Will Green Lantern's Negative Reactions Affect Future DC Movie Properties?

Will Green Lantern's Negative Reactions Affect Future DC Movie Properties?

A report by Variety confirms that DC Entertainment were using Martin Campbell's Green lantern as a tester for future character's to make the transition to the big screen. Will we still see em?..

Editorial Opinion
By MarkCassidy - Jun 17, 2011 05:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Green Lantern
Source: Variety

As we already know, Green Lantern's success or failure will most likely affect DC and Warner's decision to adapt more DC comics characters for the big screen. Batman and Superman are safe(at least until we see Zack Snyder's Man Of Steel), but we were all looking forward to a Flash movie, maybe a Wonder Woman one since the TV show is now defunct, and of course we hope and pray that the recent rumblings that all is building to a Justice League movie in the future will come to fruition.



But now Green lantern is, lets not mince words, being murdered by critics. We knew that DC and WB had a lot invested, financially and otherwise in the movie. But if GL fails to make as much of an impact as they would have hoped, will they balk at moving forward with more properties?..

Executives at Warner Bros. have slipped on their power rings and hope to conjure up more than just a new film franchise when "Green Lantern" takes flight at megaplexes today.

"Green Lantern" is being used as a test case as WB strives to get more of its comicbook characters -- which also include Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman and the Flash -- into theaters.


Of course, we all know that dollars mean more than critical reactions. But we also know that while fans of the character will doubtless flock to the movie regardless of it's reviews, non fans and casual CBM goers that hadn't heard of GL will be looking to the Empires and the Eberts for their opinion, and that could hurt it's revenue, and thus hinder the possibilities for sequels and more from DC's roster. WB Marketing Chief Sue Kroll addresses the importance of keeping everyone happy..

"Fanboys are a very vocal minority but represent a very small percentage of the moviegoing population. It's very hard when you're creating a film that's intended for mass audiences. It's very hard to keep fans happy. Fans will always have issues with what's being done to the source material. But there's a much bigger purpose for this property. It's a good primer for the future and lays the groundwork for the future of the franchise."


Well, lets hope that Green Lantern fulfills it's purpose. Even if the movie isn't up to scratch, it's still important that it makes enough green(pun intended) to keep the execs happy enough in getting more DC characters up on the screen. But should that really be OUR main concern? What happened to the days of hoping for a quality movie before hoping it makes a ton of cash? Can we really spend out movie going lives constantly hoping; "Well, maybe a sequel will be better". I'm seeing it later today anyway, expect a review later tonight or tomorrow.




By: TwitterButtons.com

By TwitterButtons.com



2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why
Related:

2011's GREEN LANTERN Starring Ryan Reynolds Is Actually A Great Movie — Here's Why

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie Great
Recommended For You:

GREEN LANTERN Director Martin Campbell Reveals The One Change That Would Have Made 2011 DC Movie "Great"

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
BlueScarab
BlueScarab - 6/17/2011, 6:09 AM
Nop it will not, they will put Nolan and Snyder too do every Dc movie :D

i think they should focus a little on some minor heroes see what people say then, so they can jump on too the very big picture i recommend Blue Beetle :D
Corpse
Corpse - 6/17/2011, 6:13 AM
Get a sequel, fix everything there. Make the conflict between Hal and Sinestro really emotional. Make sure Hal makes a jetplane construct. More of the second half of Secret Origins guidelines!
Rayne457
Rayne457 - 6/17/2011, 6:18 AM
I do not care what a critic has to say about a movie. Half the time IMO a movie deemed great by a critic is not very good when I see it. I am going to see this today regardless and feel that it will be a very good movie.
BlueScarab
BlueScarab - 6/17/2011, 6:18 AM
Intruder why are you so hurtfull, you like hurting us. DO YA?
MiZeatWizad
MiZeatWizad - 6/17/2011, 6:20 AM
For a company that puts out some of the greatest animated films, I don't get how they can't seem to get the live action genre right.
blvdnoise
blvdnoise - 6/17/2011, 6:21 AM
I HOPE NOT!! I was just thinking about this earlier and just posted a new editorial in relation to the subject, Check it out.
PaulRom
PaulRom - 6/17/2011, 6:22 AM
The opening's supposed to be around $60 million, but with the negative reviews it could change.
If it makes at least $200-250 million worldwide, it's in a good place.
billthebutcher
billthebutcher - 6/17/2011, 6:25 AM
I hope it bombs so trash movies like these don't come out. This movie is destroying the reputation of other great comic book movie to the general public.
DiLusso
DiLusso - 6/17/2011, 6:26 AM
look at transformers absolute [frick]ing shit but they made 3

