Iron Man 2 Reaches $300 Million at the US Box Office!

Iron Man 2 Reaches $300 Million at the US Box Office!

Marvel Studios' Iron Man 2 has rocketed it's way through the US and worldwide box office! Follow the jump to find out more...

By JoshWilding - Jun 16, 2010 03:06 PM EST
Filed Under: Iron Man 2
Source: SuperHeroHype

According to a report over at SuperHeroHype, the Marvel movie starring Robert Downey Jr has crossed the $300 million point at the US Box Office. The first movie which was released two years ago, made $318 million so there's still a little way to go before it manages to surpass it's predecessor. The site also points out that it will need to raise another $33 million in order to topple Alice in Wonderland which currently holds the title for North America's top grossing movie of this year.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic


However, Iron Man 2 has reached over $295 million outside of the US meaning that it has a worldwide box office total of $595.3 million which beats Iron Man's final take of $585.2 million! This is of course great news as it clearly points to the movie being a huge success! (despite some mixed reviews) It's also fair to assume that this news means we're almost guaranteed of seeing an Iron Man 3 in the future and only strengthens the fact that The Avengers will assemble on the big screen in 2012!

It's a great time to be a comic book fan!




Image and video hosting by TinyPic



Marvel Creative Committee Nixed IRON MAN 2 Scene With A Drunk Tony Stark Hitting Pepper Potts
Related:

Marvel Creative Committee Nixed IRON MAN 2 Scene With A Drunk Tony Stark Hitting Pepper Potts

IRON MAN 2: New Details Emerge About Why Demon In A Bottle Storyline Was Scrapped
Recommended For You:

IRON MAN 2: New Details Emerge About Why "Demon In A Bottle" Storyline Was Scrapped

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

HelaGood
HelaGood - 6/16/2010, 3:14 PM
WOOHOO! great article JOSH!!

AND

IM2 is only out for almost 6 weeks! $300+ million in 6 weeks is awesome!!!!

and youre right! hopefully this is the beginning of a bright MARVELous future in comic book movies!!!
hardcorefrokid
hardcorefrokid - 6/16/2010, 3:27 PM
It is a great time to be a comic book fan!
LEEE777
LEEE777 - 6/16/2010, 3:28 PM
Thats not a lot really!

I blame [frick]ing SLJ! : P
Creature
Creature - 6/16/2010, 3:35 PM
Just imagine The Avengers in 2012 after Cap and Thor are hits with general audiences. Plus, all of the fanboys who will see this. I'm looking at crowded cinemas.
JayTopStix
JayTopStix - 6/16/2010, 3:51 PM
Lee, once again youre a tool. 300 million is not a lot?? And I suppose your $200 million by Brandon Routh was more?? hahaha, youre a laughing stock.
comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 6/16/2010, 3:59 PM
This might be a reasonably good time to be a comic book MOVIE fan, given the continuing success of the genre which will only encourage more movies to be made, but I don't know about this being a good time to be a comic book BOOK fan. Both of the "Big Two" have devolved to the point that all they can do is a nonstop series of massive "events" which render individual titles barely comprehensible if you're not buying any other tied-in books and cheap shocks like killing iconic characters to sell books. The '70s or '80s were much better times to be a fan of the books themselves, with classic stories and (often) great art. The stories were almost all self-contained within individual titles, and the few times that somebody died in a book, it actually MEANT something. If those characters came back, it wasn't for years and years afterwards. It wasn't just "we'll kill this famous character off to generate some mainstream news buzz and sell a few more books. We'll bring him back in eighteen months with another convoluted explanation for how the character 'really didn't die' or 'was brought back from the dead'". Those older books weren't budget-breakers either. They weren't usually more than a dollar or two apiece, leaving money free to try out other titles that caught your interest or that a friend or guy at the comic shop was raving about.
jimthefan
jimthefan - 6/16/2010, 4:01 PM
Lees constantly speaking straight truth...I love it
JustinMSalvato
JustinMSalvato - 6/16/2010, 4:32 PM
Lee777 is an insult to women everywhere.
JoshWilding
JoshWilding - 6/16/2010, 4:47 PM
Thanks guys! :)

Regardless of the quality of comic books these days (I only read Marvel but I'll admit it varies - for example, a pile of Deadpool titles each month and the constant events which are beginning to feel a little tedious however good they might look) if you're a fan of the characters at least, that doesnt really matter! I mean, I'm only 19 - 20 on Friday - and I never imagined that I'd see an Avengers movie in my lifetime!
FutureCBMHero
FutureCBMHero - 6/16/2010, 4:50 PM
It's only there because of the first 2 weeks. People aren't lining up for IM2 right now it might make another 15 million domestically, but given most trends and the upcoming releases of different movies (Toy Story, Jonah Hex, Grown Ups, Cyrus), it'll be close. If it were a truly great movie it would be closer to 400 or 450 right now.

Also, when a movie costs 200 million to make and it has only GROSSED 300 million, the studio really isn't making that much money in the big picture. Half of that probably goes to the theaters themselves.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 6/16/2010, 4:51 PM
To be honest, aside from a couple of titles, I don't really read Marvel or DC that much anymore. There are far better comics out there from different brands. Although I guess Vertigo is DC!

As for Iron Man 2, awesome, glad it cleaning up. But as good as it was, it was still disappointing, and I think there may be more people that are ready to admit that now that some time has passed since all the hype.
Joe6Pack74
Joe6Pack74 - 6/16/2010, 6:00 PM
+1 to what Angelo just said.

llinformerll
llinformerll - 6/16/2010, 6:57 PM
@ Angelo: I thought he was the one who gripes the most on this forum.
GUNSMITH
GUNSMITH - 6/16/2010, 6:59 PM
I WONDER WHAT HIS NEW ARMOR WILL LOOK LIKE IN IRON MAN 3?
superdog
superdog - 6/16/2010, 7:05 PM
Llinfor@ No your thinking of grif :)

lee777 is awesome and I love him. He's a little out there with some of his movie likes and disikes but that's what makes him leee777 so leave him alone.
Minotauro
Minotauro - 6/16/2010, 7:46 PM
Not bad! Dark Knight and Avatar just took a little under 2 weeks to hit that mark! ;P Can't make that up!!
UncleDrew
UncleDrew - 6/16/2010, 7:53 PM
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
CHA-CHING!!!

YOUR RIGHT JOSH W. GREAT TIME TO BE A COMIC BOOK FAN
McLovin
McLovin - 6/16/2010, 9:04 PM
HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! SUCK ON THAT DC FANS!!!!

Oh and I'm with Angelo, Number 21 and superdog. Quit talking shit to LEEE777. He may be a couple of cans short of a six pack, but he's one of the great ones!!!! SO FCUK OFF AND GTFO!!!!!

@ comicb00kguy - AMEN BROTHER!
11viking11
11viking11 - 6/17/2010, 5:43 AM
Anil Rickly@ IM2 over-rated, true

rormachine@ IM2 was good, but still disappointing, true

Leee777@ agree, but SLJ has great potencial as an actor to play Nick Fury. The reason I think he didnt went good, is because:

Justin Theroux is to blame, cuz he fkd up with the script and the story line as well.

He was put to replace the original team of writers(Mark Fergus & Hawk Ostby) of Iron Man 1.0; he should be fired.

Fergus has much more experience than Theroux as writer; Theroux got this job with IM2 and, voila, fkd it up.

