Steven Spielberg Reveals Why He Regrets Infamous E.T. Firearm Edit

Steven Spielberg Reveals Why He Regrets Infamous E.T. Firearm Edit

Steven Spielberg made one particular edit for the 20th anniversary edition of beloved classic, E.T. The Extra Terrestrial, and the legendary director has now explained why he regrets his decision...

By MarkCassidy - Apr 28, 2023 03:04 PM EST
Filed Under: Sci-Fi
Source: Via SFF Gazette

Legendary director Steven Spielberg has admitted that he regrets making an infamous edit to the 20th anniversary re-release of arguably his most beloved film, 1982's E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial.

In the original version of the classic boy-and-his-alien adventure, federal officers can be seen chasing Elliot and his friends while holding guns in their hands. Believing this scene to be a little too menacing for a family-friendly film, Spielberg decided to remove the firearms and replace them with walkie-talkies for the 2002 "special edition."

It wasn't the only change (CGI was used to "improve" some shots of E.T.), but it was by far the most notable and lambasted (South Park even dedicated an entire episode to making fun of it).

Now, Spielberg has revealed that he regrets making that particular change to the movie during a Hollywood Masterclass interview (via Variety).

That was a mistake. I never should have done that. ‘E.T.’ is a product of its era. No film should be revised based on the lenses we now are, either voluntarily, or being forced to peer through. E.T.’ was a film that I was sensitive to the fact that the federal agents were approaching kids with firearms exposed and I thought I would change the guns into walkie talkies… Years went by and I changed my own views."

“I should have never messed with the archives of my own work, and I don’t recommend anyone do that," he continued. "All our movies are a kind of a signpost of where we were when we made them, what the world was like and what the world was receiving when we got those stories out there. So I really regret having that out there.”

How do you guys feel about the infamous E.T. gun removal? Do you agree that filmmakers should never go back and alter their work? Drop us a comment down below.

HIT MAN Star Glen Powell Spotted On Set Of Edgar Wright's THE RUNNING MAN; Movie's Logo Revealed
Related:

HIT MAN Star Glen Powell Spotted On Set Of Edgar Wright's THE RUNNING MAN; Movie's Logo Revealed

SQUID GAME Season 2 Trailer Sees Lee Jung-jae Embark On A Bloody New Mission As Player 456
Recommended For You:

SQUID GAME Season 2 Trailer Sees Lee Jung-jae Embark On A Bloody New Mission As Player 456

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

CoHost
CoHost - 4/28/2023, 3:44 PM
Trey Parker and Matt Stone should be the ones to thank. After their Soutj Park episode mocking those changes, Spielberg wrote them a letter that he changed his mind on altering his work. These guys saved cinema.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 4/28/2023, 3:47 PM
Good, now Lucas should admit his special edition remasters [frick]ed any chance of getting the original negatives for the first trilogy
Scripturepoetic
Scripturepoetic - 4/29/2023, 4:49 PM
@bobevanz -

Fortunately,
Thanks to groups like 'TeamNegative1' and their amazing restoration work for the trilogy, there is a chance to experience a 4K version, as it was originally printed



Projects:

4k77, 4k80, and 4k83
MotherFuckerJon
MotherFuckerJon - 4/28/2023, 3:54 PM
I kinda hate how far special fx have come. After seeing so much computer generated imagery over my adult life, it makes it difficult to watch older movies with practical effects. I wish there was some way to make a good blend of the 2.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/28/2023, 4:57 PM
@Mother[frick]erJon - A wise man (well, Gilbert Gottfried) once said, "Practical effects look fake but feel real, CGI looks real but feels fake." I think that pretty well sums it up. I grew up with practical effects, so it's easy for me to suspend disbelief and soak in some movie magic. I'd recommend spending some quality time with the films on the Arrow app, see if you can get a feel for the fake-looking, real-feeling practical stuff.

TyrantBossMedia
TyrantBossMedia - 4/28/2023, 4:09 PM
“ All our movies are a kind of a signpost of where we were when we made them, what the world was like and what the world was receiving when we got those stories out there. ”

EXACTLY

That is why I am firmly against banning and changing movies at all.
They are a product of their time.
Where we were as a country, a world, politically, morally, ethically, etc.

