Wolverine: A Review From A Comic Purist & Realist!

Wolverine: A Review From A Comic Purist & Realist!

All I hear is boo-hoo this wasn't done right boo-hoo that was done wrong! Yeesh! Buy a ladder and get over! Then, wake up to reality! Yeah, I'm a comic book purist! I'm also a realist! Read my honest and straight up review of Wolverine, then go see it with an open mind and not a "spoiled-brat-wanting-movies-my-way-cry-baby"! Yeesh! Leave your issues in your tissues!

By tasman71 - May 05, 2009 01:05 PM EST

Just saw Wolverine with my wife Saturday.

When considering to go see it, let me issue the following warning, in the event you don't want you or your kids to partake:

Wolverine uses G.D. three times and uses Christ similarly once.

Now, for the review, discounting the above.

IT ROCKS SO HARD!!!

SPOILERS BELOW!!!

They tinkered with Wolvies origin just a little bit, making him and Victor/Sabretooth brothers on the run as opposed to Victor pursuing Wolvie to kill him. Still, it worked. It added an extra tension dimension to their relationship. It worked.

Will.i.am as Wraith was a solid performance, as was Dom Monaghan as Bolt. Too bad Victor had his way with them. No sequel paychecks!

Putting Fred Dukes/Blob in Wolvies past was an interesting twist but it worked. In spite of the way he was portrayed, he served a type of catalyst roll. That, and it introduces and makes Blob available for the Brotherhood in the upcoming X-Men: First Class.

Dan Henney played Agent Zero/Maverick with extreme arrogance, which was perfect. Remember, he's escaped death on many occasions so the exploding helicopter sets up his return in the sequels nicely. Or sets him up for the Deadpool movie. That would be interesting.

Dan Huston as Stryker was done to perfection. A manipulative, evil, mutant hating, butthead! Huston just oozed it so much you wanted Wolvie to slice his head off every time you saw him! I liked it!

Silver Fox was used in a similar fashion to the comics but with a few twists. The only one I didn't like was making her and Emma Frost/White Queen sisters. There wasn't even a resemblance between the two of them. The power change actually worked for me in the story. However, her being involved in the program sets her up for a return. The movie never said she didn't have the healing factor. Still, it worked.

Wade Wilson/Deadpool couldn't have been cast any better! Ryan Reynolds nailed it! I was hoping for a little more mouth but, it was Wolvie's show. With a Deadpool spinoff with RR on the way, butt-kicking is abot to pick up, along with body count! Gotta love the Merc with the Mouth!

Another, and perhaps the, most perfect casting was Taylor Kitsch as Remy LeBeau/Gambit! He had the look, the style, and, thanks to Friday Night Lights, the athletic ability. Dey don't get much betta dan dis! Coulda had some more Cajun accent but dat be one t'ief what need his own movie, no?! It does set up a Gambit movie and, given his past as equally twisted as Wolvies, it could be like swamp gumbo, loaded with flavor and pack a punch!

Now, this fan boy did have a freakasm when Patrick Stewart as Prof X stepped off the helicopter to rescue Scott/Cyclops, Emma, Quicksilver, Toad, Banshee, Magma(or Firestar?), and, I think, the St. Croix twins, Nicole and Claudette. There were a few others but I didn't get a good enough look to id them. Still, SWEET! Beautiful set up for X-Men First Class.

Liev Schrieber played Victor/Sabey with such delicious homicidal fun. Granted, I wanted someone bigger than Wolvie cause that's how he is in the comics but, it worked so, so, so nice! He really oozed the killing joy when he was wasting people, just like our comics Sabey! What can I say, I love a villain done right! Plus, he and Hugh really seemed to feed off each other well in their scenes.

Of course, Hugh Jackman IS Wolverine! He really did a nice job balancing the human and the animal! Nailed it. Looking forward to some Wolvie in Japan action next. Silver Samurai, Lady Deathstrike, you're on deck!

Now, for my ONE REAL BIG GRIPE! In the comics, adamantium is indestructible, it can't even cut or break when hit with other adamantium. So, to scramble Logan's memory, Stryker shoots him in the head with adamantium bullets, theorizing his brain will heal but his memories won't, thereby violating the comic established facts about adamantium by having the bullets pierce Logan's adamantium infused skull! Yeah, that was messed up. It so defied comic facts I can't accept it. My wife theorized it rang his bell so hard(five skull shots) it shook his brain up like a blender. Maybe.

