GREEN LANTERN: A Review/Retrospective

GREEN LANTERN: A Review/Retrospective

Finally managed to check this film out. Hit the jump to check out my review/retrospective of one of the more controversial comic book movies, and.....it's not a negative one.

Review Opinion
By Destroyer14 - Feb 16, 2012 07:02 PM EST
Filed Under: Green Lantern
Source: My Blog



Green Lantern came out a year ago. It was DC attempting to break out of the norm. See, they really don't like to venture past Batman and Superman. (They tried a few years ago with Jonah Hex, and you know how that turned out.) Well, Green Lantern was I'm sure supposed to be the start of the DC 'Cinematic Universe.' That idea was quickly destroyed when it bombed. Negative reviews all over the place, it was just a mess and DC was probably extremely disappointed. They're probably like, "Well, we have an upcoming Batman and Superman film, we'll just forget about that Justice League movie." So unlike a lot of people, I didn't go to the theater to watch it. In fact, this review is coming right after watching it. For some reason, I tend to like a lot of movies people don't like. Spider-Man 3, X-Men 3, Jurassic Park 3, Clash of the Titans (2010), and even X-Men Origins. I don't consider any of those to be 'bad' films. However, despite what you might think, I know there are 'bad films out there. (Super Mario Bros, the worst film ever made.) So going into Green Lantern, I wasn't expecting an awesome film. After watching it, I can definitely say it's far from being awesome, but it's still a pretty good comic book movie that gets more hate than it deserves.

Official description from Warner Bros:

In a universe as vast as it is mysterious, a small but powerful force has existed for centuries. Protectors of peace and justice, they are called the Green Lantern Corps. A brotherhood of warriors sworn to keep intergalactic order, each Green Lantern wears a ring that grants him superpowers. But when a new enemy called Parallax threatens to destroy the balance of power in the Universe, their fate and the fate of Earth lie in the hands of their newest recruit, the first human ever selected: Hal Jordan (Ryan Reynolds). Hal is a gifted and cocky test pilot, but the Green Lanterns have little respect for humans, who have never harnessed the infinite powers of the ring before. But Hal is clearly the missing piece to the puzzle, and along with his determination and willpower, he has one thing no member of the Corps has ever had: humanity. With the encouragement of fellow pilot and childhood sweetheart Carol Ferris (Blake Lively), if Hal can quickly master his new powers and find the courage to overcome his fears, he may prove to be not only the key to defeating Parallax.... he will become the greatest Green Lantern of all.

One must question why exactly Warner Bros. would want to bring Jonah Hex to the big screen. I mean, he's not even b-lister, he's a C-lister. So DC wanting to bring Green Lantern to the big screen was a pretty great idea. It was just going to be like what Marvel did with Iron Man. He was never an A-lister like Spider-Man or Wolverine, but thanks to the film, he's now an A-lister liked by the general public. (He's seen on everything from shirts to lunch boxes.) So Green Lantern was meant todo just that, only it didn't. Green Lantern is a stereotypical summer blockbuster. Average acting, generic 'immature but in the end becomes a serious hero' character, lots of special-effect driven sequences, and a bit of a cardboard romance. (Though the latter isn't as generic or forced like many others.) This film was going to do what Iron Man did for Marvel, but failed with the general public and fans. Now before I begin this review, it's fair to say that I'm not a huge of the Green Lantern franchise. I know the characters and origins, but that's about it. With that said, I thought the film did a pretty good establishing the character and his universe. Simple and straightforward, it's the 'Star Wars' of comic book movies, like how Thor is the 'Lord of the Rings' of comic book movies. Green Lantern suffers for some scenes feeling too rushed and mediocre acting. It's attempting to be 'epic' but that just doesn't happen. A little bit above average would be the term.


Ryan Reynolds plays the title character. He actually had some experience in the genre, he played Deadpool in X-Men Origins beforehand. His portrayal of Hal Jordan was mixed. Sometimes he's alright, but sometimes he's just corny. Granted, I expected a lot worse, but the portrayal wasn't that bad. I could see a great improvement if the film ever gets a sequel. Blake Lively plays the love interest, Carol Ferris. Now I really expected an awful portrayal, but she wasn't that bad. Whereas the romance in Thor felt completely rushed, this feels natural and not just 'put in.' Peter Sarsgaard as Hector Hammond plays the secondary main villain. Now his portrayal could have been better. However, some scenes he was admittedly menacing. (The scene were he yells to Hal to "Sit down" being a prime example) Mark Strong as Sinestro was spot on, like he was lifted straight from the comics. He needed a lot more screen time.