The woke changes being made to movies today are tarnishing the time capsule of that era of storytelling, and worse they are doing it to books as well.
Woke Disney making Menken change the lyrics to two of the songs in the Little Mermaid woke remake is a change to the original.
Even though it is a new version of the movie it should remain true to the source material.

Banning Song of the South is ridiculous as is changing Token’s name in South Park to Tolkien and then going back and changing the subtitles of part episodes to read Tolkien.

Putting a sensitivity disclaimer on front of Gone With the Wind is a travesty.

Covering Daryl Hannah’s butt with CGI hair is another dumb change.

My fear is an Orwellian future where all literature and media is changed to erase the past in an attempt to rewrite history.
Fogs
Fogs - 4/28/2023, 4:12 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - Cheers. Great comment.
TyrantBossMedia
TyrantBossMedia - 4/28/2023, 4:43 PM
@Fogs - Thanks
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 4/28/2023, 4:57 PM
Should films of the past be changed/cancelled? No. They were a product of the era they were made in and it can be considered a piece of educational history due to why certain jokes/characters/storylines were written. When Disney decided to change Splash Mountain into Princess and the Frog people were upset. But that's still a current attraction that's past messages do not represent the messages of today. But past products shouldn't be altered upon a re-release or completely deleted as it takes away from the Historical message and history behind it.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 4/28/2023, 5:06 PM
@SonOfAGif - That's right. Totalitarian, one-party states such as Cuba, China, etc. censor or alter passages or scenes from earlier literary or cinematic works of art if the passage or scene doesn't fit the plan. It kills me to see Western society beginning to do the same.
TyrantBossMedia
TyrantBossMedia - 4/28/2023, 5:24 PM
@SonOfAGif - And what were the "past messages" of Splash Mountain?
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 4/28/2023, 5:28 PM
@TyrantBossMedia - You have Google and you being the Conservative White Knight should already know exactly what past messages your base is upset that was a cause for change. I'm not playing this game with you today.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/28/2023, 5:28 PM
@GeneralZod - There are a couple of genre/grindhouse reissue labels that have been putting out discs where the viewer can choose between the original, uncut film, and an edited version better suited to modern sensibilities, cutting out explicit sex, rape, animal cruelty, etc. I think this is the ideal for home video and even streaming releases.

That said, editing old media so that it can be more easily resold to modern audiences is just capitalism, pure and simple. Has nothing to do with totalitarian regimes or Orwellian dystopias or any of that other hysteria.
TyrantBossMedia
TyrantBossMedia - 4/28/2023, 5:35 PM
@SonOfAGif - You aren't going to enlighten me because you know the "past messages" you see are messages that you have either conjured up in your oversensitive fragility, or what you have been told by other professionally offended.

You know your argument is weak and that I will take you apart with facts.
TyrantBossMedia
TyrantBossMedia - 4/28/2023, 5:36 PM
@GeneralZod - He's a Fascist. It's what we have to deal with because of decades of brainwashing in the education system.
GeneralZod
GeneralZod - 4/28/2023, 10:58 PM
@ClintThaHamster - It 100% has to do with the rise in political correctness and the fear to speak out against censorship -- you know, the censorship the Democrat Party fought very hard against as recently as 20 years ago, when the Democrat Party advanced classical liberalism (free speech, presumption of innocence, equality (not equity), etc. Today, they advance Marxism. Corporate America complies because political commissars now sit on their DEI committees, and senior management is in fear of being called 'racist,' 'misogynist,' 'transphobe' or any other label and canceled by the Leftist mob via MSM, Twitter and other social media platforms. Aunt Jemima syrup is a perfect example -- the smiling black woman on the label was dropped not because of capitalism, but because of Pepsi Co's fear that if they didn't comply with the policy dictates from the commissars on the left, they would be canceled or called out on Twitter. Another example is the censorship of certain images in some Dr. Seuss children's books, such as "To Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street." Same thing. The censorship had nothing to do with capitalism; it had everything to do with kowtowing to the Marxists who were threatening to cancel Pepsi products or Dr. Seuss books entirely.
Clintthahamster
Clintthahamster - 4/29/2023, 11:09 AM
@GeneralZod -
dragon316
dragon316 - 4/28/2023, 5:09 PM
Wouldn’t matter to me guns walkie-talkies as long scene stays same don’t see what guns would do unless plan use them
View Recorder