As for Weapon XI, well, it actually worked. Seeing Wolvie/Sabey fighting it together was a nice touch to their brotherhood, especially when Sabey said they're brothers and they gotta look out for each other and nobody kills Logan but him! Aw, they used Wade/DP to make XI! Get over it. It set him up to be the mask over the scars anti-hero we all know and love. Seriously, what better way to make him more annoying than sewing his mouth shut, cutting his head off, then bringing him back! He'll never shut up now! It worked.

One secret ending, which we got, has Weapon XI/Wade Wilson/Deadpool alive and reaching out of the rubble for his severed head. Nice setup for the Deadpool movie. The other, which I haven't seen, supposedly has Logan in a bar in Japan, drinking to remember. Wolvy 2 with the Silver Samurai and Lady Deathstike anyone? Sweet.

Now, for you comic book purists, get over it. I AM a comic book purist but I approach comic book movies with the reality that some things done in comics can't be done in movies without some modifications, whether due to time constraints, budget, or whatever. Plus, these movies aren't just made for us, they're made to bring in new fans! So, sometimes, so the new fans leave quicker than they arrived but more confused, you make some modifications. Never be happy or rejoice that the movies are getting made.

I am just happy to see the movies made in a way that works! Quite frankly, all comic book purists should be. Yeah, we can be angry when they totally screw them up but, this isn't one of those. This actually worked well.

IT ROCKED!

Sadly, for me, they get my ticket money towards the box office total but, due to the way above mentioned warning, it won't be in my DVD collection. I do draw a line on things. As a Christian and Reverend, I have to. Sorry, Wolvy!

X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Star Kevin Durand Reveals Plans For The Blob In Scrapped Sequel
Related:

X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Star Kevin Durand Reveals Plans For The Blob In Scrapped Sequel

DEADPOOL Creator Rob Liefeld Shares Horrified Reaction To Resurfaced X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Concept Art
Recommended For You:

DEADPOOL Creator Rob Liefeld Shares "Horrified" Reaction To Resurfaced X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE Concept Art

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 5/5/2009, 2:05 PM
lol, So the violence, nudity, patracide, severed heads and kindly old couple killings were fine but not Wolvie saying "Christ"? Gotcha!
Spike1980
Spike1980 - 5/5/2009, 2:21 PM
Very well put.I agree with you 100%
WisconsinCharm
WisconsinCharm - 5/5/2009, 2:21 PM
I don't think the movie was as perfect as you made it sound. there were a lot of things great about the movie but there were a lot wrong too. i'll assume you were dazzled by almost anything then.

ps: I would hate to see or have your dvd collection
loganaspatch
loganaspatch - 5/5/2009, 2:44 PM
i guess he sees the good and the bad of this movie.

how did the reverend feel about the generic special effects and plot holes and paint yourself into a corner writing?
Neo24real
Neo24real - 5/5/2009, 3:36 PM
THATS WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT!!!I wacthed the movie too and there were so many cry babies on this site oh my goodness...it was rilly pathetic if we all got movies done the way we all wanted it....hollywood movies would be a totally different experience...I think whoever wrote this review did an awesome job...the movie was not overly great but i think it came out okay all the holes were filled and they set it up nicely for sequels...people should quit crying....contrary to most peoples wailings the movie did way way way better than Watchmen...just saying
GunRyder
GunRyder - 5/5/2009, 3:43 PM
go [frick] urself ur a pussy ass muther [frick]er look at this
Christ, christ christ christ. Who gives a flying [frick]. Plus what the [frick], God Damn? are u kidding me. Take u ur wife and ur prissy kids and go [frick] urself
WisconsinCharm
WisconsinCharm - 5/5/2009, 3:58 PM
Someone needs to moderate comments like GunRyder, completely unnecessary.

You can disagree with his review but no need to take it to that level.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/5/2009, 3:59 PM
IM WOLVERINE RAGED OUT!!!!! ; )
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/5/2009, 4:02 PM
HELL YEAH!!! : D tut tut gun!
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 5/5/2009, 4:19 PM
Yep, gunryder appears to be a very aggressive, ignorant individual with no respect for other peoples beliefs and opinions...or as i like to call them, C#NTS
Deathlok
Deathlok - 5/5/2009, 4:26 PM
Other than most of the actors performing well, this movie sucked. No one seems to acknowledge that Gavin Hood is a shitty director. Maybe they got him because he had a cheap price tag. He's no Chris Nolan or Sam Raimi, that much is certain. This review is just as whiney as the crap it's attacking.
VitMagic
VitMagic - 5/5/2009, 4:27 PM
i liked the movie too. but how did the blob get a tattoo on his impenetrable skin. he stopped a tank shot with his hand, but not a needle. victor was also shaving off his nails as a kid, but they sliced through the metal of kaylas truck like knives to warm butter. remy had longer facial hair when he was introduced, but when they start fighting, he only has stubble. a few things i found funny. but i liked it. it entertained me.
Macksimus
Macksimus - 5/5/2009, 4:28 PM
Damn good review...I agee.

@GunRyder

You should contribute more often...NOT!!!

Its one thing to attack someone, but to also attack their family in the process???

WAY TO FAIL buddy.
BLACKWINGS17
BLACKWINGS17 - 5/5/2009, 4:40 PM
I know this has been repeated again and again, but people should face the reasoning behind it all before they claim die-hard fans are nothing more than cry babies. Fox did an awesome job as far as actors, but they should of given Marvel total control over story. We can handle changes, but we cannot handle changes that are so dramatic that they change the very fabric of what makes a character loved by fans to begin with.

The X-Men are about humans with special abilities. Those abilities reflect their personality, and their personality reflects the costume. If you change the special ability, then you automatically set a domino affect that changes everything else about the character. Deadpool is a ninja mercenary that uses swords and guns - not a mutant with blades comin' out of his hands and shooting laser beams out of his eyes as he teleports off walls.

I'm really sick and tired of the argument that "some things cannot translate from comics to cinema."

Wade Wilson is dieing of cancer. Weapon-X promises a cure in return for his service. Experiment leaves Wade hideously disfigured and border-line insane, but with an unmatched healing factor. Wade dawns ninja costume to hide his appearance, and offers his mercenary skills to the highest bidder. - How the flippin hell does this not translate into cinema, it d--- near writes itself.

Oh, I forgot. What makes more sense is a man that doesn't have cancer, is not Ryan Reynolds, does not use guns or swords, does not have a ninja costume that makes him recognizable by fans (and non fans believe it or not) - but instead, shoots laser beams, teleports, and swings Baraka blades and has no back story what so ever. How does that translate again?

If a man can prance around in red underwear, red cape, and a big red "S" on his chest as he is chased by a bald man wielding a magical green amulet, then I'm pretty sure audiences can handle the "Original" origins of characters.

The whole reason they put Deadpool and Gambit into this movie was in hopes of making more money on spin-offs - so people also need to stop using the "It was a WOLVERINE origin movie" argument because it only was on paper.
jd
jd - 5/5/2009, 4:46 PM
Ok, thats total bs! i just saw it today! i read all the reviews and followed it from the beginning till now! i went with an open mind! here is the thing, you say comics to movies cant be done, tell that to frank miller! this is a hollywood movie with comicbook throwbacks!!!!! they take bits from the comics to tell their own story! all in all a good film, but not the story of wolverine we all know all love! love the japan teaser at the end, sabertooth was well cast! gambit did not need to be in this movie at all! liked seeing him but deserves his own story! marvel really needs to get back the rights to this and tell wolverine's story the way it deserved to be told! iron man was well done and stayed true to the comic but just updated it! the same should be done here!
ikeula75
ikeula75 - 5/5/2009, 4:46 PM
Christian movie review? Are we really listening to a guy that wont buy the dvd because Wolvie says Christ? Anyway we know that most die hard fans think the movie blew. The whole deadpool thing ruins it. Wolverine fights next to Sabertooth through every major war and all of a sudden sees him as evil and over the line? This movie was true to the comic in some ways tho.
The main characters name was Wolverine and he had sharp claws.
This movie IS great if you dont compare it in anyway to the comics.
Betty
Betty - 5/5/2009, 4:47 PM
Okay tasman71, YOU saying something "worked" doesnt mean it actually worked. How can you say you are a purist when all of the points that you claim "worked" really didnt work at all.

"Putting Fred Dukes/Blob in Wolvies past was an interesting twist but it worked." No, it did not work. It made no sense at all. Wolvie couldve beat that information out of ANY character. And no it shouldnt introduce blob for the brotherhood for "first class". He couldve easily been introduced in "first class". Hey, here's the blob, he's a big fat guy that grabs you with his fupa!

Case in point:
Joel Schumacher put nipples on the Batman costume. It was gay but it worked! Wooo! No, it did not work.

or

Wow, Deadpool's arm swords are longer than his forearm and hand put together yet they still retract in there? It's even visually impossible but it worked! No, it didnt.
Deathlok
Deathlok - 5/5/2009, 4:56 PM
Amen to the last four posts.
ninzen
ninzen - 5/5/2009, 4:59 PM
I can see both side of the issue here. Purists are going to complain because it's not being true to the character's history. Non-purists are going to say it's fine as long as they at least attempt to get it right.