my green lantern review
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/?a=39556
connorblaze
connorblaze - 6/17/2011, 6:28 AM
I bet when The Avengers is rocking cinemas and Whedon is rolling in cash and critic adoration that WB and DC will regret saying his Wonder Woman script wasnt was they were after :P
Shaman
Shaman - 6/17/2011, 6:29 AM
Can't wait to get that review from ya, Ror! PLEASE don't go easy on the details and comparisons to other CBMs you enjoyed and hated. Use your fine tooth comb and magnifying glass for another one of your awesomely juicy reviews! I might not get to read it until Monday though...
StrangerX
StrangerX - 6/17/2011, 6:31 AM
You know fans are forgetting that this story has an Epic journey, a very emotional storyline with a grounded and humble hero. Oh wait..That's The First Avenger my bad!!
RunDTC
RunDTC - 6/17/2011, 6:34 AM
In Brightest Day, In Blackest Night, no bad film shall be in my sight. Let those who think this will be good, beware Hollywood's power, SEE THE LIGHT!
StevilNYC
StevilNYC - 6/17/2011, 6:35 AM
Dear DC,

I have the solution to your worries. Instead of spending millions of dollars on live action films, why not stick to what your good at and make animated movies for the big screen. How else can you get these colorful characters to work? Marvel can do it because they don't have many caped heroes with symbols on their chests. Don't give up. I'm on my way to see Green Lantern now. I'm a comic book fan that enjoys comic book movies. I know there's a lot of negative reviews but I don't care. I'm grateful that I can go to the movies and see X-Men, Thor and Green Lantern all playing at the same time. It's a great time to be a geek. Seriously, make PG13 or R rated animated movies. It will work. Less scrutiny and more positive reactions will come your way. There are many companies that can do what Pixar does, negotiate with them and start collaborating on a movie for each character on your roster. Like Marvel, once you have the heavy hitters taken care of, make a Justice League movie. Maybe by the time people know all about the character's back stories, they'll demand a live action version from you. Gotta go...gotta leave if I want to catch this movie. So to summarize, don't give up and try something new.


-Steve
ManofSteel23
ManofSteel23 - 6/17/2011, 6:39 AM
Im seeing this in about an hour or so
95
95 - 6/17/2011, 6:44 AM
I really think 'Green Lantern' was intended for a younger crowd, not necessarily kids, but rather a group more interested in a fun film than a "serious" one. After all, wasn't the 'Green Lantern' franchise set to replace 'Harry Potter'?

~rm
Brashlight
Brashlight - 6/17/2011, 6:47 AM
Does anyone else find it interesting that LEE has been very quiet since these green lantern reviews started?
HulkPool
HulkPool - 6/17/2011, 6:48 AM
Went to midnight showing last night!!!!! loved every minute!!! Please DC if your reading this make the sequel!!!!!!!!!!
Dingo
Dingo - 6/17/2011, 6:49 AM
Man, I hope this does well. I really, really do. I want to see the rest of the DC universe on screen, just like I want all of Marvel's stuff too. I know I'm just echoing what most people have already said... but damn I hope this boat floats.
I'm a Marvel Fan. And I want this DC movie to succeed! :/
marvel72
marvel72 - 6/17/2011, 6:50 AM
yeah it will,if they don't make a good return on the green lantern.

future projects i.e the flash,hawkman & justice league will be put on hold.

dc will be scared to try something new & we will just get batman & maybe superman films.

superman better be good or dc will be f*cked.

they may resort to selling characters to other studio's.
claybo4131
claybo4131 - 6/17/2011, 6:50 AM
DC is far behind the 8 Ball with Marvel. I think Marvel tends to know how to market movies better.


