Anton Yelchin Talks Star Trek Sequel

Anton Yelchin Talks Star Trek Sequel

Anton Yelchin shares his thought on the upcoming Star Trek sequel. Star Trek in 3D?

By TheSpaceGhost - May 05, 2011 05:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek


Hey Folks,
Collider recently had an interview with Anton Yelchin. Anton, who played "Pavel Chekov”, in J.J. Abrahams 2009 Star Trek film, shared his thoughts on the sequel. Check out what he had to say below!

Is it fun for you, as an actor, to be able to do the Star Trek sequel and return to the character of Chekov and find new layers?

Sure. I haven’t read the script, but I’m definitely looking forward to seeing what it is. It will be a lot of fun to play the character again, do all the research again and do all the homework. Also, it’s a great group of people. It’s one thing when you’re going back to a movie and you’re like, “Oh, god, I’ve got to work with these people again.” But, it’s such a great group. I enjoyed working with them all so much that I look forward to seeing them all again and working with them.


Do you think it will be easier to get back into the character, since you already know who he is?

I guess. In a way, it will be difficult too, to make sure it’s the same person. That was almost four years ago, so it will definitely be challenging to try to capture the same thing.


Do you know when you will start filming?

No, I have no idea. It should be at some point. At some point, we will make it.


What are your thoughts on 3D films? Do you hope that Star Trek 2 will be in 3D?

One thing that’s fundamental is that you can really see the difference when someone converts to 3D or shoots in 3D. We shot Fright Night in 3D, so we shot it with 3D cameras, which is really one camera with two cameras on it. It makes a big difference, I think. You can tell when a movie was made with the idea of 3D. I don’t really think about it. What’s most fundamental is that the movie itself is good, and then 3D is one of those things that you layer on top of it. You can use it to make certain parts of the movie more exciting, but if the movie isn’t good, then you’re not going to care about the 3D either
Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is Never Going To Happen
Related:

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is "Never Going To Happen"

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Opt1mu5Pr1m4l
Opt1mu5Pr1m4l - 5/5/2011, 6:46 AM
Screw the 3D. Star Trek 2 will be fine as it is. I would like to see Anton return as Kyle Reese in the new Terminator film though.
darkclarkent
darkclarkent - 5/5/2011, 7:14 AM
Here's a 3D scene from next movie

JackBauer
JackBauer - 5/5/2011, 9:45 AM
He was the worst part of the reboot. Everyone else kicked ass. They shouuld recast Chekov for any future films.
View Recorder