What's your opinion? A Response To BATMAN V SUPERMAN vs The Critics

What's your opinion? A Response To BATMAN V SUPERMAN vs The Critics

Who is really making the "public opinion", especially on movies? Hit the link to check out my analysis on movies and the bandwagon effect.

Editorial Opinion
By TheLoveDoc - Apr 01, 2016 10:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Batman vs. Superman

Hey guys.

    TheLoveDoc is here again with yet another article I’ve been wanting to write. This time around I’ll be delving into the bandwagon effect, consumer behaviors, and the spiral of silence. Why would I take a look into all of this? Because for the vast majority of people out there, it is a direct correlation of their opinions on movies. Now let’s dive on in and see what the Love Doctor has in store.

    The bandwagon effect is described as “a psychological phenomenon whereby people do something primarily because other people are doing it, regardless of their own beliefs, which they may ignore or override. The bandwagon effect has wide implications, but is commonly seen in politics and consumer behavior...According to this concept, the increasing popularity of a product or phenomenon encourages more people to "get on the bandwagon" too. The bandwagon effect explains why there are fashion trends”  Now before I jump into an analysis, let’s define consumer behavior, which is described as “the study of individuals, groups, or organizations and the processes they use to select, secure, use, and dispose of products, services, experiences, or ideas to satisfy needs and the impacts that these processes have on the consumer and society.”

 

    So what does all of this mean Love Doc? It means that people will often conform to share a common consensus. People will actually ditch their original thoughts when they hear other people have a different opinion. So for fear of being different, they conform to an opinion and defend it. Heck, one of my good friends did the exact same thing with Batman v Superman (such reason is a heavy influence on the timing of this article). So before you know it there will be a majority opinion on something and only a particular fraction of that opinion will be original and honest. This happens in a variety of things, and for sake of this conversation : movies. As stated, one of the driving factors of consumer behavior is the bandwagon effect. The vast majority of people, and yes, maybe even you have fallen into the bandwagon effect. Why do you think you saw a surplus of “fans” of the Carolina Panthers and Denver Broncos this year? People naturally want to hop onto the winning side and have a winning majority opinion. It’s all about being a self proclaimed successful person. After all, when you go into a conversation isn't it easier to defend a majority opinion than a minority opinion?


    Another thing to take into account here is that the loudest people in a conversation are the one’s strongly for or strongly against. This is a huge contributor to the bandwagon effect. You will constantly have people over exaggerating themselves whether its for attention or out of pure love of something. These people are the one’s most commonly hear and most definitely the one’s the media will cover. So what happens when an opinion is around you? Well according to the bandwagon effect you will adopt that opinion. This is exactly why loud people, such as the media, are so influential. Very few people naturally like to stand up for a non majority opinion, especially when they're not behind their keyboard.


    Now let’s see all of this play out in real life with Batman v Superman: Batman v Superman is released and starts to get negative reviews. Those negative reviews get big press. People then assume the movie is bad without seeing it. More negative reviews from critics pour in, many of which are results of the bandwagon effect. More coverage on bad reviews. Audience reaction gets worse, and that's after they’ve seen the reviews.

    Now mind me some people will genuinely dislike a movie. And that is their opinion; I have no problem with opinions, especially if they are genuine. But right now we are talking about people’s opinions that aren’t really their own. Batman v Superman is an example and in no way am I defending the movie, but rather am trying to display the bandwagon effect with a recent example. This happens in politics with every passing election. Just go online and look at the videos of people being interviewed about their favorite candidates and knowing next to nothing about their economic policies. Mind me people will usually know about social policies (because that’s all that matters in government, right?).

 

    All of what I have previously mentioned feeds into the “Spiral of Silence”, which was “Originally proposed by German political scientist Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann in 1974,Spiral of silence is the term meant to refer to the tendency of people to remain silent when they feel that their views are in opposition to the majority view on a subject...stipulates that individuals have a fear of isolation, which results from the idea that a social group or the society in general might isolate, neglect, or exclude members due to the members' opinions. This fear of isolation consequently leads to remaining silent instead of voicing opinions. Media is an important factor that relates to both the dominant idea and people's perception of the dominant idea. The assessment of one's social environment may not always correlate with reality.”

 

The spiral of silence is another way of showing how some views are silenced for fear of being different. Whereas the bandwagon effect is also attributed to wanting to be “trendy”, the spiral of silence is nothing more than conforming out of a fear of isolation. The spiral model describes the phenomena perfectly, and can be seen in the four steps as follows:

 

  1. “We can distinguish between fields where the opinions and attitudes involved are static, and fields where those opinions and attitudes are subject to changes... Where opinions are relatively definite and static – for example, “customs” – one has to express or act according to this opinion in public or run the risk of becoming isolated. In contrast, where opinions are in flux, or disputed, the individual will try to find out which opinion he can express without becoming isolated.

  2. Individuals who, when observing their environments, notice that their own personal opinion is spreading and is taken over by others, will voice this opinion self-confidently in public. On the other hand, individuals who notice that their own opinions are losing ground will be inclined to adopt a more reserved attitude when expressing their opinions in public.

  3. It follows from this that, as the representatives of the first opinion talk quite a lot while the representatives of the second opinion remain silent, there is a definite influence on the environment: an opinion that is being reinforced in this way appears stronger than it really is, while an opinion suppressed as described will seem to be weaker than it is in reality.

  4. The result is a spiral process which prompts other individuals to perceive the changes in opinion and follow suit, until one opinion has become established as the prevailing attitude while the other opinion will be pushed back and rejected by everybody with the exception of the hard core that nevertheless sticks to that opinion.”

 

    Does this model speak true to everyday scenarios and how people adopt opinions? I can think of countless times i have seen this happened, and I’d be lying if I said it’s never happened to me. Here’s a thought: Public opinion is never really public opinion. It is a [debatably and somewhat] large opinion that has caught on through the spiral of silence and the bandwagon effect. It’s a frightening statement really.


    So here’s my call to action guys. Make your own opinion and stick to it. Don’t be silent or conform just because a bunch of loud bossy people think they’re right. Go out, get informed ( in this case go see the movie) and make your own original opinion. Several years ago I really stopped caring about what critics said and found my own, original taste in movies. It was a sigh of relief knowing my mission wasn’t to agree with everyone else, but to take a step back and agree with my own self. There will be factors that will try and bind you your whole life. Factor’s such as some guy saying Batman v Superman sucked and you don’t say anything because you’re hiding the fact that you actually kinda liked it. Be yourself people, not everyone else.

 

Cheers,

TheLoveDoc










 

 

James Gunn Reveals His Title For A (Hypothetical) BATMAN And SUPERMAN Team-Up Movie
Related:

James Gunn Reveals His Title For A (Hypothetical) BATMAN And SUPERMAN Team-Up Movie

BATMAN: Ben Affleck's DCEU Appearances Ranked From Worst To Best According To Rotten Tomatoes
Recommended For You:

BATMAN: Ben Affleck's DCEU Appearances Ranked From Worst To Best According To Rotten Tomatoes

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DudeOfSteel16
DudeOfSteel16 - 4/1/2016, 11:37 AM
DudeOfSteel16
DudeOfSteel16 - 4/1/2016, 11:39 AM
But seriously, great article!
ANewPope
ANewPope - 4/1/2016, 11:52 AM
This. All of this!!
Forthas
Forthas - 4/1/2016, 12:06 PM
Here is the problem and simultaneously the enlightenment of your article. The bandwagon effect did occur but in the opposite way. When Batman v Superman was announced it excited hardcore fans about the film. Over the course of three years they created a narrative that this film would challenge the Avengers, be the "be all, end all of comic book films" and create the lunch of a shared universe. When the film opened and critics (who have no vested interest in the film expressed their true feelings) Warner Brothers created the alternative narrative that the critics did not understand because the film was made for fans (despite the well known fact that the majority of audience are not hard core fans and WB would like to make their money back. THUS the hardcore fans jumped on the "BAND WAGON," attacking critics (who have no vested interest in the film) , becoming public apologists for the film, and finding select issues to use to defend it. The movie has been panned by a number of people who were openly cheering for the film. But suddenly it became:

OK that Batman killer;
OK that Batman shows no detective skills;
OK that Lex Luthor was nothing like the source material;
OK that Jimmy Olsen was unceremoniously killed;
OK that the introduction of the Justice League was forced and lame;
OK that Superman kills again (although not so obviously);
OK that the movie contains numerous plot holes;
OK that the movie will not reach the success level of the Avengers as was constantly stated; and
OK that the end of the conflict (between Batman and Superman) ends solely as a result of a coincidence...

Because Warner Brothers told the world that this is not really for the masses just the fans? So the supposed die hard fans who loved their comic book re-processed what the critics were saying as unfair and an attack on their "product" and thus entered into a type of "CONSUMER BEHAVIOR" going on the web and posting vigorous defenses of the indefensible in order "to satisfy needs and the impacts that these processes have on the consumer." the fact that none of the many criticisms (which even people who liked the movie grudgingly will acknowledge) are taken as fatal shows that the die hard fans have now engaged in a "SPIRAL OF SILENCE" blindly accepting changes to characters that are patently unfaithful to the comic source materials and why ... so that they could hang on to their pre-release narrative that the film would put DC on par with Marvel's Avengers franchise.

So it is the so called DC fan base that exhibits these traits. They are the ones out of touch with the consensus mainstream and have created a narrative bubble that rejects reason and facts so that they can have their own world view their way.
nibs
nibs - 4/1/2016, 12:19 PM
@Forthas - If "mainstream" means Iron Man 2, then you can keep it.
TheLoveDoc
TheLoveDoc - 4/1/2016, 12:28 PM
@Forthas - I see what you're saying, and thats a good way of looking at it from a fan perspective. However, I'm focusing on the mainstream audience and critics and an issue that goes much further beyond BvS. The article sort of speaks for itself in that regard. If you were to ask people in the street why they hated BvS, most (not all) would give you answers that seem recycled. Mind me this artilce is not in defense on BvS, but rather people who blindly follow others in regards to ALL movies.
Forthas
Forthas - 4/1/2016, 1:00 PM
@nibs - I don't get the connection
Forthas
Forthas - 4/1/2016, 1:04 PM
@TheLoveDoc - By saying

"Now let’s see all of this play out in real life with Batman v Superman: Batman v Superman is released and starts to get negative reviews. Those negative reviews get big press. People then assume the movie is bad without seeing it. More negative reviews from critics pour in, many of which are results of the bandwagon effect. More coverage on bad reviews. Audience reaction gets worse, and that's after they’ve seen the reviews."

Are you not defending the film by suggesting that some of the later reviews are critics who are victims of the bandwagon effect. What is the proof other than your very personal view of things?
TheLoveDoc
TheLoveDoc - 4/1/2016, 1:09 PM
@Forthas - I used BvS as an example because as I read through reviews it became apparent (to me at least) critics were copying other critics opinions. It happens with good movies to. A large portion of the academy voted 12 years a Slave for best picture without seeing the movie because it had received good buzz and didn't want to do something "wrong". I get you didn't like BvS and kinda wants to chew me out for using it as an example. You really want my opinion? I thought it was an O-K movie. People naturally conform to popular opinion and that is the point of this article. BvS is a example I used thats topical.
sikwon
sikwon - 4/1/2016, 4:28 PM
The movie wasn't terrible, it was OK
that's all it was. a flawed movie. and there was no reason for BvS to be just an ok movie.
View Recorder