Evolution Of A Character: The Hulk in Film

Evolution Of A Character: The Hulk in Film

The Avengers is merely a week away for some of us, so I will be talking about how the character design has evolved, through the various different incarnations that have been released, in film.

Editorial Opinion
By Ashes2Phoenix - Apr 19, 2012 06:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Fan Fic



As we all know, The Avengers is merely weeks away from release. There have been advanced screenings of the movie and most people that have been lucky enough see it, seem to be rather impressed with The Hulk. During this article I will go through the evolution of the character in film.


Ang Lee's Hulk 2003:



During the year of 2003, CGI was beginning to become the answer to, comic book hero adaptions. In 2002 Spider-Man was released and showcased some excellent CGI, for its time. Not only did this film prove that the super hero genre could be adapted to the big screen but it also paved the way for other comic book heroes adaptions.

A year later, Ang lee's Hulk was released. Whilst again, the character model was pretty good for its time, the actual film itself was not particularly great. Eric Bana was cast to play, Bruce Banner and to be honest I thought he did a pretty good job with the material he was given. Although the story was far from impressive, his performance was solid as a whole.

Now, of course, looking back at the CGI, it is pretty laughable. The texture and depth of the character is very shallow and looks incredibly outdated. The detail is not that great and doesn't help to suspend the viewers disbelief. The facial expressions are very limited and this makes it hard for the audience to become emotionally invested in the character.

Whilst it isn't fantastic, I would still recommend giving it a watch, if you haven't seen it before because it will help you appreciate, how far films have come, in terms of CGI and design.



The Incredible Hulk 2008:



Five years later, The Hulk was rebooted featuring Edward Norton as the hero. This film was considerably better than Ang Lee's attempt and also began setting the Marvel unverse up for The Avengers.

The CGI, in this film was a vast improvement. The detail of the muscles and the face, were much more believable. Although, motion capture technology was not used in this film and at times, I wish they had. So instead of the expressions actually being Norton's the CGI department had to recreate them. At some points the animation for the facial expressions, looked hollow. I mean lets face it, it must pretty hard to try and recreate facial expressions, when they are not produced through, motion technology. This of course was a year before, films like Avatar would fully utilise this new tech.

Edward Norton brought his own take to the character and so far it has been my favourite. He is a fantastic actor and made Bruce Banner for me, a real person. I was disappointed when I discovered, that he would not reprise his role in The Avengers but I will go over that, later in the article.

All in all, this film for me was great and how I expected a Hulk movie to be. There were some fantastic action set pieces and the film as a whole, was a great time. As I said earlier, this interpretation was particularly significant, in setting things up for The Avengers movie. I yelped with joy when I saw Tony Stark appear at the end and new Marvel were serious about making an Avengers film.

The Avengers 2012:



Well, here it is. The interpretation of The Hulk many people have waited for. This version will be played by Mark Ruffalo. When he was first announced to play the role, many people were annoyed that Edward Norton would not be reprising his role, including myself. I was impressed with Norton's performance and was disappointed that he would not feature in The Avengers. That was until clips, of Ruffalo's Hulk began to surface.

From what I have seen, he seems very natural in the role and could bring a new emotional dynamic to Bruce Banner. It appears he will be treated as an outcast and I think this is the best way they could have taken the character.

Now, to move onto the animation of The Hulk. From what I have seen so far, it is looking exceptional. This film has featured motion capture technology, meaning that Mark Ruffalo will play the character of The Hulk. If you look at the detail in the face, you can see that it displays his facial structure and I feel this will be a great way of portraying a variety of emotions. What I found with the previous films, is that, when Bruce Banner would change into the Hulk, it would become emotionally detaching because it was merely just CGI. In this version, even though it is CGI, will contain all of Ruffalo's features and expressions. This I feel, will build a great new dimension to the character and make him visually interesting to watch.

So there it is ladies and gentlemen. Let me know what you think in the comments below !
A.I. - Artificial Ironman: An all original WHAT IF...
Related:

A.I. - Artificial Ironman: An all original WHAT IF...

Nice Beaver! THE NAKED GUN Popcorn Bucket Hilariously Recalls Original's Bawdiest Joke; First Reactions Land
Recommended For You:

"Nice Beaver!" THE NAKED GUN Popcorn Bucket Hilariously Recalls Original's Bawdiest Joke; First Reactions Land

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Duskbyday
Duskbyday - 4/19/2012, 7:23 AM
Great write up! And it's weird to see three quite different versions of the character, though I think they finally have nailed it!
BigK1337
BigK1337 - 4/19/2012, 7:32 AM
Weird that there is no mention of the 70s Incredible Hulk, however this article is about the cgi designs of the Hulk in film. Other than that, great article
blvdnoise
blvdnoise - 4/19/2012, 7:44 AM
Yes. It is a shame things didn't pan out with Norton. However, this new incarnation of Hulk seems to be the best yet, which I'm very, very, excited about. Now I often wonder how many of these (necessary) changes to Banner's other half might not have happened if Norton was still in the picture.. 13 more days!
Hellsing
Hellsing - 4/19/2012, 8:17 AM
So far what I've heard bout the movie banner and the hulk steal the show so I guess that proves that marvel do know how to cast the perfect.actor for the role.
antonio
antonio - 4/19/2012, 11:07 AM
I liked Eric Bana and I loved Norton and I saw the film last saturday and I have to say....Mark Ruffalo>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.Edward Norton>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eric Bana.
TheActionAce
TheActionAce - 4/19/2012, 1:06 PM
@WesleyGibson that's one of my favourite part of the film
CraptainAmerica
CraptainAmerica - 4/19/2012, 4:08 PM
Nice article!

Athough, if you watch the TIH blu-ray or DVD special features you will see that they used a degree of motion capture for Norton's facial expressions. So, in some scenes, there are elements that are built upon Norton's performance facially.
Ashes2Phoenix
Ashes2Phoenix - 4/19/2012, 5:56 PM
@CraptainAmerica: I didn't see that. Might have to check that out. I always find it intriguing to see the technology used. Thanks for pointing that out !
testingmyresolve
testingmyresolve - 4/29/2012, 10:23 AM
It is the best version by far, and the fight scene between Hulk and Thor is one of the many amazing moments in this movie.Hulk being under Loki's control.
julius033
julius033 - 5/1/2012, 10:12 PM
hulk in avengers .... so good !
View Recorder