InstigatorGIRL's Rant & Review of Nightmare On Elm Street!

InstigatorGIRL's Rant & Review of Nightmare On Elm Street!

Warning, there are ~SPOILERS~ herein!

Review Opinion
By InstigatorGIRL - May 03, 2010 03:05 PM EST
Filed Under: Horror

Okay so let me just start out by saying that I did not like this movie. It wasn't Jackie Earle Haley that disappointed me in this movie, in fact, he didn't do that bad of a job playing Freddy Krueger in my honest opinion.

What did disappoint me were some key things which I will list below.

~SPOILERS~

* Okay first off was they really had no character development in this movie they introduced a character and then within the next few scenes they were dead. There wasn't enough time for me to even feel anything for the characters.

* Too many one liners. I know, I know, Freddy said a lot of one liners in the original movies but these were just so lame rather than menacing or funny. There was only one Freddy line that was hysterical and didn't make me roll my eyes or shake my head in annoyance.

Freddy: "I found you Nancy. What should we play now?"
Nancy: "F*** YOU!"
Freddy: "Oh! That sounds fun! A little fast for my taste."

HAHAHAHAHAHA! Awesome! That was a true Freddy Kreuger moment to me.

* Also I was annoyed that they didn't focus the story around Nancy until half way through the movie. They show her for like 2 scenes but then you don't even see her for half of the movie. They focused on her friend Kris only to find out the story wasn't about her. That didn't make any sense to me. Don't put THAT much focus on characters unless they have importance to the story, which, from what I got, Kris had none.

* How do they not remember Freddy Krueger and the horrible things he did?? They never explained that. I'm sorry but I would remember something like that? Hell I remember when my fear of spiders happened and I was 4! Something that traumatic and none of these 6 kids remember anything? Not likely.

* Clancy Brown was Lex Luthor even when killing Krueger and being a loving dad. Couldn't get past it. LMAO.

* Also in the original Freddy was a child murderer. In this he was not. WTF? Also they make it seem like he was innocent of everything. Until they pull a Shalalalaman and, what a twist (...no it wasn't), he actually was a pedophile and did things to the kids. So the parents killed him. Um... okay. I get killing him but why try making a twist with Freddy's crimes.

The original did a much better job of this twist. Here's from what I remember. Fred Krueger was a child murderer. He was found guilty but he was released from prison because of a f-up with the warrant. So the parents took the law in their own hands and burned the mother f***er to death in his boiler room hideout. That makes more sense for them killing him!

* No imagination with the death scenes or anything. The deaths were BORING!

* Okay that kid injects himself with epinephrine (adrenaline) and then gets in a car accident. I know for a fact his heart wouldn't be able to handle it and he would most likely die. If they can have Freddy Krueger state that the mind stays alive for 7 minutes after the heart stops then they should know that kid would be dead!

* Horrible acting except for Jackie Earle Haley.

* Too many dream sequences. It was obvious Haley was carrying the movie and even still it got old.

* Makeup sucked!

* Nancy's mom wasn't an alcoholic.

* Last thing, I also had a problem with this in the original. If he is ALREADY dead and chilling in the dream world and you bring him out of the dream world, why kill him? Don't you think he is only going to end up chasing you again if you did kill him?? I don't understand this logic. DON'T KILL HIM!

I honestly must say don't go see this movie. It is a total let down and the original is ten times better than this trash. Wait and rent it on Netflx. Or better yet wait until it's playing on Sy Fy with the rest of the trashy flicks.

My rating is 1.5 out of 5

TERRIFIER 3: Art The Clown Returns For Festive Frights In Gory New Trailer
Related:

TERRIFIER 3: Art The Clown Returns For Festive Frights In Gory New Trailer

BEETLEJUICE BEETLEJUICE: Michael Keaton's Ghost With The Most Returns In Batsh*t New Trailer
Recommended For You:

BEETLEJUICE BEETLEJUICE: Michael Keaton's Ghost With The Most Returns In Batsh*t New Trailer

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Scarface
Scarface - 5/3/2010, 4:20 PM
WOW don,t hold back IGirl
If a pedophile got hold of my kid he would be begging for death before I would be done with him or her.
If a child murderer killed my kid I may just kill him or her fast.
What I,m getting it is I would be much more cruel to someone who scared my child for life.
So that part of it I get.
I also don,t think it imposible to regress bad memories of something that bad happening to you as a child.
I myself have not seen this yet and am sill looking forward to it. But these two problems that you have with it I don,t think myself are far off the realm of reality of a parents reaction to and a childs regression of.
Still glad you posted this though after I watch this I may agree with everything you have said
InstigatorGIRL
InstigatorGIRL - 5/3/2010, 4:46 PM
@Scarface. No I wasn't stating they were out of line. Because I would be the same way if someone tried anything with my daughter. I was meaning that the way they went about it was kinda lame. The parents were never sure that he did anything. They went off what they're kids said (which isn't out of line but even one of the kids said, "how do you know WE weren't lying?") and they didn't mean to kill him they were trying to smoke him out to beat the crap out of him. As in the original [frick]er got what he deserved.

