And Fincher...yeah, he is clearly not that desperate to get down to this kindergarten level with studios. He doesent need to.

Why do you think James Cameron passed as well on Spider-Man as on X-Men? Why do you think Fincher passed on Spidey TWICE? They clearly had enough chances to get their share of superhero movies....they just figured they had better things to do.

In the end, a few words about that precious man Nolan:

When he agreed on Batman Begins in early 2004 he had only 3 small films in his vita. They were acclaimed, but not on a very grand scale. Also, he needed to establish himself with an BoxOffice smash, he wanted to become a brand (something he has achieved by now). That is also the reason why David Finher doesent need a superhero anymore, he IS established. Nolan WASENT, when he agreed to Batman. So, anyways, Nolan took Batman, which is, by the way, the best superhero character to go with if you dont wanna get too fancy. And Nolan did very well.

Now, after his dream project "Inception" which was an universally acclaimed masterpiece AND a huge BoxOffice smash, he wouldnt do a ComicBookMovie anymore either. He only did the 2 Batman sequels because he saw the once in a lifetime chance to get his name attached to an epic and unforgettable movie-trilogy. But now he is out of the superhero-realm. And he will most likely never return. (Producing and "godfathering" doesent count)

So, well, let me close this. I just wanna sum it up for all of you who are still hoping that one day they will get a Fincher directed Daredevil or a Cameron directed "Marvel Space thing":

Ready....ready for the closing line?

THIS IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!!!!!

Deal with it.

SAG-AFTRA Slams Creation Of AI Actress Tilly Norwood: It Has No Life Experience To Draw From
Related:

SAG-AFTRA Slams Creation Of AI "Actress" Tilly Norwood: "It Has No Life Experience To Draw From"

ABSOLUTE BATMAN: Here's How Long Scott Snyder's Series Is Intended To Last
Recommended For You:

ABSOLUTE BATMAN: Here's How Long Scott Snyder's Series Is Intended To Last

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Zarog
Zarog - 8/16/2012, 9:49 PM
'Cause money. That's why. Don't be so naive. Money can make a LOT of things happen.
Jaywing
Jaywing - 8/16/2012, 9:49 PM
Haha this is awesome
Zarog
Zarog - 8/16/2012, 9:52 PM
Oh, [frick]. I just realized the who the jackass was that wrote this. PuyGuy, go [frick] yourself. Your opinions are retarded. Your trolling is retarded. Nobody likes you. Get the [frick] off the website. It would bring tremendous joy to everyone on this website if you left. Thank you.
Tainted87
Tainted87 - 8/16/2012, 9:54 PM
You are amazingly ignorant.
Fincher and Cameron BOTH worked on Spider-man during its TWENTY-FIVE years of brainstorming and drafting. Cameron even wrote a screenplay which was HORRIBLE; an origin story with Electro as a business tycoon and Sandman as a failed experiment. In fact, Cameron is one of the main reasons it took so damn long for Spider-man to get off the ground.
Fincher wanted to kill off Gwen.
breakUbatman
breakUbatman - 8/16/2012, 10:10 PM
PuyGuy you might want to proofread your article for typos
95
95 - 8/16/2012, 10:33 PM
I agree — except for the part about Marvel Studios being "control whores". They're as much into control of their films as any studio. Marvel Studios' creative team are like architects planning a master community. Each housing developer has freedom with their plots of land, but all together vision is cohesive.

Back to Fincher:

With Spider-Man over at Sony, he's more likely to do that, than Daredevil. Besides, I don't think he's the best choice for Daredevil (I liked the suggestions of Goddard, Refn, or Rian). There's other comic book movies that could use his talents. I understand why @PuyGuy is frustrated. I saw some anti-Nolan folks recommending Fincher for DD a day ago — which was quite strange — he would treat DD the same way Nolan treated Batman (maybe slightly better / slight worst). As a fan of Nolan's Batman, of course I find nothing wrong with that.

If Fincher is heavily creatively involved, DD won't be as "faithful" to the comics. But if you hand that guy a good script written by... say Frank Miller/Mark Waid/Whedon/Goddard... Fincher would blow our minds.
95
95 - 8/16/2012, 11:07 PM
@PuyGuy It's unlikely, but David Fincher would do a comic book movie. He'll probably hate hearing questions about the project from loud fans, but he would do it.
95
95 - 8/16/2012, 11:16 PM
Isn't Fincher doing Twenty Thousand Leagues Under The Sea in 3D soon? That's a comic book (well, there's a comic book run of the novel).
jessepostal
jessepostal - 8/17/2012, 5:38 AM
Good article, and good debate. I'm going to agree with you on this. At least in the aspect of they will never do an A class cbm. Marvel likes smaller directors that they can pave there way with. Directors not in the ones you mentioneds pay grade. Dc got lucky with the batman hits and made Nolan a very big name today. He finished his trilogy a huge star himself when starting out nowhere near what he is now. Dc had to keep him on no matter what the pay grade was, I don't think they really had a choice in that matter. As for the directors mentioned they all like doing their own thing. And idk why you would want any of them to make one anytime soon. Sure visually a Cameron cbm would look great, but the story wouldn't be. Finchers would be too off the wall and drag on. Now I know the goon was in the works but that isn't an A list cbm, with that movie he had the power to do whatever he wanted to do with it. These guys have the power to do that, why would they listen to whatever someone else wants? Would you rather work for yourself or some pushy ahole boss? Once again good article puyguy
SoFresh
SoFresh - 8/17/2012, 5:49 AM
@Puyguy

Man I´m kinda drunk at the moment so I´m not gonna write an essay on this and I don´t know if I´m even gonna be rational, excuse me if I mess up.
Dude, it´s like this, if I liked some ones art and decided to commission a piece with Zod beating the shit out of Pikachu(Chill, I´m just messing with you) and financed it with my money, would you think it would be alright if he decided to make something different?

@BattlinMurdock

No problem, it seems like you know your stuff.
CPBuff22
CPBuff22 - 8/17/2012, 6:20 AM
When you don't limit directors, producers, & screenwriters and let them do whatever they want you get things like Cloud Galactus, Batnipples, Green Lantern vs Yellow Turd, Ghost Rider peeing fire, Bullseye with a tattoo on his forehead, Power Ranger Goblin, 10 Minute on screen 70s Show Venom, Superman having a kid, an impossible flying contraption called "The Bat", Giant Gamma Dogs, henchman Bane(twice), character never being called by their name(Catwoman, Pheonix), blown continuity between films(Transformers, Nolan Batman, X-Men), Heroes who drink jelly beans from Martini glasses, Vampire Pomeranian, etc and so forth.
Hellsing
Hellsing - 8/17/2012, 6:34 AM
@BattlinMurdock Mate you [frick]ing rule, great arguments against this moron. Well done man.

So this article is trying to essentially say that James Cameron and David Fincher and the likes are god and never would touch CBM's, like some one already mentioned Cameron was actively developing spider-man, even developing a screenplay. Yeah that doesn't sound like a director who's above CBM's, and oh and he was trying to get an X-Men movie going before it went to singer. It sure doesn't sound like that this dude considered CBM's beneath him when he spent so much time on them. Cameron never passed on the opportunity to direct it, hell the dude wanted to Dicaprio as Spidey. The studio shut it down couldn't afford it

And Cameron was not an up and coming director the guy was fully established with the terminator series and Aliens. So your whole stance that these "big name" directors are above CBM's is just plain stupid.

I think James Mangold is a great director but he also directed that piece of shit movie with Tom Cruise and Diaz. Snyders good too but he made a piece of shit called Sucker Punch, yeah so excuse me if I have more faith in the man who like some one already pointed out re-invented the whole buddy cop action movie and directed a movie that essentially relaunched an actors career.
Zarog
Zarog - 8/17/2012, 8:34 AM
BattlinMurdock is my new favorite user.
BarnaclePete
BarnaclePete - 8/17/2012, 10:12 AM
The only thing dumber than this editorial is that you guys are arguing so much about it. Who cares? It's his opinion.
joe384
joe384 - 8/17/2012, 10:13 AM
Hey James Cameron did agree to do a story arc on Entourage about him directing the Aquaman movie, so why would it be so hard to beleive this could really happen. I mean with what Nolan has done, and now Weadon, comicbookmovies are the thing right now, and not so far off from one of them getting a best picture award nom or even win at the Oscar. Correct me if i'm wrong but don't all film makers aspire to gain that kind of buzz.
Sabconth
Sabconth - 8/17/2012, 10:34 AM
@yossarian

Nolan was a relatively unheard of director who hadn't been tested on a big blockbuster project.

Warner Bros lucked out on finding him, and the likelihood that any studio will find someone as talented who isn't famous yet is very, very slim.
SageMode
SageMode - 8/17/2012, 10:42 AM
This article just wreaks of Nolanitis.

And given the author of article, im not surprised.
LoudNoises
LoudNoises - 8/17/2012, 11:00 AM
I'm not out to try and argue in favor of the possibility that any of these A-list directors you mentioned would sign on to direct a CBM. quite the contrary actually. I think your right. There is a very slim chance that any of these directors would take a giant step backwards in their career to direct a very orchestrated and controlled Marvel or DC property where they are unable to showcase the artistic lincense they have worked so hard to achieve. Their names alone sell their movies and don't require a popular franchise like Batman or Spiderman to further their careers.

At the same time I can't see anything wrong with saying a particular A-list director would be a good choice to helm a particular CBM. Fanboys can dream can't they? Everyone understands that their personal feelings about the direction of a CBM carries no weight. It's just like the Fan Fiction section that is filled with Fan Casts. It's just a bunch of fans discussing their fantasy casts. Just like sports fanatics who create their own fantasy teams in a fantasy sports league. Who cares if everyone on this site agreed that David Fincher would be the ideal dictector to take on the next Batman reboot. It means nothing. Fans are just looking at directors they are familiar with and imagining "what if?". There's really no reason to get all worked up over such a trivial subject as choosing a fantasy director.
SoFresh
SoFresh - 8/17/2012, 12:36 PM
Seeing as everyone is praising BattlinMurdock

1 2
View Recorder