I think they did a fine job with this movie in the sense they respected the source material and the character. I think it was a good movie standing on it's own.

If they had said they were doing the origin story and trying to be completely true to the comic then I think the purists would have something to complain about.

So, to the purists who are bent out of shape because they didn't give you your particular version of the story I'll just say "Chill out and get over it."

With that said, they definitely had some holes in the plot, the major one being the adamantium bullets. Seriously, wtf? We've seen it be punctured by bullets in this movie and apparently bent by Magneto in the the first X-Men movie. I guess "indestructible" isn't what we all think it is. :)

I'll gladly buy this movie on DVD and I'm definitely looking forward to the sequel.
2leftarms
2leftarms - 5/5/2009, 5:08 PM
Wow you really underlined the positives waaaay too much.

But if you enjoyed yourself, who am I to judge?
theothegreat
theothegreat - 5/5/2009, 5:11 PM
This is my first post and I gotta admit I like what the man had to say. He was on point on many levels. I went to go see the movie also like many of you did and I liked it. This movie is so far the best movie of the year. Yes liberties were taken but that is to be expected. I kno I don't have any stripes to posting but I've been up with this site for a very very long time. Trust me when a say that no one has a right to attack another man's family. This is directed at you GunRyder, that was messed up the way you came at dude. If you don't agree with the reverend that's fine, heck if you got some critiques of your own let's hear them. I'm sure we all wouldn't mind hearing how the movie could've been made better. But what gives you the right to atttack the man like that? A man of God no less. I don't know exactly where your head is at, but I would imagine that its up your rear end. Have a little respect and check yourself.
adamant877
adamant877 - 5/5/2009, 5:14 PM
Gunryder: Wow, did someone piss in your cocoapuffs, or what?! Look, too many people want to turn these message boards into personal attack ads. It's sickening, but it's an unfortunate side effect of free speach. Just try to remember not to sit idly by, or let word vomit become the concensus. We'll all profit from your restraint!

Decent review, all in all. I have absolutely no problem with the treatement they gave Sabretooth and Wolvie. The idea of these guys as brothers has been a possibility since their inception, and honestly, only makes sense. I've personally thought that that's how it was going to pan out from the beginning. Good story telling is good story telling.
Sure there were a lot of inconsistencies, but what is done is done. Hopefully someone will learn (eventually) that you can take liberties, but those liberties better damn well make more sense than the source material!
(ie. Betty: Yeah, I thought the same thing about the wakisashi blades... Huh?) lol
animeex
animeex - 5/5/2009, 5:59 PM
Wow... So much passion. No movie will ever be done exact. I know that and by now everyone should. I think the concept can be transferred from source to movie and I can also see some of the changes made. A friend once told me that every producer or director is going to piss their scent all over a movie. I know that every producer or director has "their" view of the story. I only have a problem that they seem to go so far over board with making it different. I have seen so many movies that seem to make so much of the movies total opposite of the source. They also don't seem to take blame and accept their faults when it fails... Only take credit if it hits big. It usually is pushed to the story or concept being bad. I still cringe at parts of movies and like some changes, but keep in mind... The differences and changes will always be there.
gerant
gerant - 5/5/2009, 6:16 PM
God damn that was a good review... shame about the evangelism though.
Spike1980
Spike1980 - 5/5/2009, 6:28 PM
Doesnt look like Gundouchebag has much to say anymore.
Isnt that pretty much a straight ticket to hell to tell a priest and his family to go f-themselves. Dude that is f-ing low.
CMKOFAN
CMKOFAN - 5/5/2009, 7:07 PM
they're made to bring in new fans! So, sometimes, so the new fans leave quicker than they arrived but more confused, you make some modifications.
JamesH
JamesH - 5/5/2009, 7:46 PM
The objective details you noted in your review like the casting and acting is accurate but the praise you gave it was not. You only reviewed the acting and the cast choice which i agree were perfect but you didnt comment anything on the special effects and more importantly, the plot (or lack of).

I do complain about how they changed a lot of things in the movie but that's not my biggest gripe... bottomline is it wasnt as good a movie as TDK, Ironman, Inc Hulk, Batman Begins and Watchmen when it shouldve with no problem at all.
sniktchick74
sniktchick74 - 5/5/2009, 7:46 PM
Good review, I agree with you for the most part. I enjoyed the movie (see my review, also posted @ CBM), and I am a Wolverine FANATIC!

