COMICS: Marvel Wins Battle Over GHOST RIDER Rights Against Gary Friedrich

COMICS: Marvel Wins Battle Over GHOST RIDER Rights Against Gary Friedrich

Marvel has triumphed in their battle against former freelance writer Gary Friedrich who claimed to be entitled to the lucrative movie rights of the Ghost Rider character.

By JoshWilding - Dec 29, 2011 03:12 AM EST
Filed Under: Marvel Comics
Source: The Associated Press



Source: Larry Neumeister, The Associated Press

Comic book publisher Marvel Entertainment owns the rights to the Ghost Rider character in the fiery form that originated in the early 1970s, a federal judge ruled as she rejected the claims of a former Marvel writer seeking to cash in on lucrative movie rights.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest tossed out 4-year-old claims brought by Gary Friedrich, who said he created the motorcycle-driving Ghost Rider with the skeletal head that sometimes had fire blazing from it. A Ghost Rider of the 1950s and '60s was a Western character who rode a horse.

The judge said Friedrich gave up all ownership rights when he signed checks containing language relinquishing all rights to the predecessor companies of Marvel Entertainment LLC.

"The law is clear that when an individual endorses a check subject to a condition, he accepts that condition," the judge wrote.

Forrest said her finding made it unnecessary to "travel down the rabbit hole" to decide whether the character was created separate and apart from Marvel, whether the company hired Friedrich to create the character and whether he had thoughts about what rights he wanted to retain from the outset.

She said he also signed an agreement with Marvel in 1978 relinquishing rights in exchange for the possibility of additional future freelance work. He had worked for Marvel prior to that year as both an employee and as a freelance writer.

Telephone messages left with lawyers on both sides of the dispute were not immediately returned. Friedrich's phone number in Columbia, Ill., was unpublished.

Forrest said Friedrich began seeking legal representation when he realized about a dozen years ago that there were plans for new uses of the Ghost Rider character, including in movies. In April 2004, his lawyers began asserting rights to try to get him a financial cut of the first of two motion pictures. They failed.

In 2007, when the film "Ghost Rider" starring actor Nicolas Cage as stunt motorcyclist Johnny Blaze came out, Friedrich sued Marvel in East St. Louis, Illinois, seeking to assert his rights and gain compensation for use of the character in movies, video games, toys and promotional products.

The lawsuit was moved to New York. The movie credited Marvel as the author of the Ghost Rider characters and story. A movie sequel, "Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance," is scheduled to be released in February.

At a deposition in St. Louis last April, Friedrich testified that he stopped doing freelance comic book writing in 1978 when his alcoholism got "completely out of control," and he spent a year traveling across the country in a truck with a friend. He said he became sober in January 1979.

He said he thought he had given Marvel the rights to use Ghost Rider in comic books, but that he retained the rights for movies and anything else.

"Was that understanding ever reduced to writing?" Marvel attorney David Fleischer asked.

"No," Friedrich answered.


IRON MAN #1 Trailer Teases A Brutal New Era For Marvel Comics' Armored Avenger
Related:

IRON MAN #1 Trailer Teases A Brutal New Era For Marvel Comics' Armored Avenger

THE ULTIMATES #4 Reveals Horrifying Fate Of The Fantastic Four In The Maker's New Ultimate Universe
Recommended For You:

THE ULTIMATES #4 Reveals Horrifying Fate Of The Fantastic Four In The Maker's New Ultimate Universe

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

airrun2000
airrun2000 - 12/29/2011, 3:48 AM
Interesting...
WOLVERINEDECADE
WOLVERINEDECADE - 12/29/2011, 3:50 AM
Marvel for the win!!!
SamWinchester
SamWinchester - 12/29/2011, 3:54 AM
Another creator screwed over.... it's Siegel & Shuster all over again, just pushed up to the late 70s.
Amazo
Amazo - 12/29/2011, 4:11 AM
I'm a comicbook artist and am all for our rights being honoured but these guys (including Siegel and Shuster i'm afraid to say) all knew what they were signing at the time.The fact that times have changed along with attitudes and the profile of their chartacters means nothing imo.They signed a contract.They were paid.They moved on.Crying in hindsight because you made a mistake and didn't push for all that the property may some day be worth is not the fault of the publisher.
In short,be careful what you sign!
marvel72
marvel72 - 12/29/2011, 4:34 AM
shame its not the movie rights as well.
djohnpi
djohnpi - 12/29/2011, 4:56 AM
@marvel72 we can only wish it was the movie rights and dude knew what he signed.
BillyBatson1000
BillyBatson1000 - 12/29/2011, 5:53 AM
I'm a UK pro-musician and a published comic book artist/writer I've also collaborated with top notch writing talent. My first published work was printed in London - without the owners even ASKING to publish it. They made the print from badly copied photo-stats that I'd left with another company at a Comic Convention. I only discovered this when I tried to sell the same work to another comic company. They told me that they had seen it in print before. I threatened to sue - and realized that it wasn't worth it. It would have screwed up any chance of work with other comics. These people have NO respect for the artist/writers on their staff or free-lance. It is all about money. Always was always will be. I'm back in the 'music biz' now. Different sharks. But less of my soul paid. If you're trying to make it in the Comics Industry - watch your backs.
ThaMessenger07
ThaMessenger07 - 12/29/2011, 6:11 AM
He knew...he just saw the movie and was like "I'm Suing!"
13echo
13echo - 12/29/2011, 8:02 AM
I tried to sue for my creative rights to Howard the Duck but..........
skidz
skidz - 12/29/2011, 9:06 AM
Morale of this story is (if his claim is even remotely true): ALWAYS READ THE FINE PRINT.
spiderneil
spiderneil - 12/29/2011, 9:37 AM
if you are a creator you are better off working for image because you retain the rights of your characters. when you work for marvel you sign a contract that says what you create whilst employed by them belongs to them.

it sucks but if you want to be payed by marvel and DC you play by their rules.
Phlegmbot
Phlegmbot - 12/29/2011, 11:13 AM
I don't understand why people on here are SO angrily against the creators.

Last I heard, DC doles out checks to creators when their characters are used in cartoons, films, TV shows, etc. Not b/c the law requires them to, but b/c they feel the creator is owed something for that.

It's a real shame, a little ridiculous, that Marvel doesn't feel the same way. But it's more ridiculous that the fans of that character are actually AGAINST the person who created him.



ScionStorm
ScionStorm - 12/29/2011, 11:18 AM
Claims of a 4-year old indeed.
danielmaxshaw
danielmaxshaw - 12/29/2011, 11:47 AM
This is true, the lesson is ALWAYS Have an Attorney review a contract before you sign it.

In the 1970's there were no Marvel movies (though they had TV deals) so that thought probably did not cross his mind, versus cashing a check so he could pay his bills at the time. But then again, video Games, Home Video, and other media did not exist then either. So i can his point that how could he have signed away rights to something that didn't exist yet. Marvel simply looked at buying the character in perpetuity and prevailed in court.

That's the legal side, the moral side in my opinion?:

Come up with a standard percent to given to the acknowledged creators of a character in cases like this. Some funds SHOULD (again in my opinion) go to the creators. In this case those are Gary Friedrich, Roy Thomas and Mike Ploog. i do not know if Mr Thomas or Ploog received any compensation but I feel they all should. This can be done as a set rule by Marvel in order to give back to the creators of these characters.

In many cases the corporations such as Marvel make millions off the characters and the creators are broke. That's not a way to treat them.
novaprime
novaprime - 12/29/2011, 11:53 AM
coool
MatchesMalone1989
MatchesMalone1989 - 12/29/2011, 1:33 PM
Get the movie rights next!!!!
FlixMentallo21
FlixMentallo21 - 12/29/2011, 1:40 PM
Yikes. I met Gary Friedrich last year at WizardWorld Chicago, and he looked like he'd seen better days. He was kind enough to sign my autograph album, and after seeing this, I feel sorry for him. I say it's time that a comic book company/creator constitution be drafted to address messes like this and countless others--it's sickening.

(On a lighter note, I wish I'd written his name in print under his signature, cause now I can't tell which is his among these few in my book! Anyone know a signature-deciphering service or website?)
FlixMentallo21
FlixMentallo21 - 12/29/2011, 5:17 PM
@deathmetalbrian
Might want to add "giant corporation who through series of legal loopholes managed to get same rights as real people kicks the ____ out of underpaid freelance worker". 'Cause that's the sad truth: ever since Reconstruction, corporations secured the means to make themselves legally human. And I want it eliminated.
mstaley3000
mstaley3000 - 12/30/2011, 12:10 AM
Boo Who! Siegel and Shuster were making the equivalent of more than $1 million a year each from DC ($75,000 back in the forties adjusted for inflation) after selling the rights to Superman to DC after trying to sell them for the prior six years and finding no takers (and even destroying their original creation out of frustration). Then they decided to sue because the character became a big success which no one could have predicted and so DC fired them and then they whined about DC firing them while they continued to sue DC. They ended up broke because they were greedy and spent all their money on lawyers.

Now we got this guy crying about all the money he is missing out because what he thought was actually wrong. I am not saying he is lying about thinking he had retained the movie rights even though at the time there weren't a lot of Superhero movies being made and Marvel didn't think there was much money in them given how cheaply they sold the movie rights to their big characters to various studios. No, I am not calling him a liar who thinks he can cash in now that movies are being made. Still, it just makes me think about how smart George Lucas was to make sure he had the merchandising rights to Star Wars and how the studio gave them up to him because they didn't think they would be that valuable.
View Recorder