Cillian Murphy Talks 28 DAYS LATER Alternate Ending And Teases His Rumored 28 YEARS LATER Return

Cillian Murphy Talks 28 DAYS LATER Alternate Ending And Teases His Rumored 28 YEARS LATER Return

Oppenheimer star Cillian Murphy has reflected on his experience making Danny Boyle's 28 Days Later and briefly teases his return as Jim in the recently announced 28 Years Later. Read on for details...

By JoshWilding - Feb 07, 2024 03:02 PM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: Fear HQ

Helmed by director Danny Boyle and written by Alex Garland, 28 Days Later was released in way back 2002 and proved to be something of a game-changer for zombie movies. After all, who knew the undead could run? 

Well, that had happened on screen before in fairness, but it still felt like a fresh idea at the time and the British horror movie proved to be a hit (boasting an impressive cast led by Cillian Murphy, Naomie Harris, Christopher Eccleston, Megan Burns, and Brendan Gleeson).

28 Weeks Later was a solid standalone sequel but it's Boyle's planned 28 Years Later which will see Murphy potentially reprise his role as Jim.

Talking at a taping of SAG-AFTRA Foundation's Conversations programme for Oppenheimer (via FearHQ.com), Murphy admitted to not initially realising he was starring in a zombie movie. 

"I wasn’t too aware we were making a zombie movie, to be honest with you," he revealed, confirming he hadn't watched any of George A. Romero's Night of the Living Dead movies at the time. "It was right around the time SARS happened and there was all this 'air rage' stuff going on. So I never felt it was a zombie film. And I’m glad I didn’t watch the Romero movies because I didn’t realize how hallowed those movies were."

"Before '28 Days Later,' there weren’t that many zombie movies - it was kind of a dead genre," Muphy added. "So Danny and Alex rebooted it."

Asked if he was nervous to headline a movie with Gleeson, Murphy recalled previously sharing the screen with him in Sweety Barrett, an Irish movie which saw the Batman Begins star make his film debut as "Pat the Barman."

"I remember on that film I had to pour him a pint of Guinness. My hand was shaking," the actor confessed. "But he was so kind. I was just a kid, but he would spend the time and talk to you. I think that show the measure of the man. I’ve worked with him five or six times now and he’s one of my all-time heroes and the kindest, sweetest man - and an absolute legend."

Murphy later talked about shooting two different endings for 28 Days Later. The one we saw, in which Jim survives, and another where he dies. "I think when I was younger and bit more nihilist...I liked the image of two women surviving at the end and [frick] the man," he acknowledged. "But I think they wanted the version with the hope."

As for whether he'll play Jim again in 28 Years Later, Murphy simply responded with, "I’m available."

You can watch the full conversation with Murphy in the player below.

DEVON Interview: JERSEY SHORE Star Jenni JWoww Farley On Her Debut As A Horror Movie Director (Exclusive)
Related:

DEVON Interview: JERSEY SHORE Star Jenni "JWoww" Farley On Her Debut As A Horror Movie Director (Exclusive)

SCARY MOVIE: Original Stars On Potentially Returning For The Wayans Brothers' Upcoming Reboot
Recommended For You:

SCARY MOVIE: Original Stars On Potentially Returning For The Wayans Brothers' Upcoming Reboot

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

HammerLegFoot
HammerLegFoot - 2/7/2024, 3:12 PM
Yay!
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/7/2024, 3:28 PM
Bring Murphy back! Please!!!

I've been wondering about his character since summer, 2003



Plus, I loved this film and the concept. They aren't really zombies; they're 'infected.' But Cillian waking up to a dead hospital and then him in the church balcony? BEST EVER.

bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 2/7/2024, 5:12 PM
@lazlodaytona - he doesn't have a lot of main lead starring roles in big movies, and after Oppenheimer I wanna see more. 28 years later seems like a good opportunity
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 2/8/2024, 10:49 AM
@bkmeijer1 - agreed 110% dude. Murphy is too good to be a secondary role at this point.
However, his Scarecrow in Batman Begins was nothing short of epic.
HashTagSwagg
HashTagSwagg - 2/7/2024, 3:32 PM
The OG Rick Grimes.
Order66
Order66 - 2/7/2024, 4:21 PM
Who cares, we want Peaky Blinders!!
DocSpock
DocSpock - 2/7/2024, 5:12 PM

I'm in.

Gimme this strange always weird looking guy in a zombie flick.

Got my booze & cookies ready.

bkmeijer1
bkmeijer1 - 2/7/2024, 5:13 PM
Still one of my favourite zombie stories, mostly because of the world it takes place and how characters react to that. Only other two that had that for me are World War Z and the Telltale Walking Dead games.

Do wish we got a 28 months later first though. Probably could've helped a little more with the transition of that world. And with Murphy ofcourse
MuadDib
MuadDib - 2/7/2024, 5:48 PM
My only question relating to the technicality of it all is, in 28 weeks later they explain how the zombies essentially starve after a while.

Flash forward 28 years later, I would assume most of the zombie population would have starved to death by then. The surviving humans would have been low in numbers, so even if some of them got “turned” I just don’t understand how the zombie threat could be as bad as it was initially when the zombies def had numbers on their side

Canon108
Canon108 - 2/7/2024, 8:38 PM
@MuadDib - the postcredit scene in the sequel is the zombies reaching Paris, so maybe reaching mainland Europe is the jumping off point for Part III...
DanielPlainviewsGhost
DanielPlainviewsGhost - 2/8/2024, 3:08 AM
@MuadDib - In 28 Weeks Later it seems Alice is the only asymptomatic carrier to survive the initial outbreaks 28 Days Later. She then passes it in to Don and then the chain reaction of infection begins.

It COULD be explained that the man made virus mutated due to to Alice's resistance to it, and now those who are infected don't starve to death. And with the child also being an asymptomatic carrier it could further spread.

Absolutely not a fantastic explanation but it would work if they wanted to take an easy route.
MuadDib
MuadDib - 2/8/2024, 10:02 AM
@DanielPlainviewsGhost - Yeah, let’s see how convoluted the explanation ends up being.

I know you have to treat each movie like it’s stand alone, so you can make it the best it can be. But I also think there should be some, even if minuscule, forethought in laying the groundwork for future stories.

Def still looking forward to this, it’s still one of the great zombie movies.
BlueTheRaptor
BlueTheRaptor - 2/8/2024, 12:01 AM
I’d like to see a truly bleak future. So many zombie shows and films lead to thrivingcommunities living together. Communities in the 28 universe mean nothing but danger as it’s so quick. I’d like to see humans extremely cautious of each other in a very hostile world. We saw in 28 weeks later that lots of people = death. These zombies starve too, so the only way that they can keep coming is through fresh infection. There’s so much room for a fresh idea here.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder