FRANKENSTEIN Spoilers: Guillermo Del Toro's Adaptation Makes A Major Change To The Ending Of The Novel

FRANKENSTEIN Spoilers: Guillermo Del Toro's Adaptation Makes A Major Change To The Ending Of The Novel

Guillermo del Toro's Frankenstein makes several minor (and some not so minor) changes to Mary Shelley's original story, including one major alteration to the very end of the book...

By MarkCassidy - Oct 27, 2025 09:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Frankenstein
Source: Via FearHQ.com

Even if you haven't read Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, there's a pretty good chance you know the story.

Guillermo del Toro's long-awaited adaptation, which is now playing in theaters ahead of its Netflix premiere on November 11, sticks pretty close to the classic tale, but it does make a couple of significant changes - and one major alteration to how the story concludes.

Spoilers follow.

Frankenstein focuses on a brilliant scientist and surgeon named Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac), who becomes obsessed with cheating death after his mother passes while giving birth to his younger brother, William. Victor ultimately succeeds in giving life to a sapient Creature (Jacob Elordi) he stitches together using the limbs and organs he's harvested from various corpses, but soon abandons and attempts to destroy his creation, setting both of them on a path of despair and destruction.

For the most part, the movie plays out in much the same way as the various other adaptations we've seen over the years, but Victor is depicted as a far more cruel and deluded man than his literary counterpart, and his callous disregard for those around him leads to the death of Elizabeth Lavenza (Mia Goth), who forms a close bond with the Creature in this version of the story.

In the book, the Creature murders Elizabeth on the night of her wedding to Victor, but in del Toro's film, Frankenstein mistakenly shoots her as she embraces his creation.

With both creator and creation now driven insane with grief and fuelled by vengeance, the Creature tracks Victor to the North Pole, where he lies gravely wounded on a ship after recounting his tale to Captain Anderson. In the novel, Frankenstein dies before the Creature arrives, but here, the two share a brief moment, with Victor apologizing for his actions and begging - and receiving - forgiveness from his "son."

Instead of departing to join his creator in death as he does in the book, the Creature decides to embrace life, walking into the frozen distance to an uncertain fate.

Have you seen Frankenstein yet? If so, what did you make of these changes to the original story?

Frankenstein centers on a brilliant but egotistical scientist (Oscar Isaac) who brings a creature (Elordi) to life in an experiment that ultimately leads to the undoing of both the creator and his tragic creation.

“This film concludes a quest that started at age 7, when I saw James Whale’s Frankenstein films for the first time. I felt the jolt of recognition in that seminal moment: Gothic horror became my church, and Boris Karloff my Messiah,” del Toro said in a statement when the project was first announced.

FRANKENSTEIN: Netflix Releases Two Stunning New Posters Ahead Of Friday's Premiere - SPOILERS
Related:

FRANKENSTEIN: Netflix Releases Two Stunning New Posters Ahead Of Friday's Premiere - SPOILERS

THE ODYSSEY Stills Feature First Official Look At Tom Holland & Anne Hathaway; Mia Goth's Character Revealed
Recommended For You:

THE ODYSSEY Stills Feature First Official Look At Tom Holland & Anne Hathaway; Mia Goth's Character Revealed

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
soberchimera
soberchimera - 10/27/2025, 9:48 PM
So, it’s just recycling the themes from Hellboy, humans are the REAL monsters. ugh
Huskers
Huskers - 10/27/2025, 10:33 PM
@soberchimera - Uhm more like Hellboy and all the others borrowed from Frankensteinz.
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 10/27/2025, 10:46 PM
@soberchimera - Guillermo is almost in his 80s and we still dont know from wich Toro is he from.
soberchimera
soberchimera - 10/27/2025, 11:27 PM
@Huskers - Uhh, Hellboy didn’t kill anyone in cold blood like Frankenstein’s monster does in the book (William Frankenstein, Elizabeth)
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 10/28/2025, 12:01 AM
@Malatrova15 - Say no more fam.

User Comment Image
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 10/28/2025, 12:06 AM
@Feralwookiee - you think this is funny ? This….this …chicannery!
Feralwookiee
Feralwookiee - 10/28/2025, 12:09 AM
@Malatrova15 - Please civilize thineself.
SpaceAgent
SpaceAgent - 10/28/2025, 7:11 AM
@Malatrova15 And HE gets to be a Frankenstein?! What a sick joke!
Ojeet78
Ojeet78 - 10/27/2025, 10:08 PM
Im very excited for this. Rory Kinnear's Caliban has been my favourite version of the creature for a while now.

