James Gunn Comments on Shooting Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 in Digital

James Gunn Comments on Shooting Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 in Digital

James Gunn Responds to criticisms on shooting Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 on Red 8K instead of Film

By Yelmurc - Jan 09, 2016 06:01 PM EST
Filed Under: Vol. 2
Source: Facebook.com

With the announcement that Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 will be the first film to shoot on the RED Weapon 8K, I've received a lot of excitement from a lot of people. THANKS! However, I also get a lot of folks asking why we chose not to shoot on film, and it's assumed we aren't doing so because of the expense. 

So, if you're interested, here's the deal.

When you're shooting a film at the level of Guardians of the Galaxy, the cost of film vs. digital is negligible - for me it's an aesthetic and creative choice.

Firstly, I believe when shooting on a format like the Red Weapon 8K or the Alexa 65, the amount of data is so massive - certainly more so than on a strip of film - that it gives you more freedom in production and post production to create exactly the film you want to create than actual film does. As anyone who has ever worked with me knows, I am a control freak. Such high resolution gives me the ability to control ever single bit of data (to do so would take a long time, but at least the knowledge comforts me). Many filmmakers look to essentially replicate the look of film, but I don't share that interest. I believe that innovations in camera and shooting technologies as well as visual and practical effects gives us the ability to create a new aesthetic of film, one different from what the past has offered but equally beautiful - perhaps even more so. I respect many of the filmmakers who continue to shoot on film - and some of the most gorgeous movies of 2015 have been in that format. But I think sometimes that the love of actual film is based in nostalgia more than it is in objective beauty. Many filmmakers remember the films of their youth and want to replicate that magic. For me, I'm interested in being one of the many who help to create a new kind of magic that will usher the cinematic experience into the future. What will the children of today think of fondly with nostalgia?

And, yes, most filmmakers who have shot digital have underutilized the format. But with these new cameras their advantages are easier to see for everyone.

And there are three other reasons I chose this format:

1) It is easier to seamlessly incorporate massive amounts of visual, digital effects - including a digital tree and raccoon - into a digital base.
2) One of the ways I capture my actor's performances is by doing massively long takes, over and over - sometimes up to an hour - much longer than your typical 11-minute reel of film. I find this a better way to capture the energy and rawness in a performance (and we get better outtakes of me yelling at Michael Rooker off-screen).
3) Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 will be utilizing another new technologies I'm very excited about but can't quite go into yet. But, for this technology, you need a camera the small size of the RED Weapon - a film camera is too big, as is the Alexa 65 (which is also an amazing camera).

Have a wonderful day.

 

GOTG VOL. 2 Director Says Drax, Not Baby Groot, Was The Most Popular Character In Test Screenings
Related:

GOTG VOL. 2 Director Says Drax, Not Baby Groot, Was The Most Popular Character In Test Screenings

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 2: James Gunn Says Stan Lee's Cameo Was Inspired By Fan Theories
Recommended For You:

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY VOL. 2: James Gunn Says Stan Lee's Cameo Was Inspired By Fan Theories

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

LordHarryLatts
LordHarryLatts - 1/9/2016, 7:03 PM
Step Up 5: Outer Space Disco Party.
TucksFrom2015
TucksFrom2015 - 1/9/2016, 7:36 PM
It's gonna be so dense. Every single frame is gonna have so much going on. And best of all we'll be able to see every little flake on Bautista's bodypaint.
BlackIceJoe
BlackIceJoe - 1/9/2016, 7:54 PM
I'm personally really happy he went with this camera and I hope more directors will use it in the future. One thing I really like is it will allow the movie to have a higher FPS (frames per second) and was one of the best things about The Hobbit, when Peter Jackson filmed it. Because with a higher FPS you get to see more detail on screen, plus it makes the images clearer too and I can't see why anyone would be against that. So I can't wait to see how much this helps GOTG2.
LordHarryLatts
LordHarryLatts - 1/9/2016, 8:48 PM
Thor...I'm a weird guy. I'd like to actually see the movie before I grade it. But that's just me.
XelCorp
XelCorp - 1/9/2016, 9:29 PM
@HeavensWarrior- *Cant tell if troll is serious*
XelCorp
XelCorp - 1/9/2016, 9:34 PM
@LordHarryLatts- What you should be worrying about is the Dawn of Teenage mutant Turtle featuring :Batman and Superman d*ick swinging contest and Poor man's Riddler
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 1/9/2016, 9:41 PM
I can't care about stuff like this. Sometimes I try, but I can't. As long as it produces relatively good quality images, I don't see the difference...
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 1/9/2016, 9:42 PM
@WeddingTux
It's gonna be so dense. Every single frame is gonna have so much going on.


EgoEgor
EgoEgor - 1/10/2016, 1:31 AM
So they're using a new camera, he decides to write an essay about it.


Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 1/10/2016, 2:00 AM
So, I just finished watching GotG with Gunn's commentary. No big shocker from it, but the guy comes across as having a very emotional base and just being generally a competent filmmaker, if a bit parochial at times. The movie is better than I remembered it, though.

It just makes me so glad that we've got the Russos on the Avengers going forward. Those guys are the definition of methodical, and if anyone can unpack the kind of complexity that a supercrossover like Infinity War is likely to be, it's them.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 1/10/2016, 2:36 AM
I wish I could have opinions about James Gunn, but honestly, he just seems like a guy with considerable skill and knowledge who, aside from a few quirks (and more than that, I think, a desire to be seen as quirky).

It's not like the Russos, who I can marvel at their meticulously deliberate approach. Or Whedon who I can sympathize with as he wrestles in the tent like some nerdly Jacob struggling against his own angels and demons. Or Peyton Reed, who I can at least appreciate his unrestrained fandom. Or even Singer and Snyder, where I pull my hair out over the apparent disregard for to worldbuilding and characterization (respectively), but I can at least appreciate their strengths of clear ability to tell stories and remarkable vocabulary of basic comic book visual id.

Gunn just comes across to me as a very average guy. I don't really have anything to complain about, or to be excited about either. I'm fairly jazzed to see another Guardians movie because of the sort of lightning in a bottle they made with the first one, but if Gunn's next project after that happened to be, say, Green Lantern or Inhumans or X-Force, I wouldn't actually be all that excited by the prospect. I'd say: "He'll probably do a good job because he generally does a good job".
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 1/10/2016, 2:37 AM
I like to nitpick, but Gunn himself doesn't really afford me the opportunity.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 1/10/2016, 2:43 AM
Oh, I've got something. "Boo, James Gunn. How dare you use digital film! It lacks the soul of celluloid! Boo!"
RocketRed
RocketRed - 1/10/2016, 5:16 AM
I mean, nothing will ever beat the feel of film. As great as digital is, it's still not there yet.

But Gunn can do the movie however the [frick] he wants.

If He wants to go full Sean S. Baker use a mother[frick]in' Iphone 6.

By the way, "Tangerine" is by far the best movie of 2015.

By far. Holy hell.
Beetleborg
Beetleborg - 1/10/2016, 7:03 AM
it makes more sense with a CGI heavy film to use digital rather than film
marvelstudios
marvelstudios - 1/10/2016, 7:23 AM
We as viewers, probably won't even notice the difference.
View Recorder