Parallax plays the central villain. I thought he was very good, and the backstory with the Guardian was fantastic. Granted, his design (mainly his head) could have been better, but his voice and everything else was great. Kilowog was spot on, also lifted straight from the comics. Tomar-Re was also great, these two really needed to appear more. The soundtrack is above average, it had some really great themes that fit the atmosphere. The special effects are mixed. There is A LOT of CGI in this film, maybe a bit too much. Usually I wouldn't say something like that, but a lot of it would have fit better as a CGI movie rather than a live action film. Now, Oa looks fantastic, rivals Asgard for most glorious looking place in a comic book movie. The Guardians and Green Lantern Corps all look fantastic. The Green Lantern costume looks a bit too cheesy. I'm sorry, but the mask just doesn't look that great. I must say, the beginning was the best part of the film. It really gave you an impression that this was going to be an 'epic' film. Sadly, the earth scenes couldn't keep up. In fact, it's very similar to Thor in that matter. Both are really good when they're in Oa/Asgard, but mediocre on earth. The difference is that Thor had a better main actor and story.

Overall, Green Lantern isn't a great film. It could have been better. With that said, it's still a watchable flick. I went in there not expecting much and left thinking "That was actually pretty good." While it some mediocre acting, it still does a good job establishing the Green Lantern universe. It's worthy of a sequel. It could have used a bit more time to explain things, the whole Sinestro after-credits thing was just forced, he needed more screen time and motivation within the film for that. Green Lantern is a pretty good film, it doesn't deserve the hate it gets, and is definitely not even close to being one of the worst comic book movies of all time.

7/10

2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why
Related:

2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie Great
Recommended For You:

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie "Great"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
luckylu
luckylu - 2/16/2012, 8:09 PM
i must agree with you. i enjoyed it enough to at least give it a redemption shot for a sequel. overall not great but not terrible.
jessepostal
jessepostal - 2/16/2012, 8:10 PM
terrible movie, and don't think this needs to be on main
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 2/16/2012, 8:10 PM
I actually felt the same way. I didn't think it was great and I didn't think it was bad. Felt it was a decent flick and introduced the character fairly well. A lot of people didn't care for it at all. To each their own.
edwardshiro
edwardshiro - 2/16/2012, 8:12 PM
It was a short film ... but I had fun and I enjoyed seeing the character in the film. For me, not a bad movie ... I think the criticism was sentenced. I'm objective, I think it was better than other superhero movies last year.
jbak368
jbak368 - 2/16/2012, 8:13 PM
I agree with you too. I watched it and thought it was a decent but not great movie. The one major flaw as far as I'm concerned is in the characterization of Hal Jordan - he shouldn't be reluctant to take the ring because he's not sure he's responsible enough for it, he should be gung ho to take the ring because he ISN'T responsible enough to recognize that he's not responsible enough for it.
DCnerd46
DCnerd46 - 2/16/2012, 8:14 PM
Deserves a shot at a sequel. Sinestro makes a great villain & Mark Strong always plays villains well. Put 'em together & you've got one hell of a movie. Geoff Johns should write the movie, he's brilliant & knows the characters inside & out. Loved your review =)
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 2/16/2012, 8:17 PM
DC is part of Warner Bros.

This film came out a year ago, I didn't see the need to spoiler alert it.
KALel3412
KALel3412 - 2/16/2012, 8:19 PM
i agree. im a huge GL fan and i dont think it was great it wasnt bad. the other lanterns need more screen time. more training, and again more sinestro. it sucks bc the sequel would be so much better imo. more action and more sinestro.
KALel3412
KALel3412 - 2/16/2012, 8:20 PM
and for those that think thor was epic, it was the gl of the marvel movies to me. it just didnt do it for me. esp the earth scenes. gl and thor have pretty much the same flaws imo
95
95 - 2/16/2012, 8:22 PM
It was fun, I liked it. Then again, I got to see it for free (can't complain). But, I had to realize that this was a $200M blockbuster. Martin Campbell and the TV-writers failed fans of this beloved comic book. I honestly believe fans could of a done a better job than the hired writers. This film was less SPACE OPERA, and more SOAP OPERA. Take Hal & Carol's romance for example. In the end, I think the artificial VFX killed it for me. Oh yeah, and Hector Hammond's prosthetics and crying. The whole "I want Carol, I'm a biology teacher, I hate dad, my dad got me this job subplot was one of the worst in a movie, ever. Lame movie.
SwedishSkinJer
SwedishSkinJer - 2/16/2012, 8:25 PM
This really doesn't need to be on the front page.

Anyway, my two main issues with the film 1) the awful, awful, almost video game cutscene-level CGI and 2) Hector Hammond and the Parallax stories didn't gel. Hector was pretty lame as a villain and his development was fairly mediocre.
95
95 - 2/16/2012, 8:26 PM
@magic8

Spot on. I agree with your comparison.
SwedishSkinJer
SwedishSkinJer - 2/16/2012, 8:27 PM
The film didn't do a good job building its world, period. Oa was good conceptually, just not visually. It all looked fake, overproduced, artificial. Terrible.
95
95 - 2/16/2012, 8:28 PM
@magic8

Well, I thought the CGI aliens looked awful. But the suit was a cool concept.
SwedishSkinJer
SwedishSkinJer - 2/16/2012, 8:28 PM
Anyone who can say with a straight face that Parallax the CGI Poo looked good is kidding themselves. They could have found some really neat ways to meld practical with digital like Peter Jackson frequently does. Instead, everything was sleek, terrible Uncanny Valley pixels.
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 2/16/2012, 8:32 PM
@magic8 No, but since Warner Bros. owns DC, it's (almost) the same thing. They know what works, but they chose Jonah Hex, an un-bankable character.

@nailbiter111 Yeah I get that a lot, haha. I'm reading your reasons now.
jessepostal
jessepostal - 2/16/2012, 8:33 PM
um thanks wolverinesfury for reporting me for saying this didn't need to be on main? sorry its a year later and this movie isn't important anymore. Funny how they moved it off main though.
2gold
2gold - 2/16/2012, 8:45 PM
Green Lantern is one of those films that just made me angry. Not because it's bad, but because it is the definition of wasted potential. It's a first pick in the NFL draft who you know can do it, but the work ethic isn't there and it makes dumb off the field decisions and ruins everything.

The casting was mostly good. Reynolds is fine, Lively isn't even the worse and she's easy on the eyes and Strong is outstanding. But they are given NOTHING to work with. And Parallax is a wasted villain who looks like they had leftover House on Haunted Hill cgi they wanted to use. It wasn't imaginative and the backstory was blown.

Is it a bad movie? No, it's average, and THAT is the problem. You are watching actors trying to drag a 10000 pound weight up a mountain and watching the director kick them with every pull. The decision to CGI the mask and suit? I don't get it, I'll probably never get it because it was a waste of money to get something you could have just designed. With better direction and even a remotely decent script, Lantern is a perfect stepping stone to a franchise. Sinestro and his war will make X-Men 3 look like The Dark Knight if the same writers are allowed near it. It's a lifeless soul less attempt to cash in on toys instead of make a movie and because of that, it's a failure. Would I be against a sequel with the same cast? No. Would I be against a sequel with the same director and writing team? Yes, because I have zero faith in them to do anything but sink it.
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 2/16/2012, 8:48 PM
magic 8@ Warner Bros. owns DC. Regardless of whether Jonah Hex was produced by WB, don't you think they two entities would have had meetings and discussion on the film? I think it is pretty naive to think that DC didn't give their blessing or input on whether the film should be done or not. It is their character after all.
Destroyer14
Destroyer14 - 2/16/2012, 9:05 PM
The old Godzilla movies have heart, they are some of the best.
PaulRom
PaulRom - 2/17/2012, 8:04 AM
I don't really get all the hate for this movie, honestly. Sure, there's too much CGI, a half-assed script, lack of an amazing villain and some hit and miss acting (mostly for Lively and Sarsgaard), but I thought it was much better than what people make it out to be. In fact, saying that films like X-Men 3, Jonah Hex, Spider-Man 3, X-Men Origins and Batman & Robin are better is purely ridiculous, IMO.

Great review as always Destroyer, I'd probably give the film a 6 or 7/10.
Swanky
Swanky - 2/17/2012, 9:03 AM
Better a year late then never lol
superotherside
superotherside - 2/17/2012, 5:38 PM
I'd give it probably a 6/10, it's watchable, but reading some good GL comics, it's downright laughable.

What's the problem is, Hal. Reynolds didn't do a horrible job with the script he was given but I just don't like him for some reason. He just irritates me. LOL. The only reason why I like Hal in the comics is when he's being compared and doing a sort of back and forth with Sinestro. But really that's the only reason I like Hal in the comics. Which we don't get to see much of. So yeah. Plus this movie gives people who don't know the comics the wrong impression. Green Lantern, is many, many characters. There are several human Green Lanterns, and I think they should have gone with two Green Lantern characters. Hal Jordan and John Stewart. This would give a balance to the film I think. If I was DC and I had already done GL this is what I'd do to requel it.

Hal, Sinistro, Kilowog, and an newly recruited John Stewart investigate the death of Abin Sur. They would find that Atrocious had killed him. They would go after him, but Atrocious would find a weapon (The Manhunters), which the Guardians had disabled after creating their new corp, and turn them back on. Finally, after the Manhunters killing several Green Lanterns, Sinistro would use the forbidden object (the Yellow ring), which the Guardians had created, against the Manhunters, Hal tries to stop him using the ring resulting in them battling each other. Sinistro escapes after the Manhunters have been defeated mostly by Stewart. GL2 Sinistro Corps War!

I'd have a new actor to replace Jordan and Ferris just to get new blood in the audience. Like Ghost Rider, they should have replaced Nick Cage. So that's why I'd replace Reynolds.

Anyway great review bro as always and what did you think of my idea about a GL requel?
thegreek
thegreek - 2/20/2012, 9:08 PM
People just keep bitching about a movie that wasn't the worst movie and actually had more action then THOR I loved THOR but I also loved GL it was a great introduction to GL....

Get off all ur high horses
1 2
View Recorder