Tim Burton's BEETLEJUICE Sequel Gets Official Title; The Ghost With The Most Returns On First Poster

Tim Burton's BEETLEJUICE Sequel Gets Official Title; The Ghost With The Most Returns On First Poster

Tim Burton's Beetlejuice sequel is set to hit theaters this September, and Warner Bros. has now unveiled the movie's official title along with a first poster...

By MarkCassidy - Feb 02, 2024 01:02 PM EST
Filed Under: Horror
Source: Via FearHQ

It looks like ol' Betelgeuse's number has finally been called!

Though there's still no sign of a trailer, Warner Bros. has shared the first poster for Tim Burton's Beetlejuice sequel, which is now officially titled Beetlejuice Beetlejuice!

Wait... does it count if you only type his name three times? 

The one-sheet includes the tagline "the wait is almost over," which is a clever call-back to the ending of the original horror comedy classic, which saw Michael Keaton's Ghost With the Most stuck in a very long queue after his plot to marry Lydia Deetz was foiled and he was sent back to the Afterlife via Sandworm.

Betelgeuse also had his head shrunk by a witch doctor for stealing his ticket and attempting to cut in line, so it'll be interesting to see if the lecherous Bio-Exorcist is still in the same state when we catch up with him later this year.

You can check out the poster along with some recent set videos below.

Keaton spoke about returning to the role in a recent interview with Empire.

"Beetlejuice is the most f--kin’ fun you can have working. It’s so fun, it’s so great. And you know what it is? We’re doing it exactly like we did the first movie," he says. "There’s a woman in the great waiting room for the afterlife literally with a fishing line – I want people to know this because I love it – tugging on the tail of a cat to make it move."

"[Burton] and I were talking about it years and years ago, never telling anybody," he continued. "I said, ‘if it happens, first of all, we’ve both said we’re doing it many times. We both agreed, if it happens, it has to be done as close to the way we made it the first time. Making stuff up, making stuff happen, improvising and riffing, but literally handmade stuff like people creating things with their hands and building something. F--kin’ great. It’s the most fun I’ve had working on a movie in I can’t tell you how long."

Winona Ryder will be back as Lydia Deetz, with Jenna Ortega on board as her daughter, Astrid. Catherine O'Hara is also set to reprise her role as Lydia's mother, Delia Deetz, but Alec Baldwin and Gina Davis are not expected to return.

Other new cast members include Monica Bellucci as Betelgeuse's wife, Willem Dafoe as an afterlife cop, and Justin Theroux in an undisclosed role.

Wednesday creators Alfred Gough and Miles Millar penned the script.

Beetlejuice 2 is set to release in theaters on Sept. 6, 2024.

M3GAN Returns In A New Body In First Official Look At Next Year's Sequel
Related:

M3GAN Returns In A New Body In First Official Look At Next Year's Sequel

FROM: Acclaimed Sci-Fi Horror Series Renewed For A 10-Episode Fourth Season
Recommended For You:

FROM: Acclaimed Sci-Fi Horror Series Renewed For A 10-Episode Fourth Season

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
WEAPONXOXOXO
WEAPONXOXOXO - 2/2/2024, 1:08 PM
AWESOME! June 9th!! I'M THERE!
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 2/2/2024, 1:12 PM
@WEAPONXOXOXO - Americans read dates the other way around (makes no sense personally) so it's September 6th
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/2/2024, 1:17 PM
@Urubrodi - - It's only the wrong way around because the year comes afterwards. If the year came first it would make more sense. Y-M-D (largest to smallest). Outside the US it's D-M-Y (smallest to largest). Either way is logical.

But M-D-Y is not logical at all.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 2/2/2024, 1:30 PM
@ObserverIO - It is logical, as it gives you all the information you need. How does knowing the month first make it illogical?
SATW42
SATW42 - 2/2/2024, 3:30 PM
@ObserverIO - not that I walk around thinking America has it all figured out, but do you actually speak out loud like "let's go to the movies July 9th?" or do you say "Let's go to the movies the 9th of July"
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/2/2024, 3:40 PM
@MosquitoFarmer - Because there is no logical order to it.

Look at our number system. The number 147 is in order. There is 1 hundred 4 tens and 7. If I wanted to tell you the same amount but I said 471 it would make no sense. Because the numbers go from largest to smallest.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/2/2024, 3:41 PM
@MosquitoFarmer - We could say numbers backwards and it would still be logical. We could say 741 meaning 7 and 4 tens and 1 hundred. It's not the way we do it, but it would still be a logical system.
What's the logic in our Month-Day-Year system?
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/2/2024, 3:44 PM
@SATW42 - Again, it's not that the month and day are the wrong way around. It's only wrong if the year (the biggest) is directly before or after the day (the smallest). When using all three, the month should always be in the middle.

So July 9th and 9th of July are both correct.

But July of 9th is stupid.
Ryguy88
Ryguy88 - 2/2/2024, 4:06 PM
@ObserverIO - M-D-Y is how you say the date
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 2/2/2024, 4:31 PM
@ObserverIO - You're talking about two different things. And you still haven't explained how knowing the month first makes it illogical, cause it's useful information to know.
Baf
Baf - 2/2/2024, 5:19 PM
@ObserverIO - I never really thought about it before but I can tell you when I was younger, we used to just write the month and date and didn't have to include the year because, well, everyone knows what year it is.
RolandD
RolandD - 2/2/2024, 5:20 PM
@ObserverIO - Yeah and I bet you think Sharp Dressed Man is by Zed Zed Top.😂
OriginalGusto1
OriginalGusto1 - 2/2/2024, 8:56 PM
@Urubrodi - When you're the best...you set the rules. It's just that simple.
philinterrupted
philinterrupted - 2/2/2024, 9:16 PM
@SATW42 - I’d say July 9th.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 2/3/2024, 2:57 AM
@philinterrupted - But when the holiday comes up it becomes the 4th of July.
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 2/3/2024, 2:59 AM
@OriginalGusto1 - To be a "rule" other people would follow, but it's only Americans being different.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 6:19 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - It's all useful information to know. But when you put it down in order, it ought to have a certain order. M-D-Y has no order.

What is the logical order of M-D-Y? Why that particular 'order'?

If it's not logical, then it's illogical.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 6:21 AM
@Baf - That's how I remember it too. And there's nothing wrong with that system. That makes sense.

It's when they slapped the year on it that it became stupid, because they put the year in the wrong place. They followed the international standard of putting it at the end, but because the US does M-D instead of D-M it was in the wrong place. They should have ignored the international standard and put it at the beginning so it would make more sense.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 6:22 AM
If you're gonna do it the opposite way around to everywhere else, then you've got to commit.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 2/3/2024, 7:23 AM
@ObserverIO - Just cause it's not aesthetically pleasing to your sensibility doesn't make it wrong. Knowing the month first is just as relevant.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 7:51 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - It's not orderly. There's no order.

123 is orderly.
321 is orderly
231 is not.
132 is not.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 2/3/2024, 7:58 AM
@ObserverIO - You go ahead and compare general numbers to dates.
AnungUnRama
AnungUnRama - 2/3/2024, 7:59 AM
@ObserverIO - Actually international standard going by ISO 8601 is YYYY-MM-DD. But this is barely in use
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 8:02 AM
@AnungUnRama - That actually makes the most sense because it's the same way that we deal with pretty much all numbers. Largest to smallest.

So technically we had it right by saying month first and then day. But then we [frick]ed it up when we put the year at the end instead of the beginning.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 8:05 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - Dates are numbers. We even replace the name of the months with a number. December is 12 because it's the 12th month of the year. We don't put 21 for December, meaning 2 x months + 1 x 10 months. We put the 1 before the two, because a ten is larger than a single.
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 2/3/2024, 8:06 AM
@ObserverIO - I said "general numbers", didn't I?
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 8:10 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - And it's the same with time. Digitally a quarter to midnight is 11:45, because hours are larger than minutes.
Adding 30 seconds to that would be 11:45:30.

Now if a country decided to have the minutes first instead of hours they would say 45:11. And that's fine. There's still an order to that. Nothing wrong with that.

So my question to you now is, if you were to say 45:11 for a quarter to midnight instead of 11:45, where would put the 30 seconds, if you were to add them? The beginning or the end?
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 8:11 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - Also "general" numbers as opposed to what? Sumerian?
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 2/3/2024, 8:50 AM
@ObserverIO - Dates.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 9:01 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - Dates use general numbers.

So if we said 45:11 for a quarter to midnight instead of 11:45 and you were to add 30 seconds where would you put it?

a) 45:11:30

or b) 30:45:11
MosquitoFarmer
MosquitoFarmer - 2/3/2024, 9:29 AM
@ObserverIO - We're not talking about time, are we? Just cause you'd rather they say the movie is coming out on the 6th of September instead of on September 6th, well, you'll have to live with that. You have fun taking the piss, I'm done.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 2/3/2024, 9:48 AM
@MosquitoFarmer - A month, a year and a day are measurements of time. We are talking about time.

And as I've said many times, I don't care if it's D-M or M-D, there's nothing wrong with either. Its the placement of the Year that [frick]s it up and makes it wrong.
philinterrupted
philinterrupted - 2/3/2024, 12:57 PM
@Urubrodi - that’s different, that’s one of the names of the Independence Day holiday.

I’m not saying one is right over the other though.
dracula
dracula - 2/2/2024, 1:09 PM
man this might be the largest sequel gap yet
HistoryofMatt
HistoryofMatt - 2/2/2024, 1:22 PM
@dracula - Top Gun: Maverick was also 36 years.
OriginalGusto1
OriginalGusto1 - 2/2/2024, 8:57 PM
@HistoryofMatt - still waiting on Howard The Duck: II
HammerLegFoot
HammerLegFoot - 2/2/2024, 1:09 PM
This movie is going to be either really good or really bad. No in-between
Urubrodi
Urubrodi - 2/2/2024, 1:12 PM
@HammerLegFoot - why no in-between? I mean I hope it'll be great but could end up being average.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 2/2/2024, 1:14 PM
I have faith for now. Eventually Burton has to go back to formula, he needs to.
TrentCrimm
TrentCrimm - 2/2/2024, 5:35 PM
@bobevanz -

I thought his episodes of Wednesday were good, but yeah for me Burton hasn't put out anything I've enjoyed much in a long time. Just checking IMDB and I think I'd say Corpse Bride was the last one that I actually liked. Dark Shadows I might throw into a Saturday afternoon watch category.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder