The Power of Reboots: From Superman to Star Trek, Apes & Beyond

The Power of Reboots: From Superman to Star Trek, Apes & Beyond

For many fans of film or television – and now even comic books thanks to the efforts of DC – reboot has become the new four-letter word, usually met with a roll of the eyes, a look of disdain, the shake of a head and the question, “What is wrong with those people?”

By EdGross - Aug 26, 2011 08:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Other

The response usually includes a condemnation of the dearth of new ideas in Hollywood; accusatory statements of the industry merely feeding on itself instead of trying something innovative, and general creative laziness. All of which can absolutely be true, and, indeed, has been proven to be true time and again as new takes on ideas from the past bear out the notion that that’s exactly where they should have stayed. But at the same time, we’ve seen growing evidence that, in the right creative hands, reboots offer the opportunity to reinvigorate a once thriving franchise, character or concept and make it extremely palatable for one segment of the audience that may not be overly familiar with the original incarnation, as well as the one that does and would like to see it live on in some form – even if they don’t realize it when word of said reboot first gets out.

The first recent example that comes to mind is the James Bond franchise with 2006’s Casino Royale, which introduced Daniel Craig as 007 and brought the agent back to his earliest days (though set in a modern world). While today Craig has secured his position (as far as many are concerned) as the Alpha Bond, at the time there was absolute outrage among the global 007 enthusiasts. After all, Pierce Brosnan seemed to be handling things nicely, beginning with 1995’s GoldenEye and then continuing with 1997’s Tomorrow Never Dies, 1999’s The World is Not Enough and 2002’s Die Another Die, which, incidentally, became the highest grossing Bond film up until that point. When producers Michael Wilson and Barbara Broccoli nonetheless announced that they would be revamping the series and reintroducing Bond at the start of his career with a new actor in the role, people thought they were mad; that they were violating the axiom of not fixing something that wasn’t in need of repair. But, to their credit, they saw something that Bond fans did not and Casino Royale became a critical and commercial hit, instantly establishing that Daniel Craig was indeed Bond.



Flash forward three years to 2009 and the release of director JJ Abrams and writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman’s Star Trek, arguably the most polarizing reboot ever. The idea was to inject Trek with a little Red Bull in the form of Star Wars-like energy coupled with the establishment of a new timeline that would allow Kirk, Spock and the rest of the crew of the starship Enterprise to start their adventures anew without impacting on the continuity of everything that had come before. MANY people argued that these changes weren’t necessary, but, in fact, they were. Star Trek was all but dead. Enterprise had limped off the air without making much of an impact (unfortunately – the show is extremely underrated) and Star Trek: Nemesis was ignored in its brief run in theatres, with the official magazine shutting down and even the website more or less fading away. But thanks to the efforts of Abrams/Kurtzman/Orci and the rest of the film’s cast and crew, new life was pumped into the final frontier, Star Trek was suddenly mainstream and, most importantly, people began rediscovering the original version. Now anticipation is high for the next installment – though the one misstep in this particular reboot has been waiting SO long to get a sequel going, perhaps losing what would have been built-in momentum had things come together more quickly.



This summer skepticism was abundant with word that 20th Century Fox’s reboot of the Planet of the Apes franchise, in the form of Rise of the Planet of the Apes (directed by Rupert Wyatt, written by Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver), was going to be released. While there is no question that the original film series (which spanned five entries from 1968 to 1973) was a sci-fi phenomenon in its day, there was little to indicate (including Tim Burton’s financially successful, though critically scorned 2001 remake of the original) that there would be an audience waiting for this one and that it would be received as anything less than a tired joke at this point. But the one thing that critics, moviegoers and even old time fans did not expect was that Rise of the Planet of the Apes would be a film with HEART; that the motion capture created apes would be flesh and blood “human beings”. And, because everyone kept their eye on story, character and heart, it seems as though the entire franchise has been reborn with Fox no doubt going to be announcing a sequel at any time.



The jury is still out on next year’s Dark Shadows, the Tim Burton version of the 1960s soap opera that casts Johnny Depp in the role of “reluctant vampire” Barnabas Collins. That one will truly be the great experiment, because, like Star Trek and Planet of the Apes, if it’s a hit, it will reinvigorate the entire concept and bring the original (a true phenomenon in its day) back into the pop culture forefront. If not, then Dark Shadow fades into the annals of time once the generation of kids who ran home from school every day to watch it is gone.

Then, of course, there’s the DC Comics relaunch of 52 titles, doing away in the majority of instances with old continuity and starting things from scratch. Many fans look at this as nothing more than a massive publicity stunt; that the company will wait a year or so and then do another crisis on a helluva lot of Earths to preserve what is working, do away with what is not and bring back what the fans truly love. The corporate line, however, claims that this isn’t the case; that this is their bold new step into the future and an opportunity to introduce their line – especially because digital versions will be available day and date with their printed counterparts – to a whole new audience that might not head to a comic shop, but would far more likely be willing to download a comic to read on their iPad or other such device.

Is this, then, an act of desperation (though one that could be working – the new Justice League #1 has pre-orders of 200,000 copies)? In an interview with Rolling Stone, writer Grant Morrison muses, “There's always going to be a bit of that, because comics sales are so low, people are willing to try anything these days. It's just plummeting. It's really bad from month to month. May was the first time in a long time that no comic sold over 100,000 copies, so there's a decline… There's a real feeling of things just going off the rails, to be honest. Superhero comics. The concept is quite a ruthless concept, and it's moved on, and it's kind of abandoned the first-stage rocket [comics]. And moving on to movies, where it can be more powerful, more effective. The definition of a meme is an idea that wants to replicate, and it's found a better medium through which to replicate, games, movies. It would be a shame, because one of the most amazing things about those universes is that they exist, there's a paper continuum that reflects the history.”



Morrison, of course, knows from whence he speaks in that he is writing the revamped Action Comics, which returns the Superman character back to his base roots. And as far as the Man of Steel is concerned, the timing for this reboot has probably never been better. Let’s face it (and this is coming from someone with a lifetime’s worth of fascination with Big Blue), while the “S” symbol may be one of the most recognizable in the world, the character itself doesn’t hold the public in sway in the manner that he once did. To many, Superman is passe, a relic from childhood that isn’t necessarily one that they want to embrace as they get older. And today’s kids seem to be more in to Batman, Spider-Man and Iron Man than Supes. So between the efforts of Morrison and DC, as well as director Zack Snyder with his currently-shooting Man of Steel, it’s quite possible that Superman will indeed become a fictional champion of the world again, allowing this 73-year-old icon to capture the collective imagination once more.

All of which comes together to serve the notion that if approached not just from a commercial point of view, but, instead, driven by genuine creative spirit, the reboot can successfully allow those things that once touched us deeply to live in our hearts again.

What’s your feeling? Please sound off below.


The world of Planet of the Apes is exploding with the global success of Rise of the Planet of the Apes, new comics, new illustrated novels, new non-fiction books, a sequel about to be given the green light, etc. Explore the full world of the Apes with news, interviews and much more. Just click on the image below.

Paramount Skydance Is Preparing A Bid To Purchase Warner Bros. Discovery (And DC Studios)
Related:

Paramount Skydance Is Preparing A Bid To Purchase Warner Bros. Discovery (And DC Studios)

THE BATMAN PART II: Everything We Know About Matt Reeves' Long-Awaited DC Sequel - Possible SPOILERS
Recommended For You:

THE BATMAN PART II: Everything We Know About Matt Reeves' Long-Awaited DC Sequel - Possible SPOILERS

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Greengo
Greengo - 8/26/2011, 8:46 AM
hELLEO
Greengo
Greengo - 8/26/2011, 8:47 AM
Yeesssssss
Greengo
Greengo - 8/26/2011, 8:49 AM
Nothing wrong with reboots imo. As long as Hollywood can still sprinkle in some original ideas as well.
MidNightWind
MidNightWind - 8/26/2011, 9:03 AM
Batman started everything, because of burton everyone thought superhero movies should be dark and gritty, and when batman had the justice league cartoons, everyone thought we should have more crossover cartoons, and when batman begins and the dark knight came, everyone started rebooting everything from star trek to spider-man to make it more dark and realistic as the dark knight. sure it's annoying but it's quite amazing that one man who has no superpowers at all can spark such a big change in everything in the world these days, but I hate how everyone always have to compare their work with the dark knight movie. I know batman started a spark in everything but it really turns me off when people start comparing it to their work. I bet when TDKR comes out people will start comparing that and people will start making other movies and say the writing is compared to TDKR.
SuperSomething616
SuperSomething616 - 8/26/2011, 9:06 AM
Thoroughly enjoyed this article mate :)

Alot of very valid relevant points made...I really like the way you've used film franchise reboots to drive your point home.

I totally agree also that if done correctly and handled with proper creative spirit and love a reboot can be extremely useful in reinventing particular franchises for a new generation...

At first I was dead against the DCU relaunch...I am still on the fence as I'm not happy with years of continuity being done away with...however it do understand that DC need this to help revitalise their comics...

Also I in comparison this relaunch is not something that Marvel comics can ever do as their continuity is too organised (unlike DC's) so if comics are to get the shot in the arm it needed it could only ever come from DC...