Also the fact that none of the kids even remembered going to the school together?? Also that none of the kids remembered anything at all?? That seems off to me.
Scarface
Scarface - 5/3/2010, 5:00 PM
Ok that makes more sense now
but still if my kid said something like happened to him I would still act first but that also depends on the age of the child I would be more inclined to believe a younger child say 7, 8 or younger I believe they would not be able to make something like that up.
What age are the kids in the movie when they are molested?
Your rant does make much more sense to me now though LOL
Scarface
Scarface - 5/3/2010, 5:03 PM
Oh nothing spoiled either I don,t think
Freddy a smart ass and I kinda always thought even though they never said in the original that he was a pedophile or just a sadistic bastard.
Quick deaths were not his motive
InstigatorGIRL
InstigatorGIRL - 5/3/2010, 5:41 PM
@Tea. Thanks! Its even sexier now with your comment on it. ;) lol.
Scarface
Scarface - 5/3/2010, 6:07 PM
damn you tea damn you you sexy bitch
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 5/3/2010, 7:46 PM
Good stuff IG, I'm half way through it and its literally putting me to sleep. I might be afraid Freddy would come get me in my nightmares, but since I find him about as scary as a midget with a water pistol I doubt its going to happen. Awful movie.
Dimarzo85
Dimarzo85 - 5/3/2010, 9:49 PM
i really dont understand why people are saying this movie sucked when it clearly didnt. put the originals aside. first off, a dramatic experience would surpress the memories of those children which were prolly 4 or 5 years old because they were in preschool. the mind chooses to block out certain things depending on how tragic the event is. they obviously freaked out by him taking them down to his "secret cave" so after those events the parents seperated all the kids so it would have a greater chance of not remembering a thing. shit i have best friends since middle school and we realized through pictures and talkin to our parents that we knew eachother in preschool its very easy to forget when your a young child. as far as the far fetch shit like the adrenaline yeh i can see that not happening especially when he was taking speed all his life. his heart wouldnt be able to take it and he even stated he didnt know how much to inject. but the story in this movie was a lot better then the original. let me say that robert englund was the best and no one can beat him, but his comedic personality throughout the series dissapointed me. jackie haleys performance was much better. hes evil plain and simple. he toyed with them quikly then killed them. it was the suspense of knowing if he was an innocent man or not cuz either way he would have a great motive to kill all those kids. the way they connected the kids together was great unlike the original where he just wanted to get back at the parents and take there children. he actually knew these kids and cuz of the fact that they stood in a jury and explained what he did to them he wanted revenge against the kids and the parents. plus they said he skipped town when the parents realized he was doing that to there kids so right then you knew he was guilty. and as far as getting to know the charactors.. well that wasnt the meaning of the movie, it was finding out they were all connected somehow. this movie was awesome, better then any other remake that was made so far like the horrible halloween 2 by rob zombie, or friday the 13th. jackies portayance as freddy was interesting. everyones problem is comparing this movie with the old one which you cant do. this is in a whole other catagory. like who cares if nancys mom wasnt a drunk in this one. i mean who gives a shit if she was or wasnt that shit dont matter. and there was alot of dream sequences cuz the plot is based on mirconaps, which made it alot more exciting becuase you dont know if what your seeing is reality or a dream. and it showed freddy alot more, explaining no matter what even if you do stay awake this entity will somehow get you, there is no escape this time even staying awake cant save you. thats what makes this one much more terrifying. and what matters is there is a tortured evil soul, a dream demon that wanted to finsih what he started. the deaths were not boring, they were realistic, forget the oneliners and the jokes, he wanted blood. and thats what he got. when you watch a movie you need to see it in a deeper perspective not just whats happening. and this is coming from a huge fan of the series who loved robert englund and here i am stating that this movie did an excellent job explaining his intentions and motive and that jackie haley was bad ass, he was down right evil, not a comedian or a prankster.. oh and one more thing, someone said they didnt focus on nancy until half way in the movie. THE MOVIE IS ABOUT FREDDY! STOP COMPARING THIS TO THE ORINGIAL! overall, this was a bad ass movie. stop expecting it to be like the old ones cuz that aint happening. theres a new freddy in town and hes darker then ever. when the audience applaused at the end, thats when you know they did something right. and the way nancys mom dies is alot better then the corny fake body they used in the old one when he grabbed her and pulled her back into the house. there is no escape, and dont doubt that in the sequel he will come after the parents as well and more elm street kids once he finishes the class of the preschool. jackie haley, your the man.
InstigatorGIRL
InstigatorGIRL - 5/3/2010, 11:41 PM
@Dimarzo. I'm sorry but the movie was not about Freddy it was about the kids getting hunted by Freddy. Also, considering it is a remake to a classic horror franchise it will be nit-picked at and compared to the original. Sorry but it was complete crap. It might be good for the new generations but it is in no way better than the original nor did it comapre to it. Also Friday the 13th was BY FAR a better remake. Anyways. Congrats, I guess, if you enjoyed the movie and was drawn in so much to overlook it's MANY flaws. More power to you.

@Ror midget with a water pistol. HA HA HA! Man, little people are amusing in any scenario... Yeah I found myself yawning so much while watching it you'd think I was watching it at 2 in the morning or something. lol
Dimarzo85
Dimarzo85 - 5/4/2010, 2:10 AM
See that's the thing I'm saying. You can't compare it you need to put this movie in a different catagory. But come on Friday the 13th sucked lol I mean it was a predictable unlike this nightmare movie. People were expecting the same story a child killer that got off on a tecknicality. It was unexpecting and suprising figuring out why these kids are connected and why he's doin what he's doin. Look all I'm saying is doing a remake causes this right here wut you and i are doing. Ima huge fan of this franchise and of course not everyone is gonna like it but like I said coming from a fan of the originals I still think they did a great job with this plot and the darkness of it. It wasn't just a man kidnapping kids and killing them like the old Freddy, its a man working doing his job always around kids and influencing them to go with him so he can do sick things to them which is disturbing. Of course the original is just as disturbing but my point being is not trying to compare but to simply put it in it's own catagory. No matter wut people will like and dislike this movie but for me I enjoyed it I enjoyed seeing it in someone else view and in a more darker manner. Ya know Jackie Haley signed on for three movies and Nancy will be in the next one so this franchise isn't over yet lol. Im sure the arguing will continue.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 5/4/2010, 4:59 AM
Dimaz, I wasn't a fan of the originals either so thats one factor in my not liking this, but by any critical standards I thought it was a bad film. The acting was ok I guess, but I didn't give a flying [frick] about any of the characters, they were not fully rounded or even half rounded so who cares when Freddy slices em up? Freddy himself was simply a one liner spouting joke but then I always thought he was anyway. A razor hand and a stripy jumper doesn't make someone scary when the people in peril suck! And you mention predictable, are you honestly telling me that anything in that movie surprised you in the slightest? [frick] Freddy, [frick] remakes, [frick] horror movies that don't horrify.
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/4/2010, 8:39 AM
INSTIGATOR @ Cheers for a great review, i knew this was gonna be SH1T!!

HOLLYWOOD can stick their remakes up their BUTT HOLES! : P

Hated FRIDAY THE 13TH too, (no real story to it, just the same ol, same ol, but worst).

TEA @ NO....

[frick] FREDDY! : D
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 5/4/2010, 8:42 AM
We need the old and best FREDDY back for a FREDDY VS JASON VS ASH movie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

: P
LuvInMiLyfe
LuvInMiLyfe - 5/4/2010, 9:11 AM
Great review... I'm glad i didn't waste my time.

InstigatorGIRL
InstigatorGIRL - 5/4/2010, 11:13 AM
@Tea I wonder if Freddy ever wiped his ass with the wrong hand? LMAO. jk.
InstigatorGIRL
InstigatorGIRL - 5/4/2010, 11:14 AM
@LEEE That would've been awesome! Too bad Freddy Vs. Jason was a FAIL.
superdog
superdog - 5/4/2010, 11:45 AM
great review. seems to be the consensus (dimaz not withstanding). im definately gonna skip and wait for the dvd. i didnt mind freddy vs jason so much. at least it had novelty.
Ranger14
Ranger14 - 5/4/2010, 4:58 PM
Dimarzo@ Paragraphs are our best friend. ;-)

Nice review IGirl. Considering the ratings and reviews out there on the movie, yours is right in line with the vast...vast majority of them. I doubt I will even rent it. Of course, I hate it when current Hollywood messes with the classics. It has continually proved to be failure.
Dimarzo85
Dimarzo85 - 5/4/2010, 9:34 PM
well i enjoyed it guys lol so i guess you all can hate on me for this one. see the one thing that did surprise me was the different take on who he was and what he was doing. everything else yes was obvious. so i give u that. is anyone here fans of iron man? now dont bad mouth this one guys lol
superman7
superman7 - 5/5/2010, 3:11 PM
"Clancy Brown was Lex Luthor even when killing Krueger and being a loving dad. Couldn't get past it. LMAO"

HAHAHHAHAH....

I was thinking the same exact thing the entire time! hahahhah
View Recorder