Chris Nolan fanboys need to stop wanting him to direct EVERY CBM ok, just no please, you worship the guy like ESPN does LeBron James, cause yall worship The Dark Knight like its the greatest movie of all time. Everytime a young adult book/movie comes out everyone compares it to Twilight, which is not right for 4098765546789 reasons
ClovisReilly
ClovisReilly - 6/17/2011, 6:52 AM
I haven't seen this yet, but I plan to tomorrow. The negative reviews have pretty much all said something about too much backstory. That's the difficulty of an origin story, especially such a complex one. Maybe they should've held parallax off until a third movie as it just adds even more to explain. I don't know. I hope I enjoy it, and I assume I will. I hope that other DC movies get made as well. Plus I'm pretty sure they'd already greenlit a sequel while the first one was still being filmed.
Lazerbeast
Lazerbeast - 6/17/2011, 6:52 AM
The excuse that this film is for kids is BULLSHIT. The film is boring as all hell. How many kids want to see Reynolds and Lively discussing their childhoods/relationship/careers??? That garbage was a big part of the film.
billthebutcher
billthebutcher - 6/17/2011, 6:53 AM
MY FELLOW COMICBOOKMOVIEGOERS COMIC BOOK COMPANIES VS COMIC BOOK COMPANIES...NO THE REAL ENEMY IS OUT THEIR. I FEEL THEIR REVIEWS TARGETING US...TELL ME I'M WRONG. ITS US VS THE WORLD AND ON JULY 22 THE WORLD WILL KNOW COMIC BOOK MOVIES ARE HERE TO STAY. YOU READY FOR THIS?


lol that was fun to write
JatevinM
JatevinM - 6/17/2011, 6:53 AM
I don't think it will hurt Dc's movie making plans, because I have a feeling that aside from the reviews almost everyone and their grandma is going to see this movie. Money is what talks and that is what will be the deciding factor. Dc has a chance to fix everything that is wrong with the films and just keep going.

I would however still love to see someone get Wonder Woman right. Its a crime and a shame how long she has been around and no one seems to be able to get Diana correct. I mean its not that hard to bring a warrior princess to the masses and have it accepted *couchcouchXenacoughcough*
Dingo
Dingo - 6/17/2011, 6:57 AM
@billthebutcher
Heh. Read it again, but have Billy Connolly's voice in yer head as you do. :P

oh, and a n00b question, but who is the chick in the lower right of the article picture?
sonofsamadams
sonofsamadams - 6/17/2011, 7:02 AM
Am i seriously seeing these such ignorant and dilly posts of hate? HA! If the movie sucks the studio can LEARN from it!!
Which means, the next one they do will be a hell of a lot better. Which is why im pumped for transformers 3 in that way.
Oh and btw-its 82% liked by the ppl on RT. Better than thor...
thekabsin
thekabsin - 6/17/2011, 7:06 AM
This is kind of sad, I am still going to see it. This is honestly what I expected. I am a Marvel fan, dont care for DC much but I will take a comic book movie when I can get one. I saw first class twice, fell asleep the first time. Not because it was bad but because I drove five hours and didnt sleep and had to wait for my girlfriend to get out of work so I went to a movie and fell asleep. It was not as good as the internet made it seem but it was good. X Men First Ass did better because we thought it was going to suck. Green Lantern had high hopes coming from all sorts of DC fanboys that get nothing but good cartoons and video games, aside from the comics. It will hopefully do as well as X Men and they can fine tune it for a better sequel. Reynolds is good at listening and stepping up to the plate.
BlueScarab
BlueScarab - 6/17/2011, 7:07 AM
@Dingo that is Stargirl very energetic chick
StrangerX
StrangerX - 6/17/2011, 7:11 AM
These Superhero movies need a different vibe. I'm tired of seeing DC heroes being portrayed in the modern era. It would be nice to see DC put together a Justice League movie that's a period piece similar to A New Frontier.
95
95 - 6/17/2011, 7:12 AM
@Lazerbeast @Oreos

Okay, maybe it was the idea of all the 'Green Lantern' toys I had seen in the stores. I know, lots of films have merchandise. When you have movies like 'The Dark Knight' which are serious and made bank, you'd think the studio will follow through with the same notion. I wonder why 'Green Lantern' was the way it was. I had assumed it was aimed at a different audience.

~rm
CorndogBurglar
CorndogBurglar - 6/17/2011, 7:13 AM
Just look at GI Joe. It was one of the biggest pieces of crap ever shat out onto a piece of movie film, yet its getting a sequel...

oh and Ghost Rider, too.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 6/17/2011, 7:20 AM
That's true, but then WB have always been a bit cagier. I mean look at Superman Returns. That was actually a success critically AND financially to a certain extent, it just didn't make quiet enough for them to make a sequel. They are going to be expecting GL to make an obscene amount and I honesty don't think it will be enough for them. Whether you, I or little Jimmy down the street take notice of critics is irrelevant because the fact is, lots of others do and 20 odd % on Rotten Tomatoes will be noticed.

Shaman, I'll do my best dude! It could be a massacre, but I'm hoping for a nice surprise.
1 2 3
View Recorder