Bryan Singer Talks In Detail About X-Men: First Class' Characters, Chronology And Sequels!

Bryan Singer Talks In Detail About X-Men: First Class' Characters, Chronology And Sequels!

The producer of the upcoming movie talks in detail about the characters featured, how it ties into the past movies, the inclusion of the Hellfire Club, the potential sequels and more...

By JoshWilding - Apr 20, 2011 09:04 AM EST
Filed Under: X-Men: First Class
Source: IGN Movies

In an in depth interview with IGN Movies, the producer of X-Men: First Class and director of X-Men and X2 talked in great detail about the upcoming movie and below are just some of the main highlights. To read the interview in its entirety, click on the link at the bottom of the page to head on over to the site.

On The Choice Of Title And Its Meaning:

It was initially a title I liked. I knew that there was exploration of doing a movie based on the First Class comic book, but I thought that to earn that or to get there, it would be interesting to go back to the origin of the X-Men. The formation of the relationship and the schism between Xavier and Magneto. And yet I still liked the title First Class because it reflected that concept every bit as much as the comic it's based on, so I just decided that I would pursue that story of young Xavier and young Magneto but retain the title First Class as a sort of beginning of the X-Men and they could go from there.


On How He Came Up With The Story:

Oh something I came up with just based on... When I made the first two X-Men films I was conscious of figuring out how to play the relationship between Magneto and Xavier and I was always very conscious of what their past must have been. What their friendship was like. So that back-story was always playing in my head whenever I was discussing scenes with Ian McKellen and Patrick Stewart. So this was a chance to finally go back and explore the history that was always bouncing around in my mind when I was making those other movies.


On Deciding Which Characters To Include In The Movie:

You first freak out because you assume that the good ones have already been picked. Then you just pick up the books and start reviewing and researching. I felt like I was back in the late '90s again, going through all the character histories and biographies and the comic books and graphic novels, and trying not to violate the tableaux but at the same time trying to have mutants that service different aspects of your story. Where their powers move the story forward as opposed to just being there to be cool.


On The Inclusion Of The Hellfire Club:

The Hellfire Club is actually something that [producers] Lauren Shuler Donner and Simon Kinberg had mentioned to me early on. It's something that we had discussed years ago, to incorporate them into an X-Men film, but we never quite found a way to do so. So Lauren brought it up again and I thought great, because it again plays into the idea of them being underground. Because the whole idea of the Hellfire Club is that they are an underground club, and that's perfect because we're dealing with a time when the world doesn't know that mutants exist. What better villain element than one that exists under the surface of society? And to have the mutants intertwine with the geopolitical events of the time.


On Kevin Bacon As Sebastian Shaw:

evin is just a fantastic actor and we've seen him be very charming and funny and we've seen some of his darker side in a couple of pictures, but he hasn't really done this sort of thing yet. He's quite phenomenal - he speaks multiple languages in the film flawlessly, and he's at that age now where his boyish charm can now be transformed into one of those seductive villains. And he plays it quite well - it's fun to watch him on set.


On How The Movie Ties In With The Original Trilogy:

I think the chronology works - there are some liberties, but for the most part, it makes sense. The characters make sense. Which is why Beast and Mystique were the only two I could bring back because you don't really know how old they are.


On Setting A Sequel In The 1970s or 1980s:

Absolutely. That would be a blast.


On Whether He Has A Master Plan For A Trilogy Of Movies:

Just on this one. I think that whenever people claim they have long-range plans for these things... I think what happens is you really have to see how the first one plays, how audiences respond, which characters and points of the story they respond to, and then reassess it and go from there. In my mind, that's the way I think about it.


