New POWERLESS Synopsis Moves The Action From An Insurance Agency To A Wayne Enterprises Company

New POWERLESS Synopsis Moves The Action From An Insurance Agency To A Wayne Enterprises Company

It looks like some big changes have been made to Powerless since the pilot was screened at Comic-Con earlier this year as the workplace comedy will now be set in a company owned by Gotham's Dark Knight!

By JoshWilding - Dec 11, 2016 09:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Powerless
Source: Batman-News
The pilot episode of Powerless was screened to a mixed, but mostly positive, response at this year's San Diego Comic-Con, but it sounds like NBC has made some major changes to the first ever DC Comics sitcom. While the events of the workplace comedy were originally set to take place at an insurance company, Batman-News reveals that the network has made a big change to that which ties into the world of the Caped Crusader. While the premise won't be too different, it's still a big alteration! 

For more on what to expect, here's the newly released official synopsis for the upcoming series. 
 
In a world where humanity must cope with the collateral damage of Super Heroes and Super-Villains, Emily Locke (Vanessa Hudgens) begins her first day as Director of Research & Development for Wayne Security, a subsidiary of Wayne Enterprises that specializes in products that make defenseless bystanders feel a little safer. Full of confidence and big ideas, Emily quickly learns that her expectations far exceed those of her new boss (Alan Tudyk) and officemates, so it will be up to her to lead the team toward their full potential and the realization that you don’t need superpowers to be a hero.
 
So, the company now makes products to help regular people defend themselves from superpowered individuals rather than insurance claims, and that could mean the first episode has been pretty much reshot from scratch. Alternatively, it may be the same thing with just a different - and more recognisable name - but this is still an interesting development. What do you guys think of the change?
BATMAN: DARK PATTERNS #1 Recap And Review - Masterfully Executed Body Horror
Related:

BATMAN: DARK PATTERNS #1 Recap And Review - Masterfully Executed Body Horror

James Gunn Reveals How CLAYFACE Came Together So Quickly And What It Means For THE BATMAN PART II
Recommended For You:

James Gunn Reveals How CLAYFACE Came Together So Quickly And What It Means For THE BATMAN PART II

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
ODanil
ODanil - 12/11/2016, 9:39 AM
Another batman show without batman then
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 12/11/2016, 9:45 AM
@ODanil - Which again proves my point. WB has zero faith in any other property they own but Batman. And to me that is so sad.

Which raises another question. If they are only confident in Batman why have they invested money and talent into a Batman shared universe with Nightwing, Red Hood, Robin, Azrael, Batgirl, Batwoman, and Batman Beyond?
JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 12/11/2016, 9:58 AM
@SonOfAGif - Silly little boy.........Batman is the bread and butter of DC.......just like how Marve is using Ironman in Spiderman Homecoming.

God forbid DC to capitalize on something.

JoeMomma29
JoeMomma29 - 12/11/2016, 10:10 AM
@JoeMomma29 - Also no faith in any other property......

1. Arrow

2. Supergirl

3. Flash

4. Legends

5. iZombie

6. Lucifer

7. Soon Krypton

8. Constantine (cancelled)

9. Preacher

Huh! I am really confused because in all those those I am still trying find where Batman has been used etc.......
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 12/11/2016, 9:40 AM
So... what happened? Did Disney's lawyers have a conversation with WB's about this being basically Damage Control? Was that the only reason Damage Control got any juice to begin with, as a legal maneuver? And is this the reason for what feels like an inordinate delay?

Or maybe they just wanted more Batman because Batman.
GhostDog
GhostDog - 12/11/2016, 9:44 AM
@Spock0Clock - wouldn't be surprised
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 12/11/2016, 9:48 AM
@Spock0Clock - Could be a bit of both. I remember reading at one point that Wonder Woman would make a cameo. Wouldn't surprise me one bit if a WB lawyer warned of a potential lawsuit from Disney.

Not to mention Damage Control is/was to be set within the MCU.
1 2 3 4 5
View Recorder