I wouldn't let my little kids see the movie based not only on the profanity, but also the violence and nudity. Took my 16 y.o. though, and shared the rage with her!

Betty
Betty - 5/5/2009, 8:11 PM
nudity? where? when? Did you take your clothes off? Why would you do that in a movie theater? There are children watching Wolverine!
2leftarms
2leftarms - 5/5/2009, 8:18 PM
lol @ betty
BLACKWINGS17
BLACKWINGS17 - 5/5/2009, 9:47 PM
Once again to the people who can't pay attention to small detail. We are not ticked off because they didn't tell "our" side of the story or the way "we" wanted it. We are greatly ticked off because they didn't tell the story according to the 40+ years of comic history and the 100+ writers and artists who invented those stories to begin with. So I really hate how so many people are trying to pass it off as if us fans are mad over nothing and just pulling Marvel history out of the sky.

We realize producers and directors are gonna throw their few cents into a character and plot - it only makes sense if you are gonna waste your time creating it that you have some part in its development. Deadpool was not even remotely close to his comic book counterpart - and you do not take a fan favorite character and change him as excessively and drastically as they did, all because somebody wanted to be "creative" with something they didn't help "create" to begin with.

Comic Deadpool = swords, guns, costume, disfigured, healing factor, merc-with-a-mouth.

Movie Deadpool = arm blades, eye laser-beams, nearly naked, nicely shaved, teleport, slave-with-no-mouth.
HR
HR - 5/5/2009, 9:54 PM
I will say this it did make me laugh and i didn't leave disappointed. I am still waiting for a true to the comics movie for X-men( i won't hold my breath).If Spider man and Iron man where done the right way, I am sure the X-men movies will some day find the right director. I feel that these x-men and wolverine movie is more of the ultimates version. These movies are just another patch in the Marvel universe it keeps evolving wether we like it or not. yeah i got my complaints but i have learned to take these movies for what they are and enjoy them.
HR
HR - 5/5/2009, 9:55 PM
I will say this it did make me laugh and i didn't leave disappointed. I am still waiting for a true to the comics movie for X-men( i won't hold my breath).If Spider man and Iron man where done the right way, I am sure the X-men movies will some day find the right director. I feel that these x-men and wolverine movie is more of the ultimates version. These movies are just another patch in the Marvel universe it keeps evolving wether we like it or not. yeah i got my complaints but i have learned to take these movies for what they are and enjoy them.
KainDarkwind
KainDarkwind - 5/5/2009, 10:13 PM
Stop crying, Gerant. Evangelism? Because the man mentions his beliefs? Grab some kleenex, pu$sy.
shibazz
shibazz - 5/5/2009, 10:23 PM
you are not a purist you are a whimp!!! i should know cuz my best friend.... that little Bitch is just like you and now suddenly bleieves that "Humans" are not ready to know the truth!? you are a sad fact of the rebellion .... there is always going to be those who lose their strength in the face of battle. Put yer saddle on and Fu@K OFF!!!
SHHH
SHHH - 5/5/2009, 10:39 PM
@hr

Spiderman 4 is comin
Jib7z
Jib7z - 5/5/2009, 11:06 PM
I concur on several levels. They pushed it too far in my mind when they brough in Prof. X, but that was really it when it comes to the comic world for me. They DID screw up Deadpool, but he was SO B.A. at the same freakin time. Otherwise, as a general movie, the special effects werent all that impressive. I mean, they were cool and all, but obviously fake at the same time. I just kind of assume that special effects have been hit and miss in Hollywood. Some things i dont agree with in the X-Men franchise... like the ENTIRE frickin third movie. Who's with me on THAT one?
sniktchick74
sniktchick74 - 5/5/2009, 11:11 PM
@Betty- LOL! and Errr, nooo. :-)
Scarycherry
Scarycherry - 5/6/2009, 12:36 AM
I could be wrong but i think Striker ordered the scientist's to send weapon XI deadpool to kill wolverine. The scientist looked up and said "but sir the bonding process is not complete." So i wouldn't be surprised if everyone gets the deadpool they want in the Deadpool movie when they break off or his body rejects them like a bullet and maybe all the extra powers too. I saw some kind of device on his eyes.

Hugh is Wolverine as much as Bale is Batman. Even if you hated the changes to the story.
1 2 3
View Recorder