I mean lets face it...superhero comics started with DC...and DC should be the ones to breathe new life into them again..
Solomon
Solomon - 8/26/2011, 9:07 AM
Yeah, Batman Begins started this trend in movies...
ManofSteel23
ManofSteel23 - 8/26/2011, 9:10 AM
I love reboots long as its to the right franchise,stuff like planet of the apes and star trek,they are old and in about 10 years time *if a film wasnt made* they would be long forgotten,but stuff like spiderman,that didnt need a reboot(I barely got over raimis yet)but they just want to milk that,batman has been done properly unlike the crap of the 90's films I watched as a kid,I wouldnt mind a FF4 reboot just because the first 2 was abit to much for kids,and yeah I could go on
meatbag
meatbag - 8/26/2011, 9:16 AM
Batman Begins was a welcome reboot. I loved the '89 Batman, but the sequels just got lamer and lamer, an excuse for big name actors to star in a batman movie and an opportunity to sell toys. The Bond reboot would have been OK, if they had gotten a younger actor to play a younger Bond...personally, I always thought it would be cool if they set the Bond movies in the 50s when they were written. I haven't seen Apes yet, but heard it was awesome, so I'm onboard for that. And Star Trek? I totally welcomed that, especially after I saw it. Spiderman? Nope. Too soon. I know I should reserve judgement until I see it, but...I'm not ready for a new Spidey.
Ichaos
Ichaos - 8/26/2011, 9:25 AM
To me then James bond series just kept on going and they never needed a reboot or a remake to lable the next film. Casino Royal kinda sorta rebootec but honestly it was just another bond film though well done.

FrightNight is a example of Hollywood saying lets do it again and milk an old one hit wonder and it felt like it. after seeing it I felt there was no reason to see it, nothing worthwhile was added andI would have been better off watching the original.

You can call the latest apes movie a reboot that story line came much later in the apes movies. It was well done and was a good example of a well written, shot, and acted film.

On the DC reboot it is a publicity stunt. DC even wants to call it a launch instead of a reboot when it clearly is a reboot. If it was a launch (as opposed to a relaunch) then it would have been a DC version of thr Ultimate marvel universe. Also given the lawsuits surrounding Superman its hard to ignore the timing as a way to try to dodge legal issues. Ie yanking off the characters shorts and saying look hes different now. Stupid looking but different. Also if you take too much of a character away that made him a pop culture icon of the last century you lose what made him great in the first place. Better writers would be the best solution, yanking his trunks, giving him funky boots and armor for some odd reason doesnt make a character better or more relevant. DC has had so many screwball publicity stunts that blew up intheir faces I can kind of sort of undestand why the might want to do a reboot. But theyncant undo all that they published for the past 80 plus years.
AGENTJAY1130
AGENTJAY1130 - 8/26/2011, 9:26 AM
BATMAN WILL ALWAYS BE........ THE ONE!!!! LOLOL
revloveR
revloveR - 8/26/2011, 9:29 AM
I don't usually mind reboots, but the Supes reboot grinded the [frick] outta my gears. after awhile i let it go, since i can't do shit about it, but the fact that they pushed it too 2013, made it annoying again.
Ichaos
Ichaos - 8/26/2011, 9:31 AM
@Solomon Actually xmen stated the current super movie trend.
Ichaos
Ichaos - 8/26/2011, 9:35 AM
I am not a fan of the Ultimate marvel line but that might been a better approach for DC so they can build new fans which I am unclear why drastic changes are necessary for that. But with an Ultimate approach you dont alienate your current readers and offer something new for noobs. Honestly if they wanted to get kids they could just go all kiddie with it Superfriends style.
revloveR
revloveR - 8/26/2011, 9:37 AM
@ godzillafart no. but i didn't want Superman II Redux either.
SimyJo
SimyJo - 8/26/2011, 9:43 AM
The reason the reboot or redux has been tarnished lately (especially in the case of The Incredible Hulk and Superman characters) - is because it is done for the wrong reasons. The studios are rebooting driven not by creativity or need, but driven purely by chasing greedy profit expectation, though franchises not performing, poor returns, the fear of loss of rights and jealousy over rival studio's IP property performance.
seedslinger
seedslinger - 8/26/2011, 9:43 AM
I wouldn't say 'Dark Shadows' is a reboot - it's just an adaptation of an old TV show. There's been a history of that happening in Hollywood for decades.
meatbag
meatbag - 8/26/2011, 9:50 AM
@seedslinger I remeber Dark Shadows got a reboot about 20 years ago with Ben Cross as Barnabas Collins...I actually liked it, but it never went past season 1.

@revolver/godzilla fart Superman II is where the Christopher Reeves run should have ended...so I could remember it in a good way. I liked Brandon Routh as Clark Kent, just not as Superman...and I have high hopes for MoS, but...well, I just miss the classic costume.
BackwardGalaxy
BackwardGalaxy - 8/26/2011, 9:51 AM
It's a nice article, but leaving out Batman is a pretty glaring omission. No movie was more instrumental than Batman Begins in making those other films happen.
thewolfx
thewolfx - 8/26/2011, 9:56 AM
reboots are annoying

people are just too lazy to fix there original concepts problems, so they redo everything pissing off loyal fans, while letting noobs suck each other off .
revloveR
revloveR - 8/26/2011, 10:15 AM
@ Godzillafart & meatbag; sad part is, you can't show those d-bags running the show at the box office cause they'll just put superman on ice.
FlixMentallo21
FlixMentallo21 - 8/26/2011, 10:23 AM
I attribute the whole "running out of original ideas" to two big things: one is a desire to try for more profit (which is a real ankle-biter), and the other is what I like to call a "creative drought". It's like a literal writer's block was put over tinseltown and now everybody is just doing the same old song and dance over and over again. It needs to stop. The only way to do that--boycott by not seeing any movie using the same old formula. Flock to the indie films, watch reruns on TV, don't bother with anything milking an old theme. They lose viewers, THEN they'll go back to originality.
niknik
niknik - 8/26/2011, 10:23 AM
SimyJo is right. Most of these reboots are not creativity driven. They're Cash driven. Spider-Man most certainly wasn't rebooted because it had gone stale and needed a boost. It was rebooted because Raimi had a lame idea for the 4th installment with She-Vulture and the like, and the producers sent him packing, and unfortunately Raimi was a package deal with Maguire and Dunst. Maguire and company were certainly able to pull it off for a few more years and there was plenty more story left to tell of that Peter Parker. That is an example of a reboot for all the wrong reasons.......and at just 10 years into the franchise far, FAR too soon I might add.

I would have had absolutely no problem with the Star Trek reboot if they wouldn't have gone the lazy route with their rewriting of Trek History with a new ALTERNATE universe Trek. Now these characters are NOT the Trek characters I have loved all these years. Not even close. They are completely different people, especially Kirk. I really have no interest in them any more because of this. If they had instead taken the effort to pay attention to existing canon and done the prequel we were expecting from them, telling the tale of OUR Kirk and crew I would still be following it.

I think most people don't mind reboots as long as the changes to the icon are very subtle. When they go all out drastic like DC is now doing, they most definitely without a doubt turn away a large contingent of longtime followers.

SigmaCenturion
SigmaCenturion - 8/26/2011, 10:27 AM
Nice article.

I feel reboots are both good and bad. In the case of some franchises like Star Trek and Planet of the Apes those are examples where they really put work into the franchises and tried to bring more to the story and succeeded. While as with others like some of the superhero ones like hulk and superman. They fail because for one they can't keep the same actor or in the case of Superman they can't lay the groundwork for a trilogy.

@thewolfx haha yeah. Man of Steel and the nolan batfilms are proof of that.
Blackmatter
Blackmatter - 8/26/2011, 10:31 AM
Cant really judge the Superman reboot yet, can we?
Greengo
Greengo - 8/26/2011, 10:37 AM
@actually the Rocketeer did... or The Shadow.
Begins began the reboot trend.
Greengo
Greengo - 8/26/2011, 10:38 AM
or Batman or Superman...
EastcoastAvenger
EastcoastAvenger - 8/26/2011, 10:43 AM
Growing up these were called "Remakes". Now they are "Reboots". What will the next buzzword for Hollywood updating a movie be?
EdGross
EdGross - 8/26/2011, 10:45 AM
One thing I didn't express in the article is that WHEN these reboots work, I find it kind of amazing how they can give you that sense of excitement that you had when you discovered these things for the first time. That's certainly what happened to me this summer with Rise of the Planet of the Apes. It just reignited my passion for the subject and reminded me why I loved it so much as a kid.
valeriesghost
valeriesghost - 8/26/2011, 11:15 AM
Great article @Ed you've made some great points. when you look at a reboot like spiderman and think about the marketing of these types of movies its prime for a reboot. Kids born in 2000 are now 11 and ready to soak up anything that they can claim as their own. Raimis films aren't their films, buts Webbs will belong to them.

And like you said, when i see a reboot done well, (i.e. Batman or Star Trek) its gets me excited all over again.

More then anything i want this with The Man of Steel.
1 2
View Recorder