Kirk Will Face a Challenge as a Captain in STAR TREK Sequel, Says Alex Kurtzman

Kirk Will Face a Challenge as a Captain in STAR TREK Sequel, Says Alex Kurtzman

"Kirk doesn't understand what it means to be captain." Hit the jump to check out what screenwriter Alex Kurtzman has to say regarding the evolution of the characters in the highly anticipated sequel to 2009's Star Trek.

By Jolt17 - Jun 28, 2012 03:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek
Source: The Hollywood Reporter


Talking with The Hollywood Reporter while promoting his directorial debut, People Like Us, screenwriter Alex Kurtzman managed to make time for some Star Trek-related discussion. He shares a few new details regarding the upcoming sequel to J. J. Abrams' 2009 reboot, although the main focus of the discussion is the evolution that the crew of the Enterprise will undergo after their formation in the first movie and how the character of James T. Kirk (Chris Pine) will bear the responsibility as the new captain of the ship.

"I can say the assumption that we did not want to make was that just because he's in the chair and they're on the bridge together that they're the crew that you remember from the original series. They're not -- the crew from the original series had gone on many, many journeys, they were a well-oiled machine in terms of how they function, and these characters are still figuring out who they are and who they are to each other. And I did not want to jump so far ahead that we missed a really important emotional connection to that transition for them."


"[Jim Kirk] inherits the Enterprise at the end of Star Trek but that doesn't mean he fully understands what it means to be Captain. It just means, oh, he has the Enterprise now -- so now what? He's never sent men and women to their deaths before, so what's going to happen when that kind of question comes up for him? I guess I normally look at it from a place of pure character."


Additionally, Kurtzman also explains why he is supportive of the decision to push the movie's release date back and how it is highly advantageous to the process of writing the story.

"We were supposed to be out this year in theaters, and part of why we all collectively said we really shouldn't do this is because we put a lot of love and time and effort into making this without violating canon, and yet bring something totally new to the table when it came to Star Trek. The last thing we wanted to do was destroy that by letting a speed mandate mess up our storytelling, and we just felt we weren't ready. So we wanted to take more time with the story to make sure that the story is as true to everything that keeps you watching one episode a night before bed. And you can't do that when you're rushing at a production level, either; the studio wanted us to shoot in 3D which is awesome, but what you don't want to do is rush through 3D. You want your storytelling and the sequences that you design and everything you conceptualize to be totally organic to the storytelling. And when you see a movie that is like that, that gives you that whole experience, you feel it -- you always feel it. And God bless [J.J. Abrams] for saying, 'We need another year.'"


Be sure to follow the link below to check out the full interview where the screenwriter also discusses Prometheus criticisms (which is written by the movie's co-writer, Damon Lindelof) due to the plot's quizzical nature, and how it feels to be a part of a big franchise such as Star Trek.


In the currently untitled sequel to J. J. Abrams' 2009 Star Trek reboot, actors Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Anton Yelchin, John Cho, and Simon Pegg will return as the crews of the ship U.S.S. Enterprise to face a threat posed by a new mysterious villain. With Benedict Cumberbatch joining the cast as the main antagonist, the movie is set to be released on May 17, 2013.


Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is Never Going To Happen
Related:

Quentin Tarantino Finally Explains Why His R-Rated STAR TREK Movie Is "Never Going To Happen"

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)
Recommended For You:

STAR TREK: Colm Meaney On Possible Miles O'Brien Return And What He REALLY Thinks About Trekkies (Exclusive)

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 6/28/2012, 4:31 AM
Well, considering that he never held any other rank, being made a captain before he even graduated the academy in this version, I suppose that's to be expected.

I'm really hoping they wrote a halfway intelligent script this time. Every other aspect of the first one was a lot of fun, but man... was that script full of some dumb-ass plotting.
grandizer74
grandizer74 - 6/28/2012, 4:34 AM
what a useless article. if he didn't face a challenge what would be the point of the movie?
MovieMann
MovieMann - 6/28/2012, 4:35 AM
@DudeGuyMan

Startrek was a really good movie, but there is definitely room for improvement.

I have high hopes for StarTrek 2
Super12
Super12 - 6/28/2012, 4:41 AM
[insert gif of joker clapping]
AnonymousGuy
AnonymousGuy - 6/28/2012, 4:56 AM
"He's never sent men and women to their deaths before..." Send in the redshirts!
CrowPirate1
CrowPirate1 - 6/28/2012, 4:58 AM

{shakes fist at screen and trembles for an hour, finally yelling} KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAn
meatbag
meatbag - 6/28/2012, 5:22 AM
It's nice to see a Hollywood movie made by people that actually like the source material for a change. SOunds like this will be a quality piece of work.
pintoman
pintoman - 6/28/2012, 6:33 AM
"we put a lot of love and time and effort into making this without violating canon"


HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
CrowPirate1
CrowPirate1 - 6/28/2012, 7:37 AM
@Azazel1

lol I know. Khan just was the best villain, other than the Klingons, against Kirk, and he gave Shatner his best camp work on camera.

Except for the Tribbles. and the Kingdom of Spiders. and the Comedy Central Roast. And the Twilight Zone episode. and his music.

okay.. most everything he's done. but, I digress..
95
95 - 6/28/2012, 7:38 AM
Good. Good.
thecap
thecap - 6/28/2012, 7:40 AM
if you take your time with something, it can only get better....thank you Abrams.
Darkknight23
Darkknight23 - 6/28/2012, 7:43 AM
Can JJ Abrams please take over the Transformers franchise?
Knightstalker
Knightstalker - 6/28/2012, 9:02 AM
..."we put a lot of love and time and effort into making this without violating canon"...

Meaning violating canon any more than they already have?
CrowPirate1
CrowPirate1 - 6/28/2012, 12:24 PM
CrowPirate1
CrowPirate1 - 6/28/2012, 12:25 PM
the celebration has begun.
View Recorder