"For the monster's not in my face but in my soul...."

tmp3
tmp3 - 10/28/2025, 12:31 AM
@Ojeet78 - Absolutely loved Kinnear in that role; Penny Dreadful still has the most book accurate takes on Victor and the creature for me. That said, Elordi in this new one might be my favorite creature since Karloff
Slotherin
Slotherin - 10/28/2025, 4:57 AM
@tmp3 - it's one of the most. 2004 Hallmark Frankenstein might be the most accurate depiction.
Waifuslayer2
Waifuslayer2 - 10/27/2025, 10:15 PM
That creature design killed all interest I had, which after the trailer wasn't that much. I'm done being burned by Del Taco and his half baked films. He hasn't made a decent film since Hellboy 2 and that's being generous.
Slotherin
Slotherin - 11/12/2025, 7:36 AM
@Waifuslayer2 - shame; he actually delivers a great take on the story
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 10/27/2025, 10:29 PM
Humans are not monsters, most humans are cool guys like Trump and James Gunn, DelToro stop this
asherman93
asherman93 - 10/27/2025, 11:08 PM
@Malatrova15 - I wouldn't put Gunn in the same category as a convicted rapist
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 10/27/2025, 11:13 PM
@asherman93 - but i totally would, and Kevin Feige too, or do you see him around Marvel ?…Yeah thats what i thought
OriginalGusto1
OriginalGusto1 - 10/27/2025, 10:41 PM
It's good to see Sarah Jessica Parker still getting work.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 10/27/2025, 11:08 PM
Victor Frankenstein has always been the villain of the story. I had the opportunity to see this on the big screen, and absolutely loved it. Del Toro did a Q&A at the screening and explained the reason for the ending being changed to a note of forgiveness. It was personal to him and his relationship with his father and how that translated to his relationship with his own children. It was actually quite touching.
Those weren't the only things he changed from the novel, I won't spoil others here. Not a perfect film, but I'd put it as one of my favorites of this year, at least. Visually gorgeous, some great performances, definitely worth a watch.
tmp3
tmp3 - 10/28/2025, 12:32 AM
@Patient2670 - I saw it in cinemas too; really wish it had a wider release. In parts it felt like the Frankenstein films i’ve wanted to see since I was a kid after reading the book
Slotherin
Slotherin - 10/28/2025, 4:56 AM
@Patient2670 - not to that extent.
In the novel, Victor was at worst scared of the creature and what could happen. That's not unjustified.
The creature also did murder a child in the book before making a request for a mate.
Everything I've read on this suggests they HEAVILY downplay how villainous the creature becomes and the sense of moral ambiguity more present in the novel.
Slotherin
Slotherin - 10/28/2025, 5:32 AM
@tmp3 - that much sounds good. I'm not wild about some context changes based on how it was sounding like he wanted to more directly adapt the novel at times, but it's nice to know someone liked it after the book. This is making me grab my copy as I pack up some stuff for a trip
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 10/28/2025, 12:47 PM
@tmp3 - I agree. And even with the changes he made, you can absolutely feel Del Toro's love and reverence for the material.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 10/28/2025, 1:06 PM
@Slotherin - Sure, Del Toro leaned into Frankenstein's dark side. And they do make the monster a more sympathetic, tragic figure. But both those themes were absolutely in the book. The creature's ambiguity and even rage in the book, come from his being discarded into the world without anyone to guide and teach him how to deal with his feelings or right from wrong. Other than the old blind man, he encounters nothing but hate and scorn against him. Seeing the family on the farm, and Victor with Elizabeth and his family, that's exactly why the Creature wants a companion. So yes, he does some awful things but that's still Victor's failing as much as it is, the creature's.
He absolutely makes some big changes from the book (One, in particular, I'm still not sure I love, and I won't spoil anything here), but he does a great job at both, being faithful to the spirit of the story while making it fresh and at times surprising.
I would suggest seeing the movie for yourself, rather than rely on what you read. You may very well end up not loving it like I did, but on the other hand... I'd be interested in hearing your opinion afterward.
Slotherin
Slotherin - 10/31/2025, 8:33 AM
@Patient2670 - I'll see it; I've already had a decent chunk spoiled though I appreciate you withholding.
It's just exactly the kind of changes I was hoping they wouldn't make.

Again, at worst Victor was neglectful in the novel because as far as he knew he'd madly made a monster he wasn't sure of what it was capable and he was scared. Making him deliberately cruel and abusive toward the monster is creating a darkness that wasn't there. Victor did have pity for his creation and until he was overcome with FEAR at what could happen, he was going to oblige the creation of a mate.

It seems like they've toned down the abandonment and how the creature is actually hopelessly out of place in the world as an inhuman thing in favor of making it a case of Victor being a horrible father to it.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 10/31/2025, 1:33 PM
@Slotherin - I get what you're saying, and a lot of it is valid. However, and hopefully without sounding like a shill for the movie, Del Toro does go out of his way to explain, if not justify the changes he made (to be fair, there are in fact more than one that I'm not entirely sold on.). The morals of the novel are all still intact (the creature as an outcast among the world, Victor's arrogant irresponsibility - the abandonment is actually made more extreme in a way), while giving a fresh perspective on some things. I do think it will be devisive among purists - and that's totally cool. I'm just saying that I really enjoyed it. I actually liked it far more than when Peter Jackson got to make his bucket list version of King Kong. If you like Del Toro, then I definitely think you'll enjoy this. It's a pretty good mix of all his hallmarks. Again, please do , hit me up once you've seen it. I look forward to hearing your thoughts.
Slotherin
Slotherin - 11/2/2025, 6:52 AM
@Patient2670 - we'll see when it hits Netflix.
I am going in with new expectations thankfully.
I do look forward to giving my opinion, hopefully one more adjusted by then
Slotherin
Slotherin - 11/12/2025, 7:39 AM
@Patient2670 - my dude...
Just saw it last night.

I forgive the changes. It's very much a pastiche of Frankensteins, suitingly so, but very much with a lot of love for the source and a gkod deal of thoughtfulness.

Elordi is excellent and portrays everything about the Creature very well!

I loved it.
Slotherin
Slotherin - 11/12/2025, 7:43 AM
@Patient2670 - I found myself enjoying many of thr fresh takes as well as del Toro making true to some extent a mention that some of the best parts of the novel had yet to be adapted such as us seeing the Creature going out into nature and experiencing brief peace before the hunters
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 11/12/2025, 11:59 AM
@Slotherin - That's so cool! I'm glad you enjoyed it. I totally agree with all you said. The one decision I was unsure of was the creature's X-men factor (trying not to spoil anything for anyone here), if you know what I mean. But having watched it again, even that was less of an issue. I would love to see it get some awards love for design, directing and Elordi.
Thanks for letting me know your thoughts! Cheers.
Slotherin
Slotherin - 11/13/2025, 5:35 PM
@Patient2670 - Elordi definitely deserves an award.
I wasn't sure what to make of that either; been meaning to re-read the book to see how he handled the times he had been shot. I guess it kind of makes sense given the nature of his "birth" and in playing him similar to Universal's version in that he was undying.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 11/13/2025, 6:34 PM
@Slotherin - He does. Especially when you consider that he was a last minute replacement for Andrew Garfield. And yeah, the other does kind of make sense in context.
RolandD
RolandD - 10/27/2025, 11:32 PM
I have a crazy idea. How about not putting out spoilers until the movie’s been out for a good amount of time? This website used to standby that I remember correctly.
OriginalGusto1
OriginalGusto1 - 10/27/2025, 11:35 PM
@RolandD - [frick]in commies...They've taken over everything.
vectorsigma
vectorsigma - 10/27/2025, 11:41 PM
@RolandD - there's no such thing as writing standards and integrity nowadays with these writers here and everywhere else that lives on clicks and baits.
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 10/28/2025, 12:02 AM
@RolandD - It does say spoilers, in the headline... Or was that edited after you brought it up?
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 10/28/2025, 12:03 AM
@vectorsigma - Josh and Cassidy worked hard to make this site MAGA friendly and we stand by them
Malatrova15
Malatrova15 - 10/28/2025, 12:04 AM
@Patient2670 - it was edited, is the good ol Nippy Joshy swiccheroo
Patient2670
Patient2670 - 10/28/2025, 12:18 AM
@Malatrova15 - Ahh, fair enough. Objection sustained.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 10/28/2025, 5:51 AM
@RolandD - Double edged sword as wait to long to discuss spoilers it is no longer news but I agree there has been a tendancy to post them TOO fast too oft. For me I think if a film has a Thurs release by Sunday is fair game however.

In this specific case the premiere was Aug 30th with full BO release Oct 17th so been out two weeks for most, longer for a select few AND it is a well known story with many, many, many adaptions prior of a book written over 200yrs ago so barely worth calling spoilers, lol.
RolandD
RolandD - 10/28/2025, 4:38 PM
@Patient2670 - It was there which is a valid point but this site used to wait until a movie or show was out for a while, which I think is a better standard. Some of the things they label a spoilers don’t seem as bigger thing to me such as an actor being in a movie that we didn’t know about already, but the ending is a key thing.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder