Reality Check: The Cold Hard Truth About the Spidey Reboot

Reality Check: The Cold Hard Truth About the Spidey Reboot

The phrase “[Frick] the reboot” abounds in the forums, but the reboot is what we have. It won't be pretty, and it won't be polite, but here are my thoughts on the matter. Consider this LEEE's intervention.

Editorial Opinion
By NERO - Aug 11, 2010 11:08 PM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man

Photobucket

The time has come to face facts folks, the Spider-Man franchise as we know it is done. I, for one, am really getting sick of the constant complaining about the Spider-Man and Superman reboots.
spiderman Pictures, Images and Photos


I can understand that we, as comic fans and fanboys, have a tendency to not let go of things easily. We are by our very nature locked to our childhoods in some ways, but considering that the vast majority of us are guys we are merely being the big kids we all are at heart. My own ire is raised when the time comes to move on, as has become the case with our friendly neighborhood Spider-Man and the fan favorite Brandon Routh in his role as Superman. When these topics are brought up some of our ilk magically and instantly transfigure into children refusing to go to the potty because we have become so comfortable going in our diapers.

As fanboys we are fiercely loyal to our favorite characters and comic companies. This stubborn rigidity is one of the things that define us. What would the conversations in my childhood comic book shop, Little Shop of Comics in Conyers Georgia, have been like without phrases like, “Marvel sucks.” “No, man, DC is over rated.” “Thor could so kick Superman’s ass.” About twelve years ago the era of the Comic Book Movie came to pass and with it, and the maturity of the internet, we found a whole new forum to expand the great comic shop debates. CBM is my poison of choice as I’m sure it is for many of you, but the trend of argument and commentary I have seen lately is becoming downright depressing. Every time I see a pointless argument about the reboots of Spidey, Superman, or any of the other properties being reworked I just want to pull my hair out.


I think that the vast majority of us remember the news we heard coming out of the preproduction of Spiderman 4, and I think the vast majority of those agree that what we were hearing was anything but good. Be it the skipping over of Lizard, yet again, or the rumors of a telepathically controlled Vulture and possible Vultress, none of us seemed happy with what we were to be force fed from the next installment of Sam Raimi’s Spiderman films. The forums were ripe with complaints and barbs at Raimi and company. “MJ sucks,” “Dunst looks like a foot,” (my favorite: mean, but funny as hell) “Weepy Maguire,” “Dancing Spidey,” “No more show tunes!” all of these were lines I was reading. People cried out for the head of Sam Raimi, and a bag over the head of Mary Jane. It was getting ugly and fast.

Then the news came: Sony had put their foot down. Spider-Man 4 was scrubbed. Whether the reason for the abrupt cancelation was the pig headedness of the director, or the rumors of the budget looming near the astronomical $300,000,000 mark, the project was dead. Raimi and company were canned and a script previously submitted was being used as the basis for the reboot of the franchise. There was about a day of stunned silence. Then all hell broke loose again. Now it seemed so many of the most vocal Raimi detractors were now his most ardent fans singing his praises and offering him up for canonization by the pope as St. Sam. In the words of the immortal Heath Ledger’s Joker, “What happened? Did your balls fall off?” I don’t think they did, though I sure as hell ain’t checking.

Photobucket

I think it goes back to the anal retentive nature of the fanboys. We have no power or say so in the matter, and so we’re going to pout and scream, and poop our diapers in an attempt to make mean old Sony do what we want! What do we want? Another apparent theatrical turd laid at our feet by Sam Raimi? The same old things to complain about like dancing Spidey and weepy Petey? The more unlikable and increasingly visually unstimulating MJ? One or two more villains to find out Spidey’s secret identity and that last anticlimactic showdown where the villain almost invariably kidnaps MJ and dies whilst Spidey runs around with his mask off? Really? That’s what you wanted?

Huh. I thought that’s what was being bitched about the most there…

Are we so afraid of change that we would rather have one more go-round on the Raimi train? Waste another $60 at the theater to take our wives and girlfriends to see the same thing we saw in the previous three movies. We would rather go with what we know, like it or not, than try something different. Do we stomp our feet every time a writer or artist is changed on a comic run? Of course not. Did we refuse to watch the new Batman and Spider-Man cartoons just because the old ones ended? No. Why is this any different? It’s just a change. A new direction. A new story, perhaps one in which Sandman didn’t kill Uncle Ben and Venom wasn’t vaporized after ten minutes of screen time. Here’s a truly frightening thought: it might actually be good. It might not suck. You, God forbid, might like it more than what has come before.


Here is the final slap in the face. It doesn’t matter how many of us write out or sign petitions, make” I hate Webb websites,” or constantly type “[frick] the reboot,” as the coda of every post. The ink has dried on the contracts, and we are going to have a new Spider-Man franchise and Brandon Routh is no longer Superman. It’s done guys. Learn it, live it, accept it, and no offense, but get the [frick] over it. There are things we can change and things we cannot. Why waste your time and energy on this child-like fit of stubborn inflexibility, really? In the words of Bruce Lee, “Be like water, my friend.” Adjust to the new paradigm. Become one with the force. Find your inner peace and just let it go. I’ll make a deal with you guys. If the trailer comes out and it looks awful I too will join you in the chant of “[frick] the reboot,” and write an article of apology for calling you anal retentive babies. I ask though, that when, if, or until that day comes look at these changes with an open mind and give these flicks a chance before you condemn every aspect of them. Focus instead on what you would like to see different than what has come before. I ask this for the sake of keeping the monotony out of our forums and for the sake of my ever decreasing hairline which grows smaller with every handful of hair I pull out when I read those woeful words; “[frick] the reboot.”

Look at the good the reboot may bring. As things stood with the Raimi films Goblin: dead, Doc Ock: Dead, Venom: Dead, the new films will bring life and a new chance to these characters. We may see a proper Goblin, and a truly evil Doc Ock, and Venom may actually have more than ten minutes of screen time. There are good things that can come from this reboot. And God forbid, you may actually like it.

Has WWE's Liv Morgan Landed A Major Superhero Role? Here's What We Know So Far
Related:

Has WWE's Liv Morgan Landed A Major Superhero Role? Here's What We Know So Far

Maria Gabriela de Faria & Isabela Merced Unmask Their SUPERMAN Audition & Action Scenes
Recommended For You:

Maria Gabriela de Faria & Isabela Merced Unmask Their SUPERMAN Audition & Action Scenes

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
OmegaBlack13
OmegaBlack13 - 8/12/2010, 12:17 AM
Im actually in the minority thats really excited about the reboot. While I absolutely love the original TWO movies ([frick] part 3), they had there share of flaws and unnecessary deviations from the source. Not only will this be a chance to not have the villains die at the end of every movie, but Peter Parker might actually spend a full movie in high school. Now, although Im a DC guy, it is my understanding that the heart of, and some of the best stories for Spidey, lie in the HS years. This could be the chance to dothing right!
NERO
NERO - 8/12/2010, 12:21 AM
My thoughts EXACTLY!

Damnit...Omega...stay..(Grunt)...out of...my...MIND!!! lol.
OmegaBlack13
OmegaBlack13 - 8/12/2010, 12:51 AM
NERO-Great minds huh?
Either that or Ive become a telepath. Bitchin.
InTylerWeTrust
InTylerWeTrust - 8/12/2010, 1:38 AM
Stop making sense. Now :)
NERO
NERO - 8/12/2010, 1:57 AM
Tyler, come on now; I like to stick my tongue in a light socket just as much as the next guy... what? Why does that make no sense? I like burns and nerve damage, so sue me. [frick] it. It’s all relative.

Notice for the ADHD "[frick] the rebooters" I repeated my major talking points twice since they didn't get a chance to sink in the first time around. Yeah. I said it.

[ZZZAK-KA-TAK!!!] [frick], that burns so good. Oh, wait I think my heart stopped. Wait... naw. There it goes.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 8/12/2010, 4:09 AM
TEA @ [frick] [frick] [frick] THE REBOOT!!!! ; D

Lmao NERO @ Your sick of people defending what they love so much, I'm sick of people defending the reboots/remakes! : P

Seriously who wants to see a new take on a masterpiece, hell at least wait 10 or so years!???

Back to [frick]ing GREEN GOBLIN etc etc yawn! : D

Just go right a head and stick your A$$ out for HOLLYWOOD! ; )

Fact is HOLLYWOOD's all about $$$$$$$$$, they don't give a sh1T 'bout anyone, I ain't sticking up for them...They suck (most of 'em) and most joined the flavor of the moment! (Reboot/Remakes/3D)

Only cbm that will benefit from 3D is = GREEN LANTERN!

9 out of 10 REBOOTS/REMAKES suck, only a rare few are any good!

Look at ELM STREET, FRIDAY 13TH etc!

Dead set against a CROW and ROBOCOP Remake too!

Only thing that actually needs rebooting is [frick]ing FOX's X-MEN FIRST CLASS... and only becoz who wants a [frick]ing X-MEN BORIGINS spin off???! We need them truer and a gr8 X-MEN founding movie.

Basically I've read stuff from WEBB on many articles and he's hinted and winked, it will be heavily ULTIMATE!

He's a hugggggggggggggggggge fan, and guaranteed... we will be getting ULTI GREEN GOBLIN and ELECTRO etc down the line, and I wont love to say I told you so when everyone screams about it...Yes SPIDEY 3 wasn't good, but thats why SAM should've bee able to bring back the magic of the first two! Hell, all that was leading up to LIZARD and they (SONY) [frick]s us up the A$$!

Another thing... you don't think MARVEL STUDIOS arn't going to want to do yet another origin movie once they get the rights back??? Supporting SONY is dooming all that, Joe Public will not want to see yet another Reboot once this WEBB movie comes out a third time round no matter who's making it! (ie MARVEL STUDIOS)

It sad ppl are prepared to accept anything of our beloved superheroes and comic book characters on screen....we should accept the very best! ; P

On another note, GR8 article @ NERO I see you hoping for the best, I can't just yet!
TheLonelyComicBookNerd
TheLonelyComicBookNerd - 8/12/2010, 6:34 AM
How about we give Marvel there rights back to everything and stop bitching about everything :D
claybo4131
claybo4131 - 8/12/2010, 7:58 AM
Do people forget that the Spider-man Reboot is going head to head against Star Trek 2......guess that has left the frame of mind
spider1489
spider1489 - 8/12/2010, 8:01 AM
damn! i guess you can read minds cause that is exactly what i have been thinking since they annouced the reboot! great article! NOW LETS MAKE ONE ON TELLING EVERYONE TO STOP USING THE WORD EPIC ALREADY!
AshleyWilliams
AshleyWilliams - 8/12/2010, 9:09 AM
Thank you NERO.


LEEE........
NERO
NERO - 8/12/2010, 9:19 AM
LEEE, no good reboots? What were Batman Begins and TDK. Star Trek, just to name a couple.

A masterpiece? I think not.

Why wait 10 years? Sure you could, but nothing says you have to and it will have almost been 10 years since the release of Spider-Man 1 when thi comes out. I know you mean wait 10 years after 3, but come on. What do you need a mourning period for how bad it was?

I agree studios want cash, but its a business, comics are too the studios and publishers have to make money to keep going. The thing you're overlooking is that THE STUDIO thought Spider-Man 4 was going to be SO BAD they were going to lose money that's why they killed it... THAT'S HOW BAD IT WAS LEEE, pull your head out of the sand, buddy.

I don't think Marvel will get Spider-Man back, not for a couple decades. X and Spidey are cash cows that Fox and Sony are going to hang onto for dear life. Sucks, but I think they're dug in.

InTylerWeTrust
InTylerWeTrust - 8/12/2010, 9:19 AM
"Seriously who wants to see a new take on a masterpiece"

The Spider-Man movies were not masterpieces.

"Back to [frick]ing GREEN GOBLIN etc etc yawn!"

You've read the script? You know Green Goblin's the villain again, even though the signs point to Lizard, who you've been campaigning to be the new villain? Oh wait, I see where you're coming from, TDK really blew because we already saw Joker in Batman '89. What a crap fest Nolan turned his Bat-movies into.

"Just go right a head and stick your A$$ out for HOLLYWOOD!"

No surprise you went that route, the condescending, I'm-better-than-you route. Stop being a douche about it and let us have our own damn opinions. And, it's funny, because didn't you like Rise of Cobra, the Fantastic Four movies, Ghost Rider, etc. even though they took massive dumps on the source material? No, I guess it's alright, because you can like whatever you like, but as soon as someone else likes something you don't, they're bending over and accepting everything that comes their way.

"Only cbm that will benefit from 3D is = GREEN LANTERN!"

So? It's not like we're being forced to see it in 3D. You're desperate to pick apart every single aspect of the movie, aren't you?

"9 out of 10 REBOOTS/REMAKES suck, only a rare few are any good!"

Casino Royale, Batman Begins, Star Trek, TIH. There are plenty of reboots out there that are great and that you liked, so don't pretend like they don't exist.

"Look at ELM STREET, FRIDAY 13TH etc!"

This point proves your total irrationality towards the reboot and your flat out lack of knowledge of what your talking about.

"Only thing that actually needs rebooting is [frick]ing FOX's X-MEN FIRST CLASS... and only becoz who wants a [frick]ing X-MEN BORIGINS spin off???!"

So you have more faith in Fox to make it right than Sony? Bullshit. And who wants to see a f*cking Spider-Man movie with Vulture becoming head of Daily Bugle, and Black Cat being completely changed into a different character called Vulturess? Lesser of 2 evils.

"Basically I've read stuff from WEBB on many articles and he's hinted and winked, it will be heavily ULTIMATE!"

And have you even read Ultimate Spider-Man?

"but thats why SAM should've bee able to bring back the magic of the first two"

But he wasn't going to.

"Hell, all that was leading up to LIZARD and they (SONY) [frick]s us up the A$$!"

You must have selective memory or something. LIZARD WASN'T GOING TO BE IN SM 4. Christ, what don't you get about that? It was going to be Vulture and Vulturess, and that was all on the creative team behind SM 4. Not Sony. Once again, a case of trying to pick apart Sony every way possible. And guess what, it looks like we are getting Lizard, so you should thank Sony for that. But no, you can't blow your persona of the super dedicated and hardcore fan who takes shit from no-one because your such a good fan.

"Another thing... you don't think MARVEL STUDIOS arn't going to want to do yet another origin movie once they get the rights back???"

Maybe, but that isn't going to be for a long, long time. So that argument is pointless. In the meantime, you keep on waiting until Spider-Man stops making buckets of cash for Sony and they hand the rights back. Have fun.

"It sad ppl are prepared to accept anything of our beloved superheroes and comic book characters on screen....we should accept the very best!"

And once again, the condescending I'm-better-than-you shit. GTFO. You want us to accept what YOU think is the very best. Well guess what, we don't f*cking have to. Maybe some people didn't like the Raimi films from the start and they love the idea of the reboot. We don't have to agree with everything you say and you don't dictate what's best for us as fans. So stop acting like you know everything and your opinion is the best. I don't see you bitching about Fantastic Four, Superman Returns, etc. and they were all far from "the very best." No, you're just an obnoxious bigot who can't accept change or allow someone to have an opinion that is different to yours without insulting them.
Konel110693
Konel110693 - 8/12/2010, 9:33 AM
i agree 100% with everything that has been said here beside lee. for fricks sake accept it for wat it is we are comic book/movie fans are we not
NERO
NERO - 8/12/2010, 11:45 AM
LEEE consider this your intervention, man. We're all here for you, will you accept help? Will you go to treatment for your Raimi addiction?
matt28
matt28 - 8/12/2010, 11:48 AM
ha ha ha leee777 cracks me up with his [frick] the reboot why is this not his catch phrase.
Deadshot
Deadshot - 8/12/2010, 2:42 PM
Nero I really dislike how you keep writing how some people want the Spiderman Sam Raimi series to continue in the same sentence as some people wanting Brandon Routh to return. They are two entirely different things, and the majority of Superman fans don't want that boring no charisma actor anywhere near the reboot, the difference between the two is, Superman Returns was a colossal failure in every possible way and should be forgotten about, where as the Spiderman franchise altogether made 2 billion dollars worldwide and millions of kids grew up with Tobey Maguire as the webhead.

Look I don't know if the reboot will suck or not, all I know is that to me and many others it will not have as much heart as Spider-man 4 could have potentially had (because we've grown up with those characters)
NERO
NERO - 8/12/2010, 4:15 PM
Deadshot, My generation grew up with Michael Keaton as Batman and Chris as Superman I find the new Nolan series far BETTER than the Burton one and look forward to the end of the Donnerverse. Is it different? Sure. But it doesn't mean it won't be as good or better just because it’s a different cast and director.

Who's to say the new Spider-Man series won't surpass the 2 billion dollar mark set by Raimi's line? That automatic assumption of failure is what I get angry about. It could be better, it could be worse, we don't know yet.

I myself, having grown up a Spidey comic fan, was never in love with the Raimi series, I found it too stilted in regards to the villains and the general dullness of Peter/Spider-Man. Raimi never got the fact that yes the guy is burdened with balancing school, relationships, and family, all that, Raimi made him joyless. I would have shot myself if I were Raimi Spidey. Raimi never got the point that the mask and the suit were Peter's Escape. He was a different person in that mask; confident, sure, arrogant, funny. That aspect's absence always distracted me. That and MJ was the girl every nerd could only dream about, Dunst couldn't pull that off.

I see the reboot as a chance to repair these mistakes as well as go back and give Spidey one character Raimi completely avoided: Gwen. Gwen needs to be there as the sacrificial lamb whose death will mark the end of Peter's childhood and beginning of Spider-MAN.

The Raimi series was over. It had run itself aground by killing villains and making MJ nearly unlikeable yet anchoring Peter to her with no room to budge. It was a mess. He had painted himself into a corner and the best he could come up with was Vultress and a Spider-baby, and we all saw how well that worked in Superman Returns. It was just done; it was time to start over.

Money is never and should never be a gage for quality. Yes, 1 and 2 were good, but they had their flaws (killing villains) and 3 muddied the water of the whole series. If box office were a good rep of quality then explain the money made by the FF franchise, GI Joe, Ghost Rider, Batman and Robin, and the Mummy films.
Deadshot
Deadshot - 8/12/2010, 4:54 PM
"and Chris as Superman"

I'm sure if the awesome reeves was still alive today, and had never been paralyzed and still looked good for his age you would rather see him play Superman again then some random guy, in spidermans case a 30 year old with a long neck.

"best he could come up with was Vultress and a Spiderbaby"

The Vultress was only in an early draft of the script and was scrapped altogether before SM4 was, and Spiderbaby I highly highly doubt was Raimis idea.

"He was a different person in that mask; confident, sure, arrogant, funny."

In every movie he did make a couple of jokes in the suit, frankly i'd think it be unrealistic in a real setting for a guy in tights for every second be making a dumb joke as hes being hit with razor sharp mechanical arms or explosive bombs being thrown at him. Also he was confident and arrogant in the costume remember this line? "I guess you haven't heard i'm the sheriff around these parts!"

"whose death will mark the end of Peter's childhood and beginning of SpiderMAN."

Funny If I recall Uncle Ben did that perfectly in the first Spider-man movie, which did not happen that long ago.
Konel110693
Konel110693 - 8/12/2010, 5:17 PM
im sorry but i agree with NERO here :L
sweetre15
sweetre15 - 8/12/2010, 6:13 PM
Thanks Nero,I completely agree
NERO
NERO - 8/12/2010, 9:01 PM
Deadshot, do you know who Chris Reeve was in 1977? He was 25 year old guy with a long neck that nobody had ever heard of. My point is the iconic heroes we know today; Reeve, Keaton, etc were all just some guy before they took on the role that made them icons. Who's to say Garfield won't be the guy to supplant the Maguire as the penultimate Spidey? Or that the next Superman will not be THE Superman for the next generation.

And to answer your Superman/Reeve comment, no. I wouldn't still want Chris as Superman even had the accident never happened and I'll tell you why: The Donner Superman was not "my Superman." What that means is Donner's Supes and Lex were all preCrisis. Meaning I, as a child of the eighties and nineties, grew up with the Post Crisis on Infinite Earth's Superman in which Clark was not a bumbling buffoon, Lex was a kick ass prince of darkness industrialist genius. I look back on those older Superman films as I do the Raimi Spidermen; there's just something missing. They don't ring true somehow. They are classics, true, but they are not about "my Superman," they are about my father's Superman. I would have expected Reeve to hang it up after the utter failure of Superman 4, which he did.

Spidey humor: In the Raimi films he never got more than a chuckle maybe once a movie. Spidey as he is in the comics should be a motor mouth psyching out, pissing off, and deflating the bad guys with every breath during a fight. The villains should want him dead just to shut him up.

Ben's death snapped him out of his childhood, but you don't become a man until you have and lose your first love, maybe not to death, but its a growing step Peter never had with Raimi. He seemed stuck in the highschool level crush with MJ. Never once did those films express WHY he loved her. Just that she was a childhood crush, that made the relationship unrealistic because who doesn't mature in love, who doesn't move on from their boyhood crush? They didn't mature well together and in the end MJ was really going beyond a point, due to bad writing and lack of chemistry between Maguire and Dunst, that made sense for them to even be together. Watch Spidey 3 again.

Gwens's death marked the final transition of Peter to a man because up to that point being Spider-Man was a game. He learned "with great power comes great responsibility" with Ben's death, but Gwen taught him that being Spiderman was not a game. To lose a parent is one thing, to lose a love or spouse as a different kind of pain. Because we love our parents by default, they raised us, care for us, and our love for them is unconditional. The love for a lover is different because you gave yourself to that person, it is more intimate, more acute. To lose that is utterly devastating, having lost a girl I cared for in a car accident in college I know that feeling and it is very different from the loss of a parent because their passing represent the loss of the past, a lovers death represent the loss of one's future. And thinking of what could have been embitters one far more than remembering how great mom was because that will always bring a feeling of warmth. Wondering what your kids would have looked like can break a guy. It did me for a couple of years.
sweetre15
sweetre15 - 8/12/2010, 10:19 PM
@Nero: Great points.you're dead on and I agree 100%.
NERO
NERO - 8/12/2010, 10:46 PM
@Fangs, or just dumping the idea of trilogies all together. They don't need one every year, one every three or so would do, but handle them like Bond films; one long linear story as you said. Casts can change, directors can change, but so long as they don't kill major characters off in each film by introducing a concept like, I dunno JAIL, and then the story can continue indefinitely like the comics. I think that would work well. I don't know if directors would like handing over that much control over their stories to the Comic companies, though.

This reboot could be the start of an ongoing series with a fresh start, and all the major players still breathing and nonvaporized.
NightBat
NightBat - 8/13/2010, 12:08 AM
Great article....I'm actually really looking forward to the remake, I never like the Raimi costume, the eyes bugged me....I really hope it's a great movie as Spider-Man is my favorite Marvel hero....
cadairjr05
cadairjr05 - 8/13/2010, 7:27 AM
Sam Raimi's version of Spiderman = Tim Burton's Version of Batman----> good movies but HUGE deviation from the source material, entirely different stories/characters all together (so many villains were painted as good people, just misguided/misunderstood...that gets old).

Hopefully Marc Webb's version of Spiderman will be like Christopher Nolan's take on Batman----> closer to the source material, more connection with the characters/story and believable. We could actually see Nolan's team had read something of the source material and made a good adaptation to the big screen.

Never been a fan of the webshooters (so thanks Sam Raimi) but i wouldn't be opposed to them bringing them on.
Deadshot
Deadshot - 8/13/2010, 8:24 AM
I just think the Sam Raimi franchise deserves a little bit more respect then being canceled like it was, it was those films that made comic book superhero films so popular again. Without the first Spider-man making 8 times its enormous budget of 150 million we probably would not have nearly as many films based on superheros in the 21st century.
squirt
squirt - 8/13/2010, 10:41 AM
i just had a perfect idea. if uncle ben is only going to be in the first movie and get killed early on in it, why not have the creator himself play uncle ben. thats right,stan" the man" lee himself should be the man who tells peter "with great power comes great responsibility."
Deadshot
Deadshot - 8/13/2010, 10:57 AM
Squirt, that would be the coolest thing ever and would easily make me think the Raimi franchise ending would have been worth it.
squirt
squirt - 8/13/2010, 11:09 AM
i would also like to see ed harris play j jonah jameson since its a reccurring character. he is an awesome actor and could do the part justice.
NERO
NERO - 8/13/2010, 12:17 PM
Stan "The Man" as Uncle Ben would be awesome.
sevenolecram
sevenolecram - 8/13/2010, 2:07 PM
Fantastic article. The first 2 Raimi films were great but they weren't perfect. After that horrible piece of crap called Spider-Man 3, I think it's time to try a different take on the character.

And I think we're very fortune to see 2 Spider-Man movie franchises come to life, for some time I thought that I would never see a live-action Spider-Man, except for that "great" 70's TV show, LOL.

GO REBOOT!!!!
thetrubatman14
thetrubatman14 - 8/13/2010, 2:58 PM
YOUR A GENIUS LEE! we should reboot the superman franchise it deserves it but, with Brandon Routh as the man of steel!!! also [frick] all you quote from lee ''anal retentive babies'' lol good one. because spiderman sooo needed a reboot!!!
squirt
squirt - 8/13/2010, 7:02 PM
hayden panetierre as gwen. michael biehn as norman. anton yelchin as harry. oded fehr as kraven. dominic purcell as eddie brock. michael emerson as miles warren. robert knepper as kletus casaday. ill have to think some more of who id like to see play roles in the reboot
Whiteharted
Whiteharted - 8/16/2010, 11:50 AM
To clear something up LEEE after Spider-Man 4 was canned and everyone who complained about suddendly changed there minds and magically praised Raimi, they were talking about Spider-Man 2.
Whiteharted
Whiteharted - 8/16/2010, 11:55 AM
Oh BTW LEEE are you saying the version of DOC OCK in the second movie wasn't good? If you are SCREW YOU! Molina rules!
NERO
NERO - 8/17/2010, 12:01 AM
Molina does rule, indeed.
1 2
View Recorder