On What Matthew Vaughn Brings To X-Men: First Class:

He's incredibly good with ensemble casts, which was the most important thing. He can service many characters, each with their own separate characterisations, each driving a common story. And he already had a love of the X-Men universe from when he had been involved in X-Men 3. And he immediately took to the period that it took place. He's a huge fan of the Bond films, and he wanted to use some of that aesthetic in this film, and I thought that was really fantastic. He's a terrific director and he's a strong director, and he's also produced and has his own team. To dive into one of these movies can be very challenging - all these things kind of going against you, and he was at a place where I knew he could take these things on and wouldn't be overwhelmed.


X-Men: First Class is set to be released in the UK on June 1st and in the US on June 2nd.




Image and video hosting by TinyPic



X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Was Partially Written In Claudia Schiffer's Hospital Room Due To Rushed Production
Related:

X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Was Partially Written In Claudia Schiffer's Hospital Room Due To Rushed Production

Matthew Vaughn Reveals Scrapped Plans For X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Trilogy And Who He Was Going To Cast As Wolverine
Recommended For You:

Matthew Vaughn Reveals Scrapped Plans For X-MEN: FIRST CLASS Trilogy And Who He Was Going To Cast As Wolverine

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 4/20/2011, 9:34 AM
Great find Josh! The more I hear the more excited i get. Singer knows how to make good films and to have him team up with Vaughn is just epic. He gives a good explanation about Mystique and Beast, hopefully the sequels will show more of the comic version of the First Class.
Cross
Cross - 4/20/2011, 9:46 AM
You SUCK!!!
JWStubner
JWStubner - 4/20/2011, 9:49 AM
Hopefully they make sequels so they can introduce a young Cyclops, Jean, and Storm.
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 4/20/2011, 9:50 AM
Singer is an awesome filmmaker, hope they hire him to direct a Marvel Studios film.
rocky
rocky - 4/20/2011, 9:54 AM
I want to see this film. I think it may turn out better than the previous 3 not to mention that it looks pretty good.

Having said that I'll always hate Singer for [frick]king up the team's make up and continuity. Why not start the shit right from the very beginning instead of picking members based on popularity or your taste. And I'll hate him fpor a shitty Superman film
marvel72
marvel72 - 4/20/2011, 10:04 AM
f*ck singer,one great movie doesn't make you a great director.

you ruined the x-men & you f*cked superman.
JatevinM
JatevinM - 4/20/2011, 10:04 AM
Let the bawww storm begin
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 4/20/2011, 10:09 AM
Look above you, it already did lol
Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 4/20/2011, 10:13 AM
"On Deciding Which Characters To Include In The Movie"

And here I was sure it was going to involve the words "blindfold" and "dartboard".
WarPig
WarPig - 4/20/2011, 10:22 AM
This movie looks to be quite entertaining! I'll check it out in the theater and hope it doesn't bomb.
andrew13
andrew13 - 4/20/2011, 10:34 AM
Singer should stay away from superhero movies. The three he made (X-Men 1 & 2; Superman Returns) are really, really terrible and this one looks like a pooper.
JatevinM
JatevinM - 4/20/2011, 10:44 AM
Whoever says X-2 was horrible is insane.
VictorHugo
VictorHugo - 4/20/2011, 10:47 AM
I want Bryan Singer to direct a new Star Trek TV series.
MaddMonkk
MaddMonkk - 4/20/2011, 10:53 AM
I didn't care for Superman Returns as much as Ii thought i would, but The first 2 X-men films were great. If you don't like them then your just too stupid to understand. I try to be nice on here but that time has past. Get you VHS copy of Mutant X out and watch it before you watch Xmen then we shall welcome you back.
CherryBomb
CherryBomb - 4/20/2011, 10:55 AM

It may not be a good comic book adaptation
but it looks like a good movie. (: so I'm definitely up for it.
VictorHugo
VictorHugo - 4/20/2011, 11:02 AM
True, if it weren´t for Bryan Singer´s X-men, we would never have CBM movies again. No Spiderman, no Batman, no Iron Man and no Thor.

We would be forced to watch "Sex and the City" sequels,
the "Love Boat" remake, and the "Dallas" reboot.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 4/20/2011, 11:15 AM
The only Bryan Singer movie I like is Valkyrie. I hated what he did with the X-Men movies and his involvement with this one worries me a great deal. I'm just hoping that Matthew Vaughn will save it...the great trailer I posted earlier certainly makes it seem that way. They should have just rebooted the franchise with the original five, but they didn't because of Singer's involvement. We'll see I guess.
Illuminatus
Illuminatus - 4/20/2011, 11:25 AM
@JoshW Thats the Bryan Singer movie you like the most? You don't like The Usual Suspects? Granted, Singer shouldn't get all the credit he does for that movie, but still, it has defined the Crime-Thriller genre, and it practically immortalized Kevin Spacey.
RexDartEskimoSpy
RexDartEskimoSpy - 4/20/2011, 11:27 AM
Everything he said sounds completely thought-out to me. (Unlike many of these comments...)
VictorHugo
VictorHugo - 4/20/2011, 11:30 AM
The X-men chronology in the comics is a übermess too.
You want Cable? Stryfe? Deadpool? X-force? Age of Apocalypse? Onslaugh? Don´t worry, they´ll get there in X-men 7 and X-men 8.
Illuminatus
Illuminatus - 4/20/2011, 11:33 AM
"You first freak out because you assume that the good ones have already been picked. Then you just pick up the books and start reviewing and researching."

Bryan, judging by everything you have done with the X-Men movies in which you have been involved with, its pretty safe to say that you barely, if at all, skim through the comics and look at wikipedia/Marvel.com pages. I wouldn't be so Anti-Singer if you would just man up and say:

"Hey. Look, I have more control over this whole thing than anyone besides the studio. So these are the characters I chose, and I don't have to explain why. I know it doesn't follow the books in the slightest, but I'm making this for pure entertainment value."

He admits to that, and I'll stop being Anti-Singer in a heartbeat. Vaughn hasn't really impressed me that much (I only liked Kick-Ass the first time I saw it, although I thought Stardust was a fun little movie), but I can't necessarily blame him for whats happening with this franchise.

I was reading that Gavin Hood had roughly 60% control over Wolverine, while Vaughn only has 40%. That does not bode well for the movie in general, seeing as Singer will have majority control over the film.
Newbus
Newbus - 4/20/2011, 11:38 AM
"I think the chronology works - there are some liberties, but for the most part, it makes sense..."

Well it doesn't make sense when in your own film Xavier states he met Magneto when he he was 17 and yet in your latest film, First Class, they're a lot older when they first meet.

I still dont know why First Class is called First Class.

VictorHugo
VictorHugo - 4/20/2011, 11:39 AM
Correction, Spider-Man was already in development-hell for ages. It was like a urban legend. Just like the Battle Angel Alita movie.
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 4/20/2011, 11:43 AM
Lmao get that pube out your ass darkmatter
AskaniSon
AskaniSon - 4/20/2011, 11:48 AM
"Which is why Beast and Mystique were the only two I could bring back because you don't really know how old they are."

...what? Mystique, ok, nobody knows how old she is -- comics or otherwise -- but Beast? He's supposed to be within like 5 years of everyone else in the original 5 (maybe 10 for Iceman).

"I knew that there was exploration of doing a movie based on the First Class comic book, but I thought that to earn that or to get there, it would be interesting to go back to the origin of the X-Men."

So...before Singer came on, we would've had a movie about the original 5 directed by Vaughn? [frick] Singer. To earn a movie about the ORIGINAL team...he had to do a movie about a team BEFORE the original team??? W.T.F.

The trailers made me want to see this movie, it really looks like the best this franchise has ever offered. I have no issue with changes, but the reasoning for these changes piss me off -- these weren't necessary changes, they wouldn't make or break the story being told, Singer just doesn't know (or care, maybe) enough about these characters to realize this story could've been told WITH the original team.

I'm not a fan of what FOX/Singer has done with this franchise and I would kill to have it over at Marvel Studios, but I still hope this movie is good.
CaptainAmerica
CaptainAmerica - 4/20/2011, 11:50 AM
Rottentomatoes
Blade 1: 55%
Blade 2: 59%
X-Men 1: 82%
X-Men 2: 88%

Not to mention that Blade didnt even have the [frick]ing Marvel logo attached to it. STFU Darkmatter!
fullmetal
fullmetal - 4/20/2011, 11:50 AM
"It was initially a title I liked. I knew that there was exploration of doing a movie based on the First Class comic book, but I thought that to earn that or to get there, it would be interesting to go back to the origin of the X-Men. The formation of the relationship and the schism between Xavier and Magneto. And yet I still liked the title First Class because it reflected that concept every bit as much as the comic it's based on, so I just decided that I would pursue that story of young Xavier and young Magneto but retain the title First Class as a sort of beginning of the X-Men and they could go from there."


this comment helps me like the guy a little bit more...
fullmetal
fullmetal - 4/20/2011, 11:51 AM
if after this film...we EARN the right to see cyclops and jean...we BETTER see them in the sequel or so help me God I will assassinate this fool! @captain america...why do people constantly refer to critic sites, as if their accumulative ratings give validity to a movie being "better"...it's f ucking stupid...don't you people have your own minds...what are we politicians now? referring to statistics trying to validate our opinions as truths? opinions are opinions...period...
Illuminatus
Illuminatus - 4/20/2011, 11:54 AM
@xXkryptoniteXx Its still very debatable whether Singer's X-Men movies were the catalyst for Hollywood's craze over comic book movies, for the past decade. At the time, Hollywood was already running dry on original material, seeing as the various film festivals (Venice, Sundance, Cannes, etc.) were becoming the epicenter for new, thought out, original films. "Batman & Robin" did kill comic book movies for years in Hollywood, yes. That is a fact written directly in stone.

Many people now study Singer's first two X-Men movies and the times in which they were released, and several have determined that it was almost entirely a "WOW" factor that led to such positively reviewed films and the spawning of a relatively successful franchise. "WOW factor" is something in which people are so awestruck by what they saw, that they couldn't believe it was anything less than spectacular or even better. The X-Men films (or atleast the first two) have mostly been forgotten by the general population, showing that their novelty quickly wore off, while the Blade movies are still remembered to day, because of their incredibly shocking, dark take on the vampire mythology.

Many people are not fond of this project simply because of the studio involved. I'm sure you are well aware of Fox's proclivity for making bad movies, specifically their comic book movies. I hate to make such an assumption about you (on account of the fact that I don't know you), but you would have to be either incredibly dense and not able to see the recycled plot that X2 used, or you're simply in denial. I really do hope its neither, because it was very well established, by both critics and audiences, that X2 did in fact have a recycled plot of the first, further leading to the conclusion that Singer's involvement is a bad omen upon this project.

Most of the people, or at least the ones I've gotten to know, that don't like the idea of First Class being made, regularly make valid, logical points to justify their stance.

"No matter how you hate fox or singer or anyone for that matter....xmen well never be back to marvel and everyone in Hollywood knows singer's xmen re introduce comic book movies again."

I greatly disagree with that. You need to discern between the novelty of the first two films, albeit that novelty has worn off, and the fact that First Class is simply using a smaller, condensed, but still recycled plot of the first movies in the franchise. Granted, many of the comics are solely about the X-Men fighting the government/other mutants, but the comics often delved deeper and created many original villains which added to the great depth of the classic X-Men storyline's and made them as popular as they are today. Also, pretty much everyone that I know, regardless if they think First Class will be the best movie this summer, or the worst movie in history, firmly believe that a proper, amazing X-Men movie can only be achieved under the care and damn near expert filmmaking that Marvel Studios possesses.

MOST of what I wrote are simply theories, that I was able to actually back up with some facts and other proved theories.
1 2 3 4
View Recorder