Paramount’s Middle East Funding Said To Have Been What Made It Lose The Warner Bros. Discovery Auction

Paramount’s Middle East Funding Said To Have Been What Made It Lose The Warner Bros. Discovery Auction

It’s being reported that the Middle East funding purportedly secured by Paramount to bid for Warner Bros. Discovery is what led it to lose the auction for the company.

By DanielKlissmman - Dec 09, 2025 11:12 AM EST
Filed Under: DC Studios
Source: Semafor

The Warner Bros. Discovery sale process has been nothing short of a roller coaster. After months in which it looked like David Ellison's Paramount Skydance would acquire the company, Netflix swooped in and delivered the best offer in a second round of bids. It was then revealed the streamer had won the auction, and shortly after that, it was officially announced that Netflix would acquire WBD for $27.75 per share, totaling $82.7 billion (with a $72 billion equity value).

The story, however, did not end there. Following the announcement, Paramount Skydance submitted a hostile bid for the company, offering $30 per share, totaling approximately $108.4 billion (with an equity value of $77.9 billion). The move shocked many in the industry. Yet, according to information offered by a new report, the sweetened offer might not be enough to sway Warner Bros. Discovery's shareholders. This because the source of the company's funds is said to have been an issue in the auction. 

Semafor reports that a "major reason" that led the David Ellison-run company to lose the WBD auction was its backing by Middle Eastern funds. Variety reported earlier in December that Paramount had secured funding from Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, and Qatar Investment Authority. As reported by Semafor, the wealth funds provided $24 billion of Paramount's "initial" offer for WBD, as well as for the company's $108.4 billion hostile bid (an estimated 30% of the offer).

It's those funds that reportedly made Warner Bros. Discovery feel unsure about the bid. Per the site, according to securities filings and sources: "[The] guarantees on that money—specifically, on how and when the dollars would clear, according to people familiar with the matter—were fuzzy enough to give Warner's board one more reason to go with Netflix's $83 billion [offer]."

There appear to be more details on the matter, though. David Ellison and his father, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, are reported to have contributed $40 billion toward the offer alongside backer RedBird Capital—both the second one and this latest hostile one. According to the outlet, however, the Ellisons (the report does not specify if RedBird Capital was involved in the strategy) purportedly planned to "partly" pay themselves back for their investment through the funds provided by their Middle Eastern partners. 

Per the outlet, according to securities filings from Paramount, such strategy—described as "cross-conditionality of the equity financing"—made WBD skeptical. As was reported by Variety, the level of the wealth funds' involvement was low enough that it would not trigger the need for approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. Furthermore, per government filings read by Semafor, the sovereign wealth funds would "not play any management role or have board seats," which would allow the partnership to avoid scrutiny from the US government.

Given that, it's said WBD's advisors grew concerned that a business maneuver "structured to sidestep scrutiny might instead invite it." As explained by the outlet, Paramount's bid was backed by multiple parties. Aside from the aforementioned RedBird Capital, backers also included Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners, Bank of America, Apollo Global Management and Citigroup (the last three financed $54 billion of the offer through debt commitments, according to Variety).

Per Semafor, Paramount's bid relied considerably on "borrowing against Oracle stock owned by Larry Ellison." Said shares have experienced a decline due to AI bubble concerns, reportedly making Warner Bros. Discovery even more wary about accepting the offer. The amount of parties involved in Paramount's bid—described by the site as, "three different debt financing sources, three sovereign wealth funds, a media investor, and Kushner."—was also said to have been a red flag for WBD, who reportedly perceived the company's offer to be overly complex, ultimately making Netflix (whose "one-party" bid was deemed "straightforward") a more attractive buyer.

Warner Bros. Discovery now has 10 business days from the day the hostile bid (which will expire on January 8, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. ET, per Variety) was submitted to announce to its shareholders whether or not it will accept. During an appearance at a New York City UBS conference, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos stated (via The Hollywood Reporter) that Paramount's move was expected, and expressed confidence in Netflix's deal with Warner Bros. Discovery going through:

"Today's move was entirely expected. We have a deal done, and we are really happy with the deal for shareholders, for consumers, it's a great way to create and protect jobs in the entertainment industry. We're super confident we are going to get it across."

About The Author:
DanielKlissmman
Member Since 8/28/2021
Daniel Klissmman is an entertainment journalist who's written for Movie Pilot, CBR.com, Cinemark and AMC Theatres. He loves superheroes with a passion and really wishes he'll one day get to hang out with Moon Knight.
James Gunn Reveals Why The Authority Has Been Scrapped; May Be Revisited Someday. Not Soon.
Related:

James Gunn Reveals Why The Authority Has Been Scrapped; May Be Revisited "Someday. Not Soon."

DC Studios Branded A CinemaCon Loser By Hollywood Trade Following Underwhelming Presentation
Recommended For You:

DC Studios Branded A CinemaCon "Loser" By Hollywood Trade Following Underwhelming Presentation

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
NonPlayerC
NonPlayerC - 12/9/2025, 11:04 AM
So wonder woman can pilot her plane, just not to the movie theater
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 12/9/2025, 11:05 AM
@NonPlayerC - User Comment Image
EarlChai
EarlChai - 12/9/2025, 11:31 AM
@InfinitePunches -

User Comment Image
User Comment Image
User Comment Image
User Comment Image
TheRevelation
TheRevelation - 12/9/2025, 2:40 PM
@InfinitePunches - ?si=K7Dtqgc0HHLNQTFg

User Comment Image
SeeYouIn2034
SeeYouIn2034 - 12/9/2025, 11:05 AM
Wow. They don't want foreign hostile Islamist governments controlling our media intake? How Islamophobic.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 12/9/2025, 11:13 AM
@WalletsEmpty - 😄
DocSpock
DocSpock - 12/9/2025, 11:09 AM

Wait. Who doesn't want the death cult of islam having major influence over our media?
Goldboink
Goldboink - 12/9/2025, 11:12 AM
@DocSpock -

User Comment Image
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 12/9/2025, 11:11 AM
That banner lol…

Also WBD has to announce that they will accept the bid to its shareholders?.

I thought it would be that the shareholders could accept it on their behalf thus forcing WB to go with Paramount but if that’s not the case then this seems like a useless move by the latter since they have already publicly announced the Netflix deal so would make no sense to rescind the offer.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/9/2025, 11:22 AM
@TheVisionary25 - that banner is indeed pretty funny.

But yeah, I do think shareholders get a final say. WB themselves just give a recommendation if I understand correctly. Totally understandable they don't want Arab or Trump money though

Whichever bid is accepted though, the FCC has to approve it. And I could see them leaning toward Paramount, even with the complicated bid (same happened with EA after all).
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 12/9/2025, 11:46 AM
@bkmeijer1 - I think they are gonna stick with Netflix.
bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 12/9/2025, 12:27 PM
@TheVisionary25 - whatever they go with, I don't like it either way. Either it's death of cinema and more slop, or Arab money and Trump bootlicking.

I'm still holding out hope Universal is gonna lay down a thick 31 dollars per share.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/9/2025, 11:21 AM
It's worth noting these Middle Eastern groups have an endless supply of wealth, so they could have offered 200 billion if they wanted to. I still think Netflix is the better option because the speculation that the theater industry will die isn't based on any real data. Also, no has ever said Netflix doesn't want movies in theaters, they only said they want to reduce the theater window. They still release the 'KNIVES OUT' movies in theaters, even though they don't have to and theaters can stay in business by focusing on re-releases, concert footage and Broadway show replays. Some theaters have already figured this out and are doing just fine. It's not ideal, but it's the better of the two options for sure.
grendelthing
grendelthing - 12/9/2025, 12:09 PM
@JackDeth - Actually, Ted Serandos, Netfix's CEO, has said on multiple occasions that the theater model is outdated and he doesn't support it. They only reason they release movies in theaters is so they will be eligible for awards. They have not interest in propping up theaters.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/9/2025, 12:25 PM
@grendelthing - Actually, he said that he loves movie theaters and thinks theaters and streaming can co-exist, but the current way theaters do movies is outdated (which I agree with). He said they're too expensive (yep), the theatrical windows are too long (yep) and a lot of people prefer to stay home (yep).
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/9/2025, 6:42 PM
@JackDeth - Seems like you hate cinema too.

You said "They still release the 'KNIVES OUT' movies in theaters, even though they don't have to" but the only reason they release any movie in theaters is literally because they have to in order to be considered for awards.

Also Knives Out wasn't Netflix it was Lionsgate.

They acquired the franchise because it was a big success, but they only gave the first sequel, Glass Onion only one week in selected theaters.

"The New Knives Out Is a Big Hit. So Why Is Netflix Pulling It From Theaters?":
https://slate.com/culture/2022/11/glass-onion-knives-out-2-netflix-release-date.html

And the new one they're giving only two weeks in selected theaters only. It's actually out right now though you wouldn't know it.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/9/2025, 7:49 PM
@ObserverIO - No, I don't hate cinemas. I hate what cinemas have become. Glad you have the disposable income to see every movie you want, but I can only afford to see a few movies in theaters a year these days. I used to love going to the movies. I can't afford it anymore.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/10/2025, 3:48 AM
@JackDeth - That's because of streaming. So your solution is more streaming and shorter windows? Yeah lets hurt cinemas even more by taking one of the major studios and turning it into Netflix lol. See how much they start charging for popcorn then.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/10/2025, 3:57 AM
This could potentially kill cinema for good. Why do you think all of Hollywood is against it? Hollywood is mostly left-wing and anti Trump but they see Paramount Skydance as infinitely more preferable to Netflix.

And that's just the movie side of things, on the streaming side of things Netflix is already the Walt Disney of that world, this is the worst merger that could happen and gives them 50% of the market. This is a serious corporate monopoly. You're okay with one company having that much power?

Whereas if Paramount get WBD they'll simply be more able to compete with Walt Disney on a more equal footing.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/10/2025, 9:00 AM
@ObserverIO - No, it's not because of streaming. That's the lie. Streaming gave filmmakers another avenue, but the choice to pull some of the attention off the theater industry was solely in the hands of the creators. Theaters are expensive because we don't have regulations saying you can't charge $50 for popcorn and the industry took advantage of consumers for too long. Combine that with COVID, cheap TVs (seriously, you can get a 70 inch TV for $200 these days), and a lack of policing in the theater (if that kid kicks my chair one more time...) and you have an experience that just isn't what it used to be. I used to LOVE going to theaters. It was a BIG DEAL. Now, it's more trouble than its worth most of the time. The industry needs an overhaul... and no. It's not cause of streaming.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/10/2025, 9:48 AM
@JackDeth - Sure it's not. Anyone saying that is just supporting the big lie. Streaming had NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. Uh huh. smh

Geez JackDeth, don't hog all the Koolaid. I wanna be a Netflix mouthpiece too.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/10/2025, 9:51 AM
@JackDeth - I mean you realize what you're saying there is like "No the bullet didn't kill me. It's this massive hole, that's where all the blood is leaking from. Plus there's damage to some organs, the skin has been penetrated... the bullet had nothing to do with any of this"
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/10/2025, 10:13 AM
@ObserverIO - You probably think Netflix killed Blockbuster Video too. Of course it had nothing to do with their inability to adapt to a changing market. Did Netflix kill your dog too?
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/10/2025, 1:04 PM
@JackDeth - As I'm sure you know Netflix was the major competitor to Blockbuster and most people remember that Thunderdome battle as only having one winner. Of course the company line is to state clearly that Netflix technically did not kill Blockbuster despite obvious appearances. And you do seem to toe Netflix's company line for some reason.

I know you're not stupid so you either see Paramount Skydance as the latest incarnation of MAGA evil that must be fought or you've got stocks and shares in Netflix.

Also it may have taken me four movies and a spin-off but I already killed the guys that killed my dog.
User Comment Image
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/10/2025, 1:15 PM
@ObserverIO - I know people who worked for Blockbuster on the corporate side and I can tell you with complete authority that Blockbuster had the opportunity to put Netflix out of business with a few smart business decisions and didn't because the old guard refused to buy into the idea that people wanted to stop going to video stores. They refused to adapt and by the time they started to come around to it (with Blockbuster-At-Home), it was already too late. The free market evolves and if you don't adapt, you lose everything. Yes, I don't like MAGA. No, I don't have stock in Netflix. I just don't appreciate the scapegoating. I guess people will just have to wait to see they're not the bad guys. In the meantime, theaters better adapt to the changing landscape, or they won't survive.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/10/2025, 1:25 PM
@JackDeth - No they're not the bad guys, they just want a stranglehold monopoly on their market and they don't care whatever other markets they have to trample to get there. Things like cinema and physical media deserve to die anyway. Welcome to the future, where you watch only Netflix.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/10/2025, 1:51 PM
@ObserverIO - I never said physical media or cinema deserve to die. I said they have to adapt. Instead of making Netflix the bad guy, maybe let's talk about what cinemas can do to adapt. They can re-release more classic films, sign deals to get exclusive concert footage or footage of Broadway plays that are normally impossible for regular people to (like Hamilton, for example.) They can host more watch parties for fun films like 'ELF' or 'NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS' Some theaters are already doing this, instead of only relying on revenue from long new release windows. Those are the theaters that are gonna survive. That's free market. That's actually how Capitalism is supposed to work.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/10/2025, 2:25 PM
@JackDeth - True but the occasional blockbuster sure doesn't hurt. Sequels to The Batman, Barbie, Minecraft etc woulda helped a great deal.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/10/2025, 2:45 PM
@ObserverIO - I would be VERY surprised if Netflix completely eliminated the theater window for big tent pole films. That's just leaving money on the table and Serandos has never said that was his goal.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 12/10/2025, 2:51 PM
@JackDeth -
User Comment Image
He leaves box office money on the table all the time. He doesn't want it.
JackDeth
JackDeth - 12/10/2025, 4:01 PM
@ObserverIO - You make a lot of assumptions, but only time will tell who's right.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder