How to make comic books easier for new readers to get into.

September is over and DC's new 52 was a big hit at comic shops everywhere. Here is how DC can keep up the momentum and the rest of the industry can learn from them.

Editorial Opinion
By ironpool007 - Oct 05, 2011 07:10 PM EST
Filed Under: Other

September was a pretty exciting month for comic book fans everywhere. In addition to regular comics being released, DC released and retooled their entire line of comic books both from a publishing and story telling stnadpoint. DC made a smart move by releasing all new 1st issues throughout September. It gave skeptical reader like me, who had previously only read Batman and Green Lantern titles plus a few events here and there a lot to be exited about. I myself picked out 21 titles from the new 52.

Now though, September has come and gone and with it, DC's watershed moment has come and past. They released all of their new 1st issues, and now it is time for those 52 series to prove their worth, and release the rest of their issues. What DC did was undoubtedly a great choice. Instead of picking up a 500th issue of comic and then having to backtrack through trades and back issues, new readers were able to get a fresh jumping on point. Now it is up to DC to keep these books feeling fresh. And it's not only DC that I'm talking about here. Marvel would also probably benefit from this approach too.

What I would like to see happen is for comic books to put a cap on how many issues a series can put out in a year. Instead of publishing a series until the point that it has reached 500 plus issues, I think a wiser tactic would be to release ongoing series in volumes. Look at comic books like The Ultimates and Deadpool MAX. Each series is an going series, but the creative teams set up the books to run for 12 issues, and then reset to number 1 for a new volume. This insures that every year, new opportunities arise to bring in new readers. This is a good tactic because a new number 1 is much more reader friendly than a 500.

Whereas DC has striven to give readers new jumping o points though, Marvel seems to be more focused on legacy. After only 33 issue The Invincible Iron Man was renumbered to issue 500, because supposedly, that was roughly how many issues he had at that point altogether. Now while that big 500 may give the book a legacy look to it, there is really no logic in doing such a thing. Trust me. Pulling crap like that will only push a way new readers. I mean how is someone new to comic books supposed to figure out that from issues 33, 500 is the next chapter. They don't cruise theses sights like you and I. When they see a big 500 on a book's cover, it will likely drive them away, because they will automatically think that they now need to backtrack and find trades and back issues collecting 499 older issues. And other than that, the only people picking up a big 500th issue will be collectors looking for something to put on Ebay.

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)
Related:

THE 4:30 MOVIE Interview: Filmmaker Kevin Smith On How His Passion For The Theater Shaped New Film (Exclusive)

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking
Recommended For You:

THE FRANCHISE: Trailer For Max Series Starring Daniel Brühl Reveals Chaos Inside World Of Superhero Filmmaking

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

HowardDuck1138
HowardDuck1138 - 10/5/2011, 8:35 PM
While I agree that there's a lot to digest for new readers, I do not want comics re-booted or watered down so that new readers feel less threatened. I started reading comics 10 years ago. I made the effort to track down old issues or, at the very least, read up about the character or series online. If someone truly wants to take up comics as a hobby, I don't think it's unfair to expect them to do some catching up. Most older arcs are available in trades, so it's fairly easy to catch up. I quit reading DC in August. After investing time and money into a series, wiping the slate clean without continuing what I'd already focused on was a slap in the face. If Marvel pulls this stunt, I will stop reading their books as well.
ironpool007
ironpool007 - 10/6/2011, 3:27 PM
Your all right in some regards. Yes it is a soap opera in some regards, and some people can just pick up any issue and go from there. Some people though see a big issue though numbering in the hundreds and it's kind of intimidating. By limiting a series to 12 issue volumes and then restarting things at number 1 would look much less intimidating. This way if someone were to sart reading a series at say issue 6 or even issue, they would only have to back track 5 or 11 issues. That is alot more appealing to a new reader than having to track down hundred of back issuees or trades. And yes if they are going to invest in a comic book, then I would hope they would want to commit to it's characters and track down the older stuff, but they should not be obligated to, and that is why I think this DC relaunch is working with it's new number 1 as jumping points.
TheBatman1
TheBatman1 - 10/7/2011, 7:30 PM
HowardDuck1138 makes a great point. Thats what I did with batman. I have over 40 trades of batman that I have been reading through. Just finished A Death in the family
Redhood2k10
Redhood2k10 - 10/16/2011, 9:37 AM
The industry as a whole has been struggling from what I gather. This was needed no matter what people say, a reboot shouldn't even matter if you are truly a fan of the character. Hell I was a cavs fan before lebron and still one after. All that should matter is good story telling. I'm really liking Grifter which is a character I've never followed before and know at least 6 people that are picking up a minimum of 10 comics out of the new 52. Reboots have happened before and will continue to do so, no one really has a right go say " oh this isn't the character I grew up with " because its not. It isn't really a reboot if you keep everything the same and continue to tell the same dull stories. Bottom line weather you hate to admit it the new 52 reboot was needed and I couldn't be happier with what I've gotten out of it.
View Recorder