Also, was just hard to see a (almost) retarded Justin Hammer with a loli pop; the "ex-wife" bomb; a iron drunk man shooting at cocktails with his armor; a whiplash holding IM & WM in opposed sides, like saying: "cmon guys, hurry up, it's the final scene, I'm waiting for you to finish me off".

comicb00kguy
comicb00kguy - 6/17/2010, 6:36 AM
Josh: I've been an Avengers fan since the early '80s and never thought I'd actually see a live-action Avengers movie done, but one is coming. I just hope it's worth the wait.
JayTopStix
JayTopStix - 6/17/2010, 7:55 AM
Posting LOL in every comment you make does not make cool, anyway Iron Man 2 rocks and the box office has spoken. It is a fact, not fiction.
marvel72
marvel72 - 6/17/2010, 9:33 AM
how did it reach that mark ? its not that good,3 scenes don't make a film.
1.the fight on the race track
2.the final battle featuring ironman & war machine also the great black widow segment.
3.thors hammer.
JonF
JonF - 6/17/2010, 4:44 PM
Okay. A couple comments:

@FutureCBMHero:Your math is off. A film that cost $200 mil to make and has grossed close to $600mil worldwide has made $400mil! And that doesn't even include profits from merchandising tie-ins and licensing, not to mention revenue from upcoming DVD and Blu-Ray sales! What, does foreign currency not count?

@comicb00kguy - Same here! I've been collecting Avengers since '78 and didn't think it would EVER be feasible to make a big budget Avengers movie! We're in a golden era when SFX can offer both high quality and affordability AND can be produced in a timely manner! I'm ecstatic about that! So many possiblities have opened up in the last fifteen years due to advances in technology!

Your comments about the comic book industry are dead on! It's nice to know that there are people on this site that really know what they are talking about! Your posts are always refreshing to read for this very reason!

@Ror - Due to the approach that Favreau has chosen to take with the IM franchise, it was inevitable that the second installment would fall short of the first, given the choice of villain and the plot! I'm a little less excited about part three than I should be because part II kind of killed some of the anticipation for me. I wanted to see the Titanium Man and the Crimson Dynamo, but now they would be a bit redundant! IM2 probably could have used two super-powered villains instead of one, but Fav decided to err on the side of caution with that one! I feel that WM should have been held off at least until the third film, but oh well! What's done is done!

@ GUNSMITH - Hopefully we'll see the REAL Silver Centurion armor in all its bulked up glory! That suit was the sh*t!

FutureCBMHero
FutureCBMHero - 6/18/2010, 9:09 AM
@JonF actually my domestic math was okay. Your math is more incorrect. Of that 400 million, the studio would be lucky to take in half of it. Between what is owed to different people worldwide to the various distributors, I would bet they make less than that. The same goes to the merchandising. Yes they will obviously make a profit, but it won't be as much as you might think considering costs and individual cuts so to speak. Marvel doesn't just get to keep the 600 mil that IM2 grosses. And we haven't even gotten to the taxes on that stuff.
JonF
JonF - 6/18/2010, 2:05 PM
@FutureCBMHero - I understand all of that. Sounds like your speculating. Obviously the picture's grosses are high enough to warrant sequels and spinoffs!

If a project has made double its budget it's considered a success! That is the goal the studios have in mind! Given that Marvel produced IM2 themselves, I'd say they stand to make an even bigger profit than if IM2 were farmed out to an established production house!
FutureCBMHero
FutureCBMHero - 6/18/2010, 5:17 PM
Of course I'm speculating, I haven't seen any of the contracts or deals worked out between studios. So yeah, I kind of have to speculate. Kind of like you are speculating that making double their budget was their goal. In all reality, in Hollywood today, studios are happy just not losing money on a project (which happens far to often). To be honest the studios probably needed a bigger return out of IM2 so they can afford flops or simply continue with their other projects. Big time flicks afford studios to take risks and develop talents.

I'm not saying that they didn't make money, I'm simply saying that in the bigger picture they probably didn't make as much money as they thought(bc the movie isn't as good as people wanted it to be). If they had made a better movie, they would be seeing something near the billion dollar mark worldwide. I'm not saying anything earth-shattering here.
View Recorder