Spider-Man: Brand New Day Has Rotten Tomatoes' Highest Audience Score For Any MCU Movie

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Has Rotten Tomatoes' Highest Audience Score For Any MCU Movie

Spider-Man: Brand New Day's Audience Score on Rotten Tomatoes has been revealed, and it's broken not one, but two spectacular records for both the wall-crawler and the MCU.

By JoshWilding - Jul 30, 2026 07:07 AM EST

Early Prime Video screenings for Spider-Man: Brand New Day took place in the U.S. yesterday evening. The movie has also been released in several countries overseas, including most of Europe. 

Critics have had their say, but audiences are now weighing in, sharing their ratings on Rotten Tomatoes' "Popcornmeter." As we write this, the web-slinger's latest movie has debuted with a 98% score, breaking at least two records.

While the score could, and likely will, fluctuate in the coming days, Spider-Man: Brand New Day is now the highest-rated MCU movie ever made and the highest-rated Spider-Man movie. 

Meanwhile, on the critics-generated Tomatometer, Spider-Man: Brand New Day sits at 91% and has "Certified Fresh" status. The Critics Consensus states, "Spinning a web of spectacular set pieces together with mature emotional stakes and Tom Holland's soulful performance, Brand New Day is a promising reset that portends Spidey will remain sticky on the big screen for years to come."

All signs point to the movie breaking box office records this weekend, and there's a chance that, when all is said and done, Spider-Man: Brand New Day may gross more than this December's Avengers: Doomsday. That would be an incredible achievement, further cementing Spidey's status as the world's most popular superhero.

We'd imagine a Spider-Man 5 announcement is imminent, with the movie surely eyeing a 2028 or 2029 release. Chances are filmmaker Destin Daniel Cretton will be back at the helm; if so, that means Shang-Chi 2 is probably set to remain on the back burner.

During a recent interview with ScreenRant, Cretton shared some insights into Tom Holland's creative involvement with Brand New Day:

"I find many actors are like this... many times, they think of ideas in scenes. It's the same way that my brain thinks. So, when Tom pitches an idea, it's not just an idea like, 'Oh, it'd be cool to have this person in the movie' or whatever. He pitches the beginning, middle, and end of a scene that's something he knows he can play, something that creates a little character arc for him."

"So, there is a scene towards the end of this movie – I can't really say what it is – but it's an incredibly moving scene that has a lot of humor in it. I remember when Tom pitched that scene in the writers room, and the way he painted the picture, I could just see it so clearly. So, then we were able to take that idea, and write it into the script, and that's what ended up in the movie."

"Spider-Man: Brand New Day is everything fans could want," we wrote in our review of the movie. "Emotional, hilarious, and heartfelt, it’s an action-packed love letter to the comics and one of Spidey’s best big-screen adventures. Spider-Man has never been more amazing."

Spider-Man: Brand New Day is now playing in theaters.

About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
A lifelong comic book fan who grew up on Spider-Man: The Animated Series in the '90s, Josh Wilding has been contributing to ComicBookMovie.com since 2009.

While he's also written for websites like Batman-News, HeyUGuys, and WhatCulture, Josh is CBM's Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and the site's #1 contributor with nearly two decades of experience covering film and TV news (including interviews with Tom Holland, Chris Pratt, Gary Oldman, Halle Berry, Jon Bernthal, Tom Welling, and hundreds more).

Based in the UK with his wife, Josh is also an avid WWE and Formula 1 fan and writes about those passions on CBM's sister sites, TheRingReport.com and FullThrottleHQ.com. Favourite superhero? Spider-Man. Favourite pro wrestler? CM Punk. Favourite F1 driver? Max Verstappen.
Spider-Man: Brand New Day Production Designer Reveals Fun Daredevil Easter Egg That Didn't Make The Cut
Related:

Spider-Man: Brand New Day Production Designer Reveals Fun Daredevil Easter Egg That Didn't Make The Cut

Tom Holland's Spectacular Spider-Man: Brand New Day Salary Revealed As Movie Passes $800M Domestically
Recommended For You:

Tom Holland's Spectacular Spider-Man: Brand New Day Salary Revealed As Movie Passes $800M Domestically

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
OneMoreTime
OneMoreTime - 7/30/2026, 7:33 AM
Spider-Man: Brand New Day Has Rotten Tomatoes' Highest Audience Score for Any MCU Movie

User Comment Image
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 7/30/2026, 9:51 AM
@OneMoreTime - did you get to see it yet?
OneMoreTime
OneMoreTime - 7/30/2026, 10:40 AM
@TheFinestSmack - First viewing is today at 1 p.m.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 7/30/2026, 10:57 AM
@OneMoreTime - nice! I look forward to your review. Might be a while until I have time to get to see it.
Nomi
Nomi - 7/30/2026, 7:35 AM
The movie is so good.
SuperCat
SuperCat - 7/30/2026, 7:40 AM
User Comment Image
Yellow
Yellow - 7/30/2026, 7:41 AM
Deserved.
Love how this movie didn't just ditch everything made on the first 3 films, but instead build up from there.

The Peter and Ned scene with the LotR quotes, that silly joke didn't have the right to hit SO hard.
Nomi
Nomi - 7/30/2026, 7:55 AM
@Yellow - exactly, I was actually surprised by that.
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 7/30/2026, 7:56 AM
I'm gonna start stretching for this.
OneMoreTime
OneMoreTime - 7/30/2026, 7:56 AM
User Comment Image
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/30/2026, 8:08 AM
This is really a crowd pleaser. The crowd reactions are part of the enjoyment.

The anine fandom walkups helped there as well, lolz
Yellow
Yellow - 7/30/2026, 8:38 AM
@vectorsigma - what does the lolicon fandom has to do with anything??
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 7/30/2026, 9:03 AM
@Yellow - you wont understand, lolz
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/30/2026, 1:58 PM
@Yellow - Anime/manga fans love Spider-Man which makes sense because he's basically a shonen protagonist
Yellow
Yellow - 7/30/2026, 2:38 PM
@FireGunn - what does have to do with anything tho

Is not that the movie is doing well because it lured the 4 creeps that like dragon ball ultra or whatever lolicon stuff those creeps watch
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/30/2026, 2:50 PM
@Yellow - Oh you're one of those

I just told you why anime fans love him.
Yellow
Yellow - 7/30/2026, 5:13 PM
@FireGunn - i'm not a fan of lolicon dragon ball ultra cartoons
FireGunn
FireGunn - 7/30/2026, 5:15 PM
@Yellow - I'm not a fan of the MCU being worse than practically any anime I've watched in the last 5 years
CAPTAINPINKEYE
CAPTAINPINKEYE - 7/30/2026, 8:24 AM
Spider-Man Spider-Man
Gonna make $2 billion again
Spins a web any size
Gonna go see it three more times
Look out there goes my money again
MadThanos
MadThanos - 7/30/2026, 8:24 AM
This movie is absolutely beautiful.
MarvelZombie616
MarvelZombie616 - 7/30/2026, 9:06 AM
@TheFinestSmack - Daniel Richtman is trash.

Nothing he says has any value.
Irregular
Irregular - 7/30/2026, 9:53 AM
@TheFinestSmack - "current draft" and given to what Feige said about putting Daredevil, there at least was a moment where they were probably testing what to do next or who presents a challenge or support to the main story for Peter Parker.

So I don't think someone like Daredevil or even Ant-Man really added anything juicy when they made said draft. I do think most of these scoopers are full of shit, like MTTSH is the biggest full of shit scooper, but I do believe multiple drafts were made and the writers were playing around with different MCU characters.
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 7/30/2026, 10:18 AM
@Irregular - that's very possible, especially as this article is from 2024. I wish I had the time to do a deep dive into looking at every scoopers claims and seeing who was right, who was wrong, and who was just outright inventing narratives or riding the coattails of common sense guesses after trailers were released.
Irregular
Irregular - 7/30/2026, 10:25 AM
@TheFinestSmack - Oh for sure! I do remember there being a spreadsheet on Reddit that it would be constantly updated to who was A proper scoopers and who wasn't. MTTSH had 70% of their rumors wrong with D&W.

Daniel Richtman I think can be hit or miss, but I do feel he gets it more right than wrong. He has been on point with Doomsday rumors and DC rumors. Maybe he may have fudged up some, but so far on point.

But I do think there was "some" credibility to the idea that Venom was going to appear and that was heavily rumored by Alex Perez and then suddenly, it just STOPPED. I do remember a "a big rewrite" was reported and news of the Symbiote King being the villain died down till a year in a half later, rumors of Hulk & Punisher began to circulate
TheFinestSmack
TheFinestSmack - 7/30/2026, 10:59 AM
@Irregular - ah yes I do remember those big rumors of Knull being the big bad lol. And then it shifted to Mr.Negative being the big bad, until that changed.
Irregular
Irregular - 7/30/2026, 11:01 AM
@TheFinestSmack - I think many assumed Mr. Negative because of Daniel Destin Cretton but I do think he was possibly considered lol. They should save him for Miles.
Simonsonrules
Simonsonrules - 7/30/2026, 8:37 AM
I'm confused. I thought everything Marvel = garbage. How can this be?
soberchimera
soberchimera - 7/30/2026, 9:24 AM
@Simonsonrules - When was the last time a Spider-Man movie flopped?
Irregular
Irregular - 7/30/2026, 10:10 AM
@soberchimera - I mean if it's Spider-Man as a main character, TASM 2, twelve years ago. If we're talking about Spider-Man related then that honor goes to Kraven just recently...
soberchimera
soberchimera - 7/30/2026, 10:45 AM
@Irregular - It fell flat of Sony’s financial expectations, but TASM2 still made a profit, basically from the fact it had Spider-Man in the title and Spider-Man IN it.

If we're talking about Spider-Man related then that honor goes to Kraven just recently...
User Comment Image
Irregular
Irregular - 7/30/2026, 10:59 AM
@soberchimera - If you want to define profit when adding in home video and TV rights...sure...it made a net profit of $70 million but usually not a good sign when a studio discloses this when they have to add in home video and TV to define how much money profited off. In this case, not a whole lot if it has to factor in those analytics.

Also don't think $202 million dollar domestic is not a good look for Spider-Man when it opened way less than the 2002 film...just saying...

It fell flat of Sony’s financial expectations

So it flopped for Sony but dressed up with "fell flat of financial expectations..." to soothe the blow I see?
soberchimera
soberchimera - 7/30/2026, 11:13 AM
@Irregular - Flop means it didn’t make a profit or even breakeven at the box office, which it did. Let’s not split hairs here.
Irregular
Irregular - 7/30/2026, 11:18 AM
@soberchimera -

WW TOTAL:
TASM 1: $757,930,663
TASM 2: $716,934,779

DOM TOTAL:
TASM 1: $262,030,663
TASM 2: $203,605,622

Let's not split hairs here now...you really think with more money spent and less of a return it made a good enough profit without home video/soundtrack no one bought/TV rights? Yeah ok...
soberchimera
soberchimera - 7/30/2026, 11:23 AM
@Irregular - All you’ve proven is that it made less money than TASM1 which I never refuted, you have yet to disprove it made a profit against it’s budget.
Irregular
Irregular - 7/30/2026, 11:33 AM
@soberchimera - If I spend $350-$400 million in US dollars and the only return I get at the box office is $203 million...that's FLOP TERRITORY.

Hell if I spent $350-$400 million and I only got back over $500 million...um I didn't make shit! It flopped. If I'm accounting all the WW gross to be over $700 million...again...I spent more and made less or practically NOTHING... So it's pretty clear optics here that it flopped at the box office and is considered a flop throughout all Spider-Man films...

If it needs network buys/video game sales/home video sales/ to justify any type of profit for a movie, it flopped.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 7/30/2026, 11:43 AM
@Irregular - Except the budget was $293 million and the additional marketing costs were offset with promotional partnerships and corporate tie-ins. Do you honestly think studios pay for marketing out if their own pocket? With a $717m WW haul against $293, that’s more than $400m in profit, the math isn’t on your side bud!
Irregular
Irregular - 7/30/2026, 11:57 AM
@soberchimera - LMAO where did you get your math bro? So let's go by your logic for a second. You mean to tell me, that SONY, spent NOTHING on marketing?

So the person who edited the trailers, the television ads, coded the online ads, the company that put billboards, publicity premieres (like the one in Belgium), market researchers, distribution material that was created and other expenses were all done....FOR FREE?? Really now...everybody is paying SONY now to market...their movie....?

So to answer your question, yes, they do spend on marketing. When taking into account the box office, analysts often take into consideration roughly 50% of the production budget and add it to the costs. Also take into consideration that the studio only receives 40-50% of the worldwide box office gross, because theaters retain the rest. Meaning if $293M was the budget then $146 million was spent on marketing. Hence why their projection for TASM 2 WAS to make over $865 million WW.

Opinions over facts are not on your side bud...
soberchimera
soberchimera - 7/30/2026, 12:06 PM
@Irregular - So now you’re going to convince me The Amazing Spider-Man 2 had NO promotional tie-ins?
User Comment Image
http://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjghKrPpLZpxBag7e_grpHj4ifiCQ2oSTC37i0W5AsjEoMKWfQXVoBfpQ&s=10
User Comment Image
Also, still waiting on your concrete proof that TASM2 made 0 profit, y’know the criteria for being a flop?
Irregular
Irregular - 7/30/2026, 12:22 PM
@soberchimera - "So now you’re going to convince me The Amazing Spider-Man 2 had NO promotional tie-ins?"

So now you're going to convince me that those promotional tie-ins did wonders for TASM2 domestically at $202 million when the first made $263 million domestically with less tie ins and less marketing spent 🫩?

"Also, still waiting on your concrete proof that TASM2 made 0 profit, y’know the criteria for being a flop?"

You can still be a flop and make profit. If I invest $50 dollars in hopes to earn double to what I spent and only make $20 dollars back, how much money did I lose? Am I making a profit if I only got $20 back but I spent well over that amount?

If Johnny invested in his buddy Tommy by giving 20 apples in the hopes he sell out but he only sells 7...did Johnny really make money when he spent money on 20 apples? Do I have to speak to you like you're a 10 year old confused by a math question?

In the case of TASM2, if they spent well over (by your math LOL) $293M and only received $70 million back...how is THAT considered a success? You can't say "promo tie-ins" as part of it, because not even the last 3 Spider-Man movies had to factor that because it succeeded without it. Like I said...if you have to check off "other" as a form of profit in the checklist...your movie flopped...
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder