THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN: Josh Hutcherson Reflects On "Heartbreaking" Experience Of Losing Peter Parker Role

THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN: Josh Hutcherson Reflects On "Heartbreaking" Experience Of Losing Peter Parker Role

The Hunger Games star Josh Hutcherson has reflected on being in the running for the role of Peter Parker in 2012's The Amazing Spider-Man and recalls when it was like being told "no."

By JoshWilding - Dec 10, 2025 04:12 PM EST
Filed Under: The Amazing Spider-Man

A relative unknown at the time, Andrew Garfield was cast as Peter Parker in 2012's The Amazing Spider-Man when Sony Pictures decided to move on from Tobey Maguire and filmmaker Sam Raimi.

Fans were promised "The Untold Story," but the studio got cold feet and left some sweeping changes to Spidey's origin on the cutting room floor. Still, The Amazing Spider-Man spawned a sequel, but plans for third and fourth movies, along with Sinister Six, were scrapped when Sony teamed with Marvel Studios to bring the web-slinger into the MCU. 

Tom Holland took over from Garfield when Captain America: Civil War was released in 2016, but the Amazing Spider-Man made his comeback in Spider-Man: No Way Home five years later. The hope now is that he'll return in Avengers: Secret Wars.

However, in another corner of the Multiverse, it's Five Nights at Freddy's star Josh Hutcherson playing Peter #3. During a recent interview with ET Online, the actor reflected on being in the mix to play The Amazing Spider-Man's lead and learning he hadn't got the part.

"A few months before I got cast in Hunger Games, I was in the running to be Spider-Man," he said on the Dinner's On Me podcast. "I got told 'no,' which, as a teenager, was heartbreaking because I obviously wanted to be Spider-Man. But then, I was cast in the Hunger Games. That was the craziest turn of events."

"Hunger Games came out of nowhere. It just changed everything," he added, admitting that after starring in the franchise's four movies—The Hunger Games, Catching Fire, and the two-part Mockingjay sequels—alongside Jennifer Lawrence, work dried up. 

"I didn’t learn rejection ever," Hutcherson noted. "I knew only success from the age 9 to, like, 24, then kind of post 'Hunger Games' world. Because 'Hunger Games' set things up. The industry is so goddamn tricky because they set you up in this way where they’re like, 'You’ve arrived. You now are working with Jennifer Lawrence and Philip Seymour Hoffman, and you’re in this movie that makes billions of dollars, you’re the second lead of the film.'"

Explaining that as "quickly as they’re excited to get you into the spotlight," the opportunities start to fade, he continued, "It was just like a string of no one calling, not getting any offers, auditioning, but not getting cast. It’s this whole thing of, 'Oh wow, I have my career that I’ve had since I was 9 years old. It’s always worked. I always got cast.'"

"Of course, there are things that you don’t get cast in, but I had only known that the chances are, if I was auditioning, was going to book it. That is just not the reality at all."

Hutcherson was a popular choice for Spider-Man in the early 2010s, but it's hard now to imagine anyone other than Garfield as that particular Peter Parker. As for Holland's wall-crawler, we'll see him when Spider-Man: Brand New Day opens in theaters on July 31, 2026.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
Emma Stone Reveals The One Thing She Hated About Making THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Movies
Related:

Emma Stone Reveals The One Thing She Hated About Making THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Movies

Zack Snyder Shares Brand-New Photo Of Jason Momoa As Aquaman In JUSTICE LEAGUE
Recommended For You:

Zack Snyder Shares Brand-New Photo Of Jason Momoa As Aquaman In JUSTICE LEAGUE

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

SteviesRightFoo
SteviesRightFoo - 12/10/2025, 4:38 PM
He wouldve been good but garfield was also good
ModHaterSLADE
ModHaterSLADE - 12/10/2025, 4:39 PM
He's a good actor, but I'm glad Garfield got the role. Garfield, IMO, is the best actor to embody the wisecracking nature of the character.
Repian
Repian - 12/10/2025, 4:45 PM
He would have made a good Harry Osborn.
Repian
Repian - 12/10/2025, 5:31 PM
@Repian - Harry could be a sea of ​​repressed emotions. His father has been present in many of his life's traumatic experiences. When Harry's mother died, Norman was there to tell him, "Don't cry. Be a man."

All the emotions he hasn't processed result in a split personality. Harry and the Goblin. The dark alter ego, a product of a difficult life.
User Comment Image
ProfessorWhy
ProfessorWhy - 12/10/2025, 4:56 PM
More of a Bobby Drake
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 12/10/2025, 5:04 PM
That’s interesting and kinda sad since he’s done well performance-wise in the roles I have seen him in so it’s odd that offers or such would just dry up like that , especially after the Hunger Games…

However Hollywood is full of competition and other hungry young actors so it’s not surprising that others like Andrew Garfield would end up getting the parts he was or might have been up for.

Anyway in regards to him as TASM Peter , Hutcherson might have done well but I think Garfield was the better choice even if the material maybe didn’t do him justice at times!!.
RichardGrayson
RichardGrayson - 12/10/2025, 5:11 PM
I absolutely hated Garfield in the role. I thought he was so cringey and fake awkward. Seemed so forced and unnatural. [frick] both of those movies

But then he came back in NWH and I actually liked him. Later, I tried to rewatch his two spider man movies to see if I was being a hater . [frick]. No. Those movies are awful. And he’s awful in them. I hate his mannerisms as Peter. I can’t even pinpoint what I hate so much about his performance but he’s just so [frick]ing annoying
LibraMatter
LibraMatter - 12/10/2025, 5:24 PM
I liked Andrew Garfield in the role but felt that he was a little too cool to be Peter. Josh Hutcherson seems to fit the bill a little more, to me.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 12/10/2025, 5:45 PM
@LibraMatter - yeah , I can see that…

Making him a skateboarder I feel made him a bit too cool but that’s me.
LibraMatter
LibraMatter - 12/11/2025, 1:25 AM
@TheVisionary25 - It did! Being a skater is almost instant cool(to some degree).
WruceBayne
WruceBayne - 12/10/2025, 5:37 PM
Get him for Ben Reilly.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 12/10/2025, 5:44 PM
@WruceBayne - you mean MCU?.

If so , it should just be a blonde Tom Holland.

User Comment Image
slickrickdesigns
slickrickdesigns - 12/10/2025, 6:16 PM
Garfield was the right choice.
Lem1
Lem1 - 12/10/2025, 6:18 PM
Nah, Andrew Garfield was the right choice. He made Peter Parker the star of the show rather than any of the villains, finally, brought so much life to the character that was absent in the style of Raimi's films
harryba11zack
harryba11zack - 12/10/2025, 6:23 PM
User Comment Image
abd00bie
abd00bie - 12/11/2025, 12:43 AM
Hutcherson is like 5'6".....
DocSpock
DocSpock - 12/11/2025, 1:45 AM


Oh boo hoo.

I was Mad as hell when John Holmes just barely beat me out for all those film roles in the 70/80s, but ya gotta man up and carry on.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder