My Discontent With THE DARK KNIGHT RISES

My Discontent With THE DARK KNIGHT RISES

Drawing inspiration from two of the most revered Batman comic book story-lines (The Dark Knight Returns and Knight Fall), The Dark Knight Rises (the third installment in Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight Trilogy) is an ambitious end to an epic trilogy. Maybe a little overly ambitious. The first two acts are fantastic. The set-up is suspenseful, dramatic and just as devoted to character development as it's predecessors. However, the films third act failed to meet my expectations. The following are my points of discontent with TDKR.

Editorial Opinion
By MarVell - Sep 22, 2013 09:09 AM EST
Filed Under: The Dark Knight Rises
Source: ComicBookMovie.com



In order to protect Harvey Dent's good name and preserve the enormous number of convictions he secured as District Attorney. Batman decides to shoulder the responsibility of criminal acts perpetrated by former District Attorney, who was driven to personality disorder by the actions of the criminally insane, Joker. Eight years later, In the aftermath of the events, a recluse Bruce Wayne is forced out of retirement, picking-up the mantle of Batman once again, by the emergence of a new enemy. The masked criminal Bane. This mysterious adversary makes short work of the crime-fighter, now well past his prime. Not only is Batman defeated, but an under siege Gotham falls victim to a new order under the boot-heals of Bane and his followers.

I'm particularly fond of underdog/comeback story's so my expectations for Bruce Wayne/Batman to rise to the occasion a-mist impossible odds were high. Though the set-up is nearly perfect the end-game just didn't deliver.

#1) TWIST ENDING: Batman's back is severely damaged in his first hand to hand encounter with Bane. He's left broken at the hands of his enemy, both physically and emotionally. Though I won't nit-pick about his speedy recovery in an under-ground primitive prison without the miracle of modern science/medicine and a licensed, practising doctor. I will however nit-pick over Batman's second confrontation with Bane. An encounter which is too short and not as impact-full as the first. Also, immediately following Banes defeat, Batman is stabbed incapacitating him, by his love interest/business partner Miranda Tate. Revealing Miranda is actually the daughter of Batman's former mentor/enemy Ra's al Ghul. Talia al Ghul is the true mastermind behind the plot to destroy Gotham city and to break its champion, not Bane. Reducing one the deadliest foes in Batman's rouges-gallery, yet again (Director Joel Schumacher's 1997 Batman & Robin) into a lackey at the bequest of a beautiful fem-fatal.

#2)THE WORLDS GREATEST DETECTIVE? The films script also tends to forget or down-play Batman's deductive reasoning and he's somehow unable to deduce that Miranda is playing both sides. He also makes the same mistake with Selina (Cat Woman) Kyle earlier in the film. One could argue: Batman knew Selina was playing both sides and knew she would sell him out to Bane to save her own skin. But if he could deduce Selina's true motives why would he fall for it with Miranda/Talia? One could also argue: Batman had an emotional connection with Miranda which blinded him to her real agenda. Okay, that may be plausible if the film had spent more time with Bruce and Miranda actually developing a real romantic relationship. However such is not the case. Besides a roll in the hey, the two hardly spend any real quality time together for Bruce to grow so attached, that he'd be fooled by her deception. I guess he's only the worlds greatest detective in the comics. But I digress, back to Batman being incapacitated by the knife wound inflicted upon him by Talia. Leaving The Dark Knight defeated, yet again, and at the mercy of Bane, yet again. Selina bursts in on the bat-pod and rescues the damsel, I mean Dark Knight in distress.



#3)TOO MANY ENDINGS! Batman sacrifices himself to save Gotham by disposing of a bomb into the bay moments before it detonates in his air-craft dubbed "The Bat" . BOOM! The film could have ended there but it doesn't. Earlier the film foreshadowed this moment by stating the auto-pilot wasn't functional. Then after what seems like Batman's ultimate sacrifice, it's revealed through exposition, the auto-pilot had been repaired. They could have rolled credits here but they didn't. Nope, they probably felt their audience was too stupid to understand the not so subtle hint to Batman surviving the explosion. So a visual enactment of a hypothetical scenario Alfred describes earlier in the film is played out. Where in, Alfred visits Florence and envisions a better life for Bruce where he never returned to Gotham and never became a crime-fighter, and he lived happily ever after. Only this time Alfred isn't daydreaming, he witness Bruce alive and well and in the company of Selina. Okay, full closure right. However the film still doesn't end. The films actual final ending feels tagged on for fan service. For those who were disappointed that the Dark Knight's junior partner never made an appearance. Detective Robert Blake's real name turns out to be Robin and he seeks out the bat-cave. Suggesting he'll take over as Batman, or Robin or Nightwing or who knows. Though I'm a huge Robin/Nightwing fan, I feel that he doesn't fit into the world Christopher Nolan created and also feel this misrepresentation to be a big disservice to the character.

All nit picks aside The Dark Knight Rises is still a four out of five stars movie going experience. This article was written out of genuine respect and appreciation for Batman and all related characters. It's based on personal opinion/perception and is not meant to offend any fans of The Dark Knight Rises.

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Star Tom Hardy On Whether He'd Return As Bane For Upcoming Deathstroke Team-Up Movie
Related:

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Star Tom Hardy On Whether He'd Return As Bane For Upcoming Deathstroke Team-Up Movie

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Star Joseph Gordon-Levitt Reveals Whether There Was Ever Plans For A ROBIN Spin-Off
Recommended For You:

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES Star Joseph Gordon-Levitt Reveals Whether There Was Ever Plans For A ROBIN Spin-Off

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

TheYoungMan
TheYoungMan - 9/22/2013, 10:19 AM
"Talia al Ghul is the true mastermind behind the plot to destroy Gotham city and to break its champion, not Bane."

*sigh*
TheYoungMan
TheYoungMan - 9/22/2013, 10:33 AM
Also, if the movie ended in any of the parts where you say it "could have ended", we never would have seen Batman accomplishing his goal of becoming a symbol, and more than just a man, by passing on the mantle to Blake (who will probably pass on the mantle to someone else eventually and Batman is the protector of Gotham forever). And we never would have seen Bruce Wayne happy. That would have sucked.
JorEllinator
JorEllinator - 9/22/2013, 10:58 AM
Talia Al Ghul wasn't exactly the great mastermind. Nobody comes out and says it and when Talia gives him an order, he defies her in an instant.
SauronsBANE
SauronsBANE - 9/22/2013, 6:18 PM
1)Talia and Bane were working TOGETHER. As JorEllinator said, he even outright goes against what she told him to do. He's obviously his own man but had a soft spot for Talia (not in a creepy romantic love way, either. Just two people thrown into impossible circumstances together.) Either way, safe to say Bane was running the show, while Talia was pulling the strings in the background. He wasn't reduced into anything.

2)'I guess he's only the worlds greatest detective in the comics.' Exactly! It's not like Nolan threw it in our faces early on that his Batman would have that characteristic. Except for a few detective-ish scenes in TDK, Nolan didn't even come close to addressing this aspect from the comics. And you know what? That's okay! It obviously wasn't necessary for Nolan's Batman to be such a detective. Having said that, I didn't like how Bane was killed either (Not sure why you put that in the category called "WORLD'S GREATEST DETECTIVE", but it's all good)

3) Most 3rd movies suffer from too many endings, but truthfully...it's better than the alternative. You keep saying the movie could've ended after all those points, but that would've been terrible. It wouldn't have made sense story-wise or thematically. Also, what you call fan service is actually the resolution of the entire point of the whole trilogy: "Batman is a symbol, thus anyone can be Batman." Without Joseph GOrdon-Levitt's character literally and symbolically rising at the end, that whole theme would be unresolved. Thus why it was included at the end.

I'm not being harsh, just countering your points. I respect your opinion and reluctance to just nitpick a movie you hated, which you did not. So kudos on a nice article!
OcciferPing
OcciferPing - 9/22/2013, 8:57 PM
Yeah a lot of people don't realize that about Bane in regards to Talia. All the complaints were that he was Talia's b****, but in the end, like someone above me said, he defies her order. Also, Batman hasn't been in the playing field for 8 years, so while I wanted him to play more detective too (which he kind of does in a way), it's understandable on why he wasn't rusty.

And if you honestly thought that Miranda Tate was who she said she was, then dang you must have really gotten fooled. I didn't even see those set photos, but judging by her demeanor and personality, I knew there was more to her. Plus, it ties in everything nice with Batman Begins since she's Ra's daughter.

And with the ending, they did that to close every character's arc. If it were just Batman dying, then there would be no closure for everyone else since each character played an important part in Bruce Wayne's life, including John Blake. You feel more of the emotion too behind Batman's "death" as we see each character who knew who Batman really was have to move on with their own lives and mourn.
OcciferPing
OcciferPing - 9/22/2013, 8:58 PM
My bad, I meant "was rusty".
OcciferPing
OcciferPing - 9/22/2013, 8:59 PM
My bad. I meant "was rusty".
AC1
AC1 - 9/23/2013, 6:42 AM
@TheYoungMan I definitely agree with you about Blake's ending - it was the perfect way to show that Bruce had achieved his goal of making Batman a symbol, and the final shot of Blake rising in the Batcave is my favourite moment of the film. However, I was actually kind of disappointed that Nolan didn't kill of Bruce, which would have been much more fitting in my opinion - Bruce would have become a martyr to his cause, known only by a handful of people to have made this sacrifice, and it would have fit in with the idea throughout the trilogy that Bruce was ready and willing to die for his city if he had to. It also would've been a good way of once and for all separating Batman and Bruce Wayne for the people of Gotham, as Bruce would be dead but as far as they'd know Batman would still be around (although now he'd be John Blake).
I know we still got some of that, seeing as the people of Gotham believe Bruce died and John becomes the new Batman anyway, but I still think it would have been more meaningful if Bruce actually had died, rather than him just having the happy Hollywood ending he got. I mean, this is a guy who was completely obsessed with his mission, he became a full blown recluse when he found himself unable to become Batman again for a long time, and now we're expected to believe he's perfectly fine with taking an early retirement in Italy and allowing an untrained rookie cop take over his mantle while hundreds of escaped criminals (freed by Bane) are probably roaming through the city, making Gotham much like it would have been in the first film... it doesn't really make sense to me. Bruce would have stuck around at the very least to train John as his successor, rather than just throwing the Batsuit at the guy and saying "Hey, it's your turn now, I'm getting bored so I'm going on a permanent holiday with my girlfriend, good luck and try not to die", which is essentially what he did do at the end of Rises.

Having said that, I do understand why Nolan and co. decided to let Bruce have his "happily ever after" ending, and I suppose it is a good counterbalance to what was a otherwise a pretty bleak trilogy, but it seemed like it went against what was being set up throughout the rest of the trilogy.

Still, the film has grown on me a lot since I first saw it, and it does seem like a good ending to the trilogy, although it could have been better, and definitely seems like Nolan's most flawed film in my opinion. Also, considering both TDK and TDKR basically revolved around villains attempting to steal Gotham's soul, it seems a shame that Gotham was done best in Batman Begins - which is definitely the best in the trilogy in terms of tone, setting/mise-en-scene and the characterization of Batman/Bruce himself, although TDK has two of the three best villains in the series (I think Two Face was really underrated in the trilogy, definitely one of the best and most tragic character arcs), TDKR was a great attempt at tying the two together in order to provide a satisfying conclusion, with another fantastic villain (Bane), although certain elements dragged it down.
Wallymelon
Wallymelon - 9/23/2013, 11:10 AM
i agree 100% its not a terrible film but nolan failed in my eyes. he set up a great story with the first two films and just ran the third into the